1 - - - GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, 1987 (ICPSR 8971) 0 - - - Principal Investigator Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Mannheim - - - Second ICPSR Release September 1990 - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 1 1 - - BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE AND DATA DISCLAIMER 0 All manuscripts utilizing data made available through the Consortium should acknowledge that fact as well as identify the original collector of the data. In order to get such source acknowledgment listed in social science bibliographic utilities, it is necessary to present them in the form of a footnote or a reference. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: 0 Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (Mannheim). GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, 1987 [Computer file]. 2nd release. Cologne, W. Germany: Zentralarchiv fuer empirische Sozialforschung [producer], 1990. Cologne, W. Germany: Zentralarchiv fuer empirische Sozialforschung and Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1990 0 The ICPSR Council urges all users of the ICPSR data facilities to follow some adaptation of this statement with the parentheses indicating items to be filled in appropriately or deleted by the individual user. 0 The data (and tabulations) utilized in this (publication) were made available (in part) by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. The data for GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, 1987 were originally collected by Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (Mannheim) Neither the collector of the original data nor the Consortium bears any responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here. 0 In order to provide funding agencies with essential information about the use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, each user of the ICPSR data facilities is expected to send two copies of each completed manuscript or thesis abstract to the Consortium. Please indicate in the cover letter which data were used. 1 1 0 DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION - Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (Mannheim) GERMAN ELECTION STUDY, 1987 (ICPSR 8971) - COLLECTION CHANGES: Minor changes, including standardization of question text, have been made to the English language version of the documentation. CLASS IV NOTE: This dataset integrates the separate surveys by coding the same questions from each of the surveys under one variable. This necessitates the use of a study filter variable V3 for all analyses. EXTENT OF COLLECTION: 1 data file + machine-readable documentation DATA FORMAT: OSIRIS and Card Image File Structure: rectangular Cases: 14,375 Variables: 360 Record Length: 459 Records Per Case: 7 1 - * * * MCOUNT statistics * * * ----------------------------- - Records in 9996 1 Records out 10549 0 C cards excluded 1293 0 X cards generated 553 0 No. of variables 369 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 1 - G e r m a n E l e c t i o n S t u d y, 1987 =============================================== ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 Integrated Datapool of Monthly Surveys January 1986 to February 1987 Principal Investigators: Manfred Berger Wolfgang G.Gibowski Dieter Roth Wolfgang Schulte Forschungsgruppe Wahlen e.V., Mannheim and ipos, Mannheim ZENTRALARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG Universitaet zu Koeln Bachemerstr.40 D-5000 Koeln 41 Tel. (0221) 44 40 86 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 2 - 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 3 - Acknowledgement for Assistance ------------------------------ All manuscripts utilizing data made available through the ZENTRALARCHIV or the Consortium should acknowledge that fact as well as identify the original collectors of the data. We kindly ask the users to follow some adaptation of the following statement: The data utilized in this were docu- mented and made available by the ZENTRALARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG. The data for the "German Election Study, 1987" were originally collected by the Forschungsgruppe Wahlen e.V. and ipos, both Mannheim. Neither the original collectors nor the ZENTRALARCHIV bear any responsibility for the analyses or interpretation presented here. In order to provide funding agencies with essential information about the use of archival resources, and to facilitate the exchange of information about research activities based on the ZENTRALARCHIV's holdings, each user is expected to send two copies of each completed manuscript to the ZENTRALARCHIV or the ICPSR. 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 4 - 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 5 - Table of Contents ----------------- The "German Election Study, 1987" in the context of the German Election Data Project 6 Study Description 8 Publications 9 Sampling Information 10 Variable Description List 13 Question Cross-Reference List 17 Codebook Information 22 Codebook 24 Notes 298 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 6 - The "German Election Study, 1987" in the context of the ------------------------------------------------------- German Election Data Project ---------------------------- Election studies are a focal point of the ZENTRALARCHIV's data collection. As the "German Election Data Project" 15 election studies covering the period from 1953 to 1976 have been released and documented. This project started as joint venture of the ZENTRALARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIAL- FORSCHUNG (ZA, Koeln), the ZENTRUM FUER UMFRAGEN, METHODEN UND ANALYSEN (ZUMA, Mannheim) and the INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (ICPSR, Ann Arbor, Michigan). The 1980 German Election Study was cleaned and documented in German by the ZENTRALARCHIV; the translation into English was provided by the ICPSR. Recently, trend and panel studies for the 1983 and for the 1987 elections for the Bundestag were added to the collection by the ZENTRALARCHIV. Furthermore, a Continuity Guide has been prepared for all election studies to facilitate the search for specific indicators or questions across time. Study No. Title Study No. ZA 145 Social Bases of ICPSR 7104 West German Politics, 1953 ZA 55 German Election Studies: July 1961 ICPSR 7099 ZA 56 September 1961 ICPSR 7100 ZA 57 November 1961 ICPSR 7101 ZA 556 German Election Study, September 1965 ICPSR 7103 ZA 314 German Election Study, October 1965 ICPSR 7105 ZA 426-427 German Pre- and Post-Election Study,1969 ICPSR 7098 ZA 525 German Election Study, August-September, ICPSR 7108 1969 ZA 635-637 German Election Panel Study, 1972 ICPSR 7102 ZA 823-825 German Election Panel Study, 1976 ICPSR 7513 ZA 1053 German Election Study, 1980 ICPSR 7963 ZA 1275 German Election Study, 1983 ZA 1276 German Election Panel Study, 1983 ZA 1536 German Election Study, 1987 ZA 1537 German Election Panel Study, 1987 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 7 - The German Election Study, 1987 ------------------------------- This codebook documents the first part of the data available for the 1987 elections for the Bundestag; part 2 is documented separately. The "German Election Study, 1987" is a datapool combining thirteen separate surveys which were conducted monthly by MARPLAN. Twelve surveys -the "Politbarometer" - were organized by the FORSCHUNGSGRUPPE WAHLEN e.V.(Mannheim) as project lea- ders and financed by the Second Television Network (ZDF). Continuity of study content is a particular important aspect of the German Election Study Series. Therefore, an expanded survey was conducted under the responsibility of ipos (Mann- heim) in order to assure continuity. Overall the datapool includes twelve pre-election surveys, namely January 1986 to January 1987, and one comprehensive post-election survey carried out in February 1987. This data- set integrates the separate surveys by coding the same ques- tions from each of the surveys under one variable (which ne- cessitates the use of a study filter variable V3 for all anal- yses). Questions which occur only in single surveys are col- lected following the common variables, but precede the demo- graphic variables which were usually included in all surveys (see Question Cross-Reference List). The study was cleaned and the German codebook was prepared at the ZENTRALARCHIV FUER EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG (Koeln) by Irene Mueller, Gisela Roellgen, Rolf Roentgen and Rolf Uher. The English documentation was prepared by Maria Wieken-Mayser. Where appropriate the translation from earlier studies in the German Election Study Series have been used to provide conti- nuity in question wording. 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 8 - Study Description ----------------- German Election Study, 1987 ZA No. 1536 Accessibility: class A ZA category: 15 Time Dimension Trend study, thirteen waves: January 1986 to February 1987 Principal Investigators M.Berger, W.G.Gibowski, D.Roth, W.Schulte, Forschungsgruppe Wahlen e.V., and ipos, Mannheim Fieldwork MARPLAN, Offenbach Study Content Voting behavior 1983; planned and actual voting behavior 1987; party preference ranking; scalometers for CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP, the Greens and for leading politicians; satis- faction with past and present government; issue impor- tance; issue competence of past and present government; ranking of political goals; party preference; satisfac- tion with political system and with present leaders; evaluation of 1987 election outcome; preferred coalition; the role of the FDP in the coalition; evaluation of the economic situation; opinion on topical events e.g. union politics, nuclear energy, Chernobyl, disarmament, terro- rism, abortion regulations, foreign workers, persons seeking asylum; the GDR; characteristics of an ideal society. Universe and Sample Voting age population of the German Federal Republic Multi-stage random sample Method of Data Collection Oral interview, structured questionnaire Dimensions of the Dataset Number of units(cases): overall 14 375 (1049 + 1032 + 1010 + 1015 + 1007 + 1040 + 1047 + 1061 + 1063 + 1007 + 1006 + 1043 + 1995) Number of variables per case: 360 Number of decks per case: 7 Single punch, OSIRIS, Z.A.R.Codebook References to Related Studies The German Election Study,1980 (ZA No.1053) and the German Election Study, 1983 (ZA No.1275) integrate trend surveys before and after the 1980 and 1983 elections. A three-wave panel study for the 1987 elections is archived as German Election Panel Study, 1987 (ZA No.1537). 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 9 - Publications ------------ Forschungsgruppe Wahlen e.V. Die Konsolidierung der Wende. Eine Analyse der Bundestags- wahl 1987, in: Zeitschrift fuer Parlamentsfragen vol.18,2, June 1987 Forschungsgruppe Wahlen e.V. Bundestagswahl 1987. Eine Analyse der Wahl zum 11. Deut- schen Bundestag am 25.1.1987, Berichte der Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, Nr.45, Mannheim 1987 Wolfgang Gibowski, Max Kaase Die Ausgangslage fuer die Bundestagswahl am 25.Januar 1987, in: Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Max Kaase (eds.), Wahlen und politischer Prozess. