1 1 - - GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, 1980 0 (ZA 1053) (ICPSR 7963) - - PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR 0 FORSCHUNGSGRUPPE WAHLEN 0 MANNHEIM, GERMANY - - FIRST ZA EDITION FIRST ICPSR EDITION SPRING, 1983 - 0 ZENTRALARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG UNIVERSITAET ZU KOELN BACHEMER STR.408 D-5000 KOELN 41 0 INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH P.O. BOX 1248 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48106 1 - - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE 0 ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. - THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE ZA AND THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE 1980 GERMAN ELECTION STUDY WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE FORSCHUNGSGRUPPE WAHLEN. NEITHER THE COLLECTOR OF THE ORIGINAL DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. - IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. 1 - - STUDY DESCRIPTION 0 FEDERAL ELECTION STUDY SURVEYS ARE A POINT OF EMPHASIS OF THE ZENTRAL-ARCHIV. IN THE "GERMAN ELECTORAL DATA (GED)-PROJECT" SO FAR 15 ELECTION STUDIES CONVERING THE ELECTIONS FROM 1953 TO 1976 HAVE BEEN RELEASED AND DOCUMENTED. THE GED-PROJECT IS CONDUCTED JOINTLY BY THE ZENTRAL-ARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG (KOELN), THE ZENTRUM FUER UMFRAGEN, METHODEN UND ANALYSEN (MANNHEIM) AND THE ICPSR. 0 THE 1980 ELECTION STUDY IS A DATAPOOL COMBINING 10 SEPARATE SURVEYS. THE SEPARATE SURVEYS ARE THE 'POLITBAROMETER' CONDUCTED MONTHLY BY MARPLAN AND ORGANIZED BY THE FORSCHUNGSGRUPPE WAHLEN (MANNHEIM) AS PROJECT LEADERS, AND FINANCED BY THE SECOND TELEVISION NETWORK (ZDF). A PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT ASPECT IN THE GED SERIES CONCERNS THE CONTINUITY OF THE STUDY CONTENT. TO ASSURE THIS CONTINUITY FOR 1980, THE STUDIES FOR JUNE, SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER WERE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE RELEVANT QUESTIONS TO MAINTAIN THE CONTINUITY. 0 OVERALL THE DATAPOOL INCLUDES THE MONTHS FROM JANUARY TO NOVEMBER 1980 (EXCEPT FOR AUGUST, WHEN THERE WAS NO 'POLITBAROMETER'), AND THUS CONTAINS 8 PRE- AND 2 POST-ELECTION SURVEYS. 0 THIS DATASET INTEGRATES THE SEPARATE SURVEYS BY CODING THE SAME QUESTION FROM EACH OF THE SURVEYS UNDER ONE VARIABLE (WHICH NECESSITATES THE USE OF THE STUDY FILTER VARIABLE V5 FOR ALL ANALYSES). THE JUNE SURVEY WAS THE BASIS FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF THE FILE. QUESTIONS WHICH OCCUR ONLY IN SINGLE SURVEYS ARE COLLECTED FOLLOWING THE COMMON VARIABLES, BUT PRECEDE THE DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES WHICH WERE USUALLY COLLECTED IN EACH SURVEY. (SEE VARIABLE-QUESTION CROSS REFERENCE INDEX) 1 - - STUDY SERIES 0 IN THE COURSE OF THE GERMAN ELECTORAL DATA PROJECT THE FOLLOWING STUDIES HAVE BEEN ARCHIVED: 0 STUDY NUMBER TITLE ZA 55-57 - ICPSR 7099-7101 GERMAN ELECTION STUDIES: JULY + 1961; SEPTEMBER 1961; NOVEMBER 1961 ZA 145 - ICPSR 7104 SOCIAL BASES OF WEST GERMAN POLITICS, 1953 ZA 314 - ICPSR 7105 GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, OCTOBER + 1965 ZA 426-427 - ICPSR 7098 GERMAN PRE- AND POST-ELECTION STUDY, 1969 ZA 525 - ICPSR 7108 GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, AUGUST- SEPTEMBER 1969 ZA 556 - ICPSR 7103 GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, SEPTEMBER 1965 ZA 635-637 - ICPSR 7102 GERMAN ELECTION PANEL STUDY, + 1972 ZA 823-825 - ICPSR 7513 GERMAN ELECTION PANEL STUDY, + 1976 ZA 1053 - ICPSR 7963 GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, 1980 - THE STUDY WAS CLEANED AND THE GERMAN CODEBOOK PREPARED IN THE ZENTRAL ARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG (KOELN) BY DORIS LAMBERTZ, IRENE MUELLER, ROLF ROENTSEN, AND ROLF UHER. THE TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH WAS PREPARED BY SUSAN WENDT-HILDEBRANDT AND KAI HILDEBRANDT, UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR, CANADA. WHERE APPROPRIATE THE TRANSLATIONS FROM EARLIER STUDIES IN THE GEDP-SERIES HAVE BEEN USED TO INDICATE CONTINUITY IN QUESTION WORDING. 1 - - SAMPLING INFORMATION 0 THE SAMPLE WAS DRAWN TO REPRESENT ALL GERMAN CITIZENS OVER AGE 18 WHO RESIDE IN PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS. WEST BERLIN WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE SAMPLE. THE SAMPLE WAS DRAWN USING A STRATIFIED MULTI-STAGE RANDOM SAMPLE WITH THREE LEVELS. FIRST, THE REGIONAL SAMPLE POINTS (ELECTION DISTRICTS="WAHLBEZIRKE") WERE CHOSEN, THEN THE HOUSEHOLDS WITHIN EACH SAMPLE POINT, AND FINALLY THE PERSONS WITHIN EACH HOUSEHOLD. IN THE REGIONAL SELECTION EACH COMMUNITY WAS REPRESENTED WITH ITS ELECTION DISTRICTS FROM THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF 1976. FROM THE TOTAL OF ALL ELECTION DISTRICTS (WHICH WAS STRATIFIED ACCORDING TO SIZE OF PLACE) 202 ELECTION DISTRICTS WERE CHOSEN AS SAMPLE POINTS, ONE FOR EACH OF THE INTERVIEWERS. THE SELECTION OF HOUSEHOLD ADDRESSES IN EACH ELECTION DISTRICT PROCEEDS IN THIS STUDY ACCORDING TO THE RANDOM-ROUTE PROCEDURE. EACH INTERVIEWER WAS INSTRUCTED WHICH STREETS TO WALK AND WHICH PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS TO SELECT. IN EACH SAMPLE POINT A MAXIMUM OF 8 INTERVIEWS WERE TO BE CONDUCTED. THE RESULTING ADDRESSES CONSTITUTE THE "GROSS SAMPLE" FOR THIS SURVEY. USING A RANDOM PROCEDURE, THE RESPONDENT WAS CHOSEN FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSEHOLD WHO WERE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE. THE AVERAGE WEIGHTS BY SEX AND AGE ARE SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE: 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN AGE 18-24 0.84 1.01 0.82 1.13 25-29 1.11 1.07 0.77 1.11 30-39 0.91 0.96 0.84 1.15 40-49 0.92 1.16 0.99 1.19 50-59 1.02 0.96 1.04 1.09 60 AND 0.94 1.07 0.82 1.07 OLDER TOTAL 0.95 1.05 0.89 1.12 1 MARCH APRIL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN AGE 18-24 0.86 0.85 0.79 0.99 25-29 1.01 0.96 1.06 1.09 30-39 0.93 1.03 0.87 1.06 40-49 1.03 1.20 0.98 1.16 50-59 1.05 1.03 1.23 0.97 60 AND 0.90 1.05 0.90 0.99 OLDER TOTAL 0.96 1.04 0.96 1.04 0 MAY JUNE MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN AGE 18-24 0.77 0.93 0.88 0.92 25-29 0.76 0.83 0.98 1.03 30-39 0.95 1.10 0.84 1.01 40-49 1.07 1.15 1.01 1.19 50-59 1.12 1.16 0.97 1.02 60 AND 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.08 OLDER TOTAL 0.96 1.03 0.94 1.06 0 JULY SEPTEMBER MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN AGE 18-24 0.91 0.98 0.91 0.84 25-29 0.96 1.13 1.06 0.92 30-39 0.85 1.11 0.88 0.92 40-49 0.95 1.36 1.06 1.26 50-59 0.99 1.26 1.15 1.14 60 AND 0.71 1.04 0.97 0.92 OLDER TOTAL 0.87 1.14 1.00 1.00 0 OCTOBER NOVEMBER MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN AGE 18-24 0.74 0.90 0.80 1.05 25-29 0.97 0.81 0.84 0.99 30-39 0.97 1.16 0.90 1.07 40-49 1.02 1.05 1.05 1.02 50-59 1.23 1.27 1.00 1.05 60 AND 1.11 0.82 0.93 1.03 OLDER TOTAL 1.01 0.99 0.93 1.07 1 - - THE WEIGHTED SURVEY IS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE VOTING POPULATION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. SINCE THIS IS A RANDOM SAMPLE, A CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CAN BE CALCULATED FOR EACH RESULT WITHIN WHICH THE TRUE POPULATION VALUE WILL BE FOUND WITH A CERTAIN PROBABILITY. 1 1 VARIABLE-QUESTION CROSS REFERENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL SEP OCT NOV 5 + + + + + + + + + + 6 9 1 1 7 10 2 2 8 12 3 3 9 12A 3A 3A 10 4 10 17 11 5 11 17A 12 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 11 17B 13 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 4 2 2 14 7 5 15 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 5 3 3 16 3A 3A 3A 3A 8 3A 6 17 9 7 18 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 10A 5A 12A 7A 5A 19 5B 5B 5B 5B 5B 10B 5B 12B 7B 5B 20 5C 5C 5C 5C 5C 10C 5C 12C 7C 5C 21 5D 5D 5D 5D 5D 10D 5D 12D 7D 5D 22 5E 5E 5E 5E 5E 10E 5E 12E 7E 5E 23 6(1) 6(1) 6(1) 6(1) 6(1) 11(1) 6(1) 13(1) 8(1) 6(1) 24 6(2) 6(2) 6(2) 6(2) 6(2) 11(2) 6(2) 13(2) 8(2) 6(2) 25 6(3) 6(3) 6(3) 6(3) 6(3) 11(3) 6(3) 13(3) 8(3) 6(3) 26 6(4) 6(4) 6(4) 6(4) 6(4) 11(4) 6(4) 13(4) 8(4) 6(4) 27 6A 6A 6A 6A 6A 11A 6A 13A 8A 6(5) 28 7 7 7 7 7 12 7 14 7 29 7A 7A 7A 7A 7A 12A 7A 14A 7A 30 8A 8A 8A 8A 8A 13A 8A 15A 9A 8A 31 8B 8B 8B 8B 8B 13B 8B 15B 9B 8B 32 8C 8C 8C 8C 8C 13C 8C 15C 9C 8C 33 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 13D 8D 15D 9D 8D 34 8E 35 8F 36 13G 8G 37 13H 8H 38 8I 39 8K 40 15L 41 15M 42 11 14 26 43 12 15 27 44 16 28 45 17 29 46 13 18 47 14 19 48 9A 20A 49 9B 20B 50 9C 20C 51 9D 20D 52 9E 20E 53 9F 20F 54 9G 20G 55 20H 56 20I 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL SEP OCT NOV 57 20K 58 20L 59 21A 60 21B 61 21C 62 21D 63 21E 64 21F 65 21G 66 21H 67 21I 68 21K 69 21L 70 22 71 23A 16A 72 23B 16B 73 23C 16C 74 23D 16D 75 23E 16E 76 23F 16F 77 24 49 78 1 1 25 50 1 79 26 51 80 27 52 81 28 53 82 28A 53A 83 29 54 84 29A 54A 85 30(1) 55(1) 86 30(2) 55(2) 87 30(3) 55(3) 88 30(4) 55(4) 89 30(5) 55(5) 90 30A 55A 91 30B1 55B1 92 30B2 55B2 93 30C 55C 94 31 56 95 32 57 96 33 58 97 34 59 98 16 18 11 17 12 35 10 60 99 18 13 36 11 61 100- 62 102 103- 63 105 106 64 107 65 108 14 37 66 109 38 110 39 111 1 11 1 1 1 47 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL SEP OCT NOV 112 9 113 10 19 9 114 10A 19A 115 11 116 12 117 13 118 13A 119 14 120 14A 121 15 122 15A 123 10 124 13 125 14 126 15 127 16 128 17 19 129 17A 130 9A(1) 131 9A(2) 132 9A(3) 133 9A(4) 134 9A(5) 135 9A(6) 136 9B(1) 137 9B(2) 138 9B(3) 139 9B(4) 140 9B(5) 141 9B(6) 142 9C(1) 143 9C(2) 144 9C(3) 145 9C(4) 146 9C(5) 147 9C(6) 148 10 149 12 150 12A 151 15 152 16 153 10A 154 10B 155 10C 156 10D 157 11 158 15 159 9A 160 161- 9B 162 163- 9C 164 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL SEP OCT NOV 165- 9D 166 167- 9E 168 169- 9F 170 171 12 172 13 173 8 174 9 175 17 176 18 177 19 178- 20 180 21 181- 22 183 23 184- 24 186 25 187 30 188 31 189 32A 190 32B 191 32C 192 32D 193 33 194 34 195 35 196 36A 197 36B 198 36C 199 36D 200 36E 201 37 202 203 38 204 39 205 40 206 41 207 42A 208 42B 209 42C 210 42D 211 42E 212 42F 213 42G 214 42H 215 42I 216 42K 217 42L 218 43A(1) 219 43A(2) 220 43B(1) 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL SEP OCT NOV 221 43B(2) 222 43C(1) 223 43C(2) 224 43D(1) 225 43D(2) 226 43E(1) 227 43E(2) 228 43F(1) 229 43F(2) 230 43G(1) 231 43G(2) 232 43H(1) 233 43H(2) 234 43I(1) 235 43I(2) 236 43K(1) 237 43K(2) 238 43L(1) 239 43L(2) 240 44 241 45 242 46 243 48A 244 48B 245 48C 246 48D 247 67A 248 67B 249 67C 250 67D 251 67E 252 67F 253 67G 254 68 255 69 256 4 257 5A 258 5B 259 4 260 6 261 10 262- 11 263 264- 12 265 266 13 267 14 268 15 269 16 270 16A 271 16B 272 18 273 18A 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL SEP OCT NOV 274 19 275 20 276 21 277 22A 278 22B 279 22C 280 22D 281 22E 282 23 283 24 284 9 285 286 287 9A 288 10 289 11 290 12 291 13 292 14 293 15 294 S.A S.A S.A S.A S.A S.A S.A S.A S.A S.A 295 S.B S.B S.B S.B S.B S.B S.B S.B S.B S.B 296 S.C S.C S.C S.C S.C S.C S.C S.C S.C S.C 297 S.D S.D S.D S.D S.D S.D S.D S.D S.D S.D 298 S.E S.E S.E S.E S.E S.E S.E S.E S.E S.E 299 S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F 300 S.G S.G S.G S.G S.G S.G S.G S.G S.G S.G 301 S.H S.H S.H S.H S.H S.H S.H S.H S.H S.H 302 S.H1 S.H1 303 S.I S.I S.I S.I S.I S.I S.I S.I S.I S.I 304 S.K S.K S.K S.K S.K S.K S.K S.K S.K S.K 305 S.L S.L S.L S.L S.L S.L S.L S.L S.L S.L 306 S.L1 S.L1 307 S.L2 S.L2 308 S.L6 S.L6 309 S.M S.M S.M S.M S.M S.M S.M S.M S.M S.M 310 S.N S.N S.N S.N S.N S.N S.N S.N S.N S.N 311 S.O S.O S.O S.O S.O S.O S.O S.O S.O S.O 312 S.P S.P S.P S.P S.P S.P S.P S.P S.P S.P 313 S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q S.Q 314 S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R 315 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 S.S1 316 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 S.S2 317 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 S.S3 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 1 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 2 RESPONDENT NUMBER 3 WEIGHT - HOUSEHOLD 4 WEIGHT - REPRESENTATIVE 5 MONTH OF SURVEY 6 R'S EVALUATION OF THE PRESENT ECONOMIC SITUATION IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC 7 R'S EXPECTATION OF THE GENERAL ECONOMIC SITUATION IN A YEAR 8 IS R INTERESTED IN POLITICS 9 STRENGTH OF R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS 10 DID R VOTE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF 1976 11 CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR IN 1976 12 PARTY LIST FOR WHICH R VOTED IN 1976 13 WOULD R VOTE IF THE FEDERAL ELECTION WERE HELD NEXT SUNDAY 14 R'S VOTING INTENTION FOR CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE 15 R'S VOTING INTENTION FOR THE PARTY 16 IS R SURE HE/SHE WILL MAKE THE SAME VOTE DECISION IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION IN OCTOBER 17 WHEN DID R DECIDE WHO TO VOTE FOR 18 PREFERENCE RANKING WHICH R GIVES TO SPD 19 PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO CDU 20 PREFERENCE RANKING WHICH R GIVES TO CSU 21 PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO FDP 22 PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO THE GREENS 23 WHAT R THINKS OF THE SPD 24 WHAT R THINKS OF THE CDU 25 WHAT R THINKS OF THE CSU 26 WHAT R THINKS OF THE FDP 27 WHAT R THINKS OF THE GREENS 28 IS R SATISFIED WITH THE GOVERNMENT IN BONN 29 IS R SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE OPPOSITION 30 WHAT R THINKS OF HANS-DIETRICH GENSCHER 31 WHAT R THINKS OF HELMUT KOHL 32 WHAT R THINKS OF HELMUT SCHMIDT 33 WHAT R THINKS OF FRANZ-JOSEPH STRAUSS 34 WHAT R THINKS OF ERNST ALBRECHT 35 WHAT R THINKS OF HANS APEL 36 WHAT R THINKS OF OTTO COUNT LAMBSDORFF 37 WHAT R THINKS OF HANS MATTHOEFER 38 WHAT R THINKS OF KARL CARSTENS 39 WHAT R THINKS OF HERBERT WEHNER 40 WHAT R THINKS OF WALTHER LEISLER KIEP 41 WHAT R THINKS OF GERHARD STOLTENBERG 42 R'S EVALUATION OF HIS/HER OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION 43 R'S EXPECTED FINANCIAL SITUATION A YEAR FROM NOW 44 DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION WHETHER THE SPD AND FDP OR THE CDU/CSU GOVERN IN BONN 45 WHO WOULD HAVE TO GOVERN IN ORDER FOR R TO BE SATISFIED WITH HIS/HER FINANCIAL SITUATION 46 SHOULD NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS CONTINUE TO BE BUILT 1 47 R'S REACTION TO THE BUILDING OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEAR HIM/HER 48 HOW IMPORTANT IS THE PROBLEM OF KEEPING PRICES STABLE 49 HOW IMPORTANT IS THE PROBLEM OF SECURE JOBS 50 HOW IMPORTANT IS WORKING FOR LAW AND ORDER IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC 51 HOW IMPORTANT IS IMPROVING RELATIONS WITH THE EASTERN EUROPEAN STATES 52 HOW IMPORTANT ARE GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES 53 HOW IMPORTANT IS BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 54 HOW IMPORTANT ARE SECURE PENSIONS 55 HOW IMPORTANT IS A SECURE ENERGY SUPPLY 56 HOW IMPORTANT IS IMPROVING RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 57 HOW IMPORTANT IS IMPROVING OCCUPATIONAL TRAINING 58 HOW IMPORTANT IS GIVING THE CITIZENS MORE INFLUENCE OVER THE DECISIONS OF THE STATE 59 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO KEEP PRICES STABLE - THE SPD/FDP GOVERNMENT OR A CDU/CSU GOVERNMENT 60 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SECURE JOBS 61 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO WORK FOR LAW AND ORDER IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC 62 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE EASTERN EUROPEAN STATES 63 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO MAINTAIN GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES 64 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 65 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SECURE PENSIONS 66 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SECURE ENERGY SUPPLIES 67 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 68 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO IMPROVE OCCUPATIONAL TRAINING 69 WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO GIVE THE CITIZENS MORE INFLUENCE OVER THE DECISIONS OF THE STATE 70 SHOULD DIVORCE BE MADE AS EASY OR AS DIFFICULT AS POSSIBLE 71 PARTY R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR: SPD 72 PARTY R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR: CDU 73 PARTY R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR: FDP 74 PARTY R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR: CSU 75 PARTY R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR: GREENS 76 PARTY R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR: OTHER PARTIES 77 SHOULD A COMPLETELY NEW PARTY BE FOUNDED TO BETTER REPRESENT R'S INTERESTS 78 ARE THE RIGHT PEOPLE IN THE LEADERSHIP POSITIONS IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC 79 WERE POLITICS RECENTLY DISCUSSED IN R'S FAMILY 80 WERE POLITICS RECENTLY DISCUSSED WITH R'S FRIENDS AND ADQUAINTANCES 81 DOES R'S FAMILY'S MEMBERS LEAN TO ONE OR SEVERAL PARTIES 82 PARTIES WHICH R'S FAMILY MEMBERS LEAN TO 83 DO R'S GOOD FRIENDS AND ACQUIANTANCES LEAN LARGELY TO ONE OR SEVERAL PARTIES 1 84 PARTIES WHICH R'S FRIENDS AND ACQUAINTANCES LEAN TO 85 R'S PLACEMENT OF THE SPD ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 86 R'S PLACEMENT OF THE CDU ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 87 R'S PLACEMENT OF THE FDP ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 88 R'S PLACEMENT OF THE CSU ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 89 R'S PLACEMENT OF THE GREENS ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 90 POSITION ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE OF R'S IDEAL PARTY 91 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 92 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 93 SELF PLACEMENT ON THE LEFT - RIGHT SCALE 94 R'S VIEW ON THE ROLE OF THE CHURCHES IN POLITICS 95 R'S VIEW OF THE ROLE OF LABOR UNIONS IN POLITICS 96 WOULD IT BE GOOD IF ONE OF THE LARGE PARTIES RECEIVED AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY IN THE ELECTION 97 IF NO PARTY CAN GOVERN ALONE, WHICH PARTIES SHOULD FORM THE GOVERNMENT TOGETHER 98 WHO DOES R THINK WILL WIN THE FEDERAL ELECTION 99 WOULD R PREFER HELMUT SCHMIDT OR FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS AS CHANCELLOR 100 WHY DOES R PREFER STRAUSS AS CHANCELLOR: FIRST MENTION 101 WHY DOES R PREFER STRAUSS AS CHANCELLOR: SECOND MENTION 102 WHY DOES R PREFER STRAUSS AS CHANCELLOR: THIRD MENTION 103 WHY DOES R PREFER SCHMIDT AS CHANCELLOR: FIRST MENTION 104 WHY DOES R PREFER SCHMIDT AS CHANCELLOR: SECOND MENTION 105 WHY DOES R PREFER SCHMIDT AS CHANCELLOR: THIRD MENTION 106 WOULD R HAVE PREFERRED A CDU/CSU CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR OTHER THAN FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS 107 WOULD R HAVE PREFERRED A SPD CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR OTHER THAN HELMUT SCHMIDT 108 DOES THE CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDACY OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS IMPROVE OR REDUCE THE CHANCES OF THE CDU/CSU IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION 109 DO LABOR UNIONS IN GERMANY ACT BASICALLY CORRECTLY OR NOT CORRECTLY 110 WHICH SKIRT LENGTH DOES R LIKE BEST 111 HOW SATISFIED IS R WITH DEMOCRACY IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY 112 R'S EVALUATION OF THE UNITED STATES' ECONOMIC MEASURES AGAINST THE SOVIET UNION IN REACTION TO THE INVASION OF AFGHANISTAN 113 SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC PARTICIPATE IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES 114 SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC WITHDRAW IF THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER WESTERN NATIONS STAY AWAY FROM THE OLYMPIC GAMES 115 SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC CONTINUE TO TRY TO IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE EAST 116 SHOULD DISARMAMENT NEGOTIATIONS BE CONTINUED IN SPITE 1 OF AFGHANISTAN 117 DOES R THINK THERE WILL BE A WAR BETWEEN THE SUPERPOWERS OVER AFGHANISTAN 118 WILL THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC BE DRAWN INTO THE WAR 119 SHOULD THERE BE OTHER NATIONAL TELEVISION STATIONS WHICH ARE RADICALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE TWO EXISTING STATIONS 120 SHOULD THE NEW STATIONS BE PRIVATELY OR PUBLICLY OWNED 121 DOES R LIKE JOGGING 122 DOES R JOG 123 R'S VIEW ON RELATIONS BETWEEN WESTERN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES 124 CAN ONE ACHIEVE ANYTHING BY BEING INVOLVED IN POLITICS 125 R'S REPORT OF HIS/HER TOLERANCE TOWARD PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEAS 126 IS THERE A PARTY WHICH REPRESENTS R'S INTERESTS AND CONCERNS 127 ARE THERE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 128 DOES R OR R'S FAMILY OWN A CAR 129 HOW HIGH CAN THE PRICE OF GASOLINE GO BEFORE R WILL START LEAVING THE CAR AT HOME 130 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON RESPONSIBLE-IRRESPONSIBLE SCALE 131 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON ARROGANT-MODEST SCALE 132 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON DYNAMIC-HESITATING SCALE 133 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON CONSERVATIVE-MODERN SCALE 134 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRUSTWORTHY SCALE 135 R'S PLACEMENT OF HELMUT SCHMIDT ON ILLTEMPERED-CALM SCALE 136 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON RESPONSIBLE - IRRESPONSIBLE SCALE 137 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON ARROGANT-MODEST SCALE 138 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON DYNAMIC-HESITATING SCALE 139 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON CONSERVATIVE-MODERN SCALE 140 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRUSTWORTHY SCALE 141 R'S PLACEMENT OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS ON ILLTEMPERED-CALM SCALE 142 R'S PLACEMENT OF THE IDEAL CHANCELLOR ON RESPONSIBLE-IRRESPONSIBLE SCALE 143 R'S PLACEMENT OF IDEAL CHANCELLOR ON ARROGANT-MODEST SCALE 144 R'S PLACEMENT OF IDEAL CHANCELLOR ON DYNAMIC-HESITATING SCALE 145 R'S PLACEMENT OF IDEAL CHANCELLOR ON CONSERVATIVE-MODERN SCALE 146 R'S PLACEMENT OF IDEAL CHANCELLOR ON 1 TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRUSTWORTHY SCALE 147 R'S PLACEMENT OF IDEAL CHANCELLOR ON ILLTEMPERED-CALM SCALE 148 DOES R THINK THE PARTIES WILL KEEP THEIR AGREEMENT TO BE FAIR DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN 149 WOULD R LIKE TO LOSE SOME WEIGHT 150 WHAT R IS DOING TO LOSE WEIGHT 151 SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC JOIN THE U.S. ECONOMIC BOYCOTT OF IRAN 152 WHAT SHOULD BE DONE IN CASE OF A GAS AND HEATING OIL SHORTAGE DUE TO CUTOFF OF SUPPLIES FROM IRAN: PRICE INCREASES OR RATIONING 153 DOES R THINK PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE HE/SHE THINKS 154 DO POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT SOMETIMES SEEM SO COMPLICATED THAT A PERSON LIKE R CANNOT REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON 155 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES 156 DO THE PARTIES IN THE BUNDESTAG DIFFER IN THEIR POLITICAL VIEWS AND GOALS 157 WHERE DID R SAVE THE MONEY NEEDED FOR LAST WINTER'S HIGHER HEATING COSTS 158 WOULD THE CHANCES OF THE CDU/CSU BE BETTER IF ERNST ALBRECHT WERE THEIR CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR 159 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS IN WHICH TO KEEP PRICES STABLE: FIRST MENTION 160 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS IN WHICH TO KEEP PRICES STABLE: SECOND MENTION 161 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS IN WHICH TO INSURE JOB SECURITY: FIRST MENTION 162 MOST IMPORTANT AREA IN WHICH TO INSURE JOB SECURITY: SECOND MENTION 163 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS OF RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE: FIRST MENTION 164 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS OF RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE: SECOND MENTION 165 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS OF RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES: FIRST MENTION 166 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS OF RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES: SECOND MENTION 167 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: FIRST MENTION 168 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: SECOND MENTION 169 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS IN WHICH TO INSURE SECURE ENERGY SUPPLIES: FIRST MENTION 170 MOST IMPORTANT AREAS IN WHICH TO INSURE SECURE ENERGY SUPPLIES: SECOND MENTION 171 HOW MUCH MORE IS R WILLING TO PAY FOR A MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND CAR 172 IS IT RIGHT FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES 173 DOES R ALWAYS VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY 174 WHERE WAS R ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE PREVIOUS FEDERAL ELECTION 1 175 DOES R TEND TO BE SATISFED OR DISSATISFIED WITH THE CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDATE OF HIS/HER PARTY 176 ARE THE "GREENS" NEEDED IN THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT 177 ARE THE "GREENS" POLITICALLY MORE LEFT, CENTER, OR RIGHT 178 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION 179 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION 180 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION 181 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION 182 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION 183 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION 184 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION 185 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION 186 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION 187 HOW CLOSE DOES THE POLITICAL SYSTEM COME TO WHAT R THINKS IS RIGHT AND PROPER IN POLITICS 188 IS THAT AN IMPORTANT QUESTION TO R 189 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY TO INFLUENCE WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES 190 DO PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE MUCH WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK 191 ARE THE PARTIES REPRESENTED IN THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT NO LONGER ABLE TO SOLVE THE RELEVENT PROBLEMS 192 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES 193 HOW MUCH SHOULD THE POLITICAL SYSTEM BE CHANGED 194 DOES IT BOTHER R TO PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGE HIS/HER POLITICAL POSITION 195 R'S IMPRESSION AS TO WHICH PARTY'S SUPPORTERS ARE MOST ACTIVE IN THE CAMPAIGN 196 ACCEPTABLITY OF CURTAILMENT OF THE EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE PARTIES 197 ACCEPTIBILITY OF CURTAILMENT OF THE RIGHT OF TELEVISION TO SHOW WHAT IT WANTS TO 198 ACCEPTABILITY OF CURTAILMENT OF THE ABILITY OF LABOR UNIONS TO STRIKE 199 ACCEPTABILITY OF CURTAILMENT OF THE RIGHT TO BECOME A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR TO MILITARY SERVICE 200 ACCEPTABILITY OF CURTAILMENT OF THE RIGHT THAT ANY FOREIGNER CAN FREELY ENTER THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC 201 WHICH OF A VOTER'S TWO VOTES DECIDES HOW MANY SEATS EACH PARTY WILL HAVE IN PARLIAMENT 202 QUESTIONNAIRE VERSION FOR QUESTIONS 89 TO 91 203 HOW MUCH DOES R LIKE THE DESIGNATED PARTY 204 DO MOST PEOPLE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC LIKE THE DESIGNATED PARTY 205 WOULD R LIKE TO TALK TO A PERSON WHO WAS TALKING FOR/AGAINST THE DESIGNATED PARTY 206 WHICH PARTY WOULD R EXPECT A SUPPORTER OF TO BE REFUSED INFORMATION AS TO THE LOCATION OF A PARKING 1 LOT 207 WOULD R WEAR A PIN OR BUTTON FOR HIS/HER FAVORITE PARTY 208 WOULD R PUT A STICKER ON HIS/HER CAR TO SUPPORT HIS/HER PARTY 209 WOULD R RING DOORBELLS AND TALK TO PEOPLE ABOUT THE GOOD POINTS OF HIS/HER PARTY 210 WOULD R PUT ON PARTY POSTER ON HIS/HER HOUSE OR INTO HIS/HER WINDOW 211 WOULD R PUT UP POSTERS FOR HIS/HER PARTY 212 WOULD R TAKE PART IN A STREET DISCUSSION AND SUPPORT HIS/HER PARTY 213 WOULD R ATTEND A PARTY RALLY 214 WOULD R STAND UP AND SPEAK AT A RALLY 215 WOULD R REPRESENT THE OPINION OF HIS/HER PARTY IN RALLIES OF OTHER PARTIES 216 WOULD R HELP WITH THE DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPAIGN LITERATURE TO SUPPORT HIS/HER PARTY 217 WOULD R CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO THE CAMPAIGN CHEST OF HIS/HER PARTY 218 IMPORTANCE OF OLD AGE SECURITY TO R 219 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH OLD AGE SECURITY 220 IMPORTANCE OF PRICE STABILITY TO R 221 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH PRICE STABILITY 222 IMPORTANCE OF IMPROVED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES TO R 223 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH IMPROVED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 224 IMPORTANCE OF REDUCING TAXES TO R 225 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH REDUCING TAXES 226 IMPORTANCE OF GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES TO R 227 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES 228 IMPORTANCE OF BETTER RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION TO R 229 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH BETTER RELATION WITH THE SOVIET UNION 230 IMPORTANCE OF REUNIFICATION OF GERMANY TO R 231 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH REUNIFICATION OF GERMANY 232 IMPORTANCE OF SECURITY FROM A RUSSIAN ATTACK TO R 233 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH SECURITY FROM A RUSSIAN ATTACK 234 IMPORTANCE OF HONESTY AND FAIR PLAY IN PUBLIC LIFE TO R 235 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH HONESTY AND FAIR PLAY IN PUBLIC LIFE 236 IMPORTANCE OF BETTER PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT TO R 237 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH BETTER PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 238 IMPORTANCE OF SECURE JOBS TO R 1 239 R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH SECURE JOBS 240 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH POLITICAL PROGRAMS ON TELEVISION 241 DOES R FEEL THAT HIS/HER ACQUAINTANCES GIVE THEIR TRUE OPINIONS WHEN TALKING ABOUT POLITICS 242 CAN R SAY WITHOUT HESITATION WHAT HE/SHE THINKS WHEN TALKING ABOUT POLITICS 243 MOST IMPORTANT POLITICAL GOAL TO R 244 SECOND MOST IMPORTANT POLITICAL GOAL TO R 245 THIRD MOST IMPORTANT POLITICAL GOAL TO R 246 FOURTH MOST IMPORTANT POLITICAL GOAL TO R 247 IMPORTANCE OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH CONTINUING UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE 248 IMPORTANCE OF CITIZENS HAVING MORE SAY IN POLITICAL DECISIONS 249 IMPORTANCE OF THE POLICE FORCES OF THE STATE BEING BUILT UP FURTHER TO GUARANTEE LAW AND ORDER 250 IMPORTANCE OF TAKING CARE IN ALL ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL DECISIONS THAT THEY DO NOT ENDANGER NATURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT 251 IMPORTANCE OF CHRISTIAN VALUES BEING MORE STRONGLY OBSERVED IN MARRIAGE, FAMILY AND SOCIETY 252 IMPORTANCE OF PARTIES HAVING LESS INFLUENCE AND CITIZEN INITIATIVES MORE 253 IMPORTANCE OF EXPERTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALISTS HAVING MORE SAY IN POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS 254 HOW OFTEN DOES R FEEL STRESS IN HIS/HER DAILY WORK 255 DOES R THINK THE STRESS AT WORK HAS INCREASED, DECREASED OR STAYED THE SAME DURING THE LAST YEARS 256 DID R VOTE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF OCTOBER 5, 1980 257 R'S VOTE FOR CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE 258 R'S VOTE FOR A PARTY LIST 259 FOR WHICH PARTY DID R VOTE 260 WHEN DID R DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO VOTE 261 DOES R THINK THE SPD GENERALLY DID WELL OR POORLY IN THE ELECTION 262 FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CDU/CSU LOSING SO MANY VOTES: FIRST MENTION 263 FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CDU/CSU LOSING SO MANY VOTES: SECOND MENTION 264 FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FDP GAINING SO MANY VOTES: FIRST MENTION 265 FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FDP GAINING SO MANY VOTES: SECOND MENTION 266 HOW WOULD THE CDU/CSU HAVE DONE IF IT HAD HAD A CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR OTHER THAN FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS 267 HOW USEFUL IS THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN 268 WERE THERE TOO MANY, TOO FEW OR ABOUT THE RIGHT NUMBER OF POLITICAL PROGRAMS ON TELEVISION BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION 269 HOW WELL DID R LIKE THE TELEVISED DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE TOP CANDIDATES OF THE PARTIES 270 WAS THE DEBATE MORE OF AN INFORMATIVE OR OF AN 1 ENTERTAINING NATURE 271 SHOULD THERE BE ANOTHER DEBATE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION 272 DID R VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY AS IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION IN 1976 273 WHY DID R VOTE FOR A DIFFERENT PARTY THIS TIME 274 R'S OPINION OF THE ARMY 275 R'S OPINION OF WOMEN IN THE ARMY 276 DOES R THINK DEFENSE SPENDING IS TOO MUCH, TOO LITTLE OR JUST RIGHT 277 R'S OPINION OF THE NAMING OF ARMY BARRACKS AFTER FAMOUS GENERALS IN THE WEHRMACHT 278 R'S OPINION OF NAMING DESTROYERS AFTER FAMOUS GENERALS OF THE WEHRMACHT 279 R'S OPINION OF THE "GROSSER ZAPFENSTREICH" (MAJOR