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1983, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag 1986, pp.509-543. 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 10 - Sampling Information -------------------- The sample was drawn to represent all German citizens over age 18 who reside in private households. West Berlin was excluded from the sample. The sample was drawn using a stratified multi-stage random sample with three levels. First, the regional sample points (election districts = Wahlbezirke) were chosen, then the households within each sample point, and finally the persons within each household. In the regional selection each community was represented with its election districts from the 1976 elections to the Bundestag. From the total of all election districts (which was stratified according to size of town) 201 election districts were chosen as sample points, one for each of the interviewers. The selection of household addresses within each election district proceeds in each study according to the random- route procedure. Each interviewer was instructed which streets to walk and which private households to select. In each sample point a maximum of eight interviews were to be conducted. The resulting addresses constitute the "gross household sample" for the survey. Using a random procedure, the respon- dent was chosen from the members of the household who were eligible to vote. This dataset includes two weight variables to be used in the analyses. First, the sample representative of households was transformed into a sample representative of individuals to account for the fact that the chances of each household member to be interviewed are inversely proportional to the size of the household. The sample of individuals. Separately for each Bundesland, the sample was then weighted by sex and age to account for age and sex biases in the data. The average weights by sex and age are shown in the table below. The weighted survey is representative for the voting popula- tion of the Federal Republic. Since this is a random sample, a confidence interval can be calculated for each result within which the true population value will be found with a certain probability. 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 11 - January 1986 February 1986 Men Women Men Women Age 18-24 1.26 1.15 1.13 1.11 25-29 1.05 1.20 0.99 1.11 30-39 0.92 0.81 0.94 1.03 40-49 1.06 1.02 0.97 1.12 50-59 1.04 1.00 0.96 0.97 60 and older 0.79 1.05 0.81 1.02 Total 0.98 1.02 0.95 1.05 March 1986 April 1986 Men Women Men Women Age 18-24 1.15 1.40 1.08 1.11 25-29 0.84 1.08 1.06 0.93 30-39 0.89 0.98 0.94 0.86 40-49 0.98 1.08 1.02 0.95 50-59 0.99 0.97 1.03 0.92 60 and older 0.88 0.99 0.90 1.17 Total 0.95 1.05 0.99 1.01 May 1986 June 1986 Men Women Men Women Age 18-24 1.25 0.98 1.03 0.94 25-29 0.82 0.84 0.89 0.93 30-39 0.96 0.91 0.98 0.90 40-49 0.98 1.02 1.02 1.07 50-59 1.02 0.93 1.08 1.06 60 and older 0.93 1.20 0.87 1.11 Total 0.98 1.02 0.98 1.02 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 12 - July 1986 August 1986 Men Women Men Women Age 18-24 1.16 1.40 1.14 1.14 25-29 0.91 1.04 1.14 0.97 30-39 1.07 1.03 1.04 1.01 40-49 1.15 1.10 0.98 1.04 50-59 0.96 0.97 0.90 1.00 60 and older 0.79 0.90 0.84 1.00 Total 0.98 1.01 0.98 1.02 October 1986 November 1986 Men Women Men Women Age 18-24 1.21 1.23 1.07 1.24 25-29 1.06 0.84 1.09 0.95 30-39 0.98 0.92 0.90 0.90 40-49 0.97 1.04 0.89 1.10 50-59 0.96 0.94 1.13 0.99 60 and older 0.92 1.04 0.87 1.02 Total 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.03 December 1986 January 1987 Men Women Men Women Age 18-24 1.22 1.16 1.10 1.03 25-29 0.76 0.84 0.99 1.13 30-39 0.88 0.89 1.00 0.88 40-49 1.11 1.25 1.03 1.15 50-59 0.97 1.05 1.01 1.02 60 and older 0.95 1.02 0.88 0.96 Total 0.97 1.03 0.99 1.01 February 1987 Men Women Age 18-24 1.16 1.14 25-29 0.99 0.94 30-39 1.00 0.91 40-49 0.96 1.00 50-59 1.06 0.96 60 and older 0.93 1.02 Total 1.00 1.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 13 - Variable Description List --------------------------- 1 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 2 Respondent number 3 Month of survey 4 Satisfaction with democracy 5 - 7 Voting intention for next elections 8 Party vote in 1980 9 - 13 Preference rank which R gives to the parties 14 - 18 What R thinks of the parties 19 - 21 Satisfaction with the government and with the parties in opposition 22 - 44 What R thinks of individual politicians 45 - 48 What R thinks of Libya's role in terrorism and US boycott measures against Libya 49 - 50 Does R see an economic upswing in the GFR and who is regarded responsible for it 51 - 55 R's attitude toward and satisfaction with shopping hours 56 - 58 R's opinion on the regulations concerning payments during strikes 59 Who does R think will win the next elections 60 - 61 Does R participate in carnival 62 Are the right people in the leadership positions 63 - 65 Which current problems are personally important to R 66 - 70 R's opinion of an amendment to the Employment Pro- motion Act and the consequences thereof 71 - 74 Will unemployment increase or decrease; who is most competent to fight unemployment; do the un- employed themselves do enough to find a job 75 - 76 Who will win the German and who the World Soccer Championship 77 Whom would R prefer as chancellor 78 - 79 R's evaluation of his/her own economic situation and its development since the 1983 elections 80 - 86 R's evaluation of the economic situation of parti- cular sections of the population since 1983 87 - 88 Who is responsible for the scandal about party financing; was chancellor Kohl's reputation damaged 89 - 94 Who would be competent to handle specific issues 95 - 97 Whether R agrees to US politics concerning Libya and whether R thinks the GFR should join an economic boycott 98 - 99 Will the unions get more influence in the future and would this be positive to R 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 14 - 100 - 106 Do the unions care enough about women, young people and white-collar employees; is union politics up-to-date; do unions lean towards one particular party; are unions necessary nowadays 107 - 110 R's opinion on the Italian wine scandal and whether this scandal changed R's drinking pat- tern 111 - 112 R's interest in politics 113 Who does R think will win the elections in Lower Saxony 114 - 116 R's evaluation of the dangers of the Chernobyl accident and of the reaction of the German authorities 117 - 125 R's preferences concerning nuclear power plants; R's evaluation of the safety of German power plants and of the impact the new Ministery of the Environment and Reactor Safety will have 126 - 127 R's evaluation of relations between the United States and the German Federal Republic 128 - 129 R's opinion on changing regulations concerning abortion 130 - 131 R's opinion on police conduct during demonstration and on tightening the law governing demonstrations 132 - 134 R's evaluation of the general economic situation now and within a year and of his/her own financial situation within a year 135 - 136 R's view of a reunified Germany and R's attitude towards reunification 137 - 141 Do the media give enough information on the GDR; R's level of information of concerning the GDR 142 - 147 Typical characteristics of Germans in the GFR and in the GDR 148 - 150 Is it possible to spend vacation in the GDR; did R already spent or plan to spend a vacation there 151 Should Genscher become Foreign Minister again 152 - 153 Should Strauss or Graf Lambsdorff take on office in the Federal Government 154 - 155 Should the SPD and the Greens join to form the government and which role should the Greens take 156 - 157 Does the German economy need foreign workers; should their number be reduced 158 Do foreigners live in R's neighborhood 159 - 161 R's opinion on the problem of people seeking asylum in the GFR 162 Is democracy strong enough to fight terrorism 163 - 165 R's opinion of the unions 166 - 183 Typical characteristics R mentions for the candi- dates Kohl and Rau and for an ideal chancellor 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 15 - 184 - 186 What R thinks of the introduction of State's evidence 187 R's evaluation of the relations between the GFR and the Soviet Union 188 Should the GFR comply with US views in important political questions 189 - 190 Do the United States and the Soviet Union want disarmament 191 Has peace become more certain 192 - 193 R's information on SDI and whether the GFR should support this project 194 R's opinion on plebiscite 195 - 196 R's opinion on women joining the armed forces 197 - 198 Would R be willing to leave his/her job to have children 199 - 213 Issue competence of government and opposition 214 Did recent union politics effect R's opinion 215 - 219 R's voting intention for January 1987 220 Which party has the most active supporters 221 - 222 Does R want the FDP and the Greens to be repre- sented in the next Bundestag 223 Would it be good if one of the big parties received the absolute majority in the elections 224 Which parties should form the government together 225 Who does R think will win the next elections 226 - 228 Will the CDU/CSU gain the absolute majority; will the FDP and the Greens be represented in the next Bundestag 229 - 230 Did R participate in the elections and if not, why did R not vote 231 - 232 Constituency candidate and party vote of 1987 233 - 236 Did R vote the same way as in 1983; if not, which party did R vote for in 1983; why did R vote for another party this time or why did R not vote 237 - 238 Did poll results have an impact on R's vote 239 - 240 Does R approve of the FDP and the Greens receiving so many votes 241 - 247 R's opinion on the position of the FDP in the coalition 248 - 297 Issue importance, issue competence of government and opposition, and possible differences between the views of the present coalition partners 298 - 312 R's position and that of the individual parties with regard to the development of nuclear power, disarmament and equal opportunity for women 313 - 317 Left-right placement of the political parties 318 Self-placement on left-right scale 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 16 - 319 - 320 R's view on the role of the churches in politics and of the unions in politics 321 Is there a party which represents R's interests 322 - 323 Would it be good if one of the big parties received the absolute majority (the majority of all seats) 324 - 333 R's preferences for different types of society 334 Should the FDP form the same coalitions in the federal states as on the national level 353 - 354 R's party preference Demographic variables 335 Total number of persons over 18 years permanently living in R's household 336 - 343 R's sex, year and month of birth, age, marital status, kind of school last attended, employment status, occupational group 344 R's comparison of his/her occupational position with that of his/her father 345 R's relationship to the head of household 346 - 347 Employment status and occupational group of head of household 348 - 349 Interviewer check whether R is female and married or widowed; R's comparison of her husband's occupational position with that of her father 350 Is R or someone in the household a union member 351 - 352 R's religious preference and church attendance 355 Occupational groups represented in R's neighbor- hood 356 Federal state where the interview was conducted 357 Administrative district identification code 358 Size of town 359 - 360 Weight: household and representative 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 17 - Question Cross-Reference List of Monthly Surveys ------------------------------------------------- The monthly surveys were carried out: January 20-23 February 15-20 March 17-22 April 18-22 May 14-20 June 21-26 July 19-25 August 15-22 October 18-24 November 15-21 December 5-11 January 16-21 and after the elections for the Bundestag February 14 - March 1, 1987 1986....................................... 1987.. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Q.1 1 1 1b 1 1 1 Q.2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Q.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q.3A 3A 3a 3a 3a 3a 3A 3a 3a 3a 3a 3A 3 Q.4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 Q.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 8 Q.6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 9 Q.7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 9 Q.7A 7A 7a 7a 7a 7a 7a 7a 7a 7a 7a 7a 9a Q.8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 Q.9 9 Q.10 10 Q.11 11 Q.12 12 Q.13 13 10a 10 11 10 10 10 19 11 11 10 12 Q.13A 10a 10a 10a 19a 11a 11a 11 13 Q.14 14 Q.15 15 Q.16 16 Q.17 17 Q.18 18 Q.19 19 Q.20 20 10 15 16 11 11 11 10 15 13 12 Q.21 21 Q.21A 21a Q.22 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q.23 9 12 10 10 Q.24 11 Q.25 12 Q.26 13 Q.26A 13a Q.27 14 Q.28 15 Q.29 16 Q.30 17 Q.31 18 Q.32 19 Q.32A 19a 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 18 - 1986........................................ 1987.. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Q.33 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 11 Q.34 11 18 Q.35 12 Q.36A 13a Q.36B 13b Q.37 14 Q.38 10 Q.39 12 Q.40 13 Q.41 14 Q.42 15 Q.43 17 14 Q.44 18 Q.45 19 Q.46 20 Q.47 21 Q.48 22 Q.49 23 17 Q.49A 23a 17a Q.50 24 Q.51 25 Q.52 26 Q.52A 26a Q.53 27 Q.54 1 2 1 Q.54A 1a 2a 1a Q.55 12 Q.56 13 Q.57 14 Q.58 15 Q.59 16 17 12 23 Q.59A 17A 12a 23a Q.59B 23b Q.60 17 Q.61 18 18 13 Q.62 19 Q.63 13 Q.63A 13A Q.64 14 Q.65 15 15 Q.66 16 Q.67 19 Q.68 20 Q.69 14 Q.70 15 Q.71 16 Q.72 17 Q.73 19 Q.74 20 Q.75 21 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 19 - 1986........................................ 1987.. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Q.76 22 Q.77 23 Q.78 24 Q.79 25 Q.80 26 Q.81 27 Q.82 28 Q.83 29 Q.84 30 Q.85 11 Q.86 12 Q.87 13 Q.88 14 Q.89 15 Q.90 16 Q.91 17 Q.92 18 Q.93 20 Q.94 21 Q.95 22 Q.96 12 Q.97 13 15 Q.98 14 Q.98A 14a Q.99A 16a Q.99B 16b Q.99C 16c Q.100 12 Q.100A 12a Q.100B 12b Q.101 14 Q.102 16 Q.103 17 Q.103A 17a Q.104 18 Q.105 19 Q.105A 19a Q.106 20 Q.107 21 24 Q.107A 21a 24a Q.108 22 Q.108A 22a Q.109 13 Q.109(a) 13a Q.109(b) 13b Q.110 16 Q.111 3 Q.112 4 Q.112A 4a Q.113 5 Q.113A 5a Q.114 14 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 20 - 1986........................................ 1987.. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Q.115 15 Q.115A 15a Q.116 16 Q.117 17 Q.118 18 Q.119 19 Q.120 20 Q.121 21 Q.122 4 Q.122A 4a Q.123 5 Q.123A 5a Q.124 6 Q.124A 6a Q.124B 6b Q.124C 6c Q.125 7 Q.125A 7a Q.126 11 Q.126A 11a Q.127 12 Q.128 13 Q.129 14 Q.129(a) 14a Q.129(b) 14b Q.129(c) 14c Q.130(a) 15a Q.130(b) 15b Q.130(c) 15c Q.131 16 Q.131A 16a Q.132 17 Q.133 18 Q.134 19 Q.135(a) 20a Q.135(b) 20b Q.136 21 Q.137 22 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 21 - 1986........................................ 1987.. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Demographic Variables S.A A A A A A A A A A A A A A S.B B B B B B B B B B B B B B S.C C C C C C C C C C C C C C S.D D D D D D D D D D D D D D S.E E E E E E E E E E E E E E S.F F F F F F F F F F F F F F S.G G G G G G G G G G G G G G S.H H H H H H H H H H H H H H S.H1 H1 S.J J J J J J J J J J J J J J S.K K K K K K K K K K K K K K S.L L L L L L L L L L L L L L S.L1 L1 S.L2 L2 S.M M M M M M M M M M M M M M S.N N N N N N N N N N N N N N S.O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S.P P P P P P P P P P P P P P S.Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q S.R R R R R R R R R R R R R R S.S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S.S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S.S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S.S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S.T T T T T T T T T T T T T T S.U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 22 - Codebook Information -------------------- The example below is a reproduction of information appearing in the machine readable codebook. The numbers in angular brackets < > do not appear in the codebook, but are references to the descriptions which follow. Example ------- <1> <2> <1> V4 - DEMOCRACY IN GFR - REF.NO.:0004 <4> <5> <3> <11> Location 15 Deck 1 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 16 MD2: 9 --------- <6> Q.1 What would you generally say about democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany, that is, about our political parties and our entire political system: Are you very satisfied, rather satisfied, rather dissatisfied or very dissatisfied ? ------------------------------------------------------------- <7> ------------ <8> <9> 1. Very satisfied 2. Rather satisfied 3. Rather dissatisfied 4. Very dissatisfied 9. NA 0. Not asked in February, April and June'86 <10> ! Jan 86 Feb 82 Mar 86 Apr 86 May 86 Jun 86 Jul 86 ! +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ 1 ! 124 ! ! 93 ! ! 99 ! ! 129 ! % ! 11.9 ! ! 9.3 ! ! 9.8 ! ! 12.3 ! -+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ 2 ! 629 ! ! 614 ! ! 570 ! ! 671 ! % ! 60.2 ! ! 61.3 ! ! 56.7 ! ! 64.2 ! -+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ 3 ! 235 ! ! 238 ! ! 275 ! ! 208 ! % ! 22.5 ! ! 23.8 ! ! 27.3 ! ! 19.9 ! -+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ 4 ! 56 ! ! 57 ! ! 62 ! ! 37 ! % ! 5.4 ! ! 5.7 ! ! 6.2 ! ! 3.5 ! -+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ 0 ! ! 1032M ! ! 1015M ! ! 1040M ! ! -+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ 9 ! 5M ! ! 8M ! ! 1M ! ! 2M ! -+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ SUM 1049 ! 1032 ! 1010 ! 1015 ! 1007 ! 1040 ! 1047 ! 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 23 - Explanation ----------- <1> A variable number and a reference number have been as- signed to each item in the study. In the present codebook which documents the archived data set, these numbers are identical. Should the data set be subsetted or re- arranged the variable numbers might change to reflect the order of the new data set while the reference numbers would remain unchanged to provide a link to the archived data set. <2> Indicates the abbreviated (24 characters maximum) variable label used within OSIRIS and SPSS system files. <3> "MD" indicates the designation of missing data. MD1: in- dicates a specific single value declared as missing; MD2: designates a single value or a value range, i.e. all values equal or greater than this value have been declared missing. Although these categories are defined as missing data categories, this does not mean that the user should not or cannot use these codes if so desired. <4> Indicates the starting location and the width of the variable when the data set is stored in OSIRIS. These lo- cations may also used to access the data with software not using the OSIRIS dictionary. <5> "Deck" and "Column" indicate the location of the variable by deck and column(s) when the data are in card image form (8o column format). <6> Indicates the full question text taken from the original questionnaires including interviewer instructions. Where- ever possible the original sequence of the questions has been retained, although some changes were necessary to integrate the different questionnaires. <7> Indicates commentaries and explanations added during the processing of the study. < > within question or answer texts also indicate whether the questionnaire in a parti- cular survey deviated from the general format. <8> Indicates the code values for the single answer catego- ries. These values are the same whether the positional information in a system file <4> is used or the informa- tion in the card image file <5>. <9> Indicates the textual definition of the codes. Abbrevia- tions commonly used are "DK" (don't know), "NA" (not ascertained) and "INAP." (inappropriate). <10> Indicates frequencies by Month of Survey (V3). Column percentages are based only on "valid cases". Missing data were excluded from percentaging. <11> If a variable contains implied decimals the message "Dec places" followed by a number indicates the number of decimal places (see weight variables). If a question was asked only in a single monthly survey frequencies and percentages for this month only are printed in the codebook. The cases for all other monthly surveys are coded INP. - 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 24 - *** DECK=0001 - V1 - ZA-STUDY NUMBER 1536 - REF.NO.:0001 0 Location 1 Card 1 Width 4 Column 1- 4 0 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 ------------------------------- - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - REF.NO.:0002 0 Location 5 Card 1 Width 6 Column 5-10 0 Respondent Number ----------------- 0 This field must be combined with variable V3, Month of Survey, to uniquely identify each respondent. - - Deck Identification Number is '1' Deck 1 Column 1 ----------------------------- - V3 - MONTH OF SURVEY - REF.NO.:0003 0 Location 11 Card 1 Width 4 Column 12-15 0 Month of Survey --------------- Unweighted Abs. % 0186. January 1986 1049 7.30 0286. February 1032 7.18 0386. March 1010 7.03 0486. April 1015 7.06 0586. May 1007 7.01 0686. June 1040 7.23 0786. July 1047 7.28 0886. August 1061 7.38 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 25 - V3 - MONTH OF SURVEY - (Continued) 1086. October 1063 7.39 1186. November 1007 7.01 1286. December 1006 7.00 0187. January 1987 1043 7.26 0287. February 1995 13.88 ------ ------ 14375 100.01 - V4 - DEMOCRACY IN GFR - REF.NO.:0004 0 Location 15 Card 1 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 16 MD2: 9 0 Q.1 What would you generally say about democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany, that is, about our political parties and our entire political system? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with it? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Very satisfied 2. Somewhat satisfied 3. Somewhat dissatisfied 4. Very dissatisfied 9. NA 0. Not asked in February, April, June, August, October, December '86 and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 124 Â Â 93 Â Â 99 Â Â 129 Â Â 11.9 Â Â 9.3 Â Â 9.8 Â Â 12.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 629 Â Â 614 Â Â 570 Â Â 671 Â Â 60.2 Â Â 61.3 Â Â 56.7 Â Â 64.