TAPS CEREMONY) PERFORMED IN PUBLIC 280 R'S OPINION OF SWEARING ALLEGIANCE OR OATH OF ARMY LOYALTY PERFORMED IN PUBLIC 281 R'S OPINION OF THE INTRODUCTION OF MEDALS FOR DISTINGUISHED SOLDIERS 282 HAS THE THREAT TOWARD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC FROM THE EAST INCREASED, DECREASED, OR REMAINED THE SAME DURING THE PAST 5 YEARS 283 R'S MILITARY STATUS 284 MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS: FIRST MENTION 285 MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS: SECOND MENTION 286 MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS: THIRD MENTION 287 WAS R SATISFIED OR DISSATISFIED WITH POLITICAL EVENTS IN 1980 288 LIKELIHOOD OF REUNIFICATION OF THE TWO GERMAN STATES DURING THE NEXT 30 YEARS 289 R'S OPINION OF REUNIFICATION 290 DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TEND TO TAKE TOO HARD, TOO SOFT, OR THE RIGHT STAND IN THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE GDR 291 SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC REDUCE ECONOMIC COOPERATION WITH THE GDR 292 SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC RECOGNIZE GDR CITIZENSHIP 293 DOES R HAVE RELATIVES, FRIENDS OR ACQUAINTANCES WHO LIVE IN EAST BERLIN OR IN THE GDR 294 HOW MANY PERSONS PERMANENTLY LIVE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD 295 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN THE HOUSEHOLD AGED 18 AND ABOVE 296 R'S SEX 297 R'S AGE 298 R'S MARITAL STATUS 299 KIND OF SCHOOL WHICH R LAST ATTENDED 300 R'S EMPLOYMENT STATUS 301 OCCUPATIONAL GROUP TO WHICH R BELONGS 302 R'S COMPARISON OF HIS/HER OCCUPATIONAL POSITION WITH THAT OF HIS/HER FATHER 303 R'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 304 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S EMPLOYMENT STATUS 305 OCCUPATIONAL GROUP TO WHICH HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONGS 306 INTERVIEWER CHECK: R IS MALE AND EMPLOYED/RETIRED/APPRENTICE,STUDENT OR FEMALE AND SINGLE OR DIVORCED/MARRIED OR WIDOWED 1 307 R'S COMPARISON OF THE OCCUPATIONAL POSITION OF HER HUSBAND WITH THAT OF HER FATHER 308 OCCUPATION OF R OR R'S FATHER OR R'S HUSBAND 309 IS R OR SOMEONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD A MEMBER OF A LABOR UNION 310 R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 311 HOW FREQUENTLY DOES R ATTEND CHURCH 312 PARTY WHICH R GENERALLY LEANS TOWARD 313 HOW STRONGLY OR WEAKLY DOES R LEAN TOWARD THE PARTY 314 OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS WHICH ARE STRONGLY REPRESENTED IN R'S NEIGHBORHOOD 315 FEDERAL STATE IN WHICH INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED 316 COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION CODE 317 SIZE OF TOWN 318 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 319 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 320 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 321 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 322 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 323 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 324 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 325 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 326 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 327 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 328 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 329 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 330 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 331 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 332 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 333 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 334 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 335 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 336 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 337 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 338 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 1 339 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 340 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 341 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 342 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 343 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 344 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 345 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 346 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT 347 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 348 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 349 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 350 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION -TYPE OF CONCEPT 351 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 352 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 353 WHAT R LIKES OR DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT 354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 1 1 - DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '01' DK 1 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- 1 2 - 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0003 WEIGHT-HOUSEHOLD NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0003 LOC 9 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 21-23 IMP DEC= 2 0 WEIGHT - HOUSEHOLD ------------------ THIS WEIGHT VARIABLE CREATES A SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0004 WEIGHT-REPRESENTATIVE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0004 LOC 12 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 24-26 IMP DEC= 2 0 WEIGHT - REPRESENTATIVE ----------------------- THIS WEIGHT VARIABLE CORRECTS FOR SEX AND AGE BIASES IN THE DATA AND PRODUCES A SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE VOTING AGE POPULATION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. 1 3 - 0 VAR 0006 Q.1 ECONOMIC SITUATION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0006 LOC 17 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 27 0 Q.1. HOW WOULD YOU, QUITE GENERALLY, EVALUATE THE PRESENT ECONOMIC SITUATION IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC: VERY GOOD, GOOD, PART GOOD/PART BAD, BAD, OR VERY BAD? (INTERVIEWER: HAND LIST NO. 4 TO THE RESPONDENT.) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. VERY GOOD 2. GOOD 3. PART GOOD/PART BAD 4. BAD 5. VERY BAD 0. INAP., QUESTION ASKED ONLY IN APRIL, JUNE, SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0007 Q.2 ECON STN IN A YEAR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0007 LOC 18 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 28 0 Q.2. AND HOW WILL IT BE IN A YEAR? DO YOU EXPECT THAT THE GENERAL ECONOMIC SITUATION IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC WILL THEN BE SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER, SOMEWHAT BETTER, THE SAME, SOMEWHAT WORSE, OR SUBSTANTIALLY WORSE? (INTERVIEWER: HAND LIST NO. 5 TO THE RESPONDENT.) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER 3. THE SAME 4. SOMEWHAT WORSE 5. SUBSTANTIALLY WORSE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL, JUNE, SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0008 Q.3 INTEREST IN POLITICS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0008 LOC 19 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 29 0 Q.3. QUITE GENERALLY, ARE YOU INTERESTED IN POLITICS? ------------------------------------------------------ 1 4 - (CONTINUED) - 1. YES 2. NOT PARTICULARLY 3. NOT AT ALL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY, JUNE, SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0009 Q.3A INTEREST STRENGTH MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0009 LOC 20 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 30 0 Q.3A. (IF R IS INTERESTED IN POLITICS) HOW STRONGLY ARE YOU INTERESTED IN POLITICS: VERY STRONGLY, STRONGLY, OR NOT SO STRONGLY? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. VERY STRONGLY 2. STRONGLY 3. NOT SO STRONGLY 0. INAP., CODED 2, 3, OR 9 IN Q.3; ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY, JUNE, SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0010 Q.4 DID R VOTE IN 1976 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0010 LOC 21 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 31 0 Q.4. IN THE LAST FEDERAL ELECTION IN OCTOBER 1976 THERE WERE MANY CITIZENS WHO, FOR GOOD REASONS, COULD NOT OR DID NOT WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ELECTION. HOW ABOUT YOU? DID YOU VOTE OR DID YOU NOT VOTE, OR WERE YOU NOT YET ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF 1976? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, VOTED 2. NO, DID NOT VOTE 3. WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE, SEPTEMBER, AND OCTOBER 8. DON'T REMEMBER 9. NA 0 1 5 - 0 VAR 0011 Q.5(A) 1976 CONSTCY VOTE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0011 LOC 22 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 32 0 Q.5. (IF R VOTED IN 1976) HERE IS A VOTING BALLOT SIMILAR TO THE ONE YOU RECEIVED FOR THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF 1976. PLEASE MARK, IN SECRET, HOW YOU VOTED THEN. AT THAT TIME, YOU HAD TWO VOTES. THE FIRST VOTE WAS FOR A CANDIDATE HERE IN YOUR CONSTITUENCY, THE SECOND FOR A PARTY. PLEASE PUT THE BALLOT INTO THIS ENVELOPE. (INTERVIEWER: HAND WHITE VOTING BALLOT TO THE RESPONDENT. WHEN THE RESPONDENT IS FINISHED, TAKE THE SEALED ENVELOPE BACK AND CONTINUE WITH THE INTERVIEW. AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW, THAT IS, AFTER THE PERSONAL STATISTICS, STAPLE THE ENVELOPE TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE.) Q.5(A). RESPONDENT'S VOTE (FOR CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE), 1976 ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CDU/CSU <-CANDIDATE> 2. SPD <-CANDIDATE> 3. FDP <-CANDIDATE> 4. NPD <-CANDIDATE> 5. DKP <-CANDIDATE> 0. INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.4; ASKED ONLY IN JUNE, SEPTEMBER, AND OCTOBER 8. REFUSED 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0012 Q.5(B) 1976 PARTY VOTE MD=0 OR GE 7 REF 0012 LOC 23 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 33 0 Q.5(B). RESPONDENT'S SECOND VOTE (FOR PARTY LIST IN 1976) ---------------------------------------------------------- IN JAN.-MAY AND JULY THE QUESTION WAS: HOW ABOUT THE 1976 FEDERAL ELECTION. FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE? TELL ME USING THIS LIST. 1. CDU/CSU 2. SPD 3. FDP 1 6 - (CONTINUED) - 4. NDP 5. DKP 0. INAP; CODED 2-9 IN Q.4, NOT ASKED IN NOVEMBER 7. DID NOT VOTE IN 1976 8. WAS NOT ELIGIBLE IN 1976 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0013 Q.6 VOTE NEXT SUNDAY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0013 LOC 24 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 34 0 Q.6. IF THE FEDERAL ELECTION WERE HELD NEXT SUNDAY, WOULD YOU VOTE? ---------------------------------------------------------- (IN SEPTEMBER SURVEY) THE FEDERAL ELECTION IN ON OCTOBER 5. ARE YOU GOING TO VOTE? 1. YES 2. DON'T KNOW 3. NO 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0014 Q.7(A) VOTE INTENTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0014 LOC 25 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 35 0 Q.7. (IF R WOULD VOTE NEXT SUNDAY OR DOES NOT KNOW) HERE IS ANOTHER VOTING BALLOT SIMILAR TO THE ONE YOU WILL RECEIVE FOR FEDERAL ELECTIONS. PLEASE MARK HOW YOU WOULD VOTE IF THE FEDERAL ELECTIONS WERE NEXT SUNDAY. AGAIN, YOU HAVE TWO VOTES. THE FIRST VOTE IS FOR A CANDIDATE IN THE LOCAL CONSTITUENCY, THE SECOND VOTE IS FOR A PARTY. AFTER MARKING THE VOTING BALLOT, PLEASE PUT IT INTO THE ENVELOPE, THEN SEAL IT. (INTERVIEWER: HAND WHITE VOTING BALLOT TO THE RESPONDENT. WHEN THE RESPONDENT IS FINISHED, TAKE THE SEALED ENVELOPE BACK AND CONTINUE WITH THE INTERVIEW. AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW, THAT IS, AFTER THE PERSONAL STATISTICS, STAPLE THE ENVELOPE TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE.) Q.9(A). RESPONDENT'S VOTING INTENTION (FOR CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 7 - (CONTINUED) - 1. CDU/CSU <-CANDIDATE> 2. SPD <-CANDIDATE> 3. FDP <-CANDIDATE> 4. GREEN PARTY <-CANDIDATE> 5. DKP <-CANDIDATE> 6. NPD <-CANDIDATE> 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0015 Q.7(B) PARTY VOTE INTNTN MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0015 LOC 26 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 36 0 Q.7(B). (IF R WOULD VOTE NEXT SUNDAY OR DOES NOT KNOW) RESPONDENT'S VOTING INTENTION (FOR THE PARTY) ------------------------------------------------------- (IN JANUARY-JULY, OCTOBER, NOVEMBER:) FOR WHICH PARTY WOULD YOU VOTE (IN ELECTION NEXT SUNDAY)? PLEASE TELL ME USING THIS LIST. 1. CDU/CSU 2. SPD 3. FDP 4. NPD 5. DKP 6. GREEN PARTY 7. CITIZENS PARTY (JANUARY-MAY ONLY) 0. INAP., CODED 3 IN Q.6 8. DK 9. REFUSED/NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0016 Q.8 SURE OF VOTE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0016 LOC 27 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 37 0 Q.8. (IF R WILL PARTICIPATE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION) ARE YOU SURE THAT YOU WILL MAKE THIS SAME DECISION IN THE 1 8 - (CONTINUED) - FEDERAL ELECTION IN OCTOBER OR AREN'T YOU QUITE SURE? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SURE 2. NOT QUITE SURE 0. INAP., CODED 0,8, OR 9 IN Q.7A; NOT ASKED IN JANUARY, OCTOBER, AND NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0017 Q.9 WHEN VOTE DECISION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0017 LOC 28 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 38 0 Q.9. (IF R IS SURE HOW HE WILL VOTE IN ELECTION) CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHEN YOU REACHED THIS DECISION? DID YOU MAKE IT A LONG TIME AGO, ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO, OR DID YOU MAKE THIS DECISION IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LONG TIME AGO 2. A FEW MONTHS AGO 3. IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS 0. INAP., CODED 8 OR 9 IN Q.7A OR Q.7B; CODED 2 IN Q.8; ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0018 Q.10(A) SPD RANKING MD=9 REF 0018 LOC 29 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 39 0 Q.10. HERE ARE FIVE CARDS WITH THE NAMES OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. WOULD YOU PLEASE RANK THESE CARDS ACCORDING TO HOW WELL YOU LIKE THE PARTIES. ON TOP SHOULD BE THE PARTY WHICH YOU LIKE BEST, AT THE BOTTOM THEN WILL BE THE PARTY WHICH YOU LIKE LEAST. (INTERVIEWER: SHUFFLE WHITE DECK OF CARDS AND HAND IT TO THE RESPONDENT.) Q.10(A). PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO SPD ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. FIRST RANK (LIKES BEST) 2. SECOND RANK 1 9 - (CONTINUED) - 3. THIRD RANK 4. FOURTH RANK 5. FIFTH RANK (LIKES LEAST) 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0019 Q.10(B) CDU RANKING MD=9 REF 0019 LOC 30 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 40 0 Q.10(B). PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO CDU ---------------------------------------------- 1. FIRST RANK (LIKES BEST) 2. SECOND RANK 3. THIRD RANK 4. FOURTH RANK 5. FIFTH RANK (LIKES LEAST) 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0020 Q.10(C) CSU RANKING MD=9 REF 0020 LOC 31 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 41 0 Q.10(C). PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO CSU ---------------------------------------------- 1. FIRST RANK (LIKES BEST) 2. SECOND RANK 3. THIRD RANK 4. FOURTH RANK 5. FIFTH RANK (LIKES LEAST) 9. NA 0 1 10 - 0 VAR 0021 Q.10(D) FDP RANKING MD=9 REF 0021 LOC 32 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 42 0 Q.10(D). PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO FDP ---------------------------------------------- 1. FIRST RANK (LIKES BEST) 2. SECOND RANK 3. THIRD RANK 4. FOURTH RANK 5. FIFTH RANK (LIKES LEAST) 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0022 Q.10E GREENS RANKING MD=9 REF 0022 LOC 33 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 43 0 Q.10(E). PREFERENCE RANK WHICH R GIVES TO THE GREENS ----------------------------------------------------- 1. FIRST RANK (LIKES BEST) 2. SECOND RANK 3. THIRD RANK 4. FOURTH RANK 5. FIFTH RANK (LIKES LEAST) 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0023 Q.11(A) THINK OF SPD MD=99 REF 0023 LOC 34 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 44-45 0 Q.11. AND WHAT DO YOU THINK, IN GENERAL, ABOUT THE POLITICAL PARTIES? PLEASE TELL ME BY USING THIS SCALE. (INTERVIEWER: HAND WHITE SCALE NO. 3 TO THE RESPONDENT.) +5 MEANS THAT YOU THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTY. -5 MEANS THAT YOU DO NOT THINK MUCH OF IT AT ALL. USING THE VALUES IN BETWEEN, YOU CAN EXPRESS YOUR OPINION MORE PRECISELY. 1 11 - (CONTINUED) - Q.11(A). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE SPD? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE PARTY AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTY 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0024 Q.11(B) THINK OF CDU MD=99 REF 0024 LOC 36 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 46-47 0 Q.11(B). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE CDU? ------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE PARTY AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTY 99. NA 0 1 12 - 0 VAR 0025 Q.11(C) THINK OF CSU MD=99 REF 0025 LOC 38 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 48-49 0 Q.11(C). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE CSU? ------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE PARTY AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTY 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0026 Q.11(D) THINK OF FDP MD=99 REF 0026 LOC 40 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 50-51 0 Q.11(D). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE FDP? ------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE PARTY AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTY 99. NA 0 1 13 - 0 VAR 0027 Q.11(E) THINK OF GREENS MD=99 REF 0027 LOC 42 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 52-53 0 Q.11(E). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE GREENS? ---------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE PARTY AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTY 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0028 Q.12 SATISFIED W/GOV'T MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0028 LOC 44 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 54-55 0 Q.12. ARE YOU MORE SATISFIED OR MORE DISSATISFIED WITH WHAT THE PRESENT SPD/FDP GOVERNMENT IN BONN HAS ACCOMPLISHED SO FAR? PLEASE TELL ME WITH THE AID OF THIS SCALE. +5 MEANS THAT YOU ARE COMPLETELY SATISFIED WITH THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT IN BONN. -5 MEANS THAT YOU ARE NOT AT ALL SATISFIED WITH WHAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS ACCOMPLISHED SO FAR. ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. -5 -- NOT AT ALL SATISFIED 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- COMPLETELY SATISFIED 1 14 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP., NOT ASKED IN OCTOBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0029 Q.12A SATISFD W/OPPOSTN MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0029 LOC 46 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 56-57 0 Q.12A. AND HOW SATISFIED OR DISSATISFIED ARE YOU WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CDU/CSU OPPOSITION IN BONN? PLEASE TELL ME AGAIN WITH THE AID OF THIS SCALE. ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- NOT AT ALL SATISFIED 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- COMPLETELY SATISFIED 00. INAP., NOT ASKED IN OCTOBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0030 Q.13(A) THNK OF GENSCHER MD=99 REF 0030 LOC 48 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 58-59 0 Q.13. PLEASE TELL ME BY USING THIS SCALE WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT SOME LEADING POLITICIANS. (INTERVIEWER: SHUFFLE YELLOW DECK OF CARDS AND PRESENT THE CARDS ONE AT A TIME, TOGETHER WITH BEIGE LIST NO.6.) +5 MEANS THAT YOU THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE PARTICULAR POLITICIAN. -5 MEANS THAT YOU DO NOT THINK MUCH OF HIM AT ALL. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW ONE OR THE OTHER OF THE POLITICIANS, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO RATE HIM, OF COURSE. Q.13(A). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HANS-DIETRICH GENSCHER? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 1 15 - (CONTINUED) - 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0031 Q.13(B) THINK OF KOHL MD=99 REF 0031 LOC 50 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 60-61 0 Q.13(B). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HELMUT KOHL? ----------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0032 Q.13(C) THINK OF SCHMIDT MD=99 REF 0032 LOC 52 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 62-63 0 Q.13(C). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HELMUT SCHMIDT? -------------------------------------------------- 1 16 - (CONTINUED) - 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0033 Q.13(D) THINK OF STRAUSS MD=99 REF 0033 LOC 54 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 64-65 0 Q.13(D). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF FRANZ-JOSEPH STRAUSS? -------------------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0034 Q.13(E) THNK OF ALBRECHT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0034 LOC 56 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 66-67 0 Q.13(E). AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF ERNST ALBRECHT? -------------------------------------------------- 1 17 - (CONTINUED) - 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0035 Q.13(F) THINK OF APEL MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0035 LOC 58 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 68-69 0 Q.13(F). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HANS APEL? ----------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 99. NA 0 1 18 - 0 VAR 0036 Q.13(G) THINK LAMBSDORFF MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0036 LOC 60 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 70-71 0 Q.13(G). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF OTTO COUNT LAMBSDORFF? ----------------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE, SEPTEMBER, AND NOVEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0037 Q.13(H) THINK MATTHOEFER MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0037 LOC 62 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 72-73 0 Q.13(H). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HANS MATTHOEFER? ----------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE, SEPTEMBER, AND NOVEMBER 99. NA 1 19 - 0 VAR 0038 Q.13(I) THNK OF CARSTENS MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0038 LOC 64 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 74-75 0 Q.13(I). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF KARL CARSTENS? --------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0039 Q.13(K) THINK OF WEHNER MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0039 LOC 66 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 76-77 0 Q.13(K). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HERBERT WEHNER? ---------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 99. NA 1 20 - 0 VAR 0040 Q.13(L) THINK OF KIEP MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0040 LOC 68 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 78-79 0 Q.13(L). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF WALTHER LEISLER KIEP? ---------------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '02' DK 2 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. 1 21 - 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 2 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- 1 22 - (CONTINUED) - THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0041 Q.13(M) THNK STOLTENBERG MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0041 LOC 70 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 21-22 0 Q.13(M). WHAT DO YOU THINK OF GERHARD STOLTENBERG? --------------------------------------------------- 01. -5 -- DO NOT THINK MUCH OF THE POLITICIAN AT ALL 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. UNDECIDED 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- THINK A GREAT DEAL OF THE POLITICIAN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0042 Q.14 PERSONAL FINANCIAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0042 LOC 72 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 23 0 Q.14. HOW DO YOU EVALUATE YOUR OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION TODAY: VERY GOOD, GOOD, PART GOOD/PART BAD, BAD, OR VERY BAD? (INTERVIEWER: HAND GREEN LIST NO.1 TO THE RESPONDENT) ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. GOOD 3. PART GOOD/PART BAD 4. BAD 5. VERY BAD 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL, JUNE, SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 1 23 - 0 VAR 0043 Q.15 FINANCE IN YEAR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0043 LOC 73 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 24 0 Q.15. WHAT DO YOU THINK YOUR OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE IN A YEAR FROM NOW? DO YOU EXPECT THAT YOUR OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION THEN WILL BE SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER, SOMEWHAT BETTER, THE SAME, SOMEWHAT WORSE, OR SUBSTANTIALLY WORSE? (INTERVIEWER: HAND YELLOW LIST NO.2 TO THE RESPONDENT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER 3. THE SAME 4. SOMEWHAT WORSE 5. SUBSTANTIALLY WORSE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL, JUNE, SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0044 Q.16 GOV'T MAKE DIFFRNCE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0044 LOC 74 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 25 0 Q.16. DOES IT MAKE A GREAT DIFFERENCE, SOME DIFFERENCE OR PRACTICALLY NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL IN YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION WHETHER THE SPD AND THE FDP GOVERN IN BONN OR WHETHER THE CDU/CSU GOVERNS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. GREAT DIFFERENCE 2. SOME DIFFERENCE 3. NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0045 Q.17 BETTER PARTY FINANC MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0045 LOC 75 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 26 0 Q.17. (IF IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION WHO GOVERNS IN BONN) AND WHO WOULD HAVE TO GOVERN IN BONN IN ORDER FOR YOU TO BE SATISFIED WITH YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 24 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SPD ALONE 2. SPD PLUS FDP 3. CDU/CSU ALONE 4. CDU/CSU PLUS FDP 5. SPD PLUS CDU/CSU 6. ALL PARTIES, ALL THREE PARTIES, SPD PLUS CDU/CSU PLUS FDP 7. OTHER RESPONSES 0. INAP., CODED 3 OR 9 IN Q.16; ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0046 Q.18 NUCLEAR PLANTS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0046 LOC 76 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 27 0 Q.18. THERE IS A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS. WHAT DO YOU THINK: SHOULD NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS CONTINUE TO BE BUILT, SHOULD ONLY THE EXISTING PLANTS BE USED WITHOUT CONSTRUCTING NEW ONES, OR SHOULD THE EXISTING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS BE SHUT DOWN? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. CONTINUE TO BUILD 2. USE EXISTING ONES, NO NEW ONES 3. SHUT DOWN EXISTING ONES 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0047 Q.19 NUCLEAR IN VICINITY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0047 LOC 77 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 28 0 Q.19. PLEASE IMAGINE FOR A MOMENT THAT A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WERE TO BE BUILT HERE IN THE VICINITY. WOULD YOU OBJECT TO THIS, WOULD YOU NOT CARE EITHER WAY, OR WOULD YOU WELCOME THIS? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. OBJECT 2. WOULD NOT CARE EITHER WAY 1 25 - (CONTINUED) - 3. WELCOME 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0048 Q.20A IMP STABLE PRICES MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0048 LOC 78 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 29 0 Q.20. HERE WE HAVE PUT TOGETHER SEVERAL PROBLEMS AND GOALS WHICH ARE TALKED ABOUT IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. PLEASE TELL US FOR EACH OF THESE PROBLEMS WHETHER YOU PERSONALLY CONSIDER IT TO BE VERY IMPORTANT, IMPORTANT, NOT SO IMPORTANT, OR COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT. (INTERVIEWER: SHUFFLE GREY DECK OF CARDS AND HAND IT TO THE RESPONDENT. ALSO HAND GREEN LIST NO.9 TO THE RESPONDENT.) PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THE CARDS IN THE RESPECTIVE FIELDS OF THIS TABLE. Q.20A. KEEP PRICES STABLE -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0049 Q.20B IMP-SECURE JOBS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0049 LOC 79 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 30 0 Q.20B. SECURE JOBS -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 1 26 - (CONTINUED) - 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0050 Q.20C IMP-LAW AND ORDER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0050 LOC 80 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 31 0 Q.20C. WORK FOR LAW AND ORDER IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0051 Q.20D IMP-EAST EUR RELTN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0051 LOC 81 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 32 0 Q.20D. IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE EASTERN EUROPEAN STATES -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 1 27 - 0 VAR 0052 Q.20E IMP-US RELATIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0052 LOC 82 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 33 0 Q.20E. GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ---------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0053 Q.20F IMP-ENVIRONMENTAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0053 LOC 83 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 34 0 Q.20F. BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0054 Q.20G IMP-SECURE PENSION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0054 LOC 84 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 35 0 Q.20G. SECURE PENSIONS -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 28 - (CONTINUED) - 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0055 Q.20H IMP-ENERGY SUPPLY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0055 LOC 85 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 36 0 Q.20H. SECURE ENERGY SUPPLY -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0056 Q.20I IMP-GDR RELATIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0056 LOC 86 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 37 0 Q.20I. IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE GDR -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 1 29 - (CONTINUED) - 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0057 Q.20K IMP-OCCUP TRAINING MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0057 LOC 87 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 38 0 Q.20K. IMPROVE OCCUPATIONAL TRAINING -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0058 Q.20L IMP-CITIZEN INFLNC MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0058 LOC 88 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 39 0 Q.20L. GIVE THE CITIZENS MORE INFLUENCE OVER THE DECISIONS OF THE STATE -- HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2. IMPORTANT 3. NOT SO IMPORTANT 4. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT 5. RESPONDENT IS OPPOSED TO THIS GOAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY AND JUNE 9. NA 0 1 30 - 0 VAR 0059 Q.21A WHO PRICES STABLE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0059 LOC 89 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 40 0 Q.21. WHO WOULD BE MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE EACH OF THESE PROBLEMS TO YOUR SATISFACTION? DO YOU THINK THAT WOULD BE THE PRESENT SPD/FDP FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, OR WOULD THAT BE A CDU/CSU GOVERNMENT? (INTERVIEWER: SHUFFLE CARDS DESIGNATED AS "VERY IMPORTANT" AND "IMPORTANT' AND HAND THEM TO THE RESPONDENT AGAIN; MAKE RESPONDENT INDICATE RESPECTIVE ALPHABETIC LETTER.) Q.21A. KEEP PRICES STABLE -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0060 Q.21B WHO SECURE JOBS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0060 LOC 90 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 41 0 Q.21B. SECURE JOBS -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 1 31 - 0 VAR 0061 Q.21C WHO LAW AND ORDER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0061 LOC 91 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 42 0 Q.21C. WORK FOR LAW AND ORDER IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0062 Q.21D WHO E.EUR RELATION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0062 LOC 92 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 43 0 Q.21D. IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE EASTERN EUROPEAN STATES -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0063 Q.21E WHO US RELATIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0063 LOC 93 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 44 0 Q.21E. GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 32 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0064 Q.21F WHO ENVIRONMENTAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0064 LOC 94 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 45 0 Q.21F. BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0065 Q.21G WHO SECURE PENSION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0065 LOC 95 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 46 0 Q.21G. SECURE PENSIONS -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 1 33 - (CONTINUED) - 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0066 Q.21H WHO ENERGY SUPPLY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0066 LOC 96 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 47 0 Q.21H. SECURE ENERGY SUPPLIES -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0067 Q.21I WHO GDR RELATIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0067 LOC 97 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 48 0 Q.21I. IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE GDR -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 1 34 - 0 VAR 0068 Q.21K WHO OCCUP TRAINING MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0068 LOC 98 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 49 0 Q.21K. IMPROVE OCCUPATIONAL TRAINING -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ---------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0069 Q.21L WHO CITIZEN INFLNC MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0069 LOC 99 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 50 0 Q.21L. GIVE THE CITIZENS MORE INFLUENCE OVER THE DECISIONS OF THE STATE -- WHO IS MORE QUALIFIED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN R'S VIEW? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD/FDP 2. CDU/CSU 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0070 Q.22 DIVORCE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0070 LOC 100 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 51 0 Q.22. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY, SHOULD DIVORCE BE MADE AS EASY AS POSSIBLE OR AS DIFFICULT AS POSSIBLE, OR SHOULD IT BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DISSOLVE MARRIAGES AT ALL? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 35 - (CONTINUED) - 1. AS EASY AS POSSIBLE 2. AS DIFFICULT AS POSSIBLE 3. IT SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DISSOLVE MARRIAGES AT ALL 4. LEAVE IT AS IT IS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0071 Q.23A NEVER VOTE SPD MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0071 LOC 101 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 52 0 Q.23. NOW WHEN YOU THINK OF THE FIVE PARTIES: SPD, CDU, FDP, CSU AND THE GREENS, IS THERE A PARTY OR ARE THERE SEVERAL PARTIES FOR WHOM YOU WOULD NOT VOTE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES? IF YES, WHICH PARTY/PARTIES ARE THESE? Q.23A. YES, WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THE SPD -------------------------------------------------------- 1. MENTIONED 2. NOT MENTIONED 9. NA ENTIRE QUESTION 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0072 Q.23B NEVER VOTE CDU MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0072 LOC 102 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 53 0 Q.23B. YES, R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THE CDU ------------------------------------------- 1. MENTIONED 2. NOT MENTIONED 9. NA ENTIRE QUESTION 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 0 1 36 - 0 VAR 0073 Q.23C NEVER VOTE FDP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0073 LOC 103 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 54 0 Q.23C. YES, R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THE FDP ------------------------------------------- 1. MENTIONED 2. NOT MENTIONED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA ENTIRE QUESTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0074 Q.23D NEVER VOTE CSU MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0074 LOC 104 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 55 0 Q.23D. YES, R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THE CSU ------------------------------------------- 1. MENTIONED 2. NOT MENTIONED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA ENTIRE QUESTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0075 Q.23E NEVER VOTE GREENS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0075 LOC 105 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 56 0 Q.23E. YES, R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THE GREENS ---------------------------------------------- 1. MENTIONED 2. NOT MENTIONED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA ENTIRE QUESTION 1 37 - 0 VAR 0076 Q.23F NEVER VOTE OTHER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0076 LOC 106 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 57 0 Q.23F. YES, R WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR OTHER PARTIES ------------------------------------------------- 1. MENTIONED 2. NOT MENTIONED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA ENTIRE QUESTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0077 Q.24 NEW PARTY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0077 LOC 107 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 58 0 Q.24. DO YOU THINK THAT A COMPLETELY NEW PARTY SHOULD BE FOUNDED TO BETTER REPRESENT YOUR INTERESTS, OR ISN'T THAT NECESSARY? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. NECESSARY 2. NOT NECESSARY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0078 Q.25 RIGHT LEADERS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0078 LOC 108 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 59 0 Q.25. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME THE RIGHT PEOPLE ARE, BY AND LARGE, IN THE LEADERSHIP POSITIONS HERE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC, OR DON'T YOU THINK SO? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, I THINK SO 2. NO, I DON'T THINK SO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. DK 1 38 - 0 VAR 0079 Q.26 PLTCS DISCSD FAMILY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0079 LOC 109 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 60 0 Q.26. WERE THE PARTIES, THE POLITICIANS, AND THE NEXT FEDERAL ELECTION RECENTLY DISCUSSED IN YOUR FAMILY? WAS THAT FREQUENTLY, OCCASIONALLY, OR RARELY? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. FREQUENTLY 2. OCCASIONALLY 3. RARELY 4. NO, NOT DISCUSSED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0080 Q.27 PLTCS DISCSD FRNDS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0080 LOC 110 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 61 0 Q.27. AND WHAT ABOUT YOUR FRIENDS AND ACQUIANTANCES. HAVE YOU DISCUSSED THE PARTIES AND THE ELECTION RECENTLY? WAS THAT FREQUENTLY, OCCASIONALLY, OR RARELY? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. FREQUENTLY 2. OCCASIONALLY 3. RARELY 4. NO, NOT DISCUSSED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0081 Q.28 FAMILY PARTY LEANGS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0081 LOC 111 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 62 0 Q.28. HOW ABOUT YOUR FAMILY: DO THE FAMILY MEMBERS LARGELY LEAN TO ONE PARTY, TO SEVERAL PARTIES, OR TO NO PARTY AT ALL? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. LARGELY ONE PARTY 1 39 - (CONTINUED) - 2. SEVERAL PARTIES 3. NO PARTY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0082 Q.28(A) WHICH PARTIES MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0082 LOC 112 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 63 0 Q.28(A). (IF PARTY LEANINGS IN Q.28) WHICH PARTY/IES IS/ARE THAT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LARGELY CDU/CSU 2. LARGELY SPD 3. LARGELY FDP 4. LARGELY OTHER PARTIES 5. SPD AND CDU/CSU 6. CDU/CSU AND FDP 7. SPD AND FDP 8. OTHER COMBINATIONS 0. INAP., CODED 3, 9, OR 0 IN Q.28 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0083 Q.29 FRIENDS LEAN PARTY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0083 LOC 113 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 64 0 Q.29. AND HOW ABOUT YOUR GOOD FRIENDS AND ACQAINTANCES; DO THEY LEAN LARGELY TO ONE PARTY, TO SEVERAL PARTIES, OR TO NO PARTY AT ALL? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LARGELY ONE PARTY 2. SEVERAL PARTIES 3. NO PARTY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. DK 0 1 40 - 0 VAR 0084 Q.29A WHICH PARTIES MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0084 LOC 114 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 65 0 Q.29A. (ONLY IF PARTY LEANINGS IN Q.29) WHICH PARTY/PARTIES IS/ARE THAT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LARGELY CDU/CSU 2. LARGELY SPD 3. LARGELY FDP 4. LARGELY OTHER PARTIES 5. SPD AND CDU/CSU 6. CDU/CSU AND FDP 7. SPD AND FDP 8. OTHER COMBINATIONS 0. INAP., CODED 3, 9, OR 0 IN Q.29 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0085 Q.30(1) LEFT-RIGHT SPD MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0085 LOC 115 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 66-67 0 Q.30. THERE ARE VARIOUS TERMS WHICH ARE FREQUENTLY USED WHEN TALKING ABOUT THE POLITICAL PARTIES, SUCH AS "LEFT" AND "RIGHT." PLEASE MARK THIS SCALE WHERE YOU WOULD PLACE THE SPD, THE CDU, THE FDP, THE CSU, AND THE GREENS. (INTERVIEWER: HAND SCALE TO THE RESPONDENT.) Q.30(1). WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE THE SPD? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 1 41 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0086 Q.30(2) LEFT-RIGHT CDU MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0086 LOC 117 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 68-69 0 Q.30(2). AND WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE THE CDU? -------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0087 Q.30(3) LEFT-RIGHT FDP MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0087 LOC 119 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 70-71 0 Q.30(3). AND WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE THE FDP? -------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 1 42 - (CONTINUED) - 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0088 Q.30(4) LEFT-RIGHT CSU MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0088 LOC 121 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 72-73 0 Q.30(4). AND WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE THE CSU? -------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0089 Q.30(5) LFT-RGHT GREENS MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0089 LOC 123 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 74-75 0 Q.30(5). AND WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE THE GREENS? ----------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 1 43 - (CONTINUED) - 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0090 Q.30A LEFT-RIGHT IDEAL MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0090 LOC 125 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 76-77 0 Q.30A. AND WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE THE PARTY WHICH WOULD BE THE IDEAL PARTY FOR YOU? ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0091 Q.30B1 LFT-RGHT SCHMIDT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0091 LOC 127 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 78-79 0 Q.30B. PLEASE INDICATE NOW WHERE YOU WOULD PLACE HELMUT SCHMIDT AND FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS . Q.30B1. HELMUT SCHMIDT ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 44 - (CONTINUED) - 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '03' DK 3 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 1 45 - (CONTINUED) - 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 3 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. 1 46 - 0 VAR 0092 Q.30B2 LFT-RGHT STRAUSS MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0092 LOC 129 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 21-22 0 Q.30B2. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS --------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0093 Q.30C LEFT-RIGHT SELF MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0093 LOC 131 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 23-24 0 Q.30C. AND NOW WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW FROM YOU WHERE YOU WOULD PLACE YOURSELF ON THE SCALE. -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEFT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. RIGHT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 1 47 - 0 VAR 0094 Q.31 CHURCH & POLITICS MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0094 LOC 133 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 25-26 0 Q.31. HERE WE HAVE NOTED 2 OPPOSING POINTS OF VIEW ON THE ISSUE OF CHURCH AND POLITICS. PLEASE TELL US WITH THE HELP OF THIS SCALE WHICH VIEW YOU HOLD. THE MORE YOU HOLD ONE OF THE TWO VIEWPOINTS, THE MORE YOU MOVE YOUR MARK TOWARD THAT SIDE. ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. THE CHURCHES SHOULD HAVE A RIGHT TO GIVE THEIR OPINION IN POLITICS 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. THE CHURCHES SHOULD KEEP OUT OF POLITICS 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0095 Q.32 UNIONS & POLITICS MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0095 LOC 135 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 27-28 0 Q.32. HERE ARE ONCE AGAIN TWO OPPOSITE POINTS OF VIEW ON THE TOPIC OF LABOUR UNIONS AND POLITICS. PLEASE USE THIS SCALE AGAIN. (INTERVIEWER: HAND SCALE TO RESPONDENT) --------------------------------------------------------- 01. THE LABOR UNIONS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN POLITICS 02. . . 10. 11. THE LABOR UNIONS SHOULD KEEP OUT OF POLITICS 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 1 48 - 0 VAR 0096 Q.33 MJRTY PRTY GOOD MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0096 LOC 137 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 29 0 Q.33. WOULD YOU CONSIDER IT GOOD IF ONE OF THE LARGE PARTIES, THE SPD OR THE CDU/CSU, WOULD RECEIVE THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY IN THE UPCOMING FEDERAL ELECTION IN OCTOBER, OR WOULD YOU NOT CONSIDER THAT GOOD? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, THE SPD SHOULD RECEIVE THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY 2. YES, THE CDU/CSU SHOULD RECEIVE THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY 3. NO, WOULD NOT CONSIDER IT GOOD 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0097 Q.34 COALITION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0097 LOC 138 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 30 0 Q.34. IF AFTER THE FEDERAL ELECTION NO PARTY CAN GOVERN ALONE, WHICH PARTIES DO YOU THINK SHOULD FORM THE GOVERNMENT TOGETHER? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SPD ALONE (JUNE); SPD AND FDP (SEPTEMBER) 2. SPD PLUS FDP (JUNE); CDU/CSU AND FDP (SEPTEMBER) 3. CDU/CSU ALONE (JUNE); CDU/CSU AND SPD (SEPTEMBER) 4. CDU/CSU PLUS FDP (JUNE); OTHER (SEPTEMBER) 5. SPD PLUS CDU/CSU (JUNE) 6. ALL PARTIES, ALL THREE PARTIES, SPD PLUS CDU/CSU PLUS FDP (JUNE) 7. OTHER RESPONSE (JUNE) 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE/SEPTEMBER 9. DK, REFUSED (JUNE); NA (SEPTEMBER) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0098 Q.35 WHO WIN MD=0 REF 0098 LOC 139 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 31 0 Q.35. WHAT DO YOU PERSONALLY THINK: WHO WILL WIN THE 1 49 - (CONTINUED) - UPCOMING FEDERAL ELECTION IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR? (INTERVIEWER: ALLOW ONLY ONE RESPONSE.) . ----------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 4. SPD/FDP 5. HELMUT KOHL 6. HELMUT SCHMIDT 7. HANS-DIETRICH GENSCHER 8. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS 9. OTHER RESPONSE 0. DK; INAP., NOT ASKED IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0099 Q.36 SCHMIDT-STRAUSS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0099 LOC 140 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 32 0 Q.36. WHOM WOULD YOU PREFER AS CHANCELLOR: HELMUT SCHMIDT OR FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. HELMUT SCHMIDT 2. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS 3. NEITHER 0. INAP., NOT ASKED IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH, OCTOBER, AND NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0100 Q.37(1) WHY STRAUSS 1 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0100 LOC 141 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 33-34 0 Q.37. AND WHY DO YOU PREFER FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS? Q.37(1). REASONS FOR PREFERING STRAUSS: FIRST MENTION ------------------------------------------------------ THREE MENTIONS CODED, MULTIPLE CODES REFERENCE TO PERSONAL QUALITIES 1 50 - (CONTINUED) - 01. GENERAL, UNSPECIFIED LIKING; FOR EXAMPLE, ATTRACTIVE, LIKE HIM, LIKE HIS STYLE, LIKE HIS TYPE 02. CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS AS, FOR EXAMPLE, (MORE) HONEST, UPRIGHT, OPEN, CLEAR, TRUST INSPIRING, DOWN-TO-EARTH, TRUSTWORTHY, SUPERIOR, OBJECTIVE, CALM, THOUGHTFUL, FAIR, BETTER CHARACTER, BETTER PERSONALITY, GOOD PERSON 0 REFERENCE TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN 10. GOAL-ORIENTED, DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, PRAGMATIC, CAPABLE 11. POISED, INSPIRING 12. CONVINCING, APPEARS (MORE) CONVINCING 13. REPRESENTS HIS POINT OF VIEW, STRONG, UNYIELDING, INDEPENDENT 14. CAN SPEAK WELL, DOES NOT TALK MUCH NONSENSE 15. HAS ELAN, BETTER LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MORE INITIATIVE 16. INTELLIGENT, INTELLECTUAL 17. STRATEGIC MIND, PLANS AHEAD 18. BETTER THAN OTHERS, MORE COMPETENT 19. OTHER REPONSES WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN; NOT HEARD OF ANY DISADVANTAGES YET 0 POLITICAL REFERENCE 20. HAS BETTER CAPABILITIES, BETTER VIEWS, GOOD ARGUMENTS, IS BETTER POLITICALLY, MAKES STRONGER POLITICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, HAS PROVED HIMSELF, CAN GOVERN BETTER, HAS FORESIGHT, BETTER CANDIDATE, BETTER MAN 21. HAS GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE, CONTINUES PAST POLICIES, HAS SHOWN HIS METTLE, HIS QUALITIES ARE KNOWN, AM SATISFIED WITH HIS POLICIES 22. IS RESPECTED, POPULAR ABROAD/INTERNATIONALLY 23. THINGS SHOULD STAY AS THEY ARE, THERE IS NO BETTER ONE, REASONS FOR COMPLAINING, HAS BEEN LEADING FRG FOR 10 YEARS, HAS CUT A GOOD FIGURE 24. HAS THINGS WELL IN HAND, HAS PROVEN HIS COMPETENCE 25. BETTER PROGRAM 26. IS A STATESMAN 27. AFTER 10 YEARS IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE 28. IS POWERFUL, HAS A STRONG POWERBASE 29. OTHER RESPONSES WITH POLITICAL REFERENCE 0 1 51 - (CONTINUED) - SPECIFIC POLITICAL AREAS: DOMESTIC ISSUES 30. ECONOMIC POLICY, ESPECIALLY QUALIFIED FOR ECONOMIC QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS 31. FINANCE POLICIES, IS A FINANCIAL WIZARD, IS MORE COMPETENT WITH MONEY, INFLATION 32. PUBLIC DEBT, CUTBACKS 33. TAX RELIEF 34. DOES SOMETHING ABOUT REDUCING UNEMPLOYMENT 35. SOCIAL POLICIES, PENSIONS 36. FOR LAW AND ORDER, CREATES ORDER, NO MORE UNREST 37. POLICIES WITH REGARD TO GDR, GERMAN-GERMAN RELATIONS, RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 38. REPRESENTS NATIONAL INTERESTS 39. OTHER RESPONSES WITH REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC DOMESTIC POLICIES 0 PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS: FOREIGN RELATIONS 40. EUROPEAN POLICY 41. USA, SECURING THE WESTERN ALLIANCE 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. FOREIGN POLICY, HAS CONTRIBUTED TO GOOD NAME IN THE WORLD, BETTER OPPORTUNITIES ABROAD 44. GUARANTEES PEACE 49. OTHER MENTIONS 0 SPECIFIC PARTISAN POLITICAL REFERENCES OR GROUP REFERENCES 50. SHARES MY OPINIONS, REPRESENTS MY INTERESTS, REPRESENTS MY POLITICAL OPINION 51. BELONGS TO MY POLITICAL DIRECTION, TO MY PARTY 52. IS THE CANDIDATE OF THE CDU/CSU, IS A REAL CDU/CSU MAN 53. THE SPD OR SPD/FDP DOES NOT HAVE ANYONE BETTER 54. THE CDU/CSU HAS BETTER PEOPLE, HAS THE BETTER TEAM 55. DOES A LOT FOR WORKERS, EMPLOYEES 56. DOES A LOT FOR ENTREPRENEURS, HAS BETTER CONTACTS TO INDUSTRY 57. KNOWS THE PEOPLE, IS A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE, THINKS ABOUT THE COMMON MAN 58. REASONS WITH REGIONAL REFERENCES, IS A BAVARIAN, IS A HAMBURGER 59. OTHER RESPONSES WITH PARTISAN OR GROUP REFERENCES 0 NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO OPPOSING CANDIDATE 1 52 - (CONTINUED) - 60. CAN'T BE WORSE THAN 61. WITH YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, WITH YOU DON'T 62. DOESN'T TALK AS MUCH NONSENSE AS 63. IS BETTER THAN 64. IS NOT AS RADICAL (DICTATORIAL) AS ..., IS MORE COMPOSED, NOT AS IMPULSIVE AS ..., MORE MODERATE THAN ..., MORE LIBERAL THAN ... 65. ... IS THE LESSER EVIL, I PREFER ... TO ..., ... IS LESS DANGEROUS 66. ... HAS MORE FRIENDS THAN ... 67. SCHMIDT HAS NOT KEPT HIS PROMISES, OTHER REFERENCES SPECIFICALLY TO SCHMIDT 68. STRAUSS IS TOO OLD, OTHER SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO STRAUSS 69. OTHER IDIOSYNCRATIC RESPONSES, E.G., I CHANGE MY COURSE WITH THE WIND 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND, THIRD RESPONSE 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0101 Q.37(2) WHY STRAUSS 2 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0101 LOC 143 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 35-36 0 Q.37(2). REASONS FOR PREFERING STRAUSS: SECOND MENTION ------------------------------------------------------- REFERENCE TO PERSONAL QUALITIES 01. GENERAL, UNSPECIFIED LIKING; FOR EXAMPLE, ATTRACTIVE, LIKE HIM, LIKE HIS STYLE, LIKE HIS TYPE 02. CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS AS, FOR EXAMPLE, (MORE) HONEST, UPRIGHT, OPEN, CLEAR, TRUST INSPIRING, DOWN-TO-EARTH, TRUSTWORTHY, SUPERIOR, OBJECTIVE, CALM, THOUGHTFUL, FAIR, BETTER CHARACTER, BETTER PERSONALITY, GOOD PERSON 0 REFERENCE TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN 10. GOAL-ORIENTED, DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, PRAGMATIC, CAPABLE 1 53 - (CONTINUED) - 11. POISED, INSPIRING 12. CONVINCING, APPEARS (MORE) CONVINCING 13. REPRESENTS HIS POINT OF VIEW, STRONG, UNYIELDING, INDEPENDENT 14. CAN SPEAK WELL, DOES NOT TALK MUCH NONSENSE 15. HAS ELAN, BETTER LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MORE INITIATIVE 16. INTELLIGENT, INTELLECTUAL 17. STRATEGIC MIND, PLANS AHEAD 18. BETTER THAN OTHERS, MORE COMPETENT 19. OTHER REPONSES WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN; NOT HEARD OF ANY DISADVANTAGES YET 0 POLITICAL REFERENCE 20. HAS BETTER CAPABILITIES, BETTER VIEWS, GOOD ARGUMENTS, IS BETTER POLITICALLY, MAKES STRONGER POLITICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, HAS PROVED HIMSELF, CAN GOVERN BETTER, HAS FORESIGHT, BETTER CANDIDATE, BETTER MAN 21. HAS GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE, CONTINUES PAST POLICIES, HAS SHOWN HIS METTLE, HIS QUALITIES ARE KNOWN, AM SATISFIED WITH HIS POLICIES 22. IS RESPECTED, POPULAR ABROAD/INTERNATIONALLY 23. THINGS SHOULD STAY AS THEY ARE, THERE IS NO BETTER ONE, REASONS FOR COMPLAINING, HAS BEEN LEADING FRG FOR 10 YEARS, HAS CUT A GOOD FIGURE 24. HAS THINGS WELL IN HAND, HAS PROVEN HIS COMPETENCE 25. BETTER PROGRAM 26. IS A STATESMAN 27. AFTER 10 YEARS IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE 28. IS POWERFUL, HAS A STRONG POWERBASE 29. OTHER RESPONSES WITH POLITICAL REFERENCE 0 SPECIFIC POLITICAL AREAS: DOMESTIC ISSUES 30. ECONOMIC POLICY, ESPECIALLY QUALIFIED FOR ECONOMIC QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS 31. FINANCE POLICIES, IS A FINANCIAL WIZARD, IS MORE COMPETENT WITH MONEY, INFLATION 32. PUBLIC DEBT, CUTBACKS 33. TAX RELIEF 34. DOES SOMETHING ABOUT REDUCING UNEMPLOYMENT 35. SOCIAL POLICIES, PENSIONS 36. FOR LAW AND ORDER, CREATES ORDER, NO MORE UNREST 37. POLICIES WITH REGARD TO GDR, GERMAN-GERMAN RELATIONS, RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 38. REPRESENTS NATIONAL INTERESTS 1 54 - (CONTINUED) - 39. OTHER RESPONSES WITH REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC DOMESTIC POLICIES 0 PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS: FOREIGN RELATIONS 40. EUROPEAN POLICY 41. USA, SECURING THE WESTERN ALLIANCE 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. FOREIGN POLICY, HAS CONTRIBUTED TO GOOD NAME IN THE WORLD, BETTER OPPORTUNITIES ABROAD 44. GUARANTEES PEACE 49. OTHER MENTIONS 0 SPECIFIC PARTISAN POLITICAL REFERENCES OR GROUP REFERENCES 50. SHARES MY OPINIONS, REPRESENTS MY INTERESTS, REPRESENTS MY POLITICAL OPINION 51. BELONGS TO MY POLITICAL DIRECTION, TO MY PARTY 52. IS THE CANDIDATE OF THE CDU/CSU, IS A REAL CDU/CSU MAN 53. THE SPD OR SPD/FDP DOES NOT HAVE ANYONE BETTER 54. THE CDU/CSU HAS BETTER PEOPLE, HAS THE BETTER TEAM 55. DOES A LOT FOR WORKERS, EMPLOYEES 56. DOES A LOT FOR ENTREPRENEURS, HAS BETTER CONTACTS TO INDUSTRY 57. KNOWS THE PEOPLE, IS A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE, THINKS ABOUT THE COMMON MAN 58. REASONS WITH REGIONAL REFERENCES, IS A BAVARIAN, IS A HAMBURGER 59. OTHER RESPONSES WITH PARTISAN OR GROUP REFERENCES 0 NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO OPPOSING CANDIDATE 60. CAN'T BE WORSE THAN 61. WITH YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, WITH YOU DON'T 62. DOESN'T TALK AS MUCH NONSENSE AS 63. IS BETTER THAN 64. IS NOT AS RADICAL (DICTATORIAL) AS ..., IS MORE COMPOSED, NOT AS IMPULSIVE AS ..., MORE MODERATE THAN ..., MORE LIBERAL THAN ... 65. ... IS THE LESSER EVIL, I PREFER ... TO ..., ... IS LESS DANGEROUS 66. ... HAS MORE FRIENDS THAN ... 67. SCHMIDT HAS NOT KEPT HIS PROMISES, OTHER REFERENCES SPECIFICALLY TO SCHMIDT 1 55 - (CONTINUED) - 68. STRAUSS IS TOO OLD, OTHER SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO STRAUSS 69. OTHER IDIOSYNCRATIC RESPONSES, E.G., I CHANGE MY COURSE WITH THE WIND 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND, THIRD RESPONSE 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0102 Q.37(3) WHY STRAUSS 3 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0102 LOC 145 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 37-38 0 Q.37(3). REASONS FOR PREFERING STRAUSS: THIRD MENTION ------------------------------------------------------ REFERENCE TO PERSONAL QUALITIES 01. GENERAL, UNSPECIFIED LIKING; FOR EXAMPLE, ATTRACTIVE, LIKE HIM, LIKE HIS STYLE, LIKE HIS TYPE 02. CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS AS, FOR EXAMPLE, (MORE) HONEST, UPRIGHT, OPEN, CLEAR, TRUST INSPIRING, DOWN-TO-EARTH, TRUSTWORTHY, SUPERIOR, OBJECTIVE, CALM, THOUGHTFUL, FAIR, BETTER CHARACTER, BETTER PERSONALITY, GOOD PERSON 0 REFERENCE TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN 10. GOAL-ORIENTED, DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, PRAGMATIC, CAPABLE 11. POISED, INSPIRING 12. CONVINCING, APPEARS (MORE) CONVINCING 13. REPRESENTS HIS POINT OF VIEW, STRONG, UNYIELDING, INDEPENDENT 14. CAN SPEAK WELL, DOES NOT TALK MUCH NONSENSE 15. HAS ELAN, BETTER LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MORE INITIATIVE 16. INTELLIGENT, INTELLECTUAL 17. STRATEGIC MIND, PLANS AHEAD 18. BETTER THAN OTHERS, MORE COMPETENT 19. OTHER REPONSES WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN; NOT HEARD OF ANY DISADVANTAGES YET 0 1 56 - (CONTINUED) - POLITICAL REFERENCE 20. HAS BETTER CAPABILITIES, BETTER VIEWS, GOOD ARGUMENTS, IS BETTER POLITICALLY, MAKES STRONGER POLITICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, HAS PROVED HIMSELF, CAN GOVERN BETTER, HAS FORESIGHT, BETTER CANDIDATE, BETTER MAN 21. HAS GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE, CONTINUES PAST POLICIES, HAS SHOWN HIS METTLE, HIS QUALITIES ARE KNOWN, AM SATISFIED WITH HIS POLICIES 22. IS RESPECTED, POPULAR ABROAD/INTERNATIONALLY 23. THINGS SHOULD STAY AS THEY ARE, THERE IS NO BETTER ONE, REASONS FOR COMPLAINING, HAS BEEN LEADING FRG FOR 10 YEARS, HAS CUT A GOOD FIGURE 24. HAS THINGS WELL IN HAND, HAS PROVEN HIS COMPETENCE 25. BETTER PROGRAM 26. IS A STATESMAN 27. AFTER 10 YEARS IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE 28. IS POWERFUL, HAS A STRONG POWERBASE 29. OTHER RESPONSES WITH POLITICAL REFERENCE 0 SPECIFIC POLITICAL AREAS: DOMESTIC ISSUES 30. ECONOMIC POLICY, ESPECIALLY QUALIFIED FOR ECONOMIC QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS 31. FINANCE POLICIES, IS A FINANCIAL WIZARD, IS MORE COMPETENT WITH MONEY, INFLATION 32. PUBLIC DEBT, CUTBACKS 33. TAX RELIEF 34. DOES SOMETHING ABOUT REDUCING UNEMPLOYMENT 35. SOCIAL POLICIES, PENSIONS 36. FOR LAW AND ORDER, CREATES ORDER, NO MORE UNREST 37. POLICIES WITH REGARD TO GDR, GERMAN-GERMAN RELATIONS, RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 38. REPRESENTS NATIONAL INTERESTS 39. OTHER RESPONSES WITH REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC DOMESTIC POLICIES 0 PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS: FOREIGN RELATIONS 40. EUROPEAN POLICY 41. USA, SECURING THE WESTERN ALLIANCE 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. FOREIGN POLICY, HAS CONTRIBUTED TO GOOD NAME IN THE WORLD, BETTER OPPORTUNITIES ABROAD 44. GUARANTEES PEACE 49. OTHER MENTIONS 0 1 57 - (CONTINUED) - SPECIFIC PARTISAN POLITICAL REFERENCES OR GROUP REFERENCES 50. SHARES MY OPINIONS, REPRESENTS MY INTERESTS, REPRESENTS MY POLITICAL OPINION 51. BELONGS TO MY POLITICAL DIRECTION, TO MY PARTY 52. IS THE CANDIDATE OF THE CDU/CSU, IS A REAL CDU/CSU MAN 53. THE SPD OR SPD/FDP DOES NOT HAVE ANYONE BETTER 54. THE CDU/CSU HAS BETTER PEOPLE, HAS THE BETTER TEAM 55. DOES A LOT FOR WORKERS, EMPLOYEES 56. DOES A LOT FOR ENTREPRENEURS, HAS BETTER CONTACTS TO INDUSTRY 57. KNOWS THE PEOPLE, IS A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE, THINKS ABOUT THE COMMON MAN 58. REASONS WITH REGIONAL REFERENCES, IS A BAVARIAN, IS A HAMBURGER 59. OTHER RESPONSES WITH PARTISAN OR GROUP REFERENCES 0 NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO OPPOSING CANDIDATE 60. CAN'T BE WORSE THAN 61. WITH YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, WITH YOU DON'T 62. DOESN'T TALK AS MUCH NONSENSE AS 63. IS BETTER THAN 64. IS NOT AS RADICAL (DICTATORIAL) AS ..., IS MORE COMPOSED, NOT AS IMPULSIVE AS ..., MORE MODERATE THAN ..., MORE LIBERAL THAN ... 65. ... IS THE LESSER EVIL, I PREFER ... TO ..., ... IS LESS DANGEROUS 66. ... HAS MORE FRIENDS THAN ... 67. SCHMIDT HAS NOT KEPT HIS PROMISES, OTHER REFERENCES SPECIFICALLY TO SCHMIDT 68. STRAUSS IS TOO OLD, OTHER SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO STRAUSS 69. OTHER IDIOSYNCRATIC RESPONSES, E.G., I CHANGE MY COURSE WITH THE WIND 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND, THIRD RESPONSE 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 1 58 - 0 VAR 0103 Q.38(1) WHY SCHMIDT 1 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0103 LOC 147 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 39-40 0 Q.38. AND WHY DO YOU PREFER HELMUT SCHMIDT AS CHANCELLOR? Q.38(1). REASONS FOR PREFERING SCHMIDT: FIRST MENTION ---------------------------------------------------------- THREE MENTIONS CODED, MULTIPLE CODES REFERENCE TO PERSONAL QUALITIES 01. GENERAL, UNSPECIFIED LIKING; FOR EXAMPLE, ATTRACTIVE, LIKE HIM, LIKE HIS STYLE, LIKE HIS TYPE 02. CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS AS, FOR EXAMPLE, (MORE) HONEST, UPRIGHT, OPEN, CLEAR, TRUST INSPIRING, DOWN-TO-EARTH, TRUSTWORTHY, SUPERIOR, OBJECTIVE, CALM, THOUGHTFUL, FAIR, BETTER CHARACTER, BETTER PERSONALITY, GOOD PERSON 0 REFERENCE TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN 10. GOAL-ORIENTED, DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, PRAGMATIC, CAPABLE 11. POISED, INSPIRING 12. CONVINCING, APPEARS (MORE) CONVINCING 13. REPRESENTS HIS POINT OF VIEW, STRONG, UNYIELDING, INDEPENDENT 14. CAN SPEAK WELL, DOES NOT TALK MUCH NONSENSE 15. HAS ELAN, BETTER LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MORE INITIATIVE 16. INTELLIGENT, INTELLECTUAL 17. STRATEGIC MIND, PLANS AHEAD 18. BETTER THAN OTHERS, MORE COMPETENT 19. OTHER REPONSES WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN; NOT HEARD OF ANY DISADVANTAGES YET 0 POLITICAL REFERENCE 20. HAS BETTER CAPABILITIES, BETTER VIEWS, GOOD ARGUMENTS, IS BETTER POLITICALLY, MAKES STRONGER POLITICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, HAS PROVED HIMSELF, CAN GOVERN BETTER, HAS FORESIGHT, BETTER CANDIDATE, BETTER MAN 21. HAS GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE, CONTINUES PAST POLICIES, HAS SHOWN HIS METTLE, HIS QUALITIES ARE KNOWN, AM SATISFIED WITH HIS POLICIES 1 59 - (CONTINUED) - 22. IS RESPECTED, POPULAR ABROAD/INTERNATIONALLY 23. THINGS SHOULD STAY AS THEY ARE, THERE IS NO BETTER ONE, REASONS FOR COMPLAINING, HAS BEEN LEADING FRG FOR 10 YEARS, HAS CUT A GOOD FIGURE 24. HAS THINGS WELL IN HAND, HAS PROVEN HIS COMPETENCE 25. BETTER PROGRAM 26. IS A STATESMAN 27. AFTER 10 YEARS IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE 28. IS POWERFUL, HAS A STRONG POWERBASE 29. OTHER RESPONSES WITH POLITICAL REFERENCE 0 SPECIFIC POLITICAL AREAS: DOMESTIC ISSUES 30. ECONOMIC POLICY, ESPECIALLY QUALIFIED FOR ECONOMIC QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS 31. FINANCE POLICIES, IS A FINANCIAL WIZARD, IS MORE COMPETENT WITH MONEY, INFLATION 32. PUBLIC DEBT, CUTBACKS 33. TAX RELIEF 34. DOES SOMETHING ABOUT REDUCING UNEMPLOYMENT 35. SOCIAL POLICIES, PENSIONS 36. FOR LAW AND ORDER, CREATES ORDER, NO MORE UNREST 37. POLICIES WITH REGARD TO GDR, GERMAN-GERMAN RELATIONS, RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 38. REPRESENTS NATIONAL INTERESTS 39. OTHER RESPONSES WITH REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC DOMESTIC POLICIES 0 PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS: FOREIGN RELATIONS 40. EUROPEAN POLICY 41. USA, SECURING THE WESTERN ALLIANCE 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. FOREIGN POLICY, HAS CONTRIBUTED TO GOOD NAME IN THE WORLD, BETTER OPPORTUNITIES ABROAD 44. GUARANTEES PEACE 49. OTHER MENTIONS 0 SPECIFIC PARTISAN POLITICAL REFERENCES OR GROUP REFERENCES 50. SHARES MY OPINIONS, REPRESENTS MY INTERESTS, REPRESENTS MY POLITICAL OPINION 51. BELONGS TO MY POLITICAL DIRECTION, TO MY PARTY 52. IS THE CANDIDATE OF THE SPD/FDP, IS A REAL SPD/FDP MAN 53. THE CDU/CSU DOES NOT HAVE ANYONE BETTER 54. THE SPD/FDP HAS BETTER PEOPLE, HAS THE BETTER TEAM 1 60 - (CONTINUED) - 55. DOES A LOT FOR WORKERS, EMPLOYEES 56. DOES A LOT FOR ENTREPRENEURS, HAS BETTER CONTACTS TO INDUSTRY 57. KNOWS THE PEOPLE, IS A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE, THINKS ABOUT THE COMMON MAN 58. REASONS WITH REGIONAL REFERENCES, IS A BAVARIAN, IS A HAMBURGER 59. OTHER RESPONSES WITH PARTISAN OR GROUP REFERENCES 0 NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO OPPOSING CANDIDATE 60. CAN'T BE WORSE THAN 61. WITH YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, WITH YOU DON'T 62. DOESN'T TALK AS MUCH NONSENSE AS 63. IS BETTER THAN 64. IS NOT AS RADICAL (DICTATORIAL) AS ..., IS MORE COMPOSED, NOT AS IMPULSIVE AS ..., MORE MODERATE THAN ..., MORE LIBERAL THAN ... 65. ... IS THE LESSER EVIL, I PREFER ... TO ..., ... IS LESS DANGEROUS 66. ... HAS MORE FRIENDS THAN ... 67. SCHMIDT HAS NOT KEPT HIS PROMISES, OTHER REFERENCES SPECIFICALLY TO SCHMIDT 68. STRAUSS IS TOO OLD, OTHER SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO STRAUSS 69. OTHER IDIOSYNCRATIC RESPONSES, E.G., I CHANGE MY COURSE WITH THE WIND 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND, THIRD RESPONSE 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0104 Q.38(2) WHY SCHMIDT 2 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0104 LOC 149 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 41-42 0 Q.38(2). REASONS FOR PREFERING SCHMIDT: SECOND MENTION ------------------------------------------------------- REFERENCE TO PERSONAL QUALITIES 01. GENERAL, UNSPECIFIED LIKING; FOR EXAMPLE, 1 61 - (CONTINUED) - ATTRACTIVE, LIKE HIM, LIKE HIS STYLE, LIKE HIS TYPE 02. CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS AS, FOR EXAMPLE, (MORE) HONEST, UPRIGHT, OPEN, CLEAR, TRUST INSPIRING, DOWN-TO-EARTH, TRUSTWORTHY, SUPERIOR, OBJECTIVE, CALM, THOUGHTFUL, FAIR, BETTER CHARACTER, BETTER PERSONALITY, GOOD PERSON 0 REFERENCE TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN 10. GOAL-ORIENTED, DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, PRAGMATIC, CAPABLE 11. POISED, INSPIRING 12. CONVINCING, APPEARS (MORE) CONVINCING 13. REPRESENTS HIS POINT OF VIEW, STRONG, UNYIELDING, INDEPENDENT 14. CAN SPEAK WELL, DOES NOT TALK MUCH NONSENSE 15. HAS ELAN, BETTER LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MORE INITIATIVE 16. INTELLIGENT, INTELLECTUAL 17. STRATEGIC MIND, PLANS AHEAD 18. BETTER THAN OTHERS, MORE COMPETENT 19. OTHER REPONSES WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN; NOT HEARD OF ANY DISADVANTAGES YET 0 POLITICAL REFERENCE 20. HAS BETTER CAPABILITIES, BETTER VIEWS, GOOD ARGUMENTS, IS BETTER POLITICALLY, MAKES STRONGER POLITICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, HAS PROVED HIMSELF, CAN GOVERN BETTER, HAS FORESIGHT, BETTER CANDIDATE, BETTER MAN 21. HAS GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE, CONTINUES PAST POLICIES, HAS SHOWN HIS METTLE, HIS QUALITIES ARE KNOWN, AM SATISFIED WITH HIS POLICIES 22. IS RESPECTED, POPULAR ABROAD/INTERNATIONALLY 23. THINGS SHOULD STAY AS THEY ARE, THERE IS NO BETTER ONE, REASONS FOR COMPLAINING, HAS BEEN LEADING FRG FOR 10 YEARS, HAS CUT A GOOD FIGURE 24. HAS THINGS WELL IN HAND, HAS PROVEN HIS COMPETENCE 25. BETTER PROGRAM 26. IS A STATESMAN 27. AFTER 10 YEARS IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE 28. IS POWERFUL, HAS A STRONG POWERBASE 29. OTHER RESPONSES WITH POLITICAL REFERENCE 0 SPECIFIC POLITICAL AREAS: DOMESTIC ISSUES 1 62 - (CONTINUED) - 30. ECONOMIC POLICY, ESPECIALLY QUALIFIED FOR ECONOMIC QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS 31. FINANCE POLICIES, IS A FINANCIAL WIZARD, IS MORE COMPETENT WITH MONEY, INFLATION 32. PUBLIC DEBT, CUTBACKS 33. TAX RELIEF 34. DOES SOMETHING ABOUT REDUCING UNEMPLOYMENT 35. SOCIAL POLICIES, PENSIONS 36. FOR LAW AND ORDER, CREATES ORDER, NO MORE UNREST 37. POLICIES WITH REGARD TO GDR, GERMAN-GERMAN RELATIONS, RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 38. REPRESENTS NATIONAL INTERESTS 39. OTHER RESPONSES WITH REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC DOMESTIC POLICIES 0 PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS: FOREIGN RELATIONS 40. EUROPEAN POLICY 41. USA, SECURING THE WESTERN ALLIANCE 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. FOREIGN POLICY, HAS CONTRIBUTED TO GOOD NAME IN THE WORLD, BETTER OPPORTUNITIES ABROAD 44. GUARANTEES PEACE 49. OTHER MENTIONS 0 SPECIFIC PARTISAN POLITICAL REFERENCES OR GROUP REFERENCES 50. SHARES MY OPINIONS, REPRESENTS MY INTERESTS, REPRESENTS MY POLITICAL OPINION 51. BELONGS TO MY POLITICAL DIRECTION, TO MY PARTY 52. IS THE CANDIDATE OF THE SPD/FDP, IS A REAL SPD/FDP MAN 53. THE CDU/CSU DOES NOT HAVE ANYONE BETTER 54. THE SPD/FDP HAS BETTER PEOPLE, HAS THE BETTER TEAM 55. DOES A LOT FOR WORKERS, EMPLOYEES 56. DOES A LOT FOR ENTREPRENEURS, HAS BETTER CONTACTS TO INDUSTRY 57. KNOWS THE PEOPLE, IS A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE, THINKS ABOUT THE COMMON MAN 58. REASONS WITH REGIONAL REFERENCES, IS A BAVARIAN, IS A HAMBURGER 59. OTHER RESPONSES WITH PARTISAN OR GROUP REFERENCES 0 NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO OPPOSING CANDIDATE 60. CAN'T BE WORSE THAN 61. WITH YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, 1 63 - (CONTINUED) - WITH YOU DON'T 62. DOESN'T TALK AS MUCH NONSENSE AS 63. IS BETTER THAN 64. IS NOT AS RADICAL (DICTATORIAL) AS ..., IS MORE COMPOSED, NOT AS IMPULSIVE AS ..., MORE MODERATE THAN ..., MORE LIBERAL THAN ... 65. ... IS THE LESSER EVIL, I PREFER ... TO ..., ... IS LESS DANGEROUS 66. ... HAS MORE FRIENDS THAN ... 67. SCHMIDT HAS NOT KEPT HIS PROMISES, OTHER REFERENCES SPECIFICALLY TO SCHMIDT 68. STRAUSS IS TOO OLD, OTHER SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO STRAUSS 69. OTHER IDIOSYNCRATIC RESPONSES, E.G., I CHANGE MY COURSE WITH THE WIND 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND, THIRD RESPONSE 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0105 Q.38(3) WHY SCHMIDT 3 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0105 LOC 151 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 43-44 0 Q.38(3). REASONS FOR PREFERING SCHMIDT: THIRD MENTION ------------------------------------------------------ REFERENCE TO PERSONAL QUALITIES 01. GENERAL, UNSPECIFIED LIKING; FOR EXAMPLE, ATTRACTIVE, LIKE HIM, LIKE HIS STYLE, LIKE HIS TYPE 02. CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS AS, FOR EXAMPLE, (MORE) HONEST, UPRIGHT, OPEN, CLEAR, TRUST INSPIRING, DOWN-TO-EARTH, TRUSTWORTHY, SUPERIOR, OBJECTIVE, CALM, THOUGHTFUL, FAIR, BETTER CHARACTER, BETTER PERSONALITY, GOOD PERSON 0 REFERENCE TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN 10. GOAL-ORIENTED, DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, PRAGMATIC, CAPABLE 11. POISED, INSPIRING 12. CONVINCING, APPEARS (MORE) CONVINCING 1 64 - (CONTINUED) - 13. REPRESENTS HIS POINT OF VIEW, STRONG, UNYIELDING, INDEPENDENT 14. CAN SPEAK WELL, DOES NOT TALK MUCH NONSENSE 15. HAS ELAN, BETTER LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MORE INITIATIVE 16. INTELLIGENT, INTELLECTUAL 17. STRATEGIC MIND, PLANS AHEAD 18. BETTER THAN OTHERS, MORE COMPETENT 19. OTHER REPONSES WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS A POLITICIAN; NOT HEARD OF ANY DISADVANTAGES YET 0 POLITICAL REFERENCE 20. HAS BETTER CAPABILITIES, BETTER VIEWS, GOOD ARGUMENTS, IS BETTER POLITICALLY, MAKES STRONGER POLITICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, HAS PROVED HIMSELF, CAN GOVERN BETTER, HAS FORESIGHT, BETTER CANDIDATE, BETTER MAN 21. HAS GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE, CONTINUES PAST POLICIES, HAS SHOWN HIS METTLE, HIS QUALITIES ARE KNOWN, AM SATISFIED WITH HIS POLICIES 22. IS RESPECTED, POPULAR ABROAD/INTERNATIONALLY 23. THINGS SHOULD STAY AS THEY ARE, THERE IS NO BETTER ONE, REASONS FOR COMPLAINING, HAS BEEN LEADING FRG FOR 10 YEARS, HAS CUT A GOOD FIGURE 24. HAS THINGS WELL IN HAND, HAS PROVEN HIS COMPETENCE 25. BETTER PROGRAM 26. IS A STATESMAN 27. AFTER 10 YEARS IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE 28. IS POWERFUL, HAS A STRONG POWERBASE 29. OTHER RESPONSES WITH POLITICAL REFERENCE 0 SPECIFIC POLITICAL AREAS: DOMESTIC ISSUES 30. ECONOMIC POLICY, ESPECIALLY QUALIFIED FOR ECONOMIC QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS 31. FINANCE POLICIES, IS A FINANCIAL WIZARD, IS MORE COMPETENT WITH MONEY, INFLATION 32. PUBLIC DEBT, CUTBACKS 33. TAX RELIEF 34. DOES SOMETHING ABOUT REDUCING UNEMPLOYMENT 35. SOCIAL POLICIES, PENSIONS 36. FOR LAW AND ORDER, CREATES ORDER, NO MORE UNREST 37. POLICIES WITH REGARD TO GDR, GERMAN-GERMAN RELATIONS, RELATIONS WITH THE GDR 38. REPRESENTS NATIONAL INTERESTS 39. OTHER RESPONSES WITH REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC DOMESTIC POLICIES 1 65 - (CONTINUED) - PARTICULAR POLICY AREAS: FOREIGN RELATIONS 40. EUROPEAN POLICY 41. USA, SECURING THE WESTERN ALLIANCE 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. FOREIGN POLICY, HAS CONTRIBUTED TO GOOD NAME IN THE WORLD, BETTER OPPORTUNITIES ABROAD 44. GUARANTEES PEACE 49. OTHER MENTIONS 0 SPECIFIC PARTISAN POLITICAL REFERENCES OR GROUP REFERENCES 50. SHARES MY OPINIONS, REPRESENTS MY INTERESTS, REPRESENTS MY POLITICAL OPINION 51. BELONGS TO MY POLITICAL DIRECTION, TO MY PARTY 52. IS THE CANDIDATE OF THE SPD/FDP, IS A REAL SPD/FDP MAN 53. THE CDU/CSU DOES NOT HAVE ANYONE BETTER 54. THE SPD/FDP HAS BETTER PEOPLE, HAS THE BETTER TEAM 55. DOES A LOT FOR WORKERS, EMPLOYEES 56. DOES A LOT FOR ENTREPRENEURS, HAS BETTER CONTACTS TO INDUSTRY 57. KNOWS THE PEOPLE, IS A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE, THINKS ABOUT THE COMMON MAN 58. REASONS WITH REGIONAL REFERENCES, IS A BAVARIAN, IS A HAMBURGER 59. OTHER RESPONSES WITH PARTISAN OR GROUP REFERENCES 0 NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO OPPOSING CANDIDATE 60. CAN'T BE WORSE THAN 61. WITH YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, WITH YOU DON'T 62. DOESN'T TALK AS MUCH NONSENSE AS 63. IS BETTER THAN 64. IS NOT AS RADICAL (DICTATORIAL) AS ..., IS MORE COMPOSED, NOT AS IMPULSIVE AS ..., MORE MODERATE THAN ..., MORE LIBERAL THAN ... 65. ... IS THE LESSER EVIL, I PREFER ... TO ..., ... IS LESS DANGEROUS 66. ... HAS MORE FRIENDS THAN ... 67. SCHMIDT HAS NOT KEPT HIS PROMISES, OTHER REFERENCES SPECIFICALLY TO SCHMIDT 68. STRAUSS IS TOO OLD, OTHER SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO STRAUSS 69. OTHER IDIOSYNCRATIC RESPONSES, E.G., I CHANGE MY 1 66 - (CONTINUED) - COURSE WITH THE WIND 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND, THIRD RESPONSE 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0106 Q.39 OTHER CDU/CSU CAND MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0106 LOC 153 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 45-46 0 Q.39. WOULD YOU PERSONALLY HAVE PREFERRED A CDU/CSU CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR OTHER THAN FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS? (IF YES: WHO?) ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. ALBRECHT 02. BARZEL 03. CARSTENS 04. KOHL 05. LEISLER KIEP 06. STOLTENBERG 07. OTHER NAMES 08. ANTI-STRAUSS RESPONSES (EG. ANYBODY ELSE) 09. OTHER RESPONSES LIKE: NO ONE, THEY ARE ALL ALIKE 10. NO 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0107 Q.40 OTHER SPD CANDIDATE MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0107 LOC 155 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 47-48 0 Q.40. PERSONALLY, WOULD YOU HAVE PREFERRED ANOTHER CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR FOR THE SPD THAN HELMUT SCHMIDT? (IF SO, WHOM?) --------------------------------------------------------- 01. BRANDT 02. HAUFF 03. MATTHOEFER 04. RAVENS 05. HNAS-JOCHEN VOGEL 06. WEHNER 1 67 - (CONTINUED) - 07. OTHER NAMES 08. ANTI-SCHMIDT RESPONSES 09. OTHER RESPONSES LIKE: SPD HAS NO OTHERS, IT DOESN'T MATTER 10. NO OTHER CANDIDATE PREFERED 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 99. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0108 Q.104 STRAUSS EFFECT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0108 LOC 157 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 49 0 Q.41. PEOPLE HOLD VARIOUS VIEWS ON THE CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDACY OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS. SOME SAY THAT THE CANDIDACY OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS IMPROVES THE CHANCES OF THE CDU/CSU IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION. OTHERS SAY RATHER THAT THE CANDIDACY REDUCES THE CHANCES FOR THE CDU/CSU. WHAT DO YOU THINK? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. BETTER CHANCE 2. WORSE CHANCE 3. SAME 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY, JUNE, AND SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0109 Q.42 UNIONS CORRECTLY MD=0 REF 0109 LOC 158 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 50 0 Q.42. ONE MORE QUESTION ABOUR LABOR UNIONS: IN YOUR OPINION, DO THE UNIONS IN GERMANY ACT BASICALLY CORRECTLY OR NOT CORRECTLY? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CORRECTLY 2. NOT CORRECTLY 3. UNDECIDED 4. NO OPINION 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 0 1 68 - 0 VAR 0110 Q.43 SKIRT LENGTH MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0110 LOC 159 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 51 0 Q.43. NOW A QUESTION ABOUT WOMEN'S FASHION. WHICH SKIRT LENGTH DO YOU LIKE BEST, MINI (VERY SHORT), COVERING THE KNEE, MIDI (DOWN TO THE CALF), OR MAXI (VERY LONG)? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. MINI 2. COVERING THE KNEE 3. MIDI 4. MAXI 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JUNE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0111 Q.44 DEMOCRACY IN GFR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0111 LOC 160 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 52 0 Q.44. WHAT WOULD YOU GENERALLY SAY ABOUT DEMOCRACY IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THAT IS, ABOUT OUT POLITICAL PARTIES AND OUR ENTIRE POLITICAL SYSTEM? ARE YOU VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED OR NOT SATISFIED WITH IT? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY SATISFIED 2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL, JUNE, NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0112 Q.45 US REACTN AFGHANSTN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0112 LOC 161 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 53 0 Q.45. AT THE END OF LAST YEAR SOVIET SOLDIERS MARCHED INTO AFGHANISTAN. IN RESPONSE, THE UNITED STATES TOOK A NUMBER OF ECONOMIC MEASURES AGAINST THE SOVIET UNION, EG. A DRASTIC REDUCTION OF GRAIN SHIPMENTS. DO YOU THINK THAT THESE MEASURES GO TOO FAR, ARE SUFFICIENT, OR DO NOT GO FAR 1 69 - (CONTINUED) - ENOUGH? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. GO TOO FAR 2. SUFFICIENT 3. DO NOT GO FAR ENOUGH 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0113 Q.46 OLYMPIC PARTICIPATN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0113 LOC 162 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 54 0 Q.46. THIS SUMMER THE OLYMPIC GAMES WILL TAKE PLACE IN MOSCOW. SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THESE GAMES BECAUSE OF WHAT HAPPENED IN AFGHANISTAN, OR SHOULD IT PARTICIPATE IN SPITE OF THAT? ----------------------------------------------------------- DUE TO WHAT HAPPENED IN AFGHANISTAN THERE ARE DISCUSSIONS AS TO WHETHER GERMAN ATHLETES SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES OR NOT. WE HAVE NOTED HERE THREE OPINIONS ON THIS QUESTION: WHICH OF THESE WOULD YOU AGREE WITH MOST? 1. SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE THE WEST GERMAN ATHLETES SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE 2. WEST GERMAN ATHLETES SHOULD ONLY PARTICIPATE IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES IN MOSCOW IF THERE ARE NO FLAGS OR NATIONAL ANTHEMS. 3. SHOULD PARTICIPATE WEST GERMAN ATHLETES SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES IN MOSCOW IN ANY CASE. 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MAY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0114 Q.46(A) PART IN ANY CASE MD=0 REF 0114 LOC 163 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 55 0 Q.46(A). LET US ASSUME THAT THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER WESTERN NATIONS STAY AWAY FROM THE OLYMPIC GAMES. IN THIS 1 70 - (CONTINUED) - CASE, SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC ALSO WITHDRAW, OR SHOULD IT PARTICIPATE IN ANY CASE? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. WITHDRAW 2. PARTICIPATE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0115 Q.47 EAST EUROPE RELATNS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0115 LOC 164 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 56 0 Q.47. FOR MANY YEARS NOW, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC HAS BEEN TRYING TO IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH THE EAST (EASTERN EUROPE). SHOULD THESE NEGOTIATIONS BE STOPPED NOW, OR SHOULD THEY BE CONTINUED NOW ESPECIALLY? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. STOPPED 2. CONTINUED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0116 Q.48 DISARMAMENT TALKS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0116 LOC 165 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 57 0 Q.48. BETWEEN EAST AND WEST THERE HAVE RECENTLY BEEN FREQUENT NEGOTIATIONS ABOUT DISARMAMENT. SHOULD SUCH DISARMAMENT NEGOTIATIONS BE CONTINUED IN SPITE OF AFGHANISTAN, SHOULD THEY BE INTERRUPTED FOR THE TIME BEING, OR SHOULD THE WEST NO LONGER NEGOTIATE WITH THE EAST ABOUT DISARMAMENT? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. CONTINUE 2. INTERUPT 3. NO MORE NEGOTIATIONS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY 9. NA 0 1 71 - 0 VAR 0117 Q.49 SUPERPOWERS WAR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0117 LOC 166 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 58 0 Q.49. DO YOU THINK THAT THERE WILL BE A WAR BETWEEN THE SUPERPOWERS OVER AFGHANISTAN, OR DON'T YOU THINK SO? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. I THINK THERE WILL BE WAR. 2. I DON'T THINK THERE WILL BE WAR. 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0118 Q.49(A) GERMAN INVOLVMNT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0118 LOC 167 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 59 0 Q.49(A). (IF R THINKS THERE WILL BE WAR) DO YOU THINK THAT WE WILL BE DRAWN INTO THIS WAR, OR DON'T YOU THINK SO? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. I THINK SO. 2. I DON'T THINK SO. 0. INAP., CODED 2 OR 9 IN Q.49; NOT ASKED IN FEBRUARY-NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0119 Q.50 MORE TV STATIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0119 LOC 168 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 60 0 Q.50. AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TWO NATIONWIDE TELEVISION CHANNELS, "ARD" AND "ZDF". SHOULD THERE BE OTHER NATIONAL STATIONS WHICH ARE RADICALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE EXISTING ONES, OR SHOULD THERE BE NO FURTHER STATIONS? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHOULD BE OTHER STATIONS 2. NO FURTHER STATIONS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY 9. NA 1 72 - 0 VAR 0120 Q.50(A) OWNERSHIP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0120 LOC 169 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 61 0 Q.50(A). (IF R WANTS MORE TV CHANNELS) SHOULD THESE OTHER STATIONS BE PRIVATELY OR PUBLICLY ("OEFFENTLICH-RECHLICHEN") OWNED? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. PRIVATE 2. PUBLIC 0. INAP., CODED 2 OR 9 IN Q.50; NOT ASKED IN FEBRUARY-NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0121 Q.51 LIKE JOGGING MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0121 LOC 170 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 62 0 Q.51. MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE JOGGING. DO YOU LIKE THIS SPORT OR NOT? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE IT 2. DON'T LIKE IT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JANUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0122 Q.51(A) JOGGER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0122 LOC 171 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 63 0 Q.51(A). (IF R LIKES JOGGING) DO YOU YOURSELF JOG? --------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, REGULARLY 2. YES, OCCASIONALLY 3. NO 0. INAP., CODED 2 OR 9 IN Q.51; NOT ASKED IN FEBRUARY-NOVEMBER 9. NA 1 73 - 0 VAR 0123 Q.52 W EUR-US RELATIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0123 LOC 172 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 64 0 Q.52. CURRENTLY THERE ARE DIFFERENT VIEWS ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN WESTERN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES. WE HAVE LISTED SOME OF THEM HERE AND WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHICH OF THESE YOU AGREE WITH MOST? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE WEST-EUROPEAN COUNTRIES SHOULD CONDUCT THEIR POLICY TOWARD THE SOVIET UNION INDEPENDENTLY OF THE US. 2. THE WEST-EUROPEAN COUNTRIES SHOULD CONDUCT THEIR POLICY TOWARD THE SOVIET UNION JOINTLY AND AS EQUAL PARTNERS WITH THE US. 3. THE WEST-EUROPEAN COUNTRIES SHOULD CONDUCT THEIR POLICY TOWARD THE SOVIET UNION ACCORDING TO THE POLICIES OF THE US. 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0124 Q.53 INVOLVEMENT USEFUL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0124 LOC 173 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 65 0 Q.53. DO YOU THINK THAT ONE CAN ACHIEVE ANYTHING BY BEING INVOLVED IN POLITICS? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, AT A HIGH LEVEL (FOREIGN POLICY OR DOMESTIC POLICY) 2. YES, AT THE MUNICIPAL OR COMMUNITY LEVEL 3. YES, IN THE PERSONAL ENVIRONMENT, SUCH AS SCHOOL, WORKPLACE, OR GROUP 4. YES, 1 AND 2 5. YES, 1 THROUGH 3 6. YES, 1 AND 3 7. YES, 2 AND 3 8. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY 9. NA 0 1 74 - 0 VAR 0125 Q.54 POLITICAL TOLERANCE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0125 LOC 174 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 66 0 Q.54. HOW WOULD YOU RATE YOUR TOLERANCE TOWARD PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEAS? ARE YOU BASICALLY TOLERANT OF ALL OTHER POLITICAL VIEWS OR ARE THERE POLITICAL VIEWS WHICH YOU CAN NOT TOLERATE? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. TOLERANT OF ALL POLITICAL VIEWS 2. THERE ARE SOME POLITICAL VIEWS I CANNOT TOLERATE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0126 Q.55 PARTY REPS R MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0126 LOC 175 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 67-68 0 Q.55. IS THERE A POLITICAL PARTY WHICH YOU BELIEVE REPRESENTS YOUR INTERESTS AND CONCERNS, OR IS THERE NO SUCH PARTY? ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. SPD 02. CDU/CSU 03. FDP 04. GREENS 05. SPD AND FDP 06. SPD AND CDU/CSU 07. FDP AND CDU/CSU 08. ALL PARTIES 09. OTHER PARTIES, OTHER COMBINATIONS 10. NO, NO PARTY/PARTY DOESN'T EXIST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY 99. DK, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0127 Q.56 PARTY DIFFERENCES MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0127 LOC 177 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 69 0 Q.56. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE POLITICAL PARTIES HERE IN 1 75 - (CONTINUED) - THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC? ARE THE LARGE POLITICAL PARTIES SO SIMILAR IN THEIR PRONOUNCEMENTS AND THEIR POLITICAL ACTIONS THAT IT REALLY DOES NOT MATTER WHICH PARTY ONE VOTES FOR, OR DO YOU SEE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. PARTIES ARE SIMILAR 2. THERE ARE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0128 Q.57 OWN CAR MD=0 REF 0128 LOC 178 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 70 0 Q.57. DO YOU OR DOES YOUR FAMILY OWN A CAR? -------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY, APRIL 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0129 Q.57(A) HOW HIGH GAS MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0129 LOC 179 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 71-72 0 Q.57(A). (IF R OR HIS/HER FAMILY USE A CAR) HOW HIGH CAN THE PRICE OF GASOLINE GO BEFORE YOU START LEAVING YOUR CAR AT HOME? ---------------------------------------------------------- 10. DM 1.00 PER LITRE 11. DM 1.10 PER LITRE . . 98. DM 9.80 PER LITRE 00. INAP., CODED 2 IN Q.57; ASKED ONLY IN FEBRUARY 99. NA 0 1 76 - 0 VAR 0130 Q.58(A1) SCHMIDT RESPBLE MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0130 LOC 181 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 73-74 0 Q.58(A). WE HAVE COLLECTED HERE SOME CHARACTERISTICS WHICH A CHANCELLOR CAN HAVE. TO THE LEFT AND TO THE RIGHT OF THE SCALE ARE OPPOSITE ATTRIBUTES. PLEASE MARK WHICH CHARACTERISTICS HELMUT SCHMIDT HAS, IN YOUR OPINION. MARK THE SCALE POSITION WHICH BEST FITS SCHMIDT. THE MORE THE LEFT OR RIGHT ATTRIBUTE FITS, THE FURTHER TO THE LEFT OR RIGHT YOU SHOULD PUT YOUR MARK. Q.58(A1). HELMUT SCHMIDT: RESPONSIBLE OR IRRESPONSIBLE ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. RESPONSIBLE . . 11. IRRESPONSIBLE 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0131 Q.58(A2) SCHMIDT ARROGNT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0131 LOC 183 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 75-76 0 Q.58(A2). HELMUT SCHMIDT: ARROGANT OR MODEST --------------------------------------------- 01. ARROGANT . . 11. MODEST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 1 77 - 0 VAR 0132 Q.58(A3) SCHMIDT DYNAMIC MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0132 LOC 185 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 77-78 0 Q.58(A3). HELMUT SCHMIDT: DYNAMIC OR HESITATING ------------------------------------------------ 01. DYNAMIC . . 11. HESITATING 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0133 Q.58(A4) SCHMIDT CONSVTV MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0133 LOC 187 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 79-80 0 Q.58(A4). HELMUT SCHMIDT: CONSERVATIVE OR MODERN ------------------------------------------------- 01. CONSERVATIVE . . 11. MODERN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '04' DK 4 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- 1 78 - 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1 79 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 4 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0134 Q.58(A5) SCHMIDT TRUSTWY MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0134 LOC 189 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 21-22 0 Q.58(A5). HELMUT SCHMIDT; TRUSTWORTHY OR UNTRUSTWORTHY ------------------------------------------------------- 01. TRUSTWORTHY . . 11. UNTRUSTWORTHY 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0135 Q.58(A6) SCHMIDT ILLTMPR MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0135 LOC 191 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 23-24 0 Q.58(A6). HELMUT SCHMIDT: ILLTEMPERED OR CALM/MATTER OF FACT -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LACKING CONTROL . . 11. CALM, MATTER OF FACT 1 80 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0136 Q.58(B1) STRAUSS RESPNBL MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0136 LOC 193 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 25-26 0 Q.58(B). AND WHICH ATTRIBUTES FIT FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS? PLEASE MARK THE SCALE SO THAT IT BEST FITS STRAUSS. Q.58(B1). FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS: RESPONSIBLE OR IRRESPONSIBLE ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. RESPONSIBLE . . 11. IRRESPONSIBLE 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0137 Q.58(B2) STRAUSS ARROGNT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0137 LOC 195 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 27-28 0 Q.58(B2). FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS: ARROGANT OR MODEST -------------------------------------------------- 01. ARROGANT . . 11. MODEST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 1 81 - 0 VAR 0138 Q.58(B3) STRAUSS DYNAMIC MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0138 LOC 197 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 29-30 0 Q.58(B3). FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS: DYNAMIC OR HESITATING ----------------------------------------------------- 01. DYNAMIC . . 11. HESITATING 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0139 Q.58(B4) STRAUSS CONSVTV MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0139 LOC 199 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 31-32 0 Q.58(B4). FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS: CONSERVATIVE OR MODERN ------------------------------------------------------ 01. CONSERVATIVE . . 11. MODERN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0140 Q.58(B5) STRAUSS TRUSTWY MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0140 LOC 201 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 33-34 0 Q.58(B5). FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS: TRUSTWORTHY OR UNTRUSTWORTHY ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. TRUSTWORTHY 1 82 - (CONTINUED) - . . 11. UNTRUSTWORTHY 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0141 Q.58(B6) STRAUSS ILLTMPR MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0141 LOC 203 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 35-36 0 Q.58(B6). FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS: ILL-TEMPERED OR CALM/MATTER OF FACT ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. LACKING CONTROL . . 11. CALM, MATTER OF FACT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0142 Q.58(C1) IDEAL RESPONSBL MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0142 LOC 205 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 37-38 0 Q.58(C). AND WHAT ATTRIBUTES SHOULD AN IDEAL CHANCELLOR POSSESS? AGAIN, PLEASE MARK THE APPROPRIATE SCALE POSITION. Q.58(C1). IDEAL CHANCELLOR: RESPONSIBLE OR IRRESPONSIBLE ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. RESPONSIBLE . . 11. IRRESPONSIBLE 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 1 83 - 0 VAR 0143 Q.58(C2) IDEAL ARROGANT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0143 LOC 207 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 39-40 0 Q.58(C2). IDEAL CHANCELLOR: ARROGANT OR MODEST ----------------------------------------------- 01. ARROGANT . . 11. MODEST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0144 Q.58(C3) IDEAL DYNAMIC MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0144 LOC 209 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 41-42 0 Q.58(C3). IDEAL CHANCELLOR: DYNAMIC OR HESITATING -------------------------------------------------- 01. DYNAMIC . . 11. HESITATING 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0145 Q.58(C4) IDEAL CONSERVTV MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0145 LOC 211 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 43-44 0 Q.58(C4). IDEAL CHANCELLOR: CONSERVATIVE OR MODERN --------------------------------------------------- 01. CONSERVATIVE 1 84 - (CONTINUED) - . . 11. MODERN 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0146 Q.58(C5) IDEAL TRSTWRTHY MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0146 LOC 213 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 45-46 0 Q.58(C5). IDEAL CHANCELLOR: TRUSTWORTHY OR UNTRUSTWORTHY --------------------------------------------------------- 01. TRUSTWORTHY . . 11. UNTRUSTWORTHY 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0147 Q.58(C6) IDEAL ILLTEMPRD MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0147 LOC 215 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 47-48 0 Q.58(C6). IDEAL CHANCELLOR: ILLTEMPERED OR CALM/MATTER OF FACT ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. LACKING CONTROL . . 11. CALM, MATTER OF FACT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 1 85 - 0 VAR 0148 Q.59 PARTIES WLL BE FAIR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0148 LOC 217 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 49 0 Q.59. THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO BE FAIR DURING THE 1980 ELECTION CAMPAIGN AND NOT TO SLANDER THE OPPOSITION. DO YOU THINK THAT THE PARTIES AND POLITICIANS WILL KEEP THIS AGREEMENT, OR DON'T YOU THINK SO? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. THEY WILL KEEP THE AGREEMENT. 2. THEY WILL NOT KEEP THE AGREEMENT. 