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 235 Â Â 238 Â Â 275 Â Â 208 Â Â 22.5 Â Â 23.8 Â Â 27.3 Â Â 19.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 56 Â Â 57 Â Â 62 Â Â 37 Â Â 5.4 Â Â 5.7 Â Â 6.2 Â Â 3.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â 1032M Â Â 1015M Â Â 1040M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 5M Â Â 8M Â Â 1M Â Â 2M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 26 - V4 - DEMOCRACY IN GFR - (Continued) ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 190 Â Â 139 Â Â Â Â Â 18.9 Â Â 13.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 554 Â Â 623 Â Â Â Â Â 55.1 Â Â 59.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â 218 Â Â 224 Â Â Â Â Â 21.7 Â Â 21.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â 43 Â Â 56 Â Â Â Â Â 4.3 Â Â 5.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â Â 1006M Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 2M Â Â 1M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V5 - VOTE NEXT SUNDAY? - REF.NO.:0005 0 Location 16 Card 1 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 17 0 Q.2 If elections for the Bundestag were held next Sunday, would you vote? ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. Yes 2. Don't know 3. No 0. Not asked in January'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 865 Â 859 Â 824 Â 834 Â 807 Â 868 Â 857 Â Â 82.5 Â 83.2 Â 81.6 Â 82.2 Â 80.1 Â 83.5 Â 81.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 86 Â 78 Â 102 Â 80 Â 103 Â 78 Â 110 Â Â 8.2 Â 7.6 Â 10.1 Â 7.9 Â 10.2 Â 7.5 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 98 Â 95 Â 84 Â 101 Â 97 Â 94 Â 80 Â Â 9.3 Â 9.2 Â 8.3 Â 10.0 Â 9.6 Â 9.0 Â 7.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 27 - V5 - VOTE NEXT SUNDAY? - (Continued) ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 894 Â 881 Â 839 Â 840 Â Â 1649 Â Â 84.3 Â 82.9 Â 83.3 Â 83.5 Â Â 82.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 64 Â 83 Â 96 Â 90 Â Â 183 Â Â 6.0 Â 7.8 Â 9.5 Â 8.9 Â Â 9.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 103 Â 99 Â 72 Â 76 Â Â 163 Â Â 9.7 Â 9.3 Â 7.1 Â 7.6 Â Â 8.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V6 - CANDIDATE VOTE INTENTION - REF.NO.:0006 0 Location 17 Card 1 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 18 MD2: 8 0 Q.3 (If R would vote or does not know) Here is voting ballot similar to the one you will receive for elections for the Bundestag. Again, you have two votes. The first vote is for a candidate in the local constituency, the second vote is for a party. (Interviewer: Hand list W to the respondent). Which candidate would you vote for? Please, tell me the number of the candidate. ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. (1) CDU <-candidate> 2. (2) SPD <-candidate> 3. (3) FDP <-candidate> 4. (4) The Greens <-candidate> 5. (5) DKP <-candidate> 6. Candidate of another party 8. NA 9. INAP., coded 3 in Q.2 0. Not asked in January and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 411 Â 390 Â 363 Â 377 Â 340 Â 375 Â 428 Â Â 44.7 Â 42.8 Â 40.6 Â 43.7 Â 38.7 Â 41.6 Â 45.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 414 Â 431 Â 441 Â 387 Â 387 Â 422 Â 395 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 28 - V6 - CANDIDATE VOTE INTENTION - (Continued) Â 45.0 Â 47.3 Â 49.3 Â 44.8 Â 44.1 Â 46.8 Â 42.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 33 Â 42 Â 31 Â 34 Â 31 Â 32 Â 32 Â Â 3.6 Â 4.6 Â 3.5 Â 3.9 Â 3.5 Â 3.5 Â 3.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 52 Â 42 Â 55 Â 53 Â 107 Â 68 Â 67 Â Â 5.7 Â 4.6 Â 6.1 Â 6.1 Â 12.2 Â 7.5 Â 7.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 1 Â Â 1 Â 4 Â Â 2 Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â 0.1 Â 0.5 Â Â 0.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 9 Â 5 Â 5 Â 11 Â 9 Â 5 Â 12 Â Â 1.0 Â 0.5 Â 0.6 Â 1.3 Â 1.0 Â 0.6 Â 1.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 32M Â 26M Â 31M Â 51M Â 32M Â 44M Â 31M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 98M Â 95M Â 84M Â 101M Â 97M Â 94M Â 80M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 409 Â 422 Â 444 Â 399 Â Â Â Â 44.1 Â 45.3 Â 49.1 Â 45.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 399 Â 383 Â 329 Â 353 Â Â Â Â 43.0 Â 41.1 Â 36.4 Â 39.8 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 32 Â 29 Â 42 Â 26 Â Â Â Â 3.4 Â 3.1 Â 4.6 Â 2.9 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 75 Â 77 Â 74 Â 87 Â Â Â Â 8.1 Â 8.3 Â 8.2 Â 9.8 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 3 Â 1 Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â 0.3 Â 0.1 Â Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 10 Â 19 Â 15 Â 18 Â Â Â Â 1.1 Â 2.0 Â 1.7 Â 2.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 30M Â 33M Â 31M Â 44M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 103M Â 99M Â 72M Â 76M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 29 - V7 - PARTY VOTE INTENTION - REF.NO.:0007 0 Location 18 Card 1 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 19 MD2: 8 0 Q.3A (If R would vote or does not know) And for which party would you vote? Please, tell me the number of the party. (Interviewer: Hand list W to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. (1) CDU 2. (2) SPD 3. (3) FDP 4. (4) The Greens 5. (5) DKP (5) NPD 6. Other party 8. NA 9. INAP., coded 3 in Q.2 0. Not asked in January'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 400 Â 377 Â 353 Â 369 Â 330 Â 374 Â 425 Â Â 43.5 Â 41.2 Â 39.2 Â 42.6 Â 37.5 Â 41.3 Â 45.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 410 Â 436 Â 436 Â 396 Â 384 Â 421 Â 390 Â Â 44.6 Â 47.7 Â 48.4 Â 45.7 Â 43.6 Â 46.5 Â 41.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 39 Â 51 Â 39 Â 36 Â 38 Â 32 Â 38 Â Â 4.2 Â 5.6 Â 4.3 Â 4.2 Â 4.3 Â 3.5 Â 4.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 63 Â 46 Â 69 Â 55 Â 116 Â 73 Â 75 Â Â 6.9 Â 5.0 Â 7.7 Â 6.3 Â 13.2 Â 8.1 Â 8.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 1 Â Â 1 Â 3 Â Â 1 Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â 0.1 Â 0.3 Â Â 0.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 7 Â 4 Â 3 Â 10 Â 9 Â 5 Â 14 Â Â 0.8 Â 0.4 Â 0.3 Â 1.2 Â 1.0 Â 0.6 Â 1.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 32M Â 22M Â 26M Â 47M Â 30M Â 41M Â 24M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 98M Â 95M Â 84M Â 101M Â 97M Â 94M Â 80M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 399 Â 420 Â 444 Â 403 Â Â 765 Â Â 42.8 Â 45.1 Â 49.0 Â 45.1 Â Â 43.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 400 Â 379 Â 317 Â 343 Â Â 663 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 30 - V7 - PARTY VOTE INTENTION - (Continued) Â 42.9 Â 40.7 Â 35.0 Â 38.4 Â Â 37.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 38 Â 34 Â 48 Â 36 Â Â 138 Â Â 4.1 Â 3.6 Â 5.3 Â 4.0 Â Â 7.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 79 Â 82 Â 84 Â 93 Â Â 164 Â Â 8.5 Â 8.8 Â 9.3 Â 10.4 Â Â 9.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 4 Â 1 Â 1 Â 3 Â Â 3 Â Â 0.4 Â 0.1 Â 0.1 Â 0.3 Â Â 0.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 12 Â 16 Â 12 Â 15 Â Â 25 Â Â 1.3 Â 1.7 Â 1.3 Â 1.7 Â Â 1.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 26M Â 32M Â 29M Â 37M Â Â 74M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 103M Â 99M Â 72M Â 76M Â Â 163M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V8 - 1983 PARTY VOTE - REF.NO.:0008 0 Location 19 Card 1 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 20 MD2: 8 0 Q.4 How about the elections for the Bundestag in March 1983: For which party did you then vote ? Please, tell me using this list. (Interviewer: Hand list R to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. (1) CDU 2. (2) SPD 3. (3) FDP 4. (4) The Greens 5. (5) DKP 6. Another party 7. Did not vote 8. Was not eligible in 1980 9. NA 0. Not asked in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 31 - V8 - 1983 PARTY VOTE - (Continued) 1 Â 435 Â 422 Â 405 Â 413 Â 365 Â 405 Â 438 Â Â 48.2 Â 47.3 Â 46.1 Â 49.2 Â 43.9 Â 46.6 Â 48.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 379 Â 378 Â 387 Â 343 Â 349 Â 376 Â 383 Â Â 42.0 Â 42.4 Â 44.0 Â 40.8 Â 42.0 Â 43.3 Â 42.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 41 Â 52 Â 36 Â 36 Â 38 Â 37 Â 42 Â Â 4.5 Â 5.8 Â 4.1 Â 4.3 Â 4.6 Â 4.3 Â 4.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 44 Â 34 Â 48 Â 43 Â 68 Â 44 Â 37 Â Â 4.9 Â 3.8 Â 5.5 Â 5.1 Â 8.2 Â 5.1 Â 4.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â Â 1 Â 3 Â 1 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â 0.4 Â 0.1 Â 0.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 3 Â 6 Â 3 Â 4 Â 8 Â 6 Â 7 Â Â 0.3 Â 0.7 Â 0.3 Â 0.5 Â 1.0 Â 0.7 Â 0.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 85M Â 83M Â 80M Â 93M Â 94M Â 95M Â 82M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 37M Â 40M Â 35M Â 49M Â 57M Â 51M Â 40M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 25M Â 17M Â 16M Â 33M Â 25M Â 25M Â 17M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 409 Â 433 Â 443 Â 414 Â 437 Â Â Â 46.7 Â 48.4 Â 51.8 Â 48.5 Â 48.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 372 Â 377 Â 319 Â 342 Â 355 Â Â Â 42.5 Â 42.1 Â 37.3 Â 40.0 Â 39.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 38 Â 32 Â 42 Â 36 Â 44 Â Â Â 4.3 Â 3.6 Â 4.9 Â 4.2 Â 4.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 47 Â 46 Â 42 Â 54 Â 55 Â Â Â 5.4 Â 5.1 Â 4.9 Â 6.3 Â 6.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 2 Â 1 Â 1 Â 2 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.1 Â 0.1 Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 7 Â 6 Â 8 Â 6 Â 8 Â Â Â 0.8 Â 0.7 Â 0.9 Â 0.7 Â 0.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 94M Â 82M Â 72M Â 64M Â 76M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 32 - V8 - 1983 PARTY VOTE - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 68M Â 55M Â 58M Â 54M Â 54M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 24M Â 31M Â 22M Â 34M Â 14M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V9 - SPD RANKING - REF.NO.:0009 0 Location 20 Card 1 MD1: 9 Width 1 Column 21 0 Q.5 Here are five cards with the names of political parties in the Federal Republic. Would you please rank these cards according to how well you like the parties. On top should be the party which you like best, at the bottom then will be the party which you like least. (Interviewer: Shuffle white deck of cards and hand it to the respondent.) Q.5(A) Preference rank which R gives to SPD ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. First rank (likes best) 2. Second rank 3. Third rank 4. Fourth rank 5. Fifth rank (likes least) 9. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 453 Â 476 Â 488 Â 441 Â 429 Â 473 Â 442 Â Â 44.4 Â 47.4 Â 49.9 Â 45.6 Â 44.6 Â 47.0 Â 43.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 139 Â 137 Â 104 Â 123 Â 158 Â 142 Â 133 Â Â 13.6 Â 13.6 Â 10.6 Â 12.7 Â 16.4 Â 14.1 Â 13.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 124 Â 111 Â 114 Â 109 Â 113 Â 109 Â 114 Â Â 12.1 Â 11.1 Â 11.7 Â 11.3 Â 11.7 Â 10.8 Â 11.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 273 Â 260 Â 246 Â 263 Â 225 Â 265 Â 286 Â Â 26.7 Â 25.9 Â 25.2 Â 27.2 Â 23.4 Â 26.3 Â 28.