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0149 Q.60 LOSE WEIGHT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0149 LOC 218 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 50 0 Q.60. IN THE SPRINGTIME ESPECIALLY, MANY PEOPLE HAVE THE WISH TO TAKE OFF WEIGHT. HOW ABOUT YOU? WOULD YOU LIKE TO LOSE SOME WEIGHT, TOO, OR ARE YOU QUITE HAPPY WITH YOUR WEIGHT? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE TO TAKE OFF WEIGHT 2. HAPPY WITH WEIGHT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0150 Q.60(A) HOW LOSE WEIGHT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0150 LOC 219 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 51-52 0 Q.60(A). AND WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO LOSE SOME WEIGHT? ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. EAT LESS, EAT ONLY HALF AS MUCH, FAST, BE MODERATE IN EATING 02. DIET, EAT FEWER CALORIES 03. DRINK LESS 1 86 - (CONTINUED) - 04. EAT AND DRINK LESS 05. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 06. MORE ACTIVITY, A LOT OF ACTIVITY, JOGGING, BICYCLING 07. SWIMMING 08. TAKE WALKS 09. MORE OR A LOT OF WORK (GARDENING) 10. LESS FOOD AND DRINK AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 11. NOTHING, IN VAIN ANYHOW 12. OTHER 00. INAP., CODED 2 IN Q.60; ASKED ONLY IN MARCH 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0151 Q.61 BOYCOTT IRAN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0151 LOC 221 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 53 0 Q.61. THE HOSTAGES IN TEHERAN ARE STILL NOT FREE. FOR THIS REASON, THE US HAS DECIDED TO ENACT A COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC BOYCOTT AGAINST IRAN (PERSIA), AND HAS ASKED THEIR ALLIES TO DO THE SAME. WHAT DO YOU THINK: SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC STOP THE TRADE WITH IRAN OR NOT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STOP TRADE 2. DON'T STOP TRADE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0152 Q.62 OIL SHORTAGE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0152 LOC 222 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 54 0 Q.62. IF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC STOPS ALL TRADE WITH IRAN, IRAN WILL SEND NO MORE OIL TO THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. AS A RESULT, GASOLINE AND HEATING OIL COULD BECOME SCARCE. WHAT SHOULD BE DONE IN THAT CASE? SHOULD THE PRICES FOR GASOLINE AND HEATING OIL BE INCREASED DRASTICALLY, OR SHOULD GASOLINE AND HEATING OIL BE AVAILABLE ONLY WITH (RATIONING) COUPONS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. INCREASE PRICES 1 87 - (CONTINUED) - 2. RATIONING 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN APRIL 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0153 Q.63A OFFICIALS CARE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0153 LOC 223 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 55 0 Q.63. HERE ARE SEVERAL OPINIONS WHICH PEOPLE HOLD. ARE YOU MORE IN AGREEMENT OR MORE IN DISAGREEMENT WITH THESE VIEWS? Q.63A. I DO NOT THINK PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE MUCH WHAT PEOPLE LIKE ME THINK. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0154 Q.63B TOO COMPLICATED MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0154 LOC 224 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 56 0 Q.63B. SOMETIMES POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT SEEM SO COMPLICATED THAT A PERSON LIKE ME CANNOT REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 9. NA 0 1 88 - 0 VAR 0155 Q.63C SAY ABOUT GOV'T MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0155 LOC 225 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 57 0 Q.63C. PEOPLE LIKE ME DO NOT HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES. --------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0156 Q.63D PARTIES DIFFER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0156 LOC 226 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 58 0 Q.63D. THE PARTIES REPRESENTED IN THE BUNDESTAG BARELY DIFFER IN THEIR POLITICAL VIEWS AND GOALS. ------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0157 Q.64 MONEY FOR HEAT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0157 LOC 227 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 59 0 Q.64. HEATING ONE'S HOUSE OR APARTMENT WAS MORE EXPENSIVE LAST WINTER THAN EVER BEFORE. WHERE DID YOU SAVE THE MONEY NEEDED FOR THE ADDITIONAL HEATING COSTS? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. VACATION TRAVEL 2. WEEKEND TRIPS 3. GOING OUT, HAVING FUN 1 89 - (CONTINUED) - 4. CLOTHING 5. EATING AND DRINKING 6. FURNITURE 7. SAVE LESS 8. OWE MONEY NOW 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0158 Q.65 ALBRECHT BTTR CHNC MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0158 LOC 228 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 60 0 Q.65. AND IF RIGHT NOW ERNST ALBRECHT WERE THE CDU/CSU CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR, INSTEAD OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS, WOULD THE CHANCES FOR THE CDU/CSU BE BETTER, WORSE, OR WOULD THAT NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. BETTER 2. WORSE 3. NO DIFFERENCE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN MAY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0159 Q.66(A1) STABLE PRICES 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0159 LOC 229 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 61 0 Q.66. VARIOUS TASKS AND GOALS ARE BEING DISCUSSED IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC RIGHT NOW. FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT ONES WE HAVE NOTED SOME DEMANDS AND SUB-AREAS. PLEASE TELL US FOR EACH PROBLEM WHICH TWO AREAS ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU PERSONALLY. Q.66(A1). KEEP PRICES STABLE FIRST MENTION ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. FOOD AND ALCOHOL 2. CLOTHING, SHOES 3. HEATING, RENTS, HOUSING 4. LEISURE AND VACATIONS 1 90 - (CONTINUED) - 5. CARS AND GASOLINE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0160 Q.66(A2) STABLE PRICES 2 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0160 LOC 230 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 62 0 Q.66(A2). KEEP PRICES STABLE SECOND MENTION ------------------------------------------------------- 1. FOOD AND ALCOHOL 2. CLOTHING, SHOES 3. HEATING, RENTS, HOUSING 4. LEISURE AND VACATIONS 5. CARS AND GASOLINE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0161 Q.66(B1) JOB SECURITY 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0161 LOC 231 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 63 0 Q.66(B1). JOB SECURITY FIRST MENTION -------------------------------------------------------- 1. OWN JOB 2. JOBS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE 3. JOBS FOR WOMEN 4. JOBS FOR PEOPLE OVER 50 5. JOBS FOR HANDICAPPED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 1 91 - 0 VAR 0162 Q.66(B2) JOB SECURITY 2 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0162 LOC 232 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 64 0 Q.66(B2). JOB SECURITY SECOND MENTION --------------------------------------------------------- 1. OWN JOB 2. JOBS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE 3. JOBS FOR WOMEN 4. JOBS FOR PEOPLE OVER 50 5. JOBS FOR HANDICAPPED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0163 Q.66(C1) EAST EUROPE 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0163 LOC 233 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 65 0 Q.66(C1). RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE FIRST MENTION -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ECONOMIC RELATIONS 2. ATHLETIC EXCHANGES 3. DISARMAMENT AND PEACE EFFORTS 4. CULTURAL AFFAIRS 5. HUMAN RIGHTS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0164 Q.66(C2) EAST EUROPE 2 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0164 LOC 234 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 66 0 Q.66(C2). RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE SECOND MENTION -------------------------------------------------------- 1 92 - (CONTINUED) - 1. ECONOMIC RELATIONS 2. ATHLETIC EXCHANGES 3. DISARMAMENT AND PEACE EFFORTS 4. CULTURAL AFFAIRS 5. HUMAN RIGHTS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0165 Q.66(D1) US RELATIONS 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0165 LOC 235 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 67 0 Q.66(D1). GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE US FIRST MENTION ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. ECONOMIC RELATIONS 2. ATHLETIC EXCHANGES 3. MILITARY COOPERATION 4. MUTUAL POLITICAL SUPPORT 5. RECOGNITION OF THE AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ROLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0166 Q.66(D2) US RELATIONS 2 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0166 LOC 236 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 68 0 Q.66(D2). GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE US SECOND MENTION ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. ECONOMIC RELATIONS 2. ATHLETIC EXCHANGES 3. MILITARY COOPERATION 1 93 - (CONTINUED) - 4. MUTUAL POLITICAL SUPPORT 5. RECOGNITION OF THE AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ROLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0167 Q.66(E1) ENVIRONMENT 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0167 LOC 237 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 69 0 Q.66(E1). MORE EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FIRST MENTION --------------------------------------------------------- 1. AIR POLLUTION 2. NOISE POLLUTION 3. WATER POLLUTION 4. UNCONTROLLED CITY GROWTH (SPREADING) 5. TOO MANY EXPRESSWAYS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0168 Q.66(E2) ENVIRONMENT 2 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0168 LOC 238 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 70 0 Q.66(E2). MORE EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SECOND MENTION ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. AIR POLLUTION 2. NOISE POLLUTION 3. WATER POLLUTION 4. UNCONTROLLED CITY GROWTH (SPREADING) 5. TOO MANY EXPRESSWAYS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 1 94 - 0 VAR 0169 Q.66(F1) ENERGY 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0169 LOC 239 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 71 0 Q.66(F1). SECURE ENERGY SUPPLIES FIRST MENTION ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 2. MORE COAL-BURNING POWER PLANTS 3. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES 4. DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY SAVINGS MEASURES 5. LONG-TERM TREATIES WITH OIL-PRODUCING COUNTRIES 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0170 Q.66(F2) ENERGY 2 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0170 LOC 240 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 72 0 Q.66(F2). SECURE ENERGY SUPPLIES SECOND MENTION ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 2. MORE COAL-BURNING POWER PLANTS 3. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES 4. DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY SAVINGS MEASURES 5. LONG-TERM TREATIES WITH OIL-PRODUCING COUNTRIES 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0171 Q.67 CLEANER CAR MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0171 LOC 241 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 73 0 Q.67. TECHNICALLY IT IS POSSILBE TO BUILD LESS POLLUTING AND THUS MOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND CARS WITHOUT GREAT 1 95 - (CONTINUED) - DIFFICULTY, WHICH ARE, HOWEVER, MORE EXPENSIVE. HOW MUCH MORE ARE YOU WILLING TO PAY FOR A MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND CAR? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. UP TO DM 300.00 MORE 2. UP TO DM 500.00 MORE 3. UP TO DM 1,000.00 MORE 4. UP TO DM 1,500.00 MORE 5. UP TO DM 2,000.00 MORE 6. MORE THAN DM 2,000.00 MORE 7. NO HIGHER PRICE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 8. DON'T DRIVE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0172 Q.68 MOSCOW OLYMPICS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0172 LOC 242 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 74 0 Q.68. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES IN MOSCOW THIS SUMMER. DO YOU THINK THAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. RIGHT 2. WRONG 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN JULY 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0173 Q.69 VOTE FOR SAME PARTY MD=0 OR GE 7 REF 0173 LOC 243 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 75 0 Q.69. DO YOU ALWAYS VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY? --------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 7. NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE BEFORE 8. NEVER VOTED BEFORE 1 96 - 0 VAR 0174 Q.70 WHERE LAST ELECTION MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0174 LOC 244 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 76-77 0 Q.70. WHERE WERE YOU ELIGIBLE TO VOTE 4 YEARS AGO FOR THE PREVIOUS FEDERAL ELECTION : HERE IN THIS "BUNDESLAND" OR IN ANOTHER "BUNDESLAND"? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. HERE IN THIS "BUNDESLAND" 0 IN ANOTHER "BUNDESLAND", NAMELY: 02. SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN 03. HAMBURG 04. LOWER SAXONY 05. BREMEN 06. NORTHRHINE-WESTPHALIA 07. HESSEN 08. RHINELAND-PALATINATE 09. BADEN-WUERTTEMBERG 10. BAVARIA 11. SAARLAND 00. INAP., CODED 7 OR 8 IN Q.69; ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0175 Q.71 SATSFD PARTY CANDT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0175 LOC 246 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 78 0 Q.71. DO YOU TEND TO BE SATISFIED OR DISSATISFIED WITH THE CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDATE OF YOUR PARTY? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SATISFIED 2. DISSATISFIED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 1 97 - 0 VAR 0176 Q.72 NEED GREENS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0176 LOC 247 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 79 0 Q.72. FOR THE FIRST TIME THE "GREENS" ARE PRESENTING CANDIDATES FOR THE FEDERAL ELECTION ON OCTOBER 5. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE PROBLEMS HERE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC, WHAT DO YOU THINK: DO WE NEED TO HAVE THE "GREENS" IN THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT OR NOT? . ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. NEED TO HAVE THE "GREENS" 2. DON'T NEED THE "GREENS" 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0177 Q.73 GREENS LEFT-RIGHT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0177 LOC 248 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 80 0 Q.73. IN YOUR VIEW, ARE THE "GREENS" POLITICALLY MORE LEFT, MORE IN THE CENTER, OR MORE RIGHT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. MORE LEFT 2. MORE IN THE CENTER 3. MORE RIGHT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '05' DK 5 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- 1 98 - 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1 99 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 5 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0178 Q.74(A)/75(A) SPD 1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0178 LOC 249 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 21-25 0 Q.74. NOW COULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHAT, IN YOUR OPINION, ARE THE GOOD AND THE BAD POINTS OF THE FOLLOWING POLITICAL PARTIES: THE SPD, THE CDU/CSU, AND THE FDP. LET'S TAKE THE SPD FIRST: WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE SPD? Q.75. AND WHAT DO YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE SPD? Q.74(A)/Q.75(A). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0179 Q.74(B)/75(B) SPD 2 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0179 LOC 254 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 26-30 0 Q.74(B)/Q.75(B). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT SPD: SECOND MENTION --------------------------------------------------------- 1 100 - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, NO SECOND MENTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0180 Q.74(C)/75(C) SPD 3 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0180 LOC 259 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 31-35 0 Q.74(C)/Q.75(C). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, NO THIRD MENTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0181 Q.76(A)/77(A) CDU 1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0181 LOC 264 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 36-40 0 Q.76. AND NOW, HOW ABOUT THE GOOD AND THE BAD POINTS ABOUT THE CDU/CSU. WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE CDU/CSU? Q.76. LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION Q.77. AND WHAT DO YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE CDU/CSU? Q.76(A)/Q.77(A). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0182 Q.76(B)/77(B) CDU 2 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0182 LOC 269 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 41-45 0 Q.76(B)/Q.77(B) LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 101 - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, NO SECOND MENTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0183 Q.76(C)/77(C) CDU 3 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0183 LOC 274 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 46-50 0 Q.76(C)/Q.77(C). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, NO THIRD MENTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0184 Q.78(A)/79(A) FDP 1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0184 LOC 279 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 51-55 0 Q.78. AND NOW, HOW ABOUT THE GOOD AND THE BAD POINTS ABOUT THE FDP. WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE FDP? Q.79. AND WHAT DO YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE FDP? Q.78(A)/Q.79(A). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT FDP: FIRST MENTION ----------------------------------------------------------- 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0185 Q.78(B)/79(B) FDP 2 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0185 LOC 284 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 56-60 0 Q.78(B)/Q.79(B). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT FDP: SECOND MENTION --------------------------------------------------------- 1 102 - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, NO SECOND MENTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0186 Q.78(C)/79(C) FDP 3 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0186 LOC 289 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 61-65 0 Q.78(C)/Q.79(C). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT FDP: THIRD MENTION -------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 1 00000. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, NO THIRD MENTION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0187 Q.80 PROPER SYSTEM MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0187 LOC 294 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 66 0 Q.80. HOW CLOSE DO OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACY COME TO WHAT YOU THINK IS RIGHT AND PROPER IN POLITICS: VERY CLOSE, CLOSE, LESS CLOSE, OR NOT AT ALL CLOSE? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CLOSE 2. CLOSE 3. LESS CLOSE 4. NOT AT ALL CLOSE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 1 103 - 0 VAR 0188 Q.81 IMPORTANT QUESTION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0188 LOC 295 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 67 0 Q.81. IS THAT AN IMPORTANT QUESTION TO YOU, OR DO YOU NOT CARE ABOUT IT? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. IMPORTANT 2. DON'T CARE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0189 Q.82A VOTING ONLY WAY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0189 LOC 296 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 68 0 Q.82. HERE ARE SEVERAL OPINIONS WHICH PEOPLE HOLD. DO YOU AGREE COMPLETELY, AGREE LARGELY, DISAGREE SOMEWHAT, OR DISAGREE COMPLETELY WITH THESE? Q.82A. VOTING IS THE ONLY WAY TO INFLUENCE WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE COMPLETELY 2. AGREE LARGELY 3. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 4. DISAGREE COMPLETELY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0190 Q.82B CARE WHAT THINK MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0190 LOC 297 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 69 0 Q.82B. I DO NOT THINK THAT PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE MUCH WHAT PEOPLE LIKE ME THINK. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 104 - (CONTINUED) - 1. AGREE COMPLETELY 2. AGREE LARGELY 3. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 4. DISAGREE COMPLETELY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0191 Q.82(C) PARTIES ABLE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0191 LOC 298 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 70 0 Q.82(C). THE PARTIES REPRESENTED IN THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT ARE NO LONGER ABLE TO SOLVE THE RELEVENT PROBLEMS. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE COMPLETELY 2. AGREE LARGELY 3. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 4. DISAGREE COMPLETELY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0192 Q.82D HAVE SAY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0192 LOC 299 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 71 0 Q.82D. PEOPLE LIKE ME DO NOT HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES. --------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE COMPLETELY 2. AGREE LARGELY 3. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 4. DISAGREE COMPLETELY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 1 105 - 0 VAR 0193 Q.83 CHANGE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0193 LOC 300 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 72 0 Q.83. THIS LIST CONTAINS SEVERAL DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW ABOUT POSSIBLE CHANGES IN OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM AND OUR DEMOCRACY. WHICH OF THESE COMES CLOSEST TO HOW YOU FEEL? OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM AND OUR DEMOCRACY SHOULD BE: ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CHANGED IN ITS BASIC PRINCIPLES 2. CHANGED IN MANY RESPECTS 3. CHANGED IN SOME RESPECTS 4. LEFT EXACTLY AS IT IS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0194 Q.84 PUBLIC POSITION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0194 LOC 301 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 73 0 Q.84. DOES IT BOTHER YOU TO PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR POLITICAL POSITION, OR DOESN'T IT BOTHER YOU? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. BOTHERS ME 2. DOESN'T BOTHER ME 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0195 Q.85 ACTIVE SUPPORTERS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0195 LOC 302 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 74 0 Q.85. HOW WELL A PARTY FARES IN THE ELECTION DEPENDS A LOT UPON HOW ACTIVELY ITS SUPPORTERS WORK FOR IT DURING THE CAMPAIGN. WHAT IS YOU IMPRESSION AS TO WHOSE SUPPORTERS ARE THE MOST ACTIVE IN THIS CAMPAIGN? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. FDP 2. CDU/CSU 1 106 - (CONTINUED) - 3. SPD 4. OTHER PARTY 5. ALL ABOUT EQUAL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0196 Q.86(A) MULTI-PARTIES MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0196 LOC 303 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 75 0 Q.86. ONE OFTEN HEARS THE OPINION THAT THE STATE HAS TO DEFEND ITSELF MORE EFFECTIVELY AGAINST ITS INTERNAL ENEMIES. TOWARD THIS GOAL ONE SHOULD ACCEPT THAT SOME RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS ARE CURTAILED. WHICH RIGHTS, IN YOUR OPINION, SHOULD UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES BE CURTAILED, AND WHICH COULD BE CURTAILED QUITE A BIT? Q.86(A). THE EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE PARTIES ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. NO CURTAILMENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES 2. SOME CURTAILMENT 3. EXTENSIVE CURTAILMENT ACCEPTABLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0197 Q.86(B) TV RIGHTS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0197 LOC 304 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 76 0 Q.86(B). THE RIGHT OF TELEVISION TO SHOW WHAT IT WANTS TO --------------------------------------------------- 1. NO CURTAILMENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES 2. SOME CURTAILMENT 3. EXTENSIVE CURTAILMENT ACCEPTABLE 1 107 - (CONTINUED) - 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0198 Q.86(C) RIGHT TO STRIKE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0198 LOC 305 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 77 0 Q.86(C). THE ABILITY OF LABOR UNIONS TO STRIKE ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. NO CURTAILMENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES 2. SOME CURTAILMENT 3. EXTENSIVE CURTAILMENT ACCEPTABLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0199 Q.86(D) CONSCIENCE OBJTR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0199 LOC 306 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 78 0 Q.86(D). THE RIGHT TO BECOME A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR TO MILITARY SERVICE ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. NO CURTAILMENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES 2. SOME CURTAILMENT 3. EXTENSIVE CURTAILMENT ACCEPTABLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 1 108 - 0 VAR 0200 Q.86(E) FREE ENTRY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0200 LOC 307 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 79 0 Q.86(E). THE RIGHT THAT ANY FOREIGNER CAN FREELY ENTER THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC --------------------------------------------------------- 1. NO CURTAILMENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES 2. SOME CURTAILMENT 3. EXTENSIVE CURTAILMENT ACCEPTABLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0201 Q.87 VOTE DECIDES SEATS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0201 LOC 308 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 80 0 Q.87. IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION EACH VOTER HAS TWO VOTES, THE FIRST VOTE (ERSTSTIMME) FOR THE CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE OF A PARTY, AND THE SECOND VOTE (ZWEITSTIMME) FOR A PARTY. WHAT DO YOU THINK: WHICH VOTE DECIDES HOW MANY SEATS EACH PARTY WILL HAVE IN PARLIAMENT, THE FIRST VOTE OR THE SECOND VOTE? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. FIRST VOTE 2. SECOND VOTE 3. BOTH EQUALLY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '06' DK 6 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 6 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- 1 109 - 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 6 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 6 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1 110 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 6 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0202 Q.88 Q'RE VERSION MD=0 REF 0202 LOC 309 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 21 0 Q.88. QUESTIONNAIRE VERSION FOR QUESTIONS 89 TO 91 --------------------------------------------------------- 1. Q89 AND Q90: ASK ABOUT SPD; Q91: "FOR THE SPD" 2. Q89 AND Q90: ASK ABOUT SPD; Q91: "AGAINST THE SPD" 3. Q89 AND Q90: ASK ABOUT CDU/CSU; Q91: "FOR THE CDU/CSU" 4. Q89 AND Q90: ASK ABOUT CDU/CSU; Q91: "AGAINST THE CDU/CSU" 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0203 Q.89 LIKE PARTY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0203 LOC 310 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 22 0 Q.89. NOW I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PARTIES. IN THIS INTERVIEW, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE . EACH PARTY HAS OF COURSE ITS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES. SOMETIME ONE LIKES ON PARTY BETTER, SOMETIMES ANOTHER. NOW, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE IN ITS PRESENT STATE, WOULD YOU SAY YOU LIKE THE OVERALL, YOU LIKE IT/THEM SOMEWHAT OR NOT AT ALL? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 111 - (CONTINUED) - 1. LIKE IT/THEM WELL 2. LIKE IT/THEM SOMEWHAT 3. LIKE IT/THEM HARDLY OR NOT AT ALL 4. UNDECIDED, NO OPINION 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0204 Q.90 MOST LIKE PARTY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0204 LOC 311 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 23 0 Q.90. NOW APART FROM YOUR OWN OPINION: WHAT DO YOU THINK, DO MOST PEOPLE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC LIKE THE AT PRESENT, OR DON'T YOU THINK SO? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. PARTY IS WELL LIKED 2. DON'T THINK PARTY IS WELL LIKED 3. UNDECIDED 4. IMPOSSIBLE TO SAY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0205 Q.91 TALK MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0205 LOC 312 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 24 0 Q.91. IMAGINE THAT YOU HAD A FIVE HOUR TRAINRIDE AHEAD OF YOU AND SOMEONE IN YOUR COMPARTMENT BEGINS TO TALK