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 32 Â 20 Â 26 Â 32 Â 37 Â 18 Â 48 Â Â 3.1 Â 2.0 Â 2.7 Â 3.3 Â 3.8 Â 1.8 Â 4.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 33 - V9 - SPD RANKING - (Continued) 9 Â 28M Â 28M Â 32M Â 47M Â 45M Â 33M Â 24M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 448 Â 436 Â 362 Â 394 Â 402 Â 744 Â Â 43.3 Â 42.7 Â 36.9 Â 40.2 Â 39.6 Â 38.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 151 Â 149 Â 148 Â 156 Â 150 Â 267 Â Â 14.6 Â 14.6 Â 15.1 Â 15.9 Â 14.8 Â 13.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 116 Â 109 Â 125 Â 104 Â 128 Â 224 Â Â 11.2 Â 10.7 Â 12.8 Â 10.6 Â 12.6 Â 11.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 287 Â 289 Â 299 Â 289 Â 293 Â 605 Â Â 27.8 Â 28.3 Â 30.5 Â 29.5 Â 28.8 Â 31.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 32 Â 39 Â 46 Â 36 Â 43 Â 81 Â Â 3.1 Â 3.8 Â 4.7 Â 3.7 Â 4.2 Â 4.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 27M Â 41M Â 27M Â 27M Â 27M Â 74M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V10 - CDU RANKING - REF.NO.:0010 0 Location 21 Card 1 MD1: 9 Width 1 Column 22 0 Q.5(B) Preference rank which R gives to CDU -------------------------------------------- 0 1. First rank (likes best) 2. Second rank 3. Third rank 4. Fourth rank 5. Fifth rank (likes least) 9. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 340 Â 313 Â 299 Â 293 Â 261 Â 316 Â 359 Â Â 33.4 Â 31.1 Â 30.9 Â 30.3 Â 27.3 Â 31.7 Â 35.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 34 - V10 - CDU RANKING - (Continued) 2 Â 290 Â 266 Â 245 Â 275 Â 257 Â 269 Â 266 Â Â 28.5 Â 26.5 Â 25.3 Â 28.4 Â 26.9 Â 27.0 Â 26.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 203 Â 214 Â 199 Â 203 Â 214 Â 181 Â 203 Â Â 19.9 Â 21.3 Â 20.6 Â 21.0 Â 22.4 Â 18.2 Â 19.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 155 Â 179 Â 193 Â 160 Â 185 Â 195 Â 163 Â Â 15.2 Â 17.8 Â 19.9 Â 16.5 Â 19.4 Â 19.6 Â 16.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 30 Â 33 Â 32 Â 37 Â 38 Â 36 Â 27 Â Â 2.9 Â 3.3 Â 3.3 Â 3.8 Â 4.0 Â 3.6 Â 2.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 31M Â 27M Â 42M Â 47M Â 52M Â 43M Â 29M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 344 Â 354 Â 373 Â 362 Â 360 Â 650 Â Â 33.5 Â 34.5 Â 38.1 Â 37.0 Â 35.5 Â 34.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 263 Â 281 Â 263 Â 220 Â 236 Â 462 Â Â 25.6 Â 27.4 Â 26.9 Â 22.5 Â 23.3 Â 24.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 190 Â 210 Â 165 Â 197 Â 191 Â 378 Â Â 18.5 Â 20.5 Â 16.9 Â 20.1 Â 18.8 Â 19.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 191 Â 148 Â 146 Â 162 Â 191 Â 376 Â Â 18.6 Â 14.4 Â 14.9 Â 16.6 Â 18.8 Â 19.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 38 Â 32 Â 32 Â 37 Â 36 Â 48 Â Â 3.7 Â 3.1 Â 3.3 Â 3.8 Â 3.6 Â 2.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 35M Â 38M Â 28M Â 28M Â 29M Â 81M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V11 - CSU RANKING - REF.NO.:0011 0 Location 22 Card 1 MD1: 9 Width 1 Column 23 0 Q.5(C) Preference rank which R gives to CSU -------------------------------------------- 0 1. First rank (likes best) 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 35 - V11 - CSU RANKING - (Continued) 2. Second rank 3. Third rank 4. Fourth rank 5. Fifth rank (likes least) 9. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 128 Â 111 Â 87 Â 134 Â 111 Â 102 Â 103 Â Â 12.6 Â 11.1 Â 9.0 Â 13.9 Â 11.7 Â 10.3 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 271 Â 246 Â 248 Â 256 Â 190 Â 225 Â 270 Â Â 26.6 Â 24.6 Â 25.7 Â 26.5 Â 20.0 Â 22.7 Â 26.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 195 Â 223 Â 193 Â 182 Â 166 Â 204 Â 189 Â Â 19.2 Â 22.3 Â 20.0 Â 18.9 Â 17.5 Â 20.6 Â 18.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 226 Â 210 Â 203 Â 187 Â 228 Â 218 Â 236 Â Â 22.2 Â 21.0 Â 21.0 Â 19.4 Â 24.0 Â 22.0 Â 23.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 197 Â 212 Â 234 Â 206 Â 255 Â 243 Â 217 Â Â 19.4 Â 21.2 Â 24.2 Â 21.3 Â 26.8 Â 24.5 Â 21.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 32M Â 30M Â 45M Â 50M Â 57M Â 48M Â 32M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 112 Â 116 Â 114 Â 86 Â 101 Â 203 Â Â 10.9 Â 11.4 Â 11.7 Â 8.8 Â 10.0 Â 10.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 260 Â 254 Â 284 Â 266 Â 269 Â 440 Â Â 25.4 Â 25.0 Â 29.1 Â 27.2 Â 26.6 Â 23.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 191 Â 201 Â 172 Â 152 Â 164 Â 342 Â Â 18.7 Â 19.8 Â 17.6 Â 15.6 Â 16.2 Â 17.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 214 Â 231 Â 201 Â 234 Â 214 Â 406 Â Â 20.9 Â 22.7 Â 20.6 Â 24.0 Â 21.1 Â 21.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 246 Â 215 Â 204 Â 239 Â 265 Â 519 Â Â 24.0 Â 21.1 Â 20.9 Â 24.5 Â 26.2 Â 27.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 38M Â 46M Â 32M Â 29M Â 30M Â 85M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 36 - V12 - FDP RANKING - REF.NO.:0012 0 Location 23 Card 1 MD1: 9 Width 1 Column 24 0 Q.5(D) Preference rank which R gives to FDP -------------------------------------------- 0 1. First rank (likes best) 2. Second rank 3. Third rank 4. Fourth rank 5. Fifth rank (likes least) 9. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 40 Â 51 Â 38 Â 37 Â 41 Â 39 Â 43 Â Â 3.9 Â 5.1 Â 3.9 Â 3.8 Â 4.3 Â 3.9 Â 4.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 171 Â 189 Â 182 Â 160 Â 161 Â 190 Â 204 Â Â 16.9 Â 18.9 Â 18.8 Â 16.6 Â 16.9 Â 19.2 Â 20.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 426 Â 381 Â 384 Â 394 Â 396 Â 423 Â 445 Â Â 42.0 Â 38.1 Â 39.6 Â 40.9 Â 41.6 Â 42.7 Â 43.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 244 Â 230 Â 229 Â 241 Â 203 Â 205 Â 207 Â Â 24.1 Â 23.0 Â 23.6 Â 25.0 Â 21.3 Â 20.7 Â 20.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 133 Â 149 Â 136 Â 132 Â 152 Â 134 Â 117 Â Â 13.1 Â 14.9 Â 14.0 Â 13.7 Â 15.9 Â 13.5 Â 11.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 35M Â 32M Â 41M Â 51M Â 54M Â 49M Â 31M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 43 Â 39 Â 43 Â 35 Â 61 Â 139 Â Â 4.2 Â 3.8 Â 4.4 Â 3.6 Â 6.0 Â 7.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 218 Â 187 Â 152 Â 173 Â 194 Â 470 Â Â 21.3 Â 18.4 Â 15.6 Â 17.7 Â 19.2 Â 24.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 438 Â 417 Â 442 Â 433 Â 443 Â 812 Â Â 42.7 Â 41.1 Â 45.3 Â 44.4 Â 43.8 Â 42.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 229 Â 228 Â 221 Â 199 Â 189 Â 311 Â Â 22.3 Â 22.5 Â 22.7 Â 20.4 Â 18.7 Â 16.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 97 Â 144 Â 117 Â 135 Â 124 Â 180 Â Â 9.5 Â 14.2 Â 12.0 Â 13.8 Â 12.3 Â 9.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 37 - V12 - FDP RANKING - (Continued) 9 Â 36M Â 48M Â 32M Â 31M Â 32M Â 83M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V13 - GREENS RANKING - REF.NO.:0013 0 Location 24 Card 1 MD1: 9 Width 1 Column 25 0 Q.5(E) Preference rank which R gives to the Greens --------------------------------------------------- 0 1. First rank (likes best) 2. Second rank 3. Third rank 4. Fourth rank 5. Fifth rank (likes least) 9. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 66 Â 59 Â 72 Â 71 Â 126 Â 81 Â 79 Â Â 6.5 Â 5.9 Â 7.4 Â 7.3 Â 13.2 Â 8.1 Â 7.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 145 Â 166 Â 193 Â 154 Â 192 Â 171 Â 146 Â Â 14.3 Â 16.6 Â 20.0 Â 15.9 Â 20.0 Â 17.2 Â 14.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 67 Â 72 Â 74 Â 77 Â 63 Â 75 Â 63 Â Â 6.6 Â 7.2 Â 7.7 Â 8.0 Â 6.6 Â 7.5 Â 6.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 115 Â 120 Â 92 Â 110 Â 108 Â 107 Â 121 Â Â 11.3 Â 12.0 Â 9.5 Â 11.4 Â 11.3 Â 10.8 Â 11.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 622 Â 585 Â 536 Â 556 Â 469 Â 560 Â 607 Â Â 61.3 Â 58.4 Â 55.4 Â 57.4 Â 49.0 Â 56.3 Â 59.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 34M Â 30M Â 43M Â 47M Â 49M Â 46M Â 31M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 91 Â 90 Â 93 Â 104 Â 96 Â 193 Â Â 8.9 Â 8.8 Â 9.5 Â 10.7 Â 9.5 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 38 - V13 - GREENS RANKING - (Continued) 2 Â 137 Â 154 Â 132 Â 163 Â 168 Â 275 Â Â 13.3 Â 15.1 Â 13.5 Â 16.7 Â 16.6 Â 14.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 88 Â 76 Â 71 Â 90 Â 86 Â 152 Â Â 8.6 Â 7.5 Â 7.3 Â 9.2 Â 8.5 Â 7.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 102 Â 116 Â 107 Â 91 Â 121 Â 211 Â Â 9.9 Â 11.4 Â 10.9 Â 9.3 Â 12.0 Â 11.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 610 Â 584 Â 576 Â 528 Â 540 Â 1084 Â Â 59.3 Â 57.3 Â 58.8 Â 54.1 Â 53.4 Â 56.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 33M Â 43M Â 28M Â 30M Â 32M Â 80M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V14 - THINK OF SPD - REF.NO.:0014 0 Location 25 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 26-27 0 Q.6 And what do you think, in general, about the political parties? Please tell me by using this scale. (Interviewer: Hand list no.1 to the respondent and read.) +5 means that you think a great deal of the party. -5 means that you do not think much of it at all. Using the values in between, you can express your opinion more precisely. Q.6(A) What do you think of the SPD? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the party at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the party 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 38 Â 24 Â 32 Â 54 Â 34 Â 35 Â 41 Â Â 3.6 Â 2.3 Â 3.2 Â 5.4 Â 3.4 Â 3.4 Â 3.9 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 39 - V14 - THINK OF SPD - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 27 Â 26 Â 40 Â 27 Â 22 Â 27 Â 26 Â Â 2.6 Â 2.5 Â 4.0 Â 2.7 Â 2.2 Â 2.6 Â 2.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 61 Â 56 Â 53 Â 44 Â 51 Â 42 Â 63 Â Â 5.8 Â 5.4 Â 5.3 Â 4.4 Â 5.1 Â 4.1 Â 6.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 65 Â 73 Â 62 Â 63 Â 62 Â 50 Â 56 Â Â 6.2 Â 7.1 Â 6.2 Â 6.3 Â 6.2 Â 4.8 Â 5.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 52 Â 61 Â 70 Â 35 Â 59 Â 65 Â 68 Â Â 5.0 Â 5.9 Â 7.0 Â 3.5 Â 5.9 Â 6.3 Â 6.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 119 Â 104 Â 101 Â 116 Â 121 Â 138 Â 131 Â Â 11.4 Â 10.1 Â 10.1 Â 11.5 Â 12.1 Â 13.3 Â 12.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 147 Â 120 Â 101 Â 142 Â 124 Â 105 Â 139 Â Â 14.1 Â 11.7 Â 10.1 Â 14.1 Â 12.4 Â 10.2 Â 13.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 136 Â 147 Â 147 Â 130 Â 156 Â 160 Â 130 Â Â 13.0 Â 14.3 Â 14.7 Â 12.9 Â 15.6 Â 15.5 Â 12.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 166 Â 191 Â 187 Â 187 Â 190 Â 195 Â 177 Â Â 15.9 Â 18.6 Â 18.6 Â 18.6 Â 19.0 Â 18.9 Â 17.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 108 Â 130 Â 115 Â 100 Â 88 Â 107 Â 107 Â Â 10.3 Â 12.6 Â 11.5 Â 9.9 Â 8.8 Â 10.3 Â 10.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 126 Â 96 Â 95 Â 108 Â 92 Â 110 Â 105 Â Â 12.1 Â 9.3 Â 9.5 Â 10.7 Â 9.2 Â 10.6 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 4M Â 4M Â 7M Â 9M Â 8M Â 6M Â 4M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 44 Â 41 Â 53 Â 53 Â 37 Â 66 Â Â 4.2 Â 3.9 Â 5.3 Â 5.3 Â 3.6 Â 3.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 20 Â 29 Â 33 Â 40 Â 31 Â 49 Â Â 1.9 Â 2.7 Â 3.3 Â 4.0 Â 3.0 Â 2.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 65 Â 64 Â 56 Â 71 Â 57 Â 106 Â Â 6.2 Â 6.1 Â 5.6 Â 7.1 Â 5.5 Â 5.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 65 Â 53 Â 72 Â 65 Â 77 Â 145 Â Â 6.2 Â 5.0 Â 7.2 Â 6.5 Â 7.4 Â 7.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 59 Â 80 Â 73 Â 56 Â 63 Â 158 Â Â 5.6 Â 7.6 Â 7.3 Â 5.6 Â 6.1 Â 8.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 98 Â 122 Â 108 Â 116 Â 124 Â 238 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 40 - V14 - THINK OF SPD - (Continued) Â 9.3 Â 11.5 Â 10.8 Â 11.6 Â 11.9 Â 12.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 148 Â 137 Â 168 Â 137 Â 133 Â 269 Â Â 14.1 Â 13.0 Â 16.7 Â 13.7 Â 12.8 Â 13.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 155 Â 165 Â 139 Â 135 Â 156 Â 244 Â Â 14.7 Â 15.6 Â 13.8 Â 13.5 Â 15.0 Â 12.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 171 Â 169 Â 146 Â 153 Â 163 Â 309 Â Â 16.3 Â 16.0 Â 14.5 Â 15.3 Â 15.7 Â 15.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 100 Â 102 Â 68 Â 89 Â 96 Â 208 Â Â 9.5 Â 9.6 Â 6.8 Â 8.9 Â 9.2 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 127 Â 95 Â 88 Â 87 Â 104 Â 190 Â Â 12.1 Â 9.0 Â 8.8 Â 8.7 Â 10.0 Â 9.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 9M Â 6M Â 3M Â 4M Â 2M Â 13M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V15 - THINK OF CDU - REF.NO.:0015 0 Location 27 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 28-29 0 Q.6(B) And what do you think of the CDU? ----------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the party at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the party 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 78 Â 50 Â 65 Â 59 Â 67 Â 79 Â 54 Â Â 7.5 Â 4.9 Â 6.5 Â 5.9 Â 6.7 Â 7.6 Â 5.2 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 41 - V15 - THINK OF CDU - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 39 Â 45 Â 50 Â 45 Â 55 Â 47 Â 42 Â Â 3.7 Â 4.4 Â 5.0 Â 4.5 Â 5.5 Â 4.5 Â 4.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 56 Â 80 Â 72 Â 49 Â 63 Â 51 Â 60 Â Â 5.4 Â 7.8 Â 7.2 Â 4.9 Â 6.3 Â 4.9 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 62 Â 73 Â 81 Â 57 Â 80 Â 74 Â 55 Â Â 5.9 Â 7.1 Â 8.1 Â 5.7 Â 8.0 Â 7.2 Â 5.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 65 Â 54 Â 66 Â 71 Â 68 Â 56 Â 77 Â Â 6.2 Â 5.3 Â 6.6 Â 7.1 Â 6.8 Â 5.4 Â 7.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 126 Â 118 Â 107 Â 120 Â 131 Â 117 Â 108 Â Â 12.1 Â 11.5 Â 10.7 Â 11.9 Â 13.1 Â 11.3 Â 10.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 114 Â 118 Â 124 Â 122 Â 112 Â 125 Â 140 Â Â 10.9 Â 11.5 Â 12.4 Â 12.1 Â 11.2 Â 12.1 Â 13.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 141 Â 127 Â 109 Â 142 Â 122 Â 123 Â 133 Â Â 13.5 Â 12.4 Â 10.9 Â 14.1 Â 12.2 Â 11.9 Â 12.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 134 Â 157 Â 132 Â 131 Â 127 Â 160 Â 147 Â Â 12.8 Â 15.3 Â 13.2 Â 13.0 Â 12.7 Â 15.5 Â 14.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 130 Â 123 Â 107 Â 132 Â 98 Â 106 Â 111 Â Â 12.5 Â 12.0 Â 10.7 Â 13.1 Â 9.8 Â 10.3 Â 10.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 99 Â 81 Â 90 Â 77 Â 75 Â 96 Â 115 Â Â 9.5 Â 7.9 Â 9.0 Â 7.7 Â 7.5 Â 9.3 Â 11.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 5M Â 6M Â 7M Â 10M Â 9M Â 6M Â 5M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 62 Â 59 Â 53 Â 80 Â 70 Â 115 Â Â 5.9 Â 5.6 Â 5.3 Â 8.0 Â 6.7 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 49 Â 35 Â 33 Â 42 Â 49 Â 68 Â Â 4.7 Â 3.3 Â 3.3 Â 4.2 Â 4.7 Â 3.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 61 Â 47 Â 54 Â 62 Â 56 Â 121 Â Â 5.8 Â 4.4 Â 5.4 Â 6.2 Â 5.4 Â 6.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 52 Â 73 Â 53 Â 61 Â 64 Â 117 Â Â 4.9 Â 6.9 Â 5.3 Â 6.1 Â 6.1 Â 5.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 67 Â 47 Â 52 Â 51 Â 55 Â 127 Â Â 6.4 Â 4.4 Â 5.2 Â 5.1 Â 5.3 Â 6.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 120 Â 125 Â 102 Â 110 Â 105 Â 210 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 42 - V15 - THINK OF CDU - (Continued) Â 11.4 Â 11.8 Â 10.2 Â 11.0 Â 10.1 Â 10.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 116 Â 139 Â 128 Â 103 Â 96 Â 215 Â Â 11.0 Â 13.1 Â 12.8 Â 10.3 Â 9.2 Â 10.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 126 Â 131 Â 97 Â 107 Â 117 Â 233 Â Â 12.0 Â 12.4 Â 9.7 Â 10.7 Â 11.2 Â 11.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 144 Â 173 Â 164 Â 150 Â 141 Â 316 Â Â 13.7 Â 16.4 Â 16.4 Â 15.0 Â 13.5 Â 15.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 147 Â 130 Â 135 Â 136 Â 152 Â 255 Â Â 14.0 Â 12.3 Â 13.5 Â 13.6 Â 14.6 Â 12.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 107 Â 99 Â 131 Â 99 Â 136 Â 205 Â Â 10.2 Â 9.4 Â 13.1 Â 9.9 Â 13.1 Â 10.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 10M Â 5M Â 5M Â 5M Â 2M Â 13M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V16 - THINK OF CSU - REF.NO.:0016 0 Location 29 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 30-31 0 Q.6(C) And what do you think of the CSU? ----------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the party at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the party 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 118 Â 114 Â 110 Â 101 Â 132 Â 135 Â 103 Â Â 11.3 Â 11.1 Â 11.0 Â 10.0 Â 13.3 Â 13.1 Â 9.9 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 43 - V16 - THINK OF CSU - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 59 Â 71 Â 64 Â 49 Â 77 Â 58 Â 63 Â Â 5.7 Â 6.9 Â 6.4 Â 4.9 Â 7.7 Â 5.6 Â 6.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 55 Â 59 Â 56 Â 58 Â 64 Â 56 Â 68 Â Â 5.3 Â 5.8 Â 5.6 Â 5.8 Â 6.4 Â 5.4 Â 6.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 65 Â 53 Â 81 Â 57 Â 72 Â 76 Â 69 Â Â 6.2 Â 5.2 Â 8.1 Â 5.7 Â 7.2 Â 7.4 Â 6.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 83 Â 72 Â 69 Â 82 Â 64 Â 58 Â 72 Â Â 8.0 Â 7.0 Â 6.9 Â 8.2 Â 6.4 Â 5.6 Â 6.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 141 Â 143 Â 125 Â 124 Â 124 Â 152 Â 131 Â Â 13.5 Â 13.9 Â 12.5 Â 12.3 Â 12.5 Â 14.7 Â 12.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 117 Â 121 Â 119 Â 99 Â 109 Â 126 Â 120 Â Â 11.2 Â 11.8 Â 11.9 Â 9.9 Â 11.0 Â 12.2 Â 11.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 107 Â 109 Â 104 Â 126 Â 103 Â 101 Â 109 Â Â 10.2 Â 10.6 Â 10.4 Â 12.5 Â 10.4 Â 9.8 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 133 Â 110 Â 118 Â 124 Â 104 Â 121 Â 125 Â Â 12.7 Â 10.7 Â 11.8 Â 12.3 Â 10.5 Â 11.7 Â 12.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 85 Â 105 Â 95 Â 107 Â 78 Â 86 Â 87 Â Â 8.1 Â 10.2 Â 9.5 Â 10.6 Â 7.8 Â 8.3 Â 8.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 81 Â 69 Â 60 Â 78 Â 68 Â 62 Â 92 Â Â 7.8 Â 6.7 Â 6.0 Â 7.8 Â 6.8 Â 6.0 Â 8.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 5M Â 6M Â 9M Â 10M Â 12M Â 9M Â 8M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 135 Â 104 Â 103 Â 131 Â 138 Â 239 Â Â 12.9 Â 9.8 Â 10.3 Â 13.1 Â 13.3 Â 12.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 50 Â 52 Â 54 Â 58 Â 51 Â 113 Â Â 4.8 Â 4.9 Â 5.4 Â 5.8 Â 4.9 Â 5.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 66 Â 60 Â 56 Â 64 Â 59 Â 149 Â Â 6.3 Â 5.7 Â 5.6 Â 6.4 Â 5.7 Â 7.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 66 Â 69 Â 46 Â 51 Â 67 Â 130 Â Â 6.3 Â 6.5 Â 4.6 Â 5.1 Â 6.5 Â 6.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 57 Â 60 Â 61 Â 53 Â 57 Â 126 Â Â 5.4 Â 5.7 Â 6.1 Â 5.3 Â 5.5 Â 6.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 140 Â 140 Â 123 Â 154 Â 133 Â 237 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 44 - V16 - THINK OF CSU - (Continued) Â 13.3 Â 13.3 Â 12.3 Â 15.4 Â 12.8 Â 12.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 111 Â 127 Â 128 Â 108 Â 93 Â 222 Â Â 10.6 Â 12.0 Â 12.8 Â 10.8 Â 9.0 Â 11.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 120 Â 126 Â 97 Â 102 Â 100 Â 202 Â Â 11.4 Â 11.9 Â 9.7 Â 10.2 Â 9.6 Â 10.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 116 Â 137 Â 126 Â 112 Â 127 Â 229 Â Â 11.0 Â 13.0 Â 12.6 Â 11.2 Â 12.2 Â 11.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 85 Â 85 Â 97 Â 99 Â 113 Â 208 Â Â 8.1 Â 8.0 Â 9.7 Â 9.9 Â 10.9 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 104 Â 96 Â 111 Â 69 Â 100 Â 126 Â Â 9.9 Â 9.1 Â 11.1 Â 6.9 Â 9.6 Â 6.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 11M Â 7M Â 5M Â 5M Â 5M Â 14M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V17 - THINK OF FDP - REF.NO.:0017 0 Location 31 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 32-33 0 Q.6(D) And what do you think of the FDP? ----------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the party at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the party 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 106 Â 88 Â 78 Â 74 Â 101 Â 111 Â 70 Â Â 10.2 Â 8.6 Â 7.8 Â 7.4 Â 10.1 Â 10.7 Â 6.7 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 45 - V17 - THINK OF FDP - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 64 Â 61 Â 57 Â 46 Â 53 Â 35 Â 54 Â Â 6.1 Â 5.9 Â 5.7 Â 4.6 Â 5.3 Â 3.4 Â 5.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 62 Â 60 Â 60 Â 69 Â 76 Â 57 Â 69 Â Â 5.9 Â 5.8 Â 6.0 Â 6.9 Â 7.6 Â 5.5 Â 6.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 68 Â 64 Â 73 Â 75 Â 73 Â 69 Â 65 Â Â 6.5 Â 6.2 Â 7.3 Â 7.5 Â 7.3 Â 6.7 Â 6.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 85 Â 88 Â 91 Â 95 Â 77 Â 73 Â 74 Â Â 8.1 Â 8.6 Â 9.1 Â 9.5 Â 7.7 Â 7.1 Â 7.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 198 Â 192 Â 192 Â 210 Â 184 Â 217 Â 192 Â Â 19.0 Â 18.7 Â 19.1 Â 20.9 Â 18.5 Â 21.0 Â 18.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 161 Â 177 Â 173 Â 165 Â 163 Â 162 Â 193 Â Â 15.4 Â 17.2 Â 17.2 Â 16.4 Â 16.4 Â 15.7 Â 18.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 162 Â 134 Â 133 Â 117 Â 130 Â 152 Â 139 Â Â 15.5 Â 13.0 Â 13.3 Â 11.7 Â 13.1 Â 14.7 Â 13.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 80 Â 108 Â 95 Â 102 Â 87 Â 104 Â 112 Â Â 7.7 Â 10.5 Â 9.5 Â 10.2 Â 8.7 Â 10.1 Â 10.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 37 Â 38 Â 33 Â 37 Â 39 Â 41 Â 46 Â Â 3.5 Â 3.7 Â 3.3 Â 3.7 Â 3.9 Â 4.0 Â 4.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 20 Â 17 Â 18 Â 14 Â 13 Â 13 Â 25 Â Â 1.9 Â 1.7 Â 1.8 Â 1.4 Â 1.3 Â 1.3 Â 2.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 6M Â 5M Â 7M Â 11M Â 11M Â 6M Â 8M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 81 Â 96 Â 75 Â 87 Â 68 Â 108 Â Â 7.7 Â 9.1 Â 7.5 Â 8.7 Â 6.5 Â 5.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 32 Â 41 Â 41 Â 53 Â 49 Â 72 Â Â 3.0 Â 3.9 Â 4.1 Â 5.3 Â 4.7 Â 3.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 58 Â 59 Â 49 Â 47 Â 60 Â 90 Â Â 5.5 Â 5.6 Â 4.9 Â 4.7 Â 5.8 Â 4.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 64 Â 69 Â 72 Â 70 Â 46 Â 105 Â Â 6.1 Â 6.5 Â 7.2 Â 7.0 Â 4.4 Â 5.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 86 Â 81 Â 84 Â 89 Â 76 Â 125 Â Â 8.2 Â 7.7 Â 8.4 Â 8.9 Â 7.3 Â 6.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 167 Â 201 Â 173 Â 197 Â 188 Â 335 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 46 - V17 - THINK OF FDP - (Continued) Â 15.9 Â 19.0 Â 17.2 Â 19.8 Â 18.1 Â 16.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 195 Â 204 Â 182 Â 193 Â 195 Â 349 Â Â 18.6 Â 19.3 Â 18.1 Â 19.4 Â 18.7 Â 17.