. WOULD YOU LIKE TO TALK WITH THIS PERSON, OR WOULD YOU NOT PARTICULARLY CARE TO DO SO? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LIKE TO TALK TO THE PERSON 2. NOT PARTICULARLY LIKE TO 3. NO JUDGMENT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 1 112 - (CONTINUED) - 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0206 Q.92 PARTY REFUSED INFO MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0206 LOC 313 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 25-26 0 Q.92. NOW I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU ABOUT AN INCIDENT AND ASK YOU FOR YOUR OPINION ABOUT IT. SOMEONE COMES INTO A STRANGE TOWM AND SEARCHES IN VAIN FOR A PARKING LOT. FINALLY HE GETS OUR OF HIS CAR AND ASKS A PEDESTRIAN: "COULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHERE THERE IS A PARKING LOT AROUND HERE?" THE PEDESTRIAN RESPONDS: "ASK SOMEONE ELSE]" AND TURNS AWAY. I SHOULD ADD THAT THE DRIVER WORE A BUTTON FOR A PARTY ON HIS LAPEL. WHICH PARTY DO YOU THINK IT WAS? WHAT WOULD YOU GUESS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. CDU 02. CSU 03. CDU/CSU 04. SPD 05. FDP 06. NDP 07. DKP 08. "GREENS" 09. KBW 10. OTHER 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0207 Q.93(A) WEAR BUTTON MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0207 LOC 315 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 27 0 Q.93. NOW A QUESTION CONCERNING THE PARTY CLOSEST TO YOU: IF ONE WERE TO ASK YOU WHETHER YOU WOULD DO SOMETHING FOR THIS PARTY, FOR EXAMPLE ONE OF THE THINGS ON THESE CARDS: IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD DO FOR THE PARTY YOU LIKE BEST? WOULD YOU PLEASE SELECT THE RELEVENT CARDS. Q.93(A). I WOULD WEAR A PIN, A BUTTON. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 113 - (CONTINUED) - 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0208 Q.93(B) CAR STICKER MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0208 LOC 316 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 28 0 Q.93(B). I WOULD PUT A STICKER ON MY CAR . -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0209 Q.93(C) RING DOORBELLS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0209 LOC 317 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 29 0 Q.93(C). I WOULD RING DOORBELLS AND TALK TO PEOPLE ABOUT THE GOOD POINTS OF MY PARTY . --------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 1 114 - 0 VAR 0210 Q.93(D) POSTER MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0210 LOC 318 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 30 0 Q.93(D). I WOULD PUT A PARTY POSTER ON MY HOUSE OR INTO MY WINDOW . ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0211 Q.93(E) PUT UP POSTERS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0211 LOC 319 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 31 0 Q.93(E). I WOULD PUT UP POSTERS FOR THE PARTY. ----------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0212 Q.93(F) STREET DISCUSSN MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0212 LOC 320 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 32 0 Q.93(F). I WOULD TAKE PART IN A STREET DISCUSSION AND SUPPORT THE PARTY. ------------------------------------------------------ 1. YES 1 115 - (CONTINUED) - 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0213 Q.93(G) RALLY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0213 LOC 321 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 33 0 Q.93(G). I WOULD ATTEND A RALLY OF THE PARTY . --------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0214 Q.93(H) SPEAK AT RALLY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0214 LOC 322 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 34 0 Q.93(H). I WOULD STAND UP AT A PARTY RALLY AND SAY IN THE DISCUSSION WHAT APPEARS IMPORTANT TO ME. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 1 116 - 0 VAR 0215 Q.93(I) OTHER RALLIES MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0215 LOC 323 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 35 0 Q.93(I). I WOULD REPRESENT THE OPINION OF THE PARTY IN RALLIES OF OTHER PARTIES . ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0216 Q.93(K) DISTRIBUTE LIT MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0216 LOC 324 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 36 0 Q.93(K). I WOULD HELP WITH THE DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPAIGN LITERATURE . -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0217 Q.93(L) CONTIBUTE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0217 LOC 325 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 37 0 Q.93(L). I WOULD CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO THE CAMPAIGN CHEST OF THE PARTY . ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 117 - (CONTINUED) - 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. WOULD DO NONE OF THE ACTIVITIES 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0218 Q.94A(1) IMP OLD AGE SEC MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0218 LOC 326 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 38-39 0 Q.94(1). NOW I WOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW WHAT IMPORTANCE SOME PROBLEMS HAVE FOR YOU PERSONALLY. HERE IS A LADDER: ON THE TOP RUNG WOULD BE THE PROBLEM WHICH IS MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU. AT THE BOTTOM WOULD BE A PROBLEM WHICH MAY WILL BE SIGNIFICANT OTHERWISE BUT WHICH HAS NO IMPORTANCE FOR YOU PERSONALLY. PLEASE SHOW ME ON THE LADDER HOW IMPORTANT (FIRST PROBLEM) IS FOR YOU. Q.94A(1). OLD AGE SECURITY -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 118 - 0 VAR 0219 Q.94A(2) OLD SEC PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0219 LOC 328 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 40 0 Q.94(2). PLEASE DISREGARD COMPLETELY FOR A MOMENT WHICH PARTY YOU PERSONALLY FAVOR; WHICH PARTY DO YOU THINK CAN BEST DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM, THE SPD, THE CDU/CSU OR THE FDP? Q.94A(2). OLD AGE SECURITY -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0220 Q.94B(1) IMP PRICE STABY MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0220 LOC 329 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 41-42 0 Q.94B(1). PRICE STABILITY -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 119 - 0 VAR 0221 Q.94B(2) PRICE STBY PRTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0221 LOC 331 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 43 0 Q.94B(2). PRICE STABILITY -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0222 Q.94C(1) IMP EDUC FACLTS MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0222 LOC 332 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 44-45 0 Q.94C(1). IMPROVED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 120 - 0 VAR 0223 Q.94C(2) EDUC PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0223 LOC 334 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 46 0 Q.94C(2). IMPROVED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0224 Q.94D(1) IMP REDUCE TAX MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0224 LOC 335 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 47-48 0 Q.94D(1). REDUCING TAXES -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 121 - 0 VAR 0225 Q.94D(2) REDUCE TAX PRTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0225 LOC 337 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 49 0 Q.94D(2). REDUCING TAXES -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0226 Q.94E(1) IMP US RELATNS MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0226 LOC 338 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 50-51 0 Q.94E(1). GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE USA -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 122 - 0 VAR 0227 Q.94E(2) US RLTNS PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0227 LOC 340 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 52 0 Q.94E(2). GOOD RELATIONS WITH THE USA -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0228 Q.94F(1) IMP USSR RLTNS MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0228 LOC 341 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 53-54 0 Q.94F(1). BETTER RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ---------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 123 - 0 VAR 0229 Q.94F(2) USSR RLTNS PRTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0229 LOC 343 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 55 0 Q.94F(2). BETTER RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0230 Q.94G(1) IMP REUNIFICATN MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0230 LOC 344 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 56-57 0 Q.94G(1). REUNIFICATION OF GERMANY -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. --------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 124 - 0 VAR 0231 Q.94G(2) REUNIFCTN PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0231 LOC 346 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 58 0 Q.94G(2). REUNIFICATION OF GERMANY -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0232 Q.94H(1) IMP SECURITY MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0232 LOC 347 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 59-60 0 Q.94H(1). SECURITY FROM A RUSSIAN ATTACK -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 125 - 0 VAR 0233 Q.94H(2) SECURITY PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0233 LOC 349 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 61 0 Q.94H(2). SECURITY FROM A RUSSIAN ATTACK -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0234 Q.94I(1) IMP HONESTY MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0234 LOC 350 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 62-63 0 Q.94I(1). HONESTY AND FAIR PLAY IN PUBLIC LIFE -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. -------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 126 - 0 VAR 0235 Q.94I(2) HONESTY PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0235 LOC 352 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 64 0 Q.94I(2). HONESTY AND FAIR PLAY IN PUBLIC LIFE -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0236 Q.94K(1) IMP ENVIRONMENT MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0236 LOC 353 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 65-66 0 Q.94K(1). BETTER PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. -------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 127 - 0 VAR 0237 Q.94K(2) ENVIRONMT PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0237 LOC 355 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 67 0 Q.94K(2). BETTER PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0238 Q.94L(1) IMP SECURE JOBS MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0238 LOC 356 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 68-69 0 Q.94L(1). SECURE JOBS -- IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM TO R. ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. LEAST IMPORTANT 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. MOST IMPORTANT 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 128 - 0 VAR 0239 Q.94L(2) SECURE JOBS PTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0239 LOC 358 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 70 0 Q.94L(2). SECURE JOBS -- R'S PERCEPTION OF WHICH PARTY IS BEST ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU 3. FDP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0240 Q.95 POLITICAL PROGRAMS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0240 LOC 359 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 71 0 Q.95. HOW OFTEN DO YOU WATCH POLITICAL PROGRAMS ON TELEVISION, APART FROM DAILY NEWS PROGRAMS: VERY OFTEN, OFTEN, RARELY, NEVER? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. OFTEN 3. RARELY 4. NEVER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0241 Q.96 TRUE OPINIONS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0241 LOC 360 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 72 0 Q.96. WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT YOUR ACQUAINTANCES, COLLEAGUES AND PEOPLE HERE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, DO YOU HAVE THE FEELING THAT THEY GIVE THEIR TRUE OPINIONS, THAT IS, THAT THEY SAY WHAT THEY REALLY THINK WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT POLITICS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 129 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SAY WHAT THEY THINK 2. SOME DO, SOME DON'T 3. DON'T SAY WHAT THEY THINK 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0242 Q.97 WHAT R THINKS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0242 LOC 361 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 73 0 Q.97. AND HOW ABOUT YOU? WHEN YOU TALK WITH ACQUAINTANCES, COLLEAGUES OR PEOPLE HERE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ABOUT POLITICS: CAN YOU SAY WITHOUT HESITATION WHAT YOU THINK, OR IS IT SOMETIMES BETTER NOT TO SAY WHAT YOU THINK? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. CAN SAY WHAT I THINK 2. SOMETIMES BETTER NOT TO SAY EVERYTHING 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0243 Q.98(A) GOAL 1 MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0243 LOC 362 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 74 0 Q.98(A). IN POLITICS, AS ELSEWHERE, ONE CANNOT DO EVERYTHING ALL AT ONCE. IN THIS LIST YOU WILL FIND SEVERAL GOALS WHICH ONE CAN PURSUE IN POLITICS. IF YOU HAD TO CHOSE BETWEEN THESE DIFFERENT GOALS, WHICH GOAL WOULD BE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. MAINTAINING ORDER IN THE NATION 2. GIVING THE PEOPLE MORE SAY IN GOVERNMENT DECISIONS 3. FIGHTING RISING PRICES 4. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. DK, REFUSED 0 1 130 - 0 VAR 0244 Q.98(B) GOAL 2 MD=0 REF 0244 LOC 363 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 75 0 Q.98(B). WHICH GOAL WOULD BE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT? ---------------------------------------------------- 1. MAINTAINING ORDER IN THE NATION 2. GIVING THE PEOPLE MORE SAY IN GOVERNMENT DECISIONS 3. FIGHTING RISING PRICES 4. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0245 Q.98(C) GOAL 3 MD=0 REF 0245 LOC 364 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 76 0 Q.98(C). WHICH GOAL WOULD BE THIRD MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. MAINTAINING ORDER IN THE NATION 2. GIVING THE PEOPLE MORE SAY IN GOVERNMENT DECISIONS 3. FIGHTING RISING PRICES 4. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0246 Q.98(D) GOAL 4 MD=0 REF 0246 LOC 365 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 77 0 Q.98(D). WHICH GOAL WOULD BE FOURTH MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. MAINTAINING ORDER IN THE NATION 2. GIVING THE PEOPLE MORE SAY IN GOVERNMENT DECISIONS 3. FIGHTING RISING PRICES 4. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 1 131 - 0 VAR 0247 Q.99(A) IMP TECH PROGRES MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0247 LOC 366 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 78 0 Q.99. NOW, WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR SOCIETY WHAT WOULD BE PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT TO YOU? PLEASE USE THIS SCALE AND TELL US FOR EACH GOAL ON THIS LIST HOW IMPORTANT IT IS TO YOU. Q.99(A). TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH SHOULD CONTINUE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0248 Q.99(B) IMP CITIZEN SAY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0248 LOC 367 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 79 0 Q.99(B). CITIZENS SHOULD HAVE MORE SAY IN POLITICAL DECISIONS. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0249 Q.99(C) IMP POLICE BLDUP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0249 LOC 368 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 80 0 Q.99(C). THE POLICE FORCES OF THE STATE 1 132 - (CONTINUED) - SHOULD BE BUILT UP FURTHER TO GUARANTEE LAW AND ORDER. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '07' DK 7 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 1 133 - (CONTINUED) - 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 7 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0250 Q.99(D) IMP ENVIRONMENT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0250 LOC 369 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 21 0 Q.99(D). TAKING CARE IN ALL ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL DECISIONS THAT THEY DO NOT ENDANGER NATURE AND OUR 1 134 - (CONTINUED) - ENVIRONMENT. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0251 Q.99(E) IMP CHRISTN VALU MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0251 LOC 370 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 22 0 Q.99(E). CHRISTIAN VALUES SHOULD BE MORE STRONGLY OBSERVED IM MARRIAGE, FAMILY AND SOCIETY. --------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0252 Q.99(F) IMP CITIZEN INIT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0252 LOC 371 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 23 0 Q.99(F). PARTIES SHOULD HAVE LESS INFLUENCE, CITIZEN INITIATIVES, ON THE OTHER HAND, MORE. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 1 135 - (CONTINUED) - 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0253 Q.99(G) IMP EXPERTS SAY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0253 LOC 372 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 24 0 Q.99(G). EXPERTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALISTS SHOULD HAVE MORE SAY IN POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS. ---------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY UNIMPORTANT . . 7. VERY IMPORTANT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0254 Q.100 WORK STRESS MD=0 REF 0254 LOC 373 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 25 0 Q.100. THINKING ABOUT YOUR DAILY WORK, DO YOU OFTEN, SOMETIMES, RARELY, OR NEVER FEEL STRESS? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 2. SOMETIMES 3. RARELY 4. NEVER 5. I DON'T KNOW THE WORD STRESS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 1 136 - 0 VAR 0255 Q.101 INCREASED STRESS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0255 LOC 374 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 26 0 Q.101. DO YOU THINK THAT THE STRESS AT WORK HAS INCREASED DURING THE LAST YEARS, DECREASED, OR HAVEN'T THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASED 2. DECREASED 3. NO CHANGE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0256 Q.102 DID R VOTE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0256 LOC 375 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 27-28 0 Q.102. IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF OCTOBER 5, 1980, THERE WERE MANY CITIZENS WHO, FOR GOOD REASONS, COULD NOT OR DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE ELECTION. HOW ABOUT YOU? DID YOU VOTE OR DID YOU NOT VOTE? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. YES, VOTED 02. ABSENTEE BALLOT 03. NO, DID NOT VOTE 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 09. DON'T REMEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0257 Q.103(A) FIRST VOTE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0257 LOC 377 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 29 0 Q.103. (IF R VOTED) HERE IS A VOTING BALLOT SIMILAR TO THE ONE YOU RECEIVED FOR THE FEDERAL ELECTION ON OCTOBER 5. PLEASE MARK HOW YOU VOTED IN THIS LAST FEDERAL ELECTION. AS YOU KNOW, YOU HAD TWO VOTES: THE FIRST VOTE FOR A CANDIDATE IN THE LOCAL CONSTITUENCY, THE SECOND FOR A PARTY. WHEN YOU ARE FINISHED, PLEASE PUT THE BALLOT INTO THE ENVELOPE. 1 137 - (CONTINUED) - Q.103(A). RESPONDENT'S FIRST VOTE (FOR CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE IN 1980) ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. CDU/CSU <-CANDIDATE> 2. SPD <-CANDIDATE> 3. FDP <-CANDIDATE> 4. GREEN <-CANDIDATE> 5. NDP <-CANDIDATE> 6. DKP <-CANDIDATE> 0. INAP., CODED 3 OR 9 IN Q.102, ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0258 Q.103(B) SECOND VOTE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0258 LOC 378 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 30 0 Q.103(B). (IF R VOTED) RESPONDENT'S SECOND VOTE (FOR PARTY LIST IN 1980) ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. CDU/CSU 2. SPD 3. FDP 4. GREENS 5. NPD 6. DKP 0. INAP., CODED 3 OR 9 IN Q.102; ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0259 Q.103(C) PARTY VOTE MD=0 OR GE 7 REF 0259 LOC 379 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 31 0 Q.103(C). HOW ABOUT THE FEDERAL ELECTION IN OCTOBER: FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE? PLEASE TELL ME BY USING THIS LIST. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CDU/CSU 1 138 - (CONTINUED) - 2. SPD P 3. FDP 4. NDP 5. DKP 6. GREENS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 7. DID NOT VOTE 8. NOT AUTHORIZED TO VOTE 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0260 Q.104 WHEN DECIDE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0260 LOC 380 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 32 0 Q.104. (IF R REMEMBERS WHETHER HE/SHE VOTED OR NOT) CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHEN YOU MADE THIS DECISION? DID YOU MAKE IT LONG BEFORE THE ELECTION, ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO, OR DID YOU MAKE THE DECISION IN THE LAST WEEKS OR LAST FEW DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LONG BEFORE THE ELECTION 2. A FEW MONTHS AGO 3. IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS 4. A FEW DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION 0. INAP., CODED 3 OR 9 IN Q.102; ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0261 Q.105 SPD DID WELL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0261 LOC 381 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 33 0 Q.105. WHAT DO YOU THINK? IN THE ELECTION, DID THE SPD GENERALLY DO WELL OR POORLY? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD DID WELL 2. SPD DID POORLY 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 1 139 - 0 VAR 0262 Q.106(1) CDU/CSU LOST 1 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0262 LOC 382 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 34-35 0 Q.106. WHAT FACTORS WERE, IN YOUR MIND, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FACT THAT THE CDU/CSU LOST SO MANY VOTES? Q.106(1). FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR CDU/CSU LOSS OF VOTES: FIRST MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS; BECAUSE OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS 02. NOBODY WANTED THIS CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDATE, WRONG CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR 03. THE BAD PUBLICITY FOR STRAUSS 04. STRAUSS IS/WAS TOO RADICAL, NO TRUST IN STRAUSS, FEAR OF STRAUSS 05. BAD CAMPAIGN, INFIGHTING DURING THE CAMPAIGN, DIRTY LINEN WAS AIRED DURING THE CAMPAIGN, UNFAIR CAMPAIGN, DISGUSTING CAMPAIGN 06. WRONG CAMPAIGN, WRONG STRATEGY, WRONG ARGUMENTS 07. PLATFORM WAS NO GOOD, CDU/CSU HAD NO REAL PLATFORM 08. YOUNG VOTERS AT FAULT, YOUNG VOTERS VOTED INCORRECTLY 09. YOUNG VOTERS WERE NOT APPROACHED CORRECTLY, OTHER PARTIES PROGRAMS APPEALED MORE TO YOUNG VOTERS 10. STRAUSS WAS THE WRONG CANDIDATE FOR THE YOUNG VOTERS, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO THE YOUNG VOTERS 11. CDU/CSU WAS NO REAL ALTERNATIVE, OPPOSITION HAD NOTHING BETTER TO OFFER 12. FAULT OF THE MEDIA, INCORRECT PRESENTATION OF THE OPPOSITION IN THE MEDIA, AIR TIME FOR THE OPPOSITION WAS TOO SHORT 13. NORTH-SOUTH DIFFERENTIAL, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO THE NORTH 14. CSU WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER NATIONWIDE 15. THE NORTH DESERTED STRAUSS, ONE CANNOT TRUST THE PRUSSIANS 16. TIMING OF THE CAMPAIGN, CAMPAIGN BEGAN TOO LATE, 4 WEEKS LATER EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE COME OUT DIFFERENTLY 17. FDP IS AT FAULT, FDP TOOK (TOO) MANY VOTES FROM THE OPPOSITION 18. THE LEADERSHIP TEAM WAS NO GOOD, THERE WERE NO GOOD PEOPLE IN THE LEADERSHIP TEAM 19. THE SPD HAD THE BETTER CAMPAIGN 20. OTHER POINTS ABOUT STRAUSS 21. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE OPPOSITION 22. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN 23. OTHER (IF NOT CODED ELSEWHERE) 1 140 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0263 Q.106(2) CDU/CSU LOST 2 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0263 LOC 384 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 36-37 0 Q.106(2). FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR CDU/CSU LOSS OF VOTES: SECOND MENTION --------------------------------------------------------- 01. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS; BECAUSE OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS 02. NOBODY WANTED THIS CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDATE, WRONG CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR 03. THE BAD PUBLICITY FOR STRAUSS 04. STRAUSS IS/WAS TOO RADICAL, NO TRUST IN STRAUSS, FEAR OF STRAUSS 05. BAD CAMPAIGN, INFIGHTING DURING THE CAMPAIGN, DIRTY LINEN WAS AIRED DURING THE CAMPAIGN, UNFAIR CAMPAIGN, DISGUSTING CAMPAIGN 06. WRONG CAMPAIGN, WRONG STRATEGY, WRONG ARGUMENTS 07. PLATFORM WAS NO GOOD, CDU/CSU HAD NO REAL PLATFORM 08. YOUNG VOTERS AT FAULT, YOUNG VOTERS VOTED INCORRECTLY 09. YOUNG VOTERS WERE NOT APPROACHED CORRECTLY, OTHER PARTIES PROGRAMS APPEALED MORE TO YOUNG VOTERS 10. STRAUSS WAS THE WRONG CANDIDATE FOR THE YOUNG VOTERS, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO THE YOUNG VOTERS 11. CDU/CSU WAS NO REAL ALTERNATIVE, OPPOSITION HAD NOTHING BETTER TO OFFER 12. FAULT OF THE MEDIA, INCORRECT PRESENTATION OF THE OPPOSITION IN THE MEDIA, AIR TIME FOR THE OPPOSITION WAS TOO SHORT 13. NORTH-SOUTH DIFFERENTIAL, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO THE NORTH 14. CSU WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER NATIONWIDE 15. THE NORTH DESERTED STRAUSS, ONE CANNOT TRUST THE PRUSSIANS 16. TIMING OF THE CAMPAIGN, CAMPAIGN BEGAN TOO LATE, 4 WEEKS LATER EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE COME OUT DIFFERENTLY 17. FDP IS AT FAULT, FDP TOOK (TOO) MANY VOTES FROM THE OPPOSITION 18. THE LEADERSHIP TEAM WAS NO GOOD, THERE WERE NO GOOD 1 141 - (CONTINUED) - PEOPLE IN THE LEADERSHIP TEAM 19. THE SPD HAD THE BETTER CAMPAIGN 20. OTHER POINTS ABOUT STRAUSS 21. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE OPPOSITION 22. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN 23. OTHER (IF NOT CODED ELSEWHERE) 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER; NO SECOND MENTION 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0264 Q.107(1) FDP GAIN 1 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0264 LOC 386 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 38-39 0 Q.107. AND WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FDP GAINING SO MANY VOTES? Q.107(1). FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR FDP GAINING VOTES: FIRST MENTION ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. FDP WAS THE ONLY (REAL) ALTERNATIVE 02. BECAUSE OF GENSCHER, GENSCHER IS WELL LIKED, GENSCHER IS RESPECTED, GENSCHER IS COMPETENT, MORE MATTER-OF-FACT, DISTINGUISHED 03. BECAUSE THIS PARTY HAS SENSIBLE PEOPLE 04. MOSTLY CDU VOTERS WHO DID NOT WANT STRAUSS, THE CDU HAS LOST VOTES BECAUSE OF STRAUSS 05. 3-PARTY SYSTEM SHOULD CONTINUE, FDP WHOULD STAY IN THE BUNDESTAG 06. GOOD CAMPAIGN, FAIRER, MORE ISSUE-RELATED CAMPAIGN 07. SYMPATHY FOR THE FDP, THE FDP IS SUCH A LITTLE PARTY 08. THE BIG PARTIES SHOULD NOT GET TOO STRONG 09. THE FDP'S POLICIES HAVE BEEN GOOD/SUCCESSFUL 10. THE LEFT WING OF THE SPD HAD TO BE STOPPED 11. ABSOLUTE MAJORITY OF THE SPD HAD TO BE PREVENTED 12. SPD VOTERS VOTED FOR THE FDP THIS TIME 13. MANY VOTERS DID NOT KNOW WHO WLSE TO VOTE FOR, MANY VOTERS DID (COULD) NOT VOTE FOR ONE OF THE TWO LARGE PARTIES 14. THE PRESENTATION OF THE PARTY, SENSIBLE, TO THE POINT 15. THE FDP IS LIBERAL 16. THE FDP HAS WOM VOTES FROM BOTH LARGE PARTIES 17. GAINS DUE TO SECOND VOTES (ZWEITSTIMMEN) 18. MANY YOUNG/FIRST-TIME VOTERS VOTED FOR THE FDP 1 142 - (CONTINUED) - 19. BECAUSE THE FDP IS THE SPD'S PARTNER 20. BECAUSE OF STRAUSS, TO STOP STRAUSS 21. OTHER POINTS ABOUT GENSCHER 22. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE FDP 23. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN 24. OTHER (NOT CODED ELSEWHERE) 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0265 Q.107(2) FDP GAIN 2 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0265 LOC 388 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 40-41 0 Q.107(2). FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR FDP GAINING VOTES: SECOND MENTION ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. FDP WAS THE ONLY (REAL) ALTERNATIVE 02. BECAUSE OF GENSCHER, GENSCHER IS WELL LIKED, GENSCHER IS RESPECTED, GENSCHER IS COMPETENT, MORE MATTER-OF-FACT, DISTINGUISHED 03. BECAUSE THIS PARTY HAS SENSIBLE PEOPLE 04. MOSTLY CDU VOTERS WHO DID NOT WANT STRAUSS, THE CDU HAS LOST VOTES BECAUSE OF STRAUSS 05. 3-PARTY SYSTEM SHOULD CONTINUE, FDP WHOULD STAY IN THE BUNDESTAG 06. GOOD CAMPAIGN, FAIRER, MORE ISSUE-RELATED CAMPAIGN 07. SYMPATHY FOR THE FDP, THE FDP IS SUCH A LITTLE PARTY P 08. THE BIG PARTIES SHOULD NOT GET TOO STRONG 09. THE FDP'S POLICIES HAVE BEEN GOOD/SUCCESSFUL 10. THE LEFT WING OF THE SPD HAD TO BE STOPPED 11. ABSOLUTE MAJORITY OF THE SPD HAD TO BE PREVENTED 12. SPD VOTERS VOTED FOR THE FDP THIS TIME 13. MANY VOTERS DID NOT KNOW WHO WLSE TO VOTE FOR, MANY VOTERS DID (COULD) NOT VOTE FOR ONE OF THE TWO LARGE PARTIES 14. THE PRESENTATION OF THE PARTY, SENSIBLE, TO THE POINT 15. THE FDP IS LIBERAL 16. THE FDP HAS WOM VOTES FROM BOTH LARGE PARTIES 17. GAINS DUE TO SECOND VOTES (ZWEITSTIMMEN) 18. MANY YOUNG/FIRST-TIME VOTERS VOTED FOR THE FDP 19. BECAUSE THE FDP IS THE SPD'S PARTNER 1 143 - (CONTINUED) - 20. BECAUSE OF STRAUSS, TO STOP STRAUSS 21. OTHER POINTS ABOUT GENSCHER 22. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE FDP 23. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN 24. OTHER (NOT CODED ELSEWHERE) 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER; NO SECOND MENTION 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0266 Q.108 OTHER THAN STRAUSS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0266 LOC 390 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 42 0 Q.108. DO YOU THINK THE CDU/CSU WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER, THE SAME OR WORSE IN THIS ELECTION IF IT HAD HAD A CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR OTHER THAN FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. BETTER 2. THE SAME 3. WORSE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0267 Q.109 CAMPAIGN USEFUL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0267 LOC 391 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 43 0 Q.109. THERE ARE DIFFERENT OPINIONS ABOUT THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN. THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO THINK IT IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL, OTHERS THINK IT IS QUITE USEFUL, STILL OTHERS THINK IT IS VERY HARMFUL. WHAT DO YOU THINK? DO YOU REGARD THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN AS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL, QUITE USEFUL, FAIRLY SUPERFLUOUS, OR AS VERY HARMFUL? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL 2. QUITE USEFUL 3. FAIRLY SUPERFLUOUS 4. VERY HARMFUL 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 1 144 - (CONTINUED) - 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0268 Q.110 NMBR TV CMPGN PRGM MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0268 LOC 392 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 44 0 Q.110. BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTIONS, THE TELEVISION NETWORKS TELEVISED MANY PROGRAMS ON THE CAMPAIGN, THE PARTIES AND THE LEADING CANDIDATES. IN YOUR VIEW, WERE THERE TOO MANY POLITICAL PROGRAMS, TOO FEW, OR JUST THE RIGHT NUMBER? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. TOO MANY 2. TOO FEW 3. THE RIGHT NUMBER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0269 Q.111 LIKE TV DISCUSSION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0269 LOC 393 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 45-46 0 Q.111. THREE DAYS BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION, THE FIRST AND SECOND TELEVISION NETWORKS SIMULTANEOUSLY BROADCAST A DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE TOP CANDIDATES OR THE PARTIES: HELMUT SCHMIDT, HELMUT KOHL, FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS AND HANS-DIETRICH GENSCHER. HOW WELL DID YOU LIKE THE PROGRAM? VERY WELL, WELL, NOT SO WELL, NOT AT ALL? ------------------------------------------------------------ 01. VERY WELL 02. WELL 03. NOT SO WELL 04. NOT AT ALL 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 08. UNDOCUMENTED CODE 09. DID NOT SEE THE PROGRAM; NA 0 1 145 - 0 VAR 0270 Q.111(A) INFORM/ENTERTN MD=0 REF 0270 LOC 395 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 47 0 Q.111(A). WAS THIS PROGRAM MORE OF AN INFORMATIVE OR OF AN ENTERTAINING NATURE? --------------------------------------------------------- 1. INFORMATIVE 2. ENTERTAINING 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 0. INAP., CODED 8, 9, OR 0 IN Q.111; ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0271 Q.111(B) DEBATE NEXT ELT MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0271 LOC 396 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 48 0 Q.111(B). BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION, SHOULD THERE BE ANOTHER PROGRAM LIKE IT ? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. YES 2. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0272 Q.112 SAME PARTY MD=0 OR GE 7 REF 0272 LOC 397 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 49 0 Q.112. IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION ON OCTOBER 5, DID YOU VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY AS IN THE ELECTION IN 1976? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. YES, THE SAME 2. NO, ANOTHER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 7. DID NOT VOTE IN 1976 1 146 - (CONTINUED) - 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0273 Q.112(A) WHY DIFF PARTY MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0273 LOC 398 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 50-51 0 Q.112(A). WHY DID YOU VOTE FOR A DIFFERENT PARTY THIS TIME? --------------------------------------------------------- ONE MENTION ONLY 01. DID NOT LIKE CDU CANDIDATE 02. SCHMIDT SHOULD REMAIN AS CHANCELLOR 03. WAS DISSATISFIED 04. PREFERRED THE TOP CANDIDATE OF MY NEW PARTY 05. LIKE THE OTHER PARTY/NEW PARTY BETTER, DID NOT LIKE THE OLD PARTY ANY MORE 06. SO THAT THE FDP COULD GET MORE THAN 5% 07. BECAUSE OF THE DISPUTES OF THE OTHER PARTIES 08. THERE NEEDS TO BE A CHANGE EVERY NOW AND THEN 09. BECAUSE MY PARTY HAD NO CHANCE 10. COULD NOT DECIDE WHICH OF THE LARGE PARTIES TO VOTE FOR 11. PREFERRED THE CAMPAIGN OF THE OTHER PARTY 12. OTHER 00. INAP., CODED 0, 1, 7 TO 9 IN Q.112: ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0274 Q.113 OPINION OF ARMY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0274 LOC 400 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 52 0 Q.113. NOW SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE BUNDESWEHR (ARMY)? PLEASE TELL ME USING THIS LIST. --------------------------------------------------------- 1. A: THE BUNDESWEHR DOES NOT MATTER TO ME. 2. B: I OPPOSE THE BUNDESWEHR ON PRINCIPLE. 3. C: I REGARD THE BUNDESWEHR AS A NECESSARY EVIL. 1 147 - (CONTINUED) - 4. D: I THINK IT IS RIGHT THAT THE BUNDESWEHR EXISTS. 5. E: I AM IN FAVOR OF THE BUNDESWEHR ON PRINCIPLE AND WITHOUT RESERVATION. 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0275 Q.114 WOMEN IN ARMY MD=0 REF 0275 LOC 401 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 53 0 Q.114. WHAT IS YOUR VIEW ON THE TOPIC OF WOMEN IN THE BUNDESWEHR ? PLEASE TELL ME WHICH OPINION YOU AGREE WITH MOST. --------------------------------------------------------- 1. A: ON PRINCIPLE, WOMEN SHOULD NOT BE EMPLOYED IN THE BUNDESWEHR. 2. B: WOMEN SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENLIST VOLUNTARILY IN THE BUNDESWEHR. 3. C: WITHIN A GENERAL DRAFT WOMEN SHOULD BE DRAFTED TO THE BUNDESWEHR. 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0276 Q.115 DEFENSE SPENDING MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0276 LOC 402 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 54 0 Q.115. ALMOST ONE FIFTH (EXACTLY 18%) OF THE FEDERAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES THIS YEAR ARE FOR DEFENSE COSTS. DO YOU THINK THAT THIS IS TOO MUCH, TOO LITTLE, JUST RIGHT, OR DON'T YOU HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. TOO MUCH 2. TOO LITTLE 3. JUST RIGHT 4. NO OPINION 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 1 148 - 0 VAR 0277 Q.116(A) WEHRMACHT GENS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0277 LOC 403 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 55 0 Q.116. NOT TOO LONG AGO THERE WERE FREQUENT DISCUSSIONS AMONG THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE UPHOLDING OF TRADITION IN THE BUNDESWEHR . I WILL READ SEVERAL POSSIBILITIES TO YOU, AND WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU ON EACH OF THEM WHETHER YOU LIKE OR DISLIKE THEM. Q.116(A). HOW ABOUT THE NAMING OF ARMY BARRACKS AFTER FAMOUS GENERALS OF THE WEHRMACHT . ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LIKE IT 2. DISLIKE IT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0278 Q.116(B) DESTROYERS NAME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0278 LOC 404 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 56 0 Q.116(B). NAMING DESTROYERS AFTER FAMOUS GENERALS OF THE WEHRMACHT. ------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE IT 2. DISLIKE IT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0279 Q.116(C) TAPS IN PUBLIC MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0279 LOC 405 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 57 0 Q.116(C). THE "GROSSER ZAPFENSTREICH" (MAJOR TAPS CEREMONY) PERFORMED IN PUBLIC? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 149 - (CONTINUED) - 1. LIKE IT 2. DISLIKE IT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0280 Q.116(D) OATH IN PUBLIC MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0280 LOC 406 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 58 0 Q.116(D). SWEARING ALLEGIANCE OR OATH PERFORMED IN PUBLIC? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE IT 2. DISLIKE IT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0281 Q.116(E) MEDALS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0281 LOC 407 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 59 0 Q.116(E). THE INTRODUCTION OF MEDALS FOR DISTINGUISHED SOLDIERS/ ------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE IT 2. DISLIKE IT 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 1 150 - 0 VAR 0282 Q.117 EAST THREAT INCRSE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0282 LOC 408 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 60 0 Q.117. DO YOU THINK THAT THE THREAT TOWARD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC FROM THE EAST HAS INCREASED, DECREASED, OR REMAINED THE SAME DURING THE PAST 5 YEARS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. INCREASED 2. DECREASED 3. REMAINED THE SAME 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0283 Q.118 MILITARY STATUS MD=0 REF 0283 LOC 409 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 61 0 Q.118. PLEASE TELL ME YOUR MILITARY STATUS. WHAT ON THIS LIST IS APPROPRIATE FOR YOU? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. A: RESERVE, OR FORMER BUNDESWEHR SOLDIER 2. B: REGISTERED, BUT NOT DRAFTED YET 3. C: PRESENTLY SERVING MY DRAFT TIME IN THE BUNDESWEHR 4. D: VOLUNTARY SERVICE IN THE BUNDESWEHR AT PRESENT 5. E: WAS FORMERLY A WEHRMACHT SOLDIER 6. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR 7. G: NONE OF THESE 0. INAP., R IS FEMALE; ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0284 Q.119(1) IMP PROBLEMS 1 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0284 LOC 410 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 62-63 0 Q.119. THERE ARE, OF COURSE, DIFFERENT PROBLEMS AND TASKS HERE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC WHICH HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH BY THE GOVERNMENT AFTER THE ELECTION. WHICH PROBLEMS AND TASKS ARE, IN YOUR OPINION, PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT NOW? 1 151 - (CONTINUED) - Q.119(1). FIRST PROBLEM MENTIONED ----------------------------------------------------------- ECONOMIC SITUATION 01. PRICE STABILITY, NO INFLATION, STABLE GERMAN MARK, WAGE AND PRICE STOP 02. JOBS, SECURE JOBS, CREATE JOBS, FULL EMPLOYMENT, ELIMINATE UNEMPLOYMENT (EXCEPT IN RELATION TO GUESTWORKERS) 03. SPECIFICALLY: YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT (NOT: PROBLEMS WITH SCHOOLS AND APPRENTICES) 04. GENERAL: IMPROVE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION, ECONOMIC RECOVERY, STABILIZE ECONOMY, STIMULATE ECONOMY 05. OTHER MENTIONS OF ECONOMIC SITUATION 06. MONTANUNION, CO-DETERMINATION 07. STIMULATE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION (GENERALLY), ABOVE ALL BUILDING PRICES 08. SUPPORT SAVINGS, STIMULATE SAVINGS 0 TAXES, FINANCES 10. LOWER TAXES, DECREASE TAX LOAD 11. REFORM OF THE TAX SYSTEM 12. GENERAL MENTIONS OF TAXATION OR FINANCIAL POLICIES 13. FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES AND INCOMES, STATE DEBTS 14. MENTIONS OF STATE FEES 15. OTHER MENTIONS OF TAXES AND FINANCES 0 SOCIAL, DOMESTIC, EDUCATION POLICIES 20. SCHOOL ISSUES, APPRENTICESHIP, JOB POSITIONS, DO MORE FOR YOUTH, APPRENTICESHIP PROBLEMS 21. GENERAL EDUCATION AND SCHOOL POLICIES 22. EDUCATION/UPBRINGING OF YOUTH IN GENERAL 23. HEALTH POLICIES, BETTER HEALTH SERVICES 24. BETTER, MORE HOSPI:ALS 25. BETTER OLD AGE PROVISIONS, INCREASE PENSION; ALSO: LOWER THE MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE 26. SECURE PENSIONS 27. GENERAL MENTIONS ON PENSIONS 28. SOCIAL HOUSING, LOW RENTS 29. IMPROVEMENTS FOR WORKING WOMEN; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR MOTHERS 30. GENERAL MENTIONS OF SOCIAL POLITICS, AS, FOR EXAMPLE, BETTER SOCIAL ACHIEVEMENTS, BETTER SUPPORT 1 152 - (CONTINUED) - FOR PEOPLE IN NEED 31. YOUTH ALCOHOLISM, DRUG ABUSE, YOUTH DISCIPLINE 32. MENTION OF GUESTWORKERS, I.E. THROW GUESTWORKERS OUT 33. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 34. OTHER TOPICS, I.E., EQUALIZATION OF OPPORTUNITIES 0 RELATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO GERMANIES 35. RELATION WITH GDR - NEUTRAL OR POSITIVE MENTION (E.G., IMPROVE) 36. RELATIONS WITH GDR - NEGATIVE 37. REUNIFICATION 38. OTHER MENTIONS ON INTER-GERMAN POLICIES 0 OTHER DOMESTIC TOPICS 40. INTERNAL SECURITY, FIGHT CRIME 41. FIGHT TERRORISTS, ANARCHISTS 42. SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE 43. SUPPORT FOR SELF-EMPLOYED, MIDDLE CLASS 44. SUPPORT FOR OTHER GROUPS 45. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN RELATION TO ENERGY, NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 46. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN GENERAL 47. SECURE ENERGY SUPPLY 48. GENERAL ENERGY ISSUES 49. OTHER PROBLEMS OF DOMESTIC POLITICS OR PECULIARITIES 0 FOREIGN POLICY 50. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, EG. POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 51. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, EG. NEGATIVE 52. RALATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 53. RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES - NEGATIVE 54. RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 55. RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE - NEGATIVE 56. THIRD WORLD MENTIONS, MIDDLE EAST, FINANCIAL AID - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 57. THIRD WORLD MENTIONS, MIDDLE EAST, FINANCIAL AID - NEGATIVE 58. GENERAL STATEMENTS AS: NO WAR, STABLE FOREIGN POLICY; GUARANTEE(PRESERVE, SAFEGUARD) PEACE, AND SO FORTH 59. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES 1 153 - (CONTINUED) - 60. OTHER ISSUES 00. INAP., NOT ASKED IN JANUARY-OCTOBER 99. DK, REFUSED, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0285 Q.119(2) IMP PROBLEMS 2 MD=0 REF 0285 LOC 412 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 64-65 0 Q.119(2). SECOND PROBLEM MENTIONED ----------------------------------- ECONOMIC SITUATION 01. PRICE STABILITY, NO INFLATION, STABLE GERMAN MARK, WAGE AND PRICE STOP 02. JOBS, SECURE JOBS, CREATE JOBS, FULL EMPLOYMENT, ELIMINATE UNEMPLOYMENT (EXCEPT IN RELATION TO GUESTWORKERS) 03. SPECIFICALLY: YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT (NOT: PROBLEMS WITH SCHOOLS AND APPRENTICES) 04. GENERAL: IMPROVE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION, ECONOMIC RECOVERY, STABILIZE ECONOMY, STIMULATE ECONOMY 05. OTHER MENTIONS OF ECONOMIC SITUATION 06. MONTANUNION, CO-DETERMINATION 07. STIMULATE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION (GENERALLY), ABOVE ALL BUILDING PRICES 08. SUPPORT SAVINGS, STIMULATE SAVINGS 0 TAXES, FINANCES 10. LOWER TAXES, DECREASE TAX LOAD 11. REFORM OF THE TAX SYSTEM 12. GENERAL MENTIONS OF TAXATION OR FINANCIAL POLICIES 13. FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES AND INCOMES, STATE DEBTS 14. MENTIONS OF STATE FEES 15. OTHER MENTIONS OF TAXES AND FINANCES 0 SOCIAL, DOMESTIC, EDUCATION POLICIES 20. SCHOOL ISSUES, APPRENTICESHIP, JOB POSITIONS, DO 1 154 - (CONTINUED) - MORE FOR YOUTH, APPRENTICESHIP PROBLEMS 21. GENERAL EDUCATION AND SCHOOL POLICIES 22. EDUCATION/UPBRINGING OF YOUTH IN GENERAL 23. HEALTH POLICIES, BETTER HEALTH SERVICES 24. BETTER, MORE HOSPI:ALS 25. BETTER OLD AGE PROVISIONS, INCREASE PENSION; ALSO: LOWER THE MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE 26. SECURE PENSIONS 27. GENERAL MENTIONS ON PENSIONS 28. SOCIAL HOUSING, LOW RENTS 29. IMPROVEMENTS FOR WORKING WOMEN; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR MOTHERS 30. GENERAL MENTIONS OF SOCIAL POLITICS, AS, FOR EXAMPLE, BETTER SOCIAL ACHIEVEMENTS, BETTER SUPPORT FOR PEOPLE IN NEED 31. YOUTH ALCOHOLISM, DRUG ABUSE, YOUTH DISCIPLINE 32. MENTION OF GUESTWORKERS, I.E. THROW GUESTWORKERS OUT 33. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 34. OTHER TOPICS, I.E., EQUALIZATION OF OPPORTUNITIES 0 RELATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO GERMANIES 35. RELATION WITH GDR - NEUTRAL OR POSITIVE MENTION (E.G., IMPROVE) 36. RELATIONS WITH GDR - NEGATIVE 37. REUNIFICATION 38. OTHER MENTIONS ON INTER-GERMAN POLICIES 0 OTHER DOMESTIC TOPICS 40. INTERNAL SECURITY, FIGHT CRIME 41. FIGHT TERRORISTS, ANARCHISTS 42. SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE 43. SUPPORT FOR SELF-EMPLOYED, MIDDLE CLASS 44. SUPPORT FOR OTHER GROUPS 45. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN RELATION TO ENERGY, NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 46. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN GENERAL 47. SECURE ENERGY SUPPLY 48. GENERAL ENERGY ISSUES 49. OTHER PROBLEMS OF DOMESTIC POLITICS OR PECULIARITIES 0 FOREIGN POLICY 50. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, EG. POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 1 155 - (CONTINUED) - 51. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, EG. NEGATIVE 52. RALATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 53. RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES - NEGATIVE 54. RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 55. RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE - NEGATIVE 56. THIRD WORLD MENTIONS, MIDDLE EAST, FINANCIAL AID - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 57. THIRD WORLD MENTIONS, MIDDLE EAST, FINANCIAL AID - NEGATIVE 58. GENERAL STATEMENTS AS: NO WAR, STABLE FOREIGN POLICY; GUARANTEE(PRESERVE, SAFEGUARD) PEACE, AND SO FORTH 59. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES 60. OTHER ISSUES 00. INAP., NOT ASKED IN JANUARY-OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0286 Q.119(3) IMP PROBLEMS 3 MD=0 REF 0286 LOC 414 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 66-67 0 Q.119(3). THIRD PROBLEM MENTIONED ---------------------------------- ECONOMIC SITUATION 01. PRICE STABILITY, NO INFLATION, STABLE GERMAN MARK, WAGE AND PRICE STOP 02. JOBS, SECURE JOBS, CREATE JOBS, FULL EMPLOYMENT, ELIMINATE UNEMPLOYMENT (EXCEPT IN RELATION TO GUESTWORKERS) 03. SPECIFICALLY: YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT (NOT: PROBLEMS WITH SCHOOLS AND APPRENTICES) 04. GENERAL: IMPROVE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION, ECONOMIC RECOVERY, STABILIZE ECONOMY, STIMULATE ECONOMY 05. OTHER MENTIONS OF ECONOMIC SITUATION 06. MONTANUNION, CO-DETERMINATION 07. STIMULATE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION (GENERALLY), ABOVE ALL BUILDING PRICES 08. SUPPORT SAVINGS, STIMULATE SAVINGS 0 TAXES, FINANCES 1 156 - (CONTINUED) - 10. LOWER TAXES, DECREASE TAX LOAD 11. REFORM OF THE TAX SYSTEM 12. GENERAL MENTIONS OF TAXATION OR FINANCIAL POLICIES 13. FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES AND INCOMES, STATE DEBTS 14. MENTIONS OF STATE FEES 15. OTHER MENTIONS OF TAXES AND FINANCES 0 SOCIAL, DOMESTIC, EDUCATION POLICIES 20. SCHOOL ISSUES, APPRENTICESHIP, JOB POSITIONS, DO MORE FOR YOUTH, APPRENTICESHIP PROBLEMS 21. GENERAL EDUCATION AND SCHOOL POLICIES 22. EDUCATION/UPBRINGING OF YOUTH IN GENERAL 23. HEALTH POLICIES, BETTER HEALTH SERVICES 24. BETTER, MORE HOSPI:ALS 25. BETTER OLD AGE PROVISIONS, INCREASE PENSION; ALSO: LOWER THE MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE 26. SECURE PENSIONS 27. GENERAL MENTIONS ON PENSIONS 28. SOCIAL HOUSING, LOW RENTS 29. IMPROVEMENTS FOR WORKING WOMEN; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR MOTHERS 30. GENERAL MENTIONS OF SOCIAL POLITICS, AS, FOR EXAMPLE, BETTER SOCIAL ACHIEVEMENTS, BETTER SUPPORT FOR PEOPLE IN NEED 31. YOUTH ALCOHOLISM, DRUG ABUSE, YOUTH DISCIPLINE 32. MENTION OF GUESTWORKERS, I.E. THROW GUESTWORKERS OUT 33. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 34. OTHER TOPICS, I.E., EQUALIZATION OF OPPORTUNITIES 0 RELATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO GERMANIES 35. RELATION WITH GDR - NEUTRAL OR POSITIVE MENTION (E.G., IMPROVE) 36. RELATIONS WITH GDR - NEGATIVE 37. REUNIFICATION 38. OTHER MENTIONS ON INTER-GERMAN POLICIES 0 OTHER DOMESTIC TOPICS 40. INTERNAL SECURITY, FIGHT CRIME 41. FIGHT TERRORISTS, ANARCHISTS 42. SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE 43. SUPPORT FOR SELF-EMPLOYED, MIDDLE CLASS 1 157 - (CONTINUED) - 44. SUPPORT FOR OTHER GROUPS 45. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN RELATION TO ENERGY, NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 46. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN GENERAL 47. SECURE ENERGY SUPPLY 48. GENERAL ENERGY ISSUES 49. OTHER PROBLEMS OF DOMESTIC POLITICS OR PECULIARITIES 0 FOREIGN POLICY 50. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, EG. POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 51. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, EG. NEGATIVE 52. RALATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 53. RELATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES - NEGATIVE 54. RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 55. RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE - NEGATIVE 56. THIRD WORLD MENTIONS, MIDDLE EAST, FINANCIAL AID - POSITIVE, NEUTRAL 57. THIRD WORLD MENTIONS, MIDDLE EAST, FINANCIAL AID - NEGATIVE 58. GENERAL STATEMENTS AS: NO WAR, STABLE FOREIGN POLICY; GUARANTEE(PRESERVE, SAFEGUARD) PEACE, AND SO FORTH 59. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES 60. OTHER ISSUES 00. INAP., NOT ASKED IN JANUARY-OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0287 Q.119(A) SATSF POL EVNTS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0287 LOC 416 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 68 0 Q.119(A). THINKING BACK TO POLITICAL EVENTS IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY IN 1980, ARE YOU ON BALANCE MORE SATISFIED OR DISSATISFIED? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE SATISFIED 2. MORE DISSATISFIED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 1 158 - 0 VAR 0288 Q.120 REUNIFN LIKELY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0288 LOC 417 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 69 0 Q.120. FOR OVER 30 YEARS NOW GERMANY HAS BEEN DIVIDED. DO YOU THINK THAT THE REUNIFICATION <"ZUSAMMENSCHLUSS"> OF THE TWO GERMAN STATES WILL HAPPEN DURING THE NEXT 30 YEARS: WITH CERTAINTY, PERHAPS, LESS LIKELY, OR IS IT TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. WILL OCCUR WITH CERTAINTY 2. WILL PERHAPS OCCUR 3. IS LESS LIKELY 4. IS TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0289 Q.121 FAVOR REUNIFICATN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0289 LOC 418 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 70 0 Q.121. ARE YOU PERSONALLY IN FAVOR OF THE REUNIFICATION OF THE TWO GERMAN STATES, OPPOSED TO THE REUNIFICATION, OR DOES THE REUNIFICATION NOT MATTER TO YOU? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. IN FAVOR 2. OPPOSED 3. DOES NOT MATTER 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0290 Q.122 NEGOTN POSITION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0290 LOC 419 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 71 0 Q.122. IN THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE GDR , DO YOU THINK THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TENDS TO TAKE TOO HARD A LINE, TOO SOFT A STAND, OR IS IT ACTING JUST RIGHT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 159 - (CONTINUED) - 1. TOO HARD 2. TOO SOFT 3. JUST RIGHT 0. INAP., NOT ASKED IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0291 Q.123 REDUCE ECON COOP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0291 LOC 420 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 72 0 Q.123. RECENTLY THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC AND TEH GDR HAS DETERIORATED. SHOULD THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC THEREFORE REDUCE ECONOMIC COOPERATION WITH THE GDR, OR SHOULD IT BE LEFT AS IT IS? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. REDUCE 2. LEAVE AS IS 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0292 Q.124 GDR CITIZENSHIP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0292 LOC 421 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 73 0 Q.124. GDR-CITIZENSHIP IS NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC. WHAT DO YOU THINK: SHOULD WE RECOGNIZE GDR CITIZENSHIP IN THE FUTURE, OR SHOULD WE CONTINUE NOT TO RECOGNIZE IT? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. RECOGNIZE GDR CITIZENSHIP 2. DON'T RECOGNIZE GDR CITIZENSHIP 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 1 160 - 0 VAR 0293 Q.125 KNOW PEOPLE GDR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0293 LOC 422 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 74 0 Q.125. DO YOU HAVE RELATIVES, FRIENDS OR ACQUAINTANCES WHO LIVE IN EAST BERLIN OR IN THE GDR? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, RELATIVES ONLY 2. YES, FRIENDS OR ACQUAINTANCES ONLY 3. YES, RELATIVES, FRIENDS AND ACQUAINTANCES 4. NO 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN NOVEMBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0294 Q.S.A HOUSEHOLD SIZE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0294 LOC 423 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 75 0 Q.S.A. HOW MANY PERSONS PERMANENTLY LIVE IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD? I MEAN PEOPLE WHO SLEEP AND EAT HERE, INCLUDING YOURSELF. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ONE PERSON 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. NINE OR MORE PERSONS 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0295 Q.SB NUMBER 18 AND ABOVE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0295 LOC 424 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 76 0 Q.S.B. (INFORMAL QUESTION) NUMBER OF PERSONS IN THE HOUSEHOLD AGED 18 AND ABOVE. ---------------------------------------------------- 1. ONE PERSON . 1 161 - (CONTINUED) - . 9. NINE OR MORE PERSONS 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0296 Q.SC SEX NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0296 LOC 425 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 77 0 Q.S.C. RESPONDENT'S SEX IS: ---------------------------- 1. MALE 2. FEMALE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0297 Q.S.D AGE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0297 LOC 426 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 78-79 0 Q.S.D. WOULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME YOUR AGE? ------------------------------------------ ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. 18. EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD . . 99. NINETY-NINE YEARS OLD 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0298 Q.S.E MARITAL STATUS NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0298 LOC 428 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 80 0 Q.S.E. RESPONDENT'S MARITAL STATUS IS: --------------------------------------- 1. MARRIED 2. SINGLE 3. DIVORCED, SEPARATED 4. WIDOWED 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '08' DK 8 COL 1- 2 1 162 - ---------------------------------- 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 8 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 8 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 8 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- 1 163 - 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 8 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0299 Q.S.F KIND OF SCHOOL MD=0 REF 0299 LOC 429 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 21 0 Q.S.F. WHAT KIND OF SCHOOL DID YOU LAST ATTEND; I MEAN IN WHICH KIND OF SCHOOL DID YOU COMPLETE YOUR EDUCATION? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WITHOUT COMPLETED APPRENTICESHIP OR VOCATIONAL TRAINING 2. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WITH COMPLETED APPRENTICESHIP OR VOCATIONAL TRAINING 3. SECONDARY SCHOOL, TRADE- OR COMMERCIAL SCHOOL 4. SECONDARY SCHOOL, WITH TENTH GRADE DIPLOMA ("MITTLERE REIFE"), TRADE- OR COMMERCIAL 5. SECONDARY SCHOOL, BEYOND TENTH GRADE DIPLOMA, BUT WITHOUT "ABITUR" 6. HIGHER SPECIALIZED OR TECHNICAL SCHOOL, WITH DIPLOMA ("FACHSCHULE MIT ABSCHLUSS") 7. SECONDARY SCHOOL, THROUGH THIRTEENTH GRADE ("ABITUR") 8. UNIVERSITY, WITHOUT DEGREE 9. UNIVERSITY, WITH DEGREE 0. NA 1 164 - 0 VAR 0300 Q.S.G EMPLOYMENT STATUS NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0300 LOC 430 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 22-23 0 Q.S.G. ARE YOU PRESENTLY EMPLOYED, OR WERE YOU EVER EMPLOYED, OR WHICH OF THE CATEGORIES ON THIS LIST IS APPROPRIATE? ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. PRESENTLY IN FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT (INCLUDING FAMILY DEPENDENTS WHO HELP IN A FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS), NOT APPRENTICES 02. PRESENTLY IN PART-TIME EMPLOYMENT (INCLUDING FAMILY DEPENDENTS WHO HELP IN A FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS), NOT APPRENTICES 03. PRESENTLY WORKING REDUCED HOURS 04. TEMPORARILY UNEMPLOYED 05. AT PRESENT NOT EMPLOYED; PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED 06. RETIRED, RECEIVING PENSION, ETC. 07. NEVER BEEN EMPLOYED 08. PRESENTLY IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING AS APPRENTICE 09. PRESENTLY IN OTHER TYPE OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING, E.G., RESCHOOLING 10. PRESENTLY IN SCHOOL, INCLUDING UNIVERSITY 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0301 Q.S.H OCCUPATIONAL GROUP MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0301 LOC 432 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 24-25 0 Q.S.H. (IF R IS OR WAS EMPLOYED) TO WHICH OF THESE OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS DO YOU (OR DID YOU) BELONG? --------------------------------------------------- 01. SELF-EMPLOYED - LOWER LEVEL (E.G., SMALL SHOP KEEPER, CRAFTSMAN) 02. SELF-EMPLOYED - MEDIUM LEVEL (E.G., PROPRIETOR OF A LARGER STORE, CHIEF SALES REPRESENTATIVE) 03. OWNER OR EXECUTIVE OF A LARGE BUSINESS 04. PROFESSIONAL 05. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE - LOWER LEVEL (E.G., SALES CLERK, SECRETARY) 06. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE - MEDIUM LEVEL (E.G., ACCOUNTANT, CASHIER) 07. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE WITH UNIVERSITY EDUCATION ("WISSENSCHAFTLICHE ANGESTELLTE") 08. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE IN A MANAGERIAL 1 165 - (CONTINUED) - POSITION (E.G., DEPARTMENT HEAD, DIRECTION) 09. CIVIL SERVANT - LOW LEVEL ("BEAMTE DES EINFACHEN DIENSTES") 10. CIVIL SERVANT - MEDIUM LEVEL ("BEAMTE DES MITTLEREN DIENSTES") 11. CIVIL SERVANT - HIGH LEVEL ("BEANTE DES GEHOBENEN DIENSTES") 12. CIVIL SERVANT - HIGHEST LEVEL ("BEANTE DES HOEHEREN DIENSTES") 13. SEMI-SKILLED OR UNSKILLED WORKER 14. SKILLED WORKER 15. FARM WORKER 16. FARMER, SMALL FARM 17. FARMER, MEDIUM-SIZED FARM 18. FARMER, LARGE FARM 00. INAP., CODED 7-10 IN Q.SG 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0302 Q.S.H(1) COMPARE FATHER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0302 LOC 434 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 26 0 Q.S.H(1). (IF R IS PRESENTLY EMPLOYED)WHEN YOU COMPARE YOUR OCCUPATIONAL POSITION WITH THAT OF YOUR FATHER, WHAT WOULD YOU SAY: HAVE YOU ACHIEVED A BETTER POSITION, THE SAME POSITION, OR NOT AS GOOD A POSITION AS YOUR FATHER?/ ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. BETTER POSITION 2. THE SAME POSITION 3. NOT SO GOOD A POSITION 0. INAP., CODED 4-10 IN Q.SG; ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0303 Q.S.J RLTNSHP TO HEAD NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0303 LOC 435 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 27 0 Q.S.J. ARE YOU THE HEAD OF THIS HOUSEHOLD, OR WHAT IS YOUR RELATION TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 166 - (CONTINUED) - 1. R IS HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 2. R IS THE SPOUSE OF THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 3. R IS ACHILD (INCLUDING SON- OR DAUGHTER-IN-LAW) OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 4. R IS PARENT (OR PARENT-IN-LAW) OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 5. OTHER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0304 Q.S.K HEAD EMPLOYMENT MD=0 REF 0304 LOC 436 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 28-29 0 Q.S.K. IS THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD EMPLOYED? WHICH OF THE CATEGORIES ON THIS LIST IS APPROPRIATE? ----------------------------------------------------------- 01. PRESENTLY IN FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT (INCLUDING FAMILY DEPENDENTS WHO HELP IN A FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS), NOT APPRENTICES 02. PRESENTLY IN PART-TIME EMPLOYMENT (INCLUDING FAMILY DEPENDENTS WHO HELP IN A FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS), NOT APPRENTICES 03. PRESENTLY WORKING REDUCED HOURS 04. TEMPORARILY UNEMPLOYED 05. AT PRESENT NOT EMPLOYED; PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED 06. RETIRED, RECEIVING PENSION, ETC. 07. NEVER BEEN EMPLOYED 08. PRESENTLY IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING AS APPRENTICE 09. PRESENTLY IN OTHER TYPE OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING, E.G., RESCHOOLING 10. PRESENTLY IN SCHOOL, INCLUDING UNIVERSITY 00. INAP., CODED 1 IN Q.SJ 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0305 Q.S.L HEAD OCCUP GROUP MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0305 LOC 438 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 30-31 0 Q.S.L. (IF HH IS OR WAS EMPLOYED AND R IS NOT HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD) TO WHICH OCCUPATIONAL GROUP DOES (OR DID) THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD BELONG? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 167 - (CONTINUED) - 01. SELF-EMPLOYED - LOWER LEVEL (E.G., SMALL SHOP KEEPER, CRAFTSMAN) 02. SELF-EMPLOYED - MEDIUM LEVEL (E.G., PROPRIETOR OF A LARGER STORE, CHIEF SALES REPRESENTATIVE) 03. OWNER OR EXECUTIVE OF A LARGE BUSINESS 04. PROFESSIONAL 05. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE - LOWER LEVEL (E.G., SALES CLERK, SECRETARY) 06. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE - MEDIUM LEVEL (E.G., ACCOUNTANT, CASHIER) 07. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE WITH UNIVERSITY EDUCATION ("WISSENSCHAFTLICHE ANGESTELLTE") 08. SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEE IN A MANAGERIAL POSITION (E.G., DEPARTMENT HEAD, DIRECTION) 09. CIVIL SERVANT - LOW LEVEL ("BEAMTE DES EINFACHEN DIENSTES") 10. CIVIL SERVANT - MEDIUM LEVEL ("BEAMTE DES MITTLEREN DIENSTES") 11. CIVIL SERVANT - HIGH LEVEL ("BEANTE DES GEHOBENEN DIENSTES") 12. CIVIL SERVANT - HIGHEST LEVEL ("BEANTE DES HOEHEREN DIENSTES") 13. SEMI-SKILLED OR UNSKILLED WORKER 14. SKILLED WORKER 15. FARM WORKER 16. FARMER, SMALL FARM 17. FARMER, MEDIUM-SIZED FARM 18. FARMER, LARGE FARM 00. INAP., CODED 1 IN Q.SJ 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0306 Q.S.L(1) I'ER CHECK MD=0 REF 0306 LOC 440 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 32 0 Q.S.L(1). RESPONDENT IS: ---------------------------------------------- MALE 1. EMPLOYED 2. RETIRED 3. APPRENTICE, STUDENT 0 1 168 - (CONTINUED) - FEMALE 4. SINGLE OR DIVORCED 5. MARRIED OR WIDOWED 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0307 Q.S.L(2) CMPR HUSBD/FTHR MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0307 LOC 441 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 33 0 Q.S.L(2). WHEN YOU COMPARE THE (FORMER) OCCUPATIONAL POSITION OF YOUR HUSBAND WITH THAT OF YOUR FATHER, WHAT WOULD YOU SAY: HAS YOUR HUSBAND GONE FURTHER, OR HAS HE NOT GOTTEN AS FAR? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. GONE FURTHER 2. SAME 3. NOT AS FAR 0. INAP., CODED 1-4 IN Q.S.L(1); ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 9. DON'T KNOW 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0308 Q.S.L(3-6) OCCUPATION MD=0 REF 0308 LOC 442 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 34 0 Q.S.L(3). WHAT IS/WAS YOUR OCCUPATION? Q.S.L(4). WHAT IS/WAS YOUR FATHER'S OCCUPATION? Q.S.L(5). WHAT IS/WAS YOUR HUSBAND'S OCCUPATION? Q.S.L(6). HERE IS A LIST WITH OCCUPATION GROUPS. PLEASE READ THROUGH THIS LIST AND TELL ME, WHICH OF THESE GROUPS CONTAINS THE OCCUPATIONS WHICH ARE MOST SIMILAR TO THE OCCUPATION YOU JUST TOLD ME? I MEAN MOST SIMILAR IN THE SENSE OF WHAT ACTIVITY IS PERFORMED, OF THE PRESTIGE, THE PAY, THE RESPONSIBILITIES, ETC. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 169 - (CONTINUED) - 1. GROUP 1: LOWER MIDDLE CLASS, NON-INDUSTRIAL 2. GROUP 2: LOWER LOWER CLASS 3. GROUP 3: UPPER LOWER CLASS, INDUSTRIAL 4. GROUP 4: LOWER MIDDLE CLASS, NON-INDUSTRIAL 5. GROUP 5: UPPER MIDDLE CLASS 6. GROUP 6: UPPER CLASS 7. GROUP 7: LOWER UPPER CLASS 8. GROUP 8: MIDDLE MIDDLE CLASS 9. GROUP 9: UPPER LOWER CLASS, NON-INDUSTRIAL 0. NA; INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0309 Q.S.M UNION MEMBER MD=9 REF 0309 LOC 443 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 35 0 Q.S.M. ARE YOU OR IS SOMEONE ELSE IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD A MEMBER OF A LABOR UNION? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. YES, RESPONDENT 2. YES, ONLY SOMEONE ELSE 3. YES, R AND OTHER 4. NO 9. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0310 Q.S.N RELIGION MD=9 REF 0310 LOC 444 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 36 0 Q.S.N. WHAT IS YOUR RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE? ------------------------------------------ 1. CATHOLIC 2. PROTESTANT/LUTHERAN 3. OTHER 4. NONE 9. NA 0 1 170 - 0 VAR 0311 Q.S.O CHURCH ATTENDENCE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0311 LOC 445 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 37 0 Q.S.O. (IF R HAS A RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE) GENERALLY, HOW FREQUENTLY DO YOU ATTEND CHURCH? PLEASE GIVE JUST THE APPROPRIATE LETTER ON THIS LIST. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. A: EVERY SUNDAY 2. B: ALMOST EVERY SUNDAY 3. C: NOW AND THEN 4. D: ONCE A YEAR 5. E: LESS OFTEN 6. F: NEVER 0. INAP., CODED 4 OR 9 IN Q.S.N 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0312 Q.S.P PARTY ID MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0312 LOC 446 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 38 0 Q.S.P. MANY PEOPLE IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC LEAN TOWARD A PARTICULAR PARTY FOR A LONG TIME, ALTHOUGH THEY MAY OCCASIONALLY VOTE FOR A DIFFERENT PARTY. HOW ABOUT YOU? DO YOU IN GENERAL LEAN TOWARD A PARTICULAR PARTY? IF SO, WHICH ONE? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPD 2. CDU 3. CDU/CSU 4. CSU 5. FDP 6. OTHER 7. NO PARTY LEANING 8. DK 9. REFUSED 0 1 171 - 0 VAR 0313 Q.S.Q STRENGTH PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0313 LOC 447 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 39 0 Q.S.Q. (IF R LEANS TOWARD A PARTY) TAKEN ALTOGETHER, HOW STRONGLY OR WEAKLY DO YOU LEAN TOWARD THIS PARTICULAR PARTY: VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, MODERATELY, FAIRLY WEAKLY, OR VERY WEAKLY? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. VERY STRONGLY 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 3. MODERATELY 4. FAIRLY WEAKLY 5. VERY WEAKLY 0. INAP., CODED 7-9 IN Q.S.P 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0314 Q.S.R NEIGHBRHD OCCUPTNS MD=9 REF 0314 LOC 448 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 40 0 Q.S.R. LET US ASSUME A VISITOR FROM ELSEWHERE ASKED YOU WHICH OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS ARE PARTICULARLY STRONGLY REPRESENTED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WHICH OF THE DESCRIPTIONS ON THIS LIST WOULD YOU GIVE AS AN ANSWER? PLEASE SIMPLY NAME THE APPROPRIATE LETTER. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. A: ALMOST ONLY WORKERS 2. B: PREDOMINANTLY WORKIERS, BUT ALSO CIVIL SERVANTS AND SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES 3. C: ALMOST ONLY SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES, CIVIL SERVANTS AND SELF-EMPLOYED 4. D: PREDOMINANTLY SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES AND CIVIL SERVANTS, BUT ALSO WORKERS 5. E: ALMOST ONLY FARMERS 6. F: PREDOMINANTLY FARMERS, BUT ALSO WORKERS 7. G: PREDOMINANTLY FARMERS, BUT ALSO SALARIED WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES, AND CIVIL SERVANTS 8. MIXED 9. DK 0 1 172 - 0 VAR 0315 Q.S.S(1) STATE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0315 LOC 449 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 41-42 0 Q.S.S(1). FEDERAL STATE IN WHICH INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED. ---------------------------------------------------------- 01. SLESWIG-HOLSTEIN ("SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN") 02. HAMBURG 03. LOWER SAXONY 04. BREMEN 05. NORTHRHINE-WESTPHALIA ("NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN") 06. HESSE ("HESSEN") 07. RHINELAND-PALATINATE ("RHEINLAND-PFALZ") 08. BADEN-WUERTTEMBERG 09. BAVARIA ("BAYERN") 10. SAARLAND 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0316 Q.S.S(3) COMMUNITY ID MD=10047 OR GE 10048 REF 0316 LOC 451 WIDTH 5 DK 8 COL 43-47 0 Q.S.S(3). COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION CODE ---------------------------------------- THE FIRST AND SECOND DIGITS OF THE COMMUNITY CODE IDENTIFY THE STATE OF THE INTERVIEW. THE THIRD DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE DISTRICT WITHIN EACH STATE. THE FOURTH AND FIFTH DIGITS IDENTIFY THE COUNTY WITHIN EACH DISTRICT. 