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 176 Â 153 Â 146 Â 129 Â 171 Â 340 Â Â 16.7 Â 14.5 Â 14.6 Â 13.0 Â 16.4 Â 17.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 116 Â 107 Â 116 Â 82 Â 124 Â 299 Â Â 11.0 Â 10.1 Â 11.6 Â 8.2 Â 11.9 Â 15.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 51 Â 36 Â 51 Â 34 Â 43 Â 111 Â Â 4.9 Â 3.4 Â 5.1 Â 3.4 Â 4.1 Â 5.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 25 Â 9 Â 14 Â 15 Â 21 Â 49 Â Â 2.4 Â 0.9 Â 1.4 Â 1.5 Â 2.0 Â 2.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 10M Â 7M Â 4M Â 10M Â 2M Â 12M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V18 - THINK OF GREENS - REF.NO.:0018 0 Location 33 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 34-35 0 Q.6(E) And what do you think of the Greens? -------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the party at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the party 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 291 Â 242 Â 213 Â 212 Â 189 Â 254 Â 248 Â Â 28.0 Â 23.6 Â 21.3 Â 21.2 Â 18.9 Â 24.6 Â 23.8 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 47 - V18 - THINK OF GREENS - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 97 Â 113 Â 97 Â 91 Â 67 Â 70 Â 80 Â Â 9.3 Â 11.0 Â 9.7 Â 9.1 Â 6.7 Â 6.8 Â 7.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 93 Â 90 Â 74 Â 92 Â 91 Â 95 Â 123 Â Â 8.9 Â 8.8 Â 7.4 Â 9.2 Â 9.1 Â 9.2 Â 11.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 79 Â 67 Â 63 Â 57 Â 70 Â 67 Â 86 Â Â 7.6 Â 6.5 Â 6.3 Â 5.7 Â 7.0 Â 6.5 Â 8.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 78 Â 76 Â 73 Â 77 Â 62 Â 72 Â 82 Â Â 7.5 Â 7.4 Â 7.3 Â 7.7 Â 6.2 Â 7.0 Â 7.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 145 Â 137 Â 139 Â 146 Â 150 Â 138 Â 134 Â Â 13.9 Â 13.3 Â 13.9 Â 14.6 Â 15.0 Â 13.4 Â 12.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 106 Â 107 Â 121 Â 124 Â 108 Â 132 Â 109 Â Â 10.2 Â 10.4 Â 12.1 Â 12.4 Â 10.8 Â 12.8 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 65 Â 100 Â 96 Â 93 Â 99 Â 77 Â 74 Â Â 6.2 Â 9.7 Â 9.6 Â 9.3 Â 9.9 Â 7.5 Â 7.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 45 Â 49 Â 65 Â 63 Â 73 Â 65 Â 56 Â Â 4.3 Â 4.8 Â 6.5 Â 6.3 Â 7.3 Â 6.3 Â 5.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 28 Â 28 Â 44 Â 30 Â 56 Â 35 Â 29 Â Â 2.7 Â 2.7 Â 4.4 Â 3.0 Â 5.6 Â 3.4 Â 2.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 14 Â 18 Â 16 Â 17 Â 33 Â 27 Â 21 Â Â 1.3 Â 1.8 Â 1.6 Â 1.7 Â 3.3 Â 2.6 Â 2.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 8M Â 5M Â 9M Â 13M Â 9M Â 8M Â 5M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 266 Â 232 Â 230 Â 227 Â 234 Â 416 Â Â 25.4 Â 21.9 Â 23.0 Â 22.7 Â 22.5 Â 21.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 73 Â 84 Â 87 Â 62 Â 84 Â 203 Â Â 7.0 Â 7.9 Â 8.7 Â 6.2 Â 8.1 Â 10.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 92 Â 86 Â 87 Â 98 Â 63 Â 184 Â Â 8.8 Â 8.1 Â 8.7 Â 9.8 Â 6.1 Â 9.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 85 Â 58 Â 65 Â 66 Â 74 Â 117 Â Â 8.1 Â 5.5 Â 6.5 Â 6.6 Â 7.1 Â 5.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 82 Â 98 Â 70 Â 64 Â 76 Â 158 Â Â 7.8 Â 9.3 Â 7.0 Â 6.4 Â 7.3 Â 8.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 138 Â 138 Â 124 Â 140 Â 135 Â 254 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 48 - V18 - THINK OF GREENS - (Continued) Â 13.2 Â 13.1 Â 12.4 Â 14.0 Â 13.0 Â 12.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 110 Â 143 Â 125 Â 124 Â 129 Â 207 Â Â 10.5 Â 13.5 Â 12.5 Â 12.4 Â 12.4 Â 10.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 81 Â 108 Â 80 Â 88 Â 90 Â 156 Â Â 7.7 Â 10.2 Â 8.0 Â 8.8 Â 8.7 Â 7.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 63 Â 51 Â 60 Â 64 Â 82 Â 139 Â Â 6.0 Â 4.8 Â 6.0 Â 6.4 Â 7.9 Â 7.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 30 Â 37 Â 39 Â 35 Â 44 Â 84 Â Â 2.9 Â 3.5 Â 3.9 Â 3.5 Â 4.2 Â 4.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 29 Â 22 Â 35 Â 31 Â 29 Â 64 Â Â 2.8 Â 2.1 Â 3.5 Â 3.1 Â 2.8 Â 3.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 12M Â 6M Â 5M Â 7M Â 3M Â 13M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V19 - SATISFIED W GOVERNMENT - REF.NO.:0019 0 Location 35 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 36-37 MD2: 99 0 Q.7 Are you more satisfied or more dissatisfied with what the present CDU/CSU-FDP government in Bonn has accomplished so far? Please, tell me with the aid of this scale. +5 means that you are completely satisfied with the present government in Bonn. -5 means that you are not at all satisfied with what the government has accomplished so far. (Interviewer: Hand list no.2 to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 01. -5 -- not at all satisfied 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- completely satisfied 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 49 - V19 - SATISFIED W GOVERNMENT - (Continued) 99. NA 00. INAP., not asked in March ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 103 Â 73 Â 73 Â 88 Â 93 Â 98 Â 78 Â Â 9.9 Â 7.1 Â 7.3 Â 8.7 Â 9.3 Â 9.6 Â 7.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 53 Â 68 Â 70 Â 40 Â 49 Â 52 Â 43 Â Â 5.1 Â 6.6 Â 7.0 Â 4.0 Â 4.9 Â 5.1 Â 4.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 76 Â 98 Â 78 Â 73 Â 85 Â 58 Â 57 Â Â 7.3 Â 9.6 Â 7.8 Â 7.3 Â 8.5 Â 5.7 Â 5.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 65 Â 66 Â 79 Â 78 Â 91 Â 88 Â 71 Â Â 6.3 Â 6.5 Â 7.9 Â 7.8 Â 9.1 Â 8.6 Â 6.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 64 Â 43 Â 79 Â 71 Â 72 Â 56 Â 64 Â Â 6.2 Â 4.2 Â 7.9 Â 7.1 Â 7.2 Â 5.5 Â 6.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 119 Â 106 Â 96 Â 108 Â 109 Â 117 Â 123 Â Â 11.5 Â 10.4 Â 9.6 Â 10.7 Â 10.9 Â 11.4 Â 11.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 128 Â 134 Â 134 Â 141 Â 121 Â 140 Â 154 Â Â 12.3 Â 13.1 Â 13.3 Â 14.0 Â 12.1 Â 13.7 Â 14.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 137 Â 159 Â 121 Â 145 Â 129 Â 129 Â 142 Â Â 13.2 Â 15.5 Â 12.1 Â 14.4 Â 12.9 Â 12.6 Â 13.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 159 Â 156 Â 145 Â 151 Â 127 Â 147 Â 164 Â Â 15.3 Â 15.2 Â 14.4 Â 15.0 Â 12.7 Â 14.4 Â 15.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 86 Â 79 Â 90 Â 83 Â 73 Â 75 Â 81 Â Â 8.3 Â 7.7 Â 9.0 Â 8.3 Â 7.3 Â 7.3 Â 7.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 47 Â 41 Â 39 Â 28 Â 52 Â 62 Â 61 Â Â 4.5 Â 4.0 Â 3.9 Â 2.8 Â 5.2 Â 6.1 Â 5.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 12M Â 9M Â 6M Â 9M Â 6M Â 18M Â 9M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 75 Â 70 Â 63 Â 73 Â 80 Â Â Â 7.1 Â 6.6 Â 6.3 Â 7.3 Â 7.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 62 Â 40 Â 31 Â 50 Â 55 Â Â Â 5.9 Â 3.8 Â 3.1 Â 5.0 Â 5.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 77 Â 58 Â 60 Â 70 Â 65 Â Â Â 7.3 Â 5.5 Â 6.0 Â 7.0 Â 6.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 50 - V19 - SATISFIED W GOVERNMENT - (Continued) 4 Â 72 Â 60 Â 65 Â 67 Â 66 Â Â Â 6.8 Â 5.7 Â 6.5 Â 6.7 Â 6.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 52 Â 53 Â 54 Â 61 Â 50 Â Â Â 4.9 Â 5.0 Â 5.4 Â 6.1 Â 4.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 109 Â 151 Â 104 Â 115 Â 99 Â Â Â 10.4 Â 14.3 Â 10.4 Â 11.5 Â 9.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 136 Â 119 Â 122 Â 104 Â 103 Â Â Â 12.9 Â 11.3 Â 12.2 Â 10.4 Â 9.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 146 Â 171 Â 134 Â 124 Â 122 Â Â Â 13.9 Â 16.2 Â 13.3 Â 12.4 Â 11.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 178 Â 164 Â 185 Â 174 Â 185 Â Â Â 16.9 Â 15.5 Â 18.4 Â 17.4 Â 17.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 90 Â 99 Â 107 Â 98 Â 125 Â Â Â 8.5 Â 9.4 Â 10.7 Â 9.8 Â 12.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 56 Â 71 Â 79 Â 66 Â 91 Â Â Â 5.3 Â 6.7 Â 7.9 Â 6.6 Â 8.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 8M Â 7M Â 3M Â 4M Â 2M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V20 - SATISFIED OPPOSITION SPD - REF.NO.:0020 0 Location 37 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 38-39 MD2: 99 0 Q.7A And how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the performance of the SPD and the Greens, i.e. with the opposi- tion in Bonn? Please, tell me again with the aid of this scale. (Interviewer: Hand list no.2 to the respondent) Q.7A(1) With the performance of the SPD in opposition R is ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 01. -5 -- not at all satisfied 02. 03. 04. 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 51 - V20 - SATISFIED OPPOSITION SPD - (Continued) 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- completely satisfied 99. NA 00. Not asked in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 39 Â 23 Â 39 Â 53 Â 39 Â 43 Â 42 Â Â 3.7 Â 2.2 Â 3.9 Â 5.3 Â 3.9 Â 4.2 Â 4.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 33 Â 28 Â 36 Â 29 Â 26 Â 24 Â 29 Â Â 3.2 Â 2.7 Â 3.6 Â 2.9 Â 2.6 Â 2.3 Â 2.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 64 Â 55 Â 67 Â 60 Â 44 Â 37 Â 67 Â Â 6.1 Â 5.4 Â 6.7 Â 6.0 Â 4.4 Â 3.6 Â 6.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 87 Â 81 Â 80 Â 64 Â 83 Â 70 Â 65 Â Â 8.3 Â 7.9 Â 8.0 Â 6.4 Â 8.3 Â 6.8 Â 6.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 80 Â 97 Â 80 Â 68 Â 77 Â 95 Â 109 Â Â 7.7 Â 9.4 Â 8.0 Â 6.8 Â 7.7 Â 9.2 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 161 Â 165 Â 137 Â 152 Â 152 Â 165 Â 172 Â Â 15.4 Â 16.1 Â 13.7 Â 15.1 Â 15.2 Â 16.0 Â 16.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 172 Â 183 Â 169 Â 189 Â 174 Â 160 Â 186 Â Â 16.5 Â 17.8 Â 16.9 Â 18.8 Â 17.4 Â 15.5 Â 17.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 161 Â 144 Â 151 Â 160 Â 175 Â 142 Â 144 Â Â 15.4 Â 14.0 Â 15.1 Â 15.9 Â 17.5 Â 13.8 Â 13.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 132 Â 138 Â 137 Â 117 Â 123 Â 163 Â 119 Â Â 12.6 Â 13.4 Â 13.7 Â 11.6 Â 12.3 Â 15.8 Â 11.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 63 Â 70 Â 71 Â 74 Â 61 Â 66 Â 57 Â Â 6.0 Â 6.8 Â 7.1 Â 7.4 Â 6.1 Â 6.4 Â 5.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 52 Â 44 Â 35 Â 39 Â 45 Â 66 Â 52 Â Â 5.0 Â 4.3 Â 3.5 Â 3.9 Â 4.5 Â 6.4 Â 5.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 5M Â 4M Â 8M Â 10M Â 8M Â 9M Â 5M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 39 Â 35 Â 61 Â 44 Â 38 Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 52 - V20 - SATISFIED OPPOSITION SPD - (Continued) Â 3.7 Â 3.3 Â 6.1 Â 4.4 Â 3.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 32 Â 31 Â 26 Â 28 Â 28 Â Â Â 3.0 Â 2.9 Â 2.6 Â 2.8 Â 2.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 64 Â 53 Â 57 Â 70 Â 56 Â Â Â 6.1 Â 5.0 Â 5.7 Â 7.0 Â 5.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 90 Â 57 Â 95 Â 88 Â 93 Â Â Â 8.5 Â 5.4 Â 9.5 Â 8.8 Â 8.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 85 Â 82 Â 75 Â 87 Â 88 Â Â Â 8.1 Â 7.8 Â 7.5 Â 8.7 Â 8.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 162 Â 201 Â 158 Â 161 Â 142 Â Â Â 15.4 Â 19.0 Â 15.7 Â 16.1 Â 13.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 171 Â 185 Â 174 Â 166 Â 167 Â Â Â 16.2 Â 17.5 Â 17.3 Â 16.6 Â 16.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 156 Â 167 Â 153 Â 139 Â 164 Â Â Â 14.8 Â 15.8 Â 15.2 Â 13.9 Â 15.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 142 Â 129 Â 103 Â 111 Â 137 Â Â Â 13.5 Â 12.2 Â 10.3 Â 11.1 Â 13.