01 SCHLESWIG-HOSTEIN 01001. FLENSBURG, STADT 01002. KIEL, STADT 01003. LUEBECK, HANSESTADT 01004. NEUMUENSTER, STADT 01051. DITHMARSCHEN 01053. HERZOGENTUM LAUENBURG 01054. NORDFRIESLAND 01055. OSTHOLSTEIN 01056. PINNEBERG 01057. PLOEN 01058. RENDSBURG-ECKERNFOERDE 01059. SCHLESWIG-FLENSBURG 01060. SEGEBERG 01061. STEINBURG 01062. STORMARN 1 173 - (CONTINUED) - 02 HAMBURG 02000. HAMBURG, FREIE UND HANSESTADT 0 03 NIEDERSACHSEN 03 1 REG.-BEZ. HANNOVER 03112. HANNOVER,LANDESHAUPTSTADT 03131. GRAFSCHAFT DIEPHOLZ 03132. GRAFSCHAFT HOYA 03133. GRAFSCHAFT SCHAUMBURG 03134. HAMELN PYRMONT 03135. HANNOVER 03137. NIENBURG (WESER) 03138. SCHAUMBURG-LIPPE 0 03 2 REG.-BEZ. HILDESHEIM 03231. ALFELD (LEINE) 03234. GOETTINGEN 03235. HILDESHEIM 03236. HOLZMINDEN 03238. NORTHEIM 03239. OSTERODE AM HARZ 0 03 3 REG.-BEZ. LUENEBURG 03312. 03313. WOLFSBURG, STADT 03332. CELLE 03333. FALLINGBOSTEL 03334. GIFHORN 03335. HARBURG 03336. LUECHOW-DANNEBERG 03337. LUENEBURG 03338. SOLTAU 03339. UELZEN 0 03 4 REG.-BEZ. STADE 03411. CUXHAVEN, STADT 03431. BREMERFOERDE 03432. LAND HADELN 1 174 - (CONTINUED) - 03433. OSTERHOLZ 03434. ROTENBURG (WUEMME) 03435. STADE 03436. VERDEN 03437. WASSERMUEHLE 0 03 5 REG.-BEZ. OSNABRUECK 03511. OSNABRUECK, STADT 03531. ASCHENDORF-HUEMMLING 03533. BENTHEIM 03534. LINGEN 03536. MEPPEN 03537. OSNABRUECK 0 03 6 REG.-BEZ. AURICH 03611. EMDEN, STADT 03631. AURICH 03632. LEER 03633. NORDEN 03634. WITTMUND 0 03 7 REG.-BEZ. BRAUNSCHWEIG 03711. BRAUNSCHWEIG, STADT 03713. SALZGITTER, STADT 03733. GANDERSHEIM 03734. GOSLAR 03735. HELMSTEDT 03736. WOLFENBUETTEL 03737. PEINE 0 03 8 REG.-BEZ. OLDENBURG 03811. DELMENHORST, STADT 03812. OLDENBURG, STADT 03813. WILHELMSHAVEN, STADT 03831. AMMERLAND 03832. CLOPPENBURG 03833. FRIESLAND 03834. OLDENBURG 03835. VECHTA 03836. WESERMARSCH 0 1 175 - (CONTINUED) - 04 BREMEN 04111. BREMEN, STADT 04112. BREMERHAVEN, STADT 0 05 NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN 05 1 REG.-BEZ. DUESSELDORF 05111. DUESSELDORF, STADT 05112. DUISBURG, STADT 05113. ESSEN, STADT 05114. KREFELD, STADT 05116. MOENCHENGLADBACH 05117. MUELHEIM A.D. RUHR, STADT 05119. OBERHAUSEN, STADT 05120. REMSCHEID, STADT 05122. SOLINGEN, STADT 05124. WUPPERTAL, STADT 05154. KLEVE 05158. METTMANN 05162. NEUSS 05166. VIERSEN 05170. WESEL 0 05 3 REG.-BEZ. KOELN 05313. AACHEN, STADT 05314. BONN, STADT 05315. KOELN, STADT 05316. LEVERKUSEN, STADT 05354. AACHEN 05358. DUEREN 05362. ERFTKREIS 05366. EUSKIRCHEN 05370. HEINSBERG 05374. OBERBERGISCHER KREIS 05378. RHEINISCH-BERGISCHER KREIS 05382. RHEIN-SIEG-KREIS 0 05 5 REG.-BEZ. MUENSTER 05512. BOTTROP, STADT 05513. GELSENKIRCHEN, STADT 05515. MUENSTER (WESTF.), STADT 05554. BORKEN 1 176 - (CONTINUED) - 05558. COESFELD 05562. RECKLINGHAUSEN 05566. STEINFURT 05570. WARENDORF 0 05 7 REG.-BEZ. DETMOLD 05711. BIELEFELD, STADT 05754. GUETERSLOH 05758. HERFORD 05762. HOEXTER 05766. LIPPE 05770. MINDIN-LUEBBECKE 05774. PADERBORN 0 05 9 REG.-BEZ. ARNSBERG 05911. BOCHUM, STADT 05913. DORTMUND, STADT 05914. HAGEN, STADT 05915. HAMM, STADT 05916. HERNE, STADT 05954. ENNEPE-RUHR-KREIS 05958. HOCHSAUERLANDKREIS 05962. MAERKISCHER KREIS 05966. OLPE 05970. SIEGEN 05974. SOEST 05978. UNNA 0 06 HESSEN 06 1 REG.-BEZ. DARMSTADT 06111. DARMSTADT, STADT 06112. FRANKFURT A. MAIN, STADT 06115. OFFENBACH A. MAIN, STADT 06116. WIESBADEN, LANDESHAUPTSTADT 06117. LAHN, STADT 06171. BERGSTRASSE 06172. DARMSTADT-DIEBURG 06173. GROSS-GERAU 06176. HOCHTAUNUSKREIS 06177. LAND-DILL-KREIS 06178. LIMBURG-WEILBURG 06179. MAIN-KINZIG-KREIS 06180. MAIN-TAUNUS-KREIS 1 177 - (CONTINUED) - 06181. ODENWALDKREIS 06182. OFFENBACH 06183. RHEINGAU-TAUNUS-KREIS 06184. VOGELSBERGKREIS 06185. WETTERAUKREIS 0 06 2 REG.-BEZ. KASSEL 06212. KASSEL, STADT 06272. FULDA 06273. HERSFELD-ROTENBURG 06274. KASSEL 06275. MARBURG-BIEDENKOPF 06276. SCHWALM-EDER-KREIS 06277. WALDECK-FRANKENBERG 06278. WERRA-MEISSNER-KREIS 0 07 RHEINLAND-PFALZ 07 1 REG.-BEZ. KOBLENZ 07111. KOBLENZ, STADT 07131. AHRWEILER 07132. ALTENKIRCHEN 07133. BAD KREUSNACH 07134. BIRKENFELD 07135. COCHEM-ZELL 07137. MAYEN-KOBLENZ 07138. NEUWIED 07140. RHEIN-HUNSRUECK-KREIS 07141. RHEIN-LAHN-KREIS 07143. WESTERWALDKREIS 0 07 2 REG.-BEZ. TRIER 07211. TRIER, STADT 07231. BERNKASTEL-WITTLICH 07232. BITBURG-PRUEM 07235. TRIER-SAARBURG 0 07 3 REG.-BEZ. RHEINHESSEN-PFALZ 07311. FRANKENTHAL (PFALZ), STADT 07312. KAISERLAUTERN, STADT 07313. LANDAU IN DER PFALZ, STADT 07314. LUDWIGSHAFEN AM RHEIN, STADT 1 178 - (CONTINUED) - 07315. MAINZ, STADT 07316. NEUSTADT AS DER WEINSTRASSE, STADT 07317. PIRMASENS, STADT 07318. SPEYER, STADT 07319. WORMS, STADT 07320. ZWEIBRUECKEN, STADT 07331. ALZEY-WORMS 07332. BAD DUERKHEIM 07333. DONNERSBERGKREIS 07334. GERMERSHEIM 07335. KAISERSLAUTERN 07336. KUSEL 07337. LANDAU-BAD BERSABERN 07338. LUDWIGSHAFEN 07339. MAINZ-BINGEN 07340. PIRMASENS 0 08 BADEN-WUERTTEMBERG 08 1 REG.-BEZ. STUTTGART 08111. STUTTGART, LANDESHAUPTSTADT 08115. BOEBLINGEN 08116. ESSLINGEN 08117. GOEPPINGEN 08118. LUDWIGSBURG 08119. REMS-MURR-KREIS 08121. HEILBROWN, STADT 08125. HEILBROWN 08126. HOHENLOHE 08127. SCHWAEBISCH HALL 08128. MAIN-TAUBER-KREIS 08135. HEIDENHEIM 08136. OSTALBKREIS 0 08 2 REG.-BEZ. KARLSRUHE 08211. BADEN BADEN, STADT 08212. KARLSRUHE, STADT 08215. KARLSRUHE 08216. RASTATT 08221. HEIDELBERG, STADT 08222. MANNHEIM, STADT 08225. NECKAR-ODENWALD-KREIS 08226. RHEIN-NECKAR-KREIS 08231. PFORZHEIM, STADT 08235. CALW 08236. ENZKREIS 1 179 - (CONTINUED) - 08237. FREUDENSTADT 0 08 3 REG.-BEZ. FREIBURG 08311. FREIBURG IM BREISGAU, STADT 08315. BREISGAU-HOCHSCHWARZWALD 08316. EMMENDINGEN 08317. ORTENAUKREIS 08325. ROTTWEIL 08326. SCHWARZWALD-BAAR-KREIS 08327. TUTTLINGEN 08335. KONSTANZ 08336. LOERRACH 08337. WALDSHUT 0 08 4 REG.-BEZ. TUEBINGEN 08415. REUTLINGEN 08416. TUEBINGEN 08417. ZOLLERNALBKREIS 08421. ULM, STADT 08425. ALB-DONAU-KREIS 08426. BIBERACH 08435. BODENSEEKREIS 08436. RAVENSBURG 08437. SIGMARINGEN 0 09 BAYERN 09 1 REG.-BEZ. OBERBAYERN 09161. INGOLSTADT, STADT 09162. MUENCHEN, STADT 09163. ROSENHEIM, STADT 09171. ALTOETTING 09172. BERCHTESGADENER LAND 09173. BAD TOELZ-WOLFRATSHAUSEN 09174. DACHAU 09175. EBERSBERG 09176. EICHSTAETT 09177. ERDING 09178. FREISING 09179. FUERSTENFELDBRUCK 09180. GARMISCH-PARTENKIRCHEN 09181. LANDSBERG A. LECH 09182. MIESBACH 1 180 - (CONTINUED) - 09183. MUEHLDORF A. INN 09184. MUENCHEN 09185 NEUBURG-SCHROBENHAUSEN 09186. PFAFFENHOFEN A. D. ILM 09187. ROSENHEIM 09188. STARNBERG 09189. TRAUNSTEIN 09190. WEILHEIM-SCHONGAU 0 09 2 REG.-BEZ. NIEDERBAYERN 09261. LANDSHUT, STADT 09262. PASSAU, STADT 09263. STRAUBING, STADT 09271. DEGENDORF 09272. FREYUNG-GRAFENAU 09273. KELHEIM 09274. LANDSHUT 09275. PASSAU 09276. REGEN 09277. ROTTAL-INN 09278. STRAUBING-BOGEN 09279. DINGOLFING-LANDAU 0 09 3 REG.-BEZ. OBERPFALZ 09361. AMBERG, STADT 09362. REGENSBURG, STADT 09363. WEIDEN I. D. OPF., STADT 09371. AMBERG-SULZBACH 09372. CHAM 09373. NEUMARKT I.D. OPF. 09374. NEUSTADT A.D. WALDNAAB 09375. REGENSBURG 09376. SCHWANDORF 09377. TIRSCHENREUTH 0 09 4 REG.-BEZ. OBERFRANKEN 09461. BAMBERG, STADT 09462. BAYREUTH, STADT 09463. COBURG, STADT 09464. HOF, STADT 09471. BAMBERG 09472. BAYREUTH 09473. COBURG 09474. FORCHHEIM 1 181 - (CONTINUED) - 09475. HOF 09476. KRONACH 09477. KULMBACH 09478. LICHTENFELS 09479. WUNSIEDEL I. FICHTELGEBIRGE 0 09 5 REG.-BEZ. MITTELFRANKEN 09561. ANSBACH, STADT 09562. ERLANGEN, STADT 09563. FUERTH, STADT 09564. NUERNBERG, STADT 09565. SCHWABACH, STADT 09571. ANSBACH 09572. ERLANGEN-HOECHSTADT 09573. FUERTH 09574. NUERNBERGER LAND 09575. NEUSTADT A.D. AICH-BAD WINDSHEIM 09576. ROTH 09577. WEISSENBURG-GUNZENHAUSEN 0 09 6 REG.-BEZ. UNTERFRANKEN 09661. ASCHAFFENBURG, STADT 09662. SCHWEINFURT, STADT 09663. WUERZBURG, STADT 09671. ASCHAFFENBURG 09672. BAD KISSINGEN 09673. RHOEN-GRABFELD 09674. HASSBERGE 09675. KITZINGEN 09676. MILTENBERG 09677. MAIN-SPESSART 09678. SCHWEINFURT 09679. WUERZBURG 0 09 7 REG.-BEZ. SCHWABEN 09761. AUGSBURG, STADT 09762. KAUFBEUREN, STADT 09763. KEMPTEN (ALLGAEU), STADT 09764. MEMMINGEN, STADT 09771. AICHACH-FRIEDBERG 09772. AUGSBURG 09773. DILLINGEN A. D. DONAU 09774. GUENZBURG 09775. NEU-ULM 1 182 - (CONTINUED) - 09776. LINDAU (BODENSEE) 09777. OSTALLGAEU 09778. UNTERALLGAEU 09779. DONAU-RIES 09780. OBERALLGAEU 0 10 SAARLAND 10041. STADTVERBAND SAARBRUECKEN 10042. MERZIG-WADERN 10043. NEUNKIRCHEN 10044. SAARLOUIS 10045. SAAR-PFALZ-KREIS 10046. SANKT WENDEL 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0317 Q.S.S(4) SIZE OF TOWN NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0317 LOC 456 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 48 0 Q.S.S(4). SIZE OF TOWN ----------------------- 1. LESS THAN 2,000 INHABITANTS 2. 2,000-3,000 3. 3,000-5,000 4. 5,000-20,000 5. 20,000-30,000 6. 30,000-50,000 7. 50,000-100,000 8. 100,000-200,000 9. 200,000-500,000 0. 500,000 AND MORE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0318 Q.74(A1)/75(A2) SPD 1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0318 LOC 457 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 49-50 0 < NOTE: THE FOLLOWING VARIABLES (318-353) ARE REFORMATTED VERSIONS OF VARIABLES 178 TO 186. EACH OF THE ORIGINAL VARIABLES HAS BEEN EXPANDED TO FOUR VARIABLES. SEE NOTE 1 IN THE APPENDIX FOR MORE INFORMATION. > Q.74. NOW COULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHAT, IN YOUR OPINION, 1 183 - (CONTINUED) - ARE THE GOOD AND THE BAD POINTS OF THE FOLLOWING POLITICAL PARTIES: THE SPD, THE CDU/CSU, AND THE FDP. LET'S TAKE THE SPD FIRST: WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE SPD? Q.74(A1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.75. AND WHAT DO YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE SPD? Q.75(A1). ----------------------------------------------------------- IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 1 184 - (CONTINUED) - 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 73. 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 1 185 - (CONTINUED) - 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0319 Q.74/75(A2) SPD 1 EVALTN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0319 LOC 459 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 51 0 Q.74(A2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT Q.75(A2). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0320 Q.74/75(A3) SPD 1 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0320 LOC 460 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 52 0 Q.74(A3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 1 186 - (CONTINUED) - Q.75(A3). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0321 Q.74/75(A4) SPD 1 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0321 LOC 461 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 53 0 Q.74(A4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: FIRST MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.75(A4). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0322 Q.74(B1)/75(B1) SPD 2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0322 LOC 462 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 54-55 0 Q.74(B1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.75(B1). --------------------------------------------------------- 1 187 - (CONTINUED) - IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 1 188 - (CONTINUED) - GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 73. 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 1 189 - 0 VAR 0323 Q.74/75(B2) SPD 2 EVALTN MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0323 LOC 464 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 56 0 Q.74(B2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - EVALUATION OF THE CONCEPT Q.75(B2). --------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0324 Q.74/75(B3) SPD 2 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0324 LOC 465 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 57 0 Q.74(B3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.75(B3). --------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0325 Q.74/75(B4) SPD 2 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0325 LOC 466 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 58 0 Q.74(B4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: SECOND MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.75(B4). --------------------------------------------------------- 1 190 - (CONTINUED) - 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0326 Q.74(C1)/75(C1) SPD 3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0326 LOC 467 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 59-60 0 Q.74(C1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.75(C1). -------------------------------------------------------- IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 1 191 - (CONTINUED) - DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 0 1 192 - (CONTINUED) - NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 73. 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0327 Q.74/75(C2) SPD 3 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0327 LOC 469 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 61 0 Q.74(C2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT Q.75(C2). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 1 193 - 0 VAR 0328 Q.74/75(C3) SPD 3 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0328 LOC 470 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 62 0 Q.74(C3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.75(C3). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0329 Q.74/75(C4) SPD 3 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0329 LOC 471 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 63 0 Q.74(C4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE SPD: THIRD MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.75(C4). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 1 194 - 0 VAR 0330 Q.76(A1)/77(A1) CDU 1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0330 LOC 472 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 64-65 0 Q.76. AND NOW, HOW ABOUT THE GOOD AND THE BAD POINTS ABOUT THE CDU/CSU. WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE CDU/CSU? Q.76(A1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.77. AND WHAT DO YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE CDU/CSU? Q.77(A1). ------------------------------------------------------------ IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 1 195 - (CONTINUED) - 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 69. 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 1 196 - (CONTINUED) - 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0331 Q.76/77(A2) CDU 1 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0331 LOC 474 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 66 0 Q.76(A2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT Q.77(A2). ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0332 Q.76/77(A3) CDU 1 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0332 LOC 475 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 67 0 Q.76(A3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.77(A3). ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ASSOCIATIVE 1 197 - (CONTINUED) - 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0333 Q.76/77(A4) CDU 1 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0333 LOC 476 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 68 0 Q.76(A4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: FIRST MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.77(A4). ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0334 Q.76(B1)/77(B1) CDU 2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0334 LOC 477 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 69-70 0 Q.76(B1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.77(B1). ----------------------------------------------------------- IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 1 198 - (CONTINUED) - 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 1 199 - (CONTINUED) - 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 69. 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0335 Q.76/77(B2) CDU 2 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0335 LOC 479 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 71 0 Q.76(B2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 1 200 - (CONTINUED) - Q.77(B2). ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0336 Q.76/77(B3) CDU 2 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0336 LOC 480 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 72 0 Q.76(B3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.77(B3). ----------------------------------------------------------- P 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0337 Q.76/77(B4) CDU 2 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0337 LOC 481 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 73 0 Q.76(B4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: SECOND MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.77(B4). ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 1 201 - (CONTINUED) - 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0338 Q.76(C1)/77(C1) CDU 3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0338 LOC 482 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 74-75 0 Q.76(C1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.77(C1). ------------------------------------------------------------ IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 1 202 - (CONTINUED) - 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 69. 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 1 203 - (CONTINUED) - 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0339 Q.76/77(C2) CDU 3 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0339 LOC 484 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 76 0 Q.76(C2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT Q.77(C2). ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 1 204 - 0 VAR 0340 Q.76/77(C3) CDU 3 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0340 LOC 485 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 77 0 Q.76(C3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.77(C3). ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0341 Q.76/77(C4) CDU 3 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0341 LOC 486 WIDTH 1 DK 8 COL 78 0 Q.76(C4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE CDU/CSU: THIRD MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.77(C4). ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 1 205 - 0 VAR 0342 Q.78(A1)/79(A1) FDP 1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0342 LOC 487 WIDTH 2 DK 8 COL 79-80 0 Q.78. AND NOW, HOW ABOUT THE GOOD AND THE BAD POINTS ABOUT THE FDP. WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE FDP. Q.78(A1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.79. AND WHAT DO YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE FDP? Q.79(A1). ----------------------------------------------------------- IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 1 206 - (CONTINUED) - 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 1 207 - (CONTINUED) - 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '09' DK 9 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 9 COL 3- 6 0 ZA STUDY NUMBER-1053 -------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 9 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT NUMBER ----------------- THIS FIELD MUST BE COMBINED WITH VARIABLE 5, MONTH OF SURVEY, TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY EACH RESPONDENT. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MONTH OF SURVEY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 15 WIDTH 2 DK 9 COL 11-12 0 MONTH OF SURVEY --------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 1 208 - (CONTINUED) - 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0354 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0354 LOC 502 WIDTH 4 DK 9 COL 13-16 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7963 ----------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0355 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0355 LOC 506 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 17 0 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER -------------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET. 1. SPRING, 1983 RELEASE ............................................................... 0 VAR 0356 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0356 LOC 507 WIDTH 3 DK 9 COL 18-20 0 ICPSR PART NUMBER ----------------- THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 1-PART STUDY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0343 Q.78/79(A2) FDP 1 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0343 LOC 489 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 21 0 Q.78(A2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT 1 209 - (CONTINUED) - Q.79(A2). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0344 Q.78/79(A3) FDP 1 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0344 LOC 490 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 22 0 Q.78(A3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.79(A3). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0345 Q.78/79(A4) FDP 1 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0345 LOC 491 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 23 0 Q.78(A4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: FIRST MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.79(A4). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN 1 210 - (CONTINUED) - NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0346 Q.78(B1)/79(B1) FDP 2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0346 LOC 492 WIDTH 2 DK 9 COL 24-25 0 Q.78(B1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.79(B1). --------------------------------------------------------- IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 1 211 - (CONTINUED) - 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 1 212 - (CONTINUED) - 77. 78. 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0347 Q.78/79(B2) FDP 2 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0347 LOC 494 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 26 0 Q.78(B2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT Q.79(B2). --------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0348 Q.78/79(B3) FDP 2 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0348 LOC 495 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 27 0 Q.78(B3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY 1 213 - (CONTINUED) - Q.79(B3). --------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0349 Q.78/79(B4) FDP 2 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0349 LOC 496 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 28 0 Q.78(B4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: SECOND MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.79(B4). --------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO SECOND MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0350 Q.78(C1)/79(C1) FDP 3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0350 LOC 497 WIDTH 2 DK 9 COL 29-30 0 Q.78(C1). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - TYPE OF CONCEPT Q.79(C1). -------------------------------------------------------- 1 214 - (CONTINUED) - IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 10. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS 11. LEFT 12. PROGRESSIVE 13. DEMOCRATIC 14. LIBERAL 15. CONSERVATIVE 16. RADICAL 17. CHRISTIAN 0 SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 20. OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS 21. CHURCH 22. UPPER CLASS 23. MIDDLE CLASS 24. LOWER CLASS 25. THE PEOPLE 26. SENIOR CITIZENS 27. YOUNG PEOPLE 0 DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 30. OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS 31. ECONOMIC POLICY 32. WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33. WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34. SOCIAL POLICY 35. TAX POLICY 36. EDUCATION POLICY 37. DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38. DEFENSE POLICY 39. GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 0 FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 40. OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS 41. "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42. "OSTPOLITIK" 43. WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44. INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45. THIRD WORLD 46. GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 0 1 215 - (CONTINUED) - GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS 50. OTHER 51. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52. COALITION BEHAVIOR 53. POLITICAL MORALITY 54. PARTY PLATFORM 55. "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56. PARTY ORGANIZATION 57. PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 0 POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS 60. OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS 61. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62. CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64. PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65. SPD POLITICIANS 66. CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67. FDP POLITICIANS 68. POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 0 NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS 71. NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72. NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS 0 NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 81. CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82. NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83. OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS 0 NO CONCEPTS 91. POLITICAL DISINTEREST 00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 98. DON'T KNOW 99. NA 0 1 216 - 0 VAR 0351 Q.78/79(C2) FDP 3 EVAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0351 LOC 499 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 31 0 Q.78(C2). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - EVALUATION OF CONCEPT Q.79(C2). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. POSITIVE 2. NEGATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0352 Q.78/79(C3) FDP 3 RELTNP MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0352 LOC 500 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 32 0 Q.78(C3). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND PARTY Q.79(C3). -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ASSOCIATIVE 2. DISSOCIATIVE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0353 Q.78/79(C4) FDP 3 TIME MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0353 LOC 501 WIDTH 1 DK 9 COL 33 0 Q.78(C4). LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT THE FDP: THIRD MENTION - TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT Q.79(C4). -------------------------------------------------------- 1 217 - (CONTINUED) - 1. ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2. PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3. PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN. 4. TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5. NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 0. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN SEPTEMBER; NO THIRD MENTION 9. NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 1 218 - APPENDIX 0 0 *** NOTE 1 *** 0 STANDARD CODE FOR GOOD AND BAD POINTS OF POLITICAL PARTIES THIS NOTE GIVES A SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE CLASSIFICATION SCHEME USED TO CODE THE OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS IN VARIABLES 178-186 AND 318-353. FOR A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION SEE HANS D. KLINGEMANN, STANDARDCODE ZUR VERSCHLUESSELUNG DER EINSTELLUNGEN ZU DEN POLITISCHEN PARTEIEN IN DER BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND, MANNHEIM: ZUMA, SEPTEMBER 1976. THIS CODING SCHEME IS BASED ON THE SMALLEST UNIT OF THE RESPONDENT'S ANSWER, THE ARGUMENT. EACH OF THE RESPONDENT'S ANSWERS CAN CONTAIN SEVERAL ARGUMENTS. EACH ARGUMENT IS TO BE CODED SEPARATELY. AN ARGUMENT IS CHARACTERIZED BY THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURE: (A) THE RESPONDENT NAMES A PARTICULAR ATTRIBUTE OF POLITICAL PARTIES, (B) THIS ATTRIBUTE HAS A SPECIFIC VALUE FOR THE RESPONDENT AND IS EVALUATED BY HIM/HER, AND (C) THE ATTRIBUTE IS LINKED TO A POLITICAL PARTY BY THE RESPONDENT. THE EVALUATED ATTRIBUTE AND THE NATURE OF THE LINK INDICATE THE RESPONDENT'S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE POLITICAL PARTIES. THE RESPONDENT CAN FURTHER SPECIFY THE VALIDITY OF THE ARGUMENT BY INDICATING A TEMPORAL REFERENCE. IF THERE IS MORE THAN ONE ARGUMENT REFERENCING ONE PARTY, THE ATTITUDE OF THE RESPONDENT IS DETERMINED AS THE SUM OF THE (POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE) ARGUMENTS. THE CLASSIFICATION SCHEME IS DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR A SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTION OF THE IDEA ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS. THE BASIC UNIT OF CLASSIFICATION IS THE ARGUMENT. THIS DATA SET CONTAINS THREE ARGUMENTS FOR EACH PARTY. EACH ARGUMENT HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED SEPARATELY IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: A. WHAT TYPE OF IDEAS OR CONCEPTS DOES THE RESPONDENT USE TO DESCRIBE A PARTICULAR PARTY? B. WHAT IS THE EVALUATIVE MEANING OF THIS CONCEPT? C. WHAT RELATIONSHIP DOES THE RESPONDENT PERCEIVE BETWEEN THE POLITICAL OBJECT AND THE IDEA ELEMENT? D. DOES THE ARGUMENT CONTAIN A TIME REFERENCE? NOTE THAT VARIABLES 178-186 AND 318-353 ARE TWO SETS OF THE SAME VARIABLES. IN VARIABLES 178-186, EACH OF THE ABOVE SAME ARGUMENTS (A-D) ARE CODED AS ONE VARIABLE. VARIABLES 318-153 ARE THE SAME VARIABLES, REFORMATTED SO THAT EACH ARGUMENT IS A SEPARATE VARIABLE. - 1 219 - A. TYPES OF CONCEPTS I. IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS (FIRST TWO DIGITS) + 11 LEFT 12 PROGRESSIVE 13 DEMOCRATIC 14 LIBERAL 15 CONSERVATIVE 16 RADICAL 10 OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CONCEPTS II. SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS + 21 CHURCH 22 UPPER CLASS 23 MIDDLE CLASS 24 LOWER CLASS 25 THE PEOPLE 26 SENIOR CITIZENS 27 YOUNG PEOPLE 20 OTHER SOCIAL GROUP CONCEPTS III. DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS + 31 ECONOMIC POLICY 32 WAGE AND PRICE POLICY 33 WORK AND UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 34 SOCIAL POLICY 35 TAX POLICY 36 EDUCATION POLICY 37 DOMESTIC SECURITY, LAW AND ORDER 38 DEFENSE POLICY 39 GENERAL DOMESTIC POLICY 30 OTHER DOMESTIC POLICY CONCEPTS IV. FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS + 41 "DEUTSCHLANDPOLITIK" 42 "OSTPOLITIK" 43 WESTERN AND ALLIANCE POLITICS 44 INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 45 THIRD WORLD 46 GENERAL FOREIGN POLICY 40 OTHER FOREIGN POLICY CONCEPTS V. GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND PARTY RELATED CONCEPTS + 51 GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION COMPETENCE 52 COALITION BEHAVIOR 53 POLITICAL MORALITY 54 PARTY PLATFORM 55 "SELBSTDARSTELLUNG" 56 PARTY ORGANIZATION 57 PARTY FACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 50 OTHER VI. POLITICIANS AND PARTY LEADERS CONCEPTS + 1 220 - 61 CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF SPD 62 CHANCELLOR, CHANCELLOR CANDIDATE OF CDU/CSU 63 PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF FDP 64 PARTY CHAIRPERSON OF CSU 65 SPD POLITICIANS 66 CDU/CSU POLITICIANS 67 FDP POLITICIANS 68 POLITICIANS IN GENERAL 60 OTHER CONCEPTS RELATED TO POLITICIANS VII. NON-PARTISAN CONCEPTS + 71 NON-SPECIFIC PARTY IDENTIFICATION 72 NON-POLITICAL CONCEPTS VIII.NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS + 81 CATEGORICAL EVALUATION 82 NO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES 83 OTHER NON-SPECIFIC CONCEPTS IX. NO CONCEPTS + 91 POLITICAL DISINTEREST 98 DON'T KNOW 99 NOT ASCERTAINED 0 B. EVALUATION OF CONCEPTS (THIRD DIGIT) + 1 POSITIVE 2 NEGATIVE 9 NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 C. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPT AND POLITICAL OBJECT + 1 ASSOCIATIVE (FOURTH DIGIT) 2 DISSOCIATIVE 9 NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 0 D. TIME REFERENCE OF THE ARGUMENT (FIFTH DIGIT) + 1 ONLY PAST, NOT TODAY 2 PAST AS WELL AS TODAY 3 PAST, TODAY AND FUTURE; THIS CATEGORY IS USED WHEN NO TIME REFERENCE IS GIVEN 4 TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE 5 NOT TODAY, BUT IN THE FUTURE 9 NO CONCEPT MENTIONED 1 TERMINATION OF CODEBOOK LIST.