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 69 Â 63 Â 54 Â 57 Â 70 Â Â Â 6.5 Â 6.0 Â 5.4 Â 5.7 Â 6.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 44 Â 54 Â 48 Â 51 Â 57 Â Â Â 4.2 Â 5.1 Â 4.8 Â 5.1 Â 5.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 7M Â 6M Â 3M Â 4M Â 3M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V21 - SATISFD OPPOSTION GREENS - REF.NO.:0021 0 Location 39 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 40-41 MD2: 99 0 Q.7A(2) With the performance of the Greens in opposition R is ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 53 - V21 - SATISFD OPPOSTION GREENS - (Continued) 01. -5 -- not at all satisfied 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- completely satisfied 99. NA 00. Not asked in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 254 Â 216 Â 197 Â 202 Â 163 Â 213 Â 220 Â Â 24.4 Â 21.1 Â 19.7 Â 20.1 Â 16.3 Â 20.7 Â 21.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 80 Â 73 Â 79 Â 83 Â 61 Â 79 Â 80 Â Â 7.7 Â 7.1 Â 7.9 Â 8.3 Â 6.1 Â 7.7 Â 7.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 95 Â 104 Â 96 Â 75 Â 74 Â 71 Â 117 Â Â 9.1 Â 10.1 Â 9.6 Â 7.5 Â 7.4 Â 6.9 Â 11.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 71 Â 72 Â 69 Â 70 Â 71 Â 78 Â 70 Â Â 6.8 Â 7.0 Â 6.9 Â 7.0 Â 7.1 Â 7.6 Â 6.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 75 Â 79 Â 71 Â 73 Â 73 Â 84 Â 102 Â Â 7.2 Â 7.7 Â 7.1 Â 7.3 Â 7.3 Â 8.1 Â 9.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 185 Â 167 Â 145 Â 173 Â 181 Â 160 Â 149 Â Â 17.8 Â 16.3 Â 14.5 Â 17.2 Â 18.2 Â 15.5 Â 14.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 125 Â 144 Â 147 Â 130 Â 143 Â 133 Â 133 Â Â 12.0 Â 14.0 Â 14.7 Â 13.0 Â 14.3 Â 12.9 Â 12.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 78 Â 82 Â 89 Â 79 Â 102 Â 95 Â 69 Â Â 7.5 Â 8.0 Â 8.9 Â 7.9 Â 10.2 Â 9.2 Â 6.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 45 Â 56 Â 58 Â 74 Â 55 Â 62 Â 46 Â Â 4.3 Â 5.5 Â 5.8 Â 7.4 Â 5.5 Â 6.0 Â 4.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 18 Â 19 Â 39 Â 27 Â 45 Â 37 Â 39 Â Â 1.7 Â 1.9 Â 3.9 Â 2.7 Â 4.5 Â 3.6 Â 3.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 13 Â 13 Â 12 Â 17 Â 29 Â 19 Â 13 Â Â 1.3 Â 1.3 Â 1.2 Â 1.7 Â 2.9 Â 1.8 Â 1.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 10M Â 7M Â 8M Â 12M Â 10M Â 9M Â 9M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 54 - V21 - SATISFD OPPOSTION GREENS - (Continued) ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 229 Â 191 Â 181 Â 176 Â 194 Â Â Â 21.8 Â 18.1 Â 18.1 Â 17.6 Â 18.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 79 Â 60 Â 80 Â 74 Â 62 Â Â Â 7.5 Â 5.7 Â 8.0 Â 7.4 Â 6.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 94 Â 85 Â 88 Â 87 Â 89 Â Â Â 8.9 Â 8.0 Â 8.8 Â 8.7 Â 8.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 96 Â 75 Â 77 Â 63 Â 74 Â Â Â 9.1 Â 7.1 Â 7.7 Â 6.3 Â 7.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 94 Â 93 Â 70 Â 85 Â 76 Â Â Â 8.9 Â 8.8 Â 7.0 Â 8.5 Â 7.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 138 Â 191 Â 160 Â 150 Â 159 Â Â Â 13.1 Â 18.1 Â 16.0 Â 15.0 Â 15.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 124 Â 148 Â 135 Â 127 Â 132 Â Â Â 11.8 Â 14.0 Â 13.5 Â 12.7 Â 12.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 89 Â 99 Â 85 Â 107 Â 101 Â Â Â 8.5 Â 9.4 Â 8.5 Â 10.7 Â 9.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 59 Â 62 Â 61 Â 63 Â 77 Â Â Â 5.6 Â 5.9 Â 6.1 Â 6.3 Â 7.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 33 Â 24 Â 27 Â 37 Â 38 Â Â Â 3.1 Â 2.3 Â 2.7 Â 3.7 Â 3.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 17 Â 28 Â 38 Â 29 Â 34 Â Â Â 1.6 Â 2.7 Â 3.8 Â 2.9 Â 3.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 9M Â 7M Â 5M Â 8M Â 7M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 55 - V22 - THINK OF H.D.GENSCHER - REF.NO.:0022 0 Location 41 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 42-43 0 Q.8 Please tell me by using this scale what you think about some leading politicians. (Interviewer: Shuffle pink deck of cards and present the cards one at a time together with list no.3) +5 means that you think a great deal of the particular politician. -5 means that you do not think much of him at all. If you do not know one or the other of the politicians, you do not have to rate him, of course. Q.8(a) What do you think of Hans-Dietrich Genscher? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 93 Â 71 Â 82 Â 69 Â 71 Â 73 Â 62 Â Â 8.9 Â 6.9 Â 8.2 Â 6.9 Â 7.1 Â 7.1 Â 6.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 42 Â 48 Â 49 Â 40 Â 43 Â 32 Â 35 Â Â 4.0 Â 4.7 Â 4.9 Â 4.0 Â 4.3 Â 3.1 Â 3.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 66 Â 60 Â 87 Â 68 Â 59 Â 63 Â 50 Â Â 6.3 Â 5.8 Â 8.6 Â 6.8 Â 5.9 Â 6.1 Â 4.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 66 Â 63 Â 58 Â 56 Â 82 Â 57 Â 68 Â Â 6.3 Â 6.1 Â 5.8 Â 5.6 Â 8.2 Â 5.5 Â 6.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 70 Â 72 Â 83 Â 54 Â 76 Â 72 Â 52 Â Â 6.7 Â 7.0 Â 8.3 Â 5.4 Â 7.6 Â 7.0 Â 5.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 172 Â 174 Â 168 Â 162 Â 171 Â 156 Â 144 Â Â 16.5 Â 16.9 Â 16.7 Â 16.1 Â 17.1 Â 15.1 Â 13.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 164 Â 166 Â 130 Â 179 Â 181 Â 188 Â 186 Â Â 15.7 Â 16.2 Â 12.9 Â 17.8 Â 18.1 Â 18.3 Â 17.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 165 Â 151 Â 155 Â 166 Â 119 Â 162 Â 148 Â Â 15.8 Â 14.7 Â 15.4 Â 16.5 Â 11.9 Â 15.7 Â 14.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 56 - V22 - THINK OF H.D.GENSCHER - (Continued) 9 Â 120 Â 132 Â 113 Â 120 Â 126 Â 156 Â 168 Â Â 11.5 Â 12.9 Â 11.2 Â 11.9 Â 12.6 Â 15.1 Â 16.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 54 Â 59 Â 46 Â 59 Â 47 Â 49 Â 76 Â Â 5.2 Â 5.7 Â 4.6 Â 5.9 Â 4.7 Â 4.8 Â 7.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 33 Â 31 Â 35 Â 32 Â 23 Â 22 Â 51 Â Â 3.2 Â 3.0 Â 3.5 Â 3.2 Â 2.3 Â 2.1 Â 4.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 4M Â 5M Â 4M Â 10M Â 9M Â 10M Â 7M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 61 Â 64 Â 60 Â 61 Â 57 Â 56 Â Â 5.8 Â 6.1 Â 6.0 Â 6.1 Â 5.5 Â 2.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 18 Â 31 Â 28 Â 26 Â 28 Â 42 Â Â 1.7 Â 2.9 Â 2.8 Â 2.6 Â 2.7 Â 2.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 51 Â 39 Â 45 Â 61 Â 39 Â 42 Â Â 4.9 Â 3.7 Â 4.5 Â 6.1 Â 3.8 Â 2.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 54 Â 52 Â 53 Â 69 Â 54 Â 79 Â Â 5.2 Â 4.9 Â 5.3 Â 6.9 Â 5.2 Â 4.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 49 Â 59 Â 68 Â 44 Â 54 Â 84 Â Â 4.7 Â 5.6 Â 6.8 Â 4.4 Â 5.2 Â 4.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 156 Â 159 Â 136 Â 150 Â 149 Â 209 Â Â 14.9 Â 15.1 Â 13.6 Â 15.0 Â 14.3 Â 10.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 166 Â 163 Â 190 Â 178 Â 179 Â 315 Â Â 15.9 Â 15.4 Â 19.0 Â 17.8 Â 17.2 Â 15.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 177 Â 211 Â 154 Â 156 Â 173 Â 373 Â Â 16.9 Â 20.0 Â 15.4 Â 15.6 Â 16.7 Â 18.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 173 Â 169 Â 143 Â 146 Â 188 Â 368 Â Â 16.5 Â 16.0 Â 14.3 Â 14.6 Â 18.1 Â 18.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 80 Â 64 Â 83 Â 66 Â 79 Â 263 Â Â 7.6 Â 6.1 Â 8.3 Â 6.6 Â 7.6 Â 13.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 62 Â 45 Â 42 Â 42 Â 39 Â 147 Â Â 5.9 Â 4.3 Â 4.2 Â 4.2 Â 3.8 Â 7.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 14M Â 7M Â 5M Â 7M Â 4M Â 17M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 57 - V23 - THINK OF HELMUTH KOHL - REF.NO.:0023 0 Location 43 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 44-45 0 Q.8(b) And what do you think of Helmut Kohl? --------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 147 Â 128 Â 139 Â 127 Â 159 Â 148 Â 138 Â Â 14.1 Â 12.4 Â 13.8 Â 12.6 Â 15.9 Â 14.4 Â 13.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 49 Â 70 Â 62 Â 63 Â 72 Â 73 Â 43 Â Â 4.7 Â 6.8 Â 6.2 Â 6.3 Â 7.2 Â 7.1 Â 4.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 63 Â 70 Â 89 Â 46 Â 71 Â 57 Â 70 Â Â 6.0 Â 6.8 Â 8.8 Â 4.6 Â 7.1 Â 5.5 Â 6.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 71 Â 82 Â 70 Â 62 Â 74 Â 71 Â 70 Â Â 6.8 Â 8.0 Â 7.0 Â 6.2 Â 7.4 Â 6.9 Â 6.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 59 Â 53 Â 50 Â 70 Â 54 Â 60 Â 65 Â Â 5.6 Â 5.1 Â 5.0 Â 7.0 Â 5.4 Â 5.8 Â 6.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 102 Â 97 Â 102 Â 110 Â 109 Â 103 Â 101 Â Â 9.8 Â 9.4 Â 10.1 Â 11.0 Â 10.9 Â 10.0 Â 9.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 107 Â 126 Â 112 Â 118 Â 105 Â 109 Â 104 Â Â 10.2 Â 12.2 Â 11.1 Â 11.8 Â 10.5 Â 10.6 Â 10.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 124 Â 110 Â 116 Â 104 Â 98 Â 98 Â 118 Â Â 11.9 Â 10.7 Â 11.5 Â 10.4 Â 9.8 Â 9.5 Â 11.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 164 Â 129 Â 116 Â 130 Â 120 Â 127 Â 142 Â Â 15.7 Â 12.5 Â 11.5 Â 12.9 Â 12.0 Â 12.3 Â 13.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 81 Â 105 Â 88 Â 117 Â 82 Â 106 Â 109 Â Â 7.8 Â 10.2 Â 8.7 Â 11.7 Â 8.2 Â 10.3 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 78 Â 60 Â 62 Â 57 Â 58 Â 79 Â 82 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 58 - V23 - THINK OF HELMUTH KOHL - (Continued) Â 7.5 Â 5.8 Â 6.2 Â 5.7 Â 5.8 Â 7.7 Â 7.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 4M Â 2M Â 4M Â 11M Â 5M Â 9M Â 5M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 149 Â 104 Â 120 Â 155 Â 137 Â 184 Â Â 14.2 Â 9.8 Â 11.9 Â 15.5 Â 13.2 Â 9.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 53 Â 48 Â 48 Â 54 Â 58 Â 95 Â Â 5.0 Â 4.5 Â 4.8 Â 5.4 Â 5.6 Â 4.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 80 Â 51 Â 63 Â 66 Â 62 Â 119 Â Â 7.6 Â 4.8 Â 6.3 Â 6.6 Â 6.0 Â 6.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 67 Â 55 Â 56 Â 68 Â 47 Â 121 Â Â 6.4 Â 5.2 Â 5.6 Â 6.8 Â 4.5 Â 6.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 52 Â 61 Â 58 Â 61 Â 56 Â 130 Â Â 4.9 Â 5.8 Â 5.8 Â 6.1 Â 5.4 Â 6.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 96 Â 98 Â 65 Â 81 Â 108 Â 175 Â Â 9.1 Â 9.2 Â 6.5 Â 8.1 Â 10.4 Â 8.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 88 Â 113 Â 110 Â 88 Â 92 Â 208 Â Â 8.4 Â 10.7 Â 10.9 Â 8.8 Â 8.8 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 123 Â 123 Â 120 Â 106 Â 108 Â 233 Â Â 11.7 Â 11.6 Â 11.9 Â 10.6 Â 10.4 Â 11.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 133 Â 187 Â 146 Â 134 Â 141 Â 276 Â Â 12.7 Â 17.6 Â 14.5 Â 13.4 Â 13.5 Â 13.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 106 Â 119 Â 120 Â 105 Â 122 Â 246 Â Â 10.1 Â 11.2 Â 11.9 Â 10.5 Â 11.7 Â 12.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 104 Â 101 Â 99 Â 85 Â 110 Â 195 Â Â 9.9 Â 9.5 Â 9.9 Â 8.5 Â 10.6 Â 9.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 10M Â 3M Â 2M Â 3M Â 2M Â 13M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 59 - V24 - THINK OF F.J.STRAUSS - REF.NO.:0024 0 Location 45 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 46-47 0 Q.8(c) And what do you think of Franz-Josef Strauss? ----------------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 129 Â 127 Â 125 Â 118 Â 146 Â 153 Â 145 Â Â 12.4 Â 12.3 Â 12.5 Â 11.7 Â 14.6 Â 14.8 Â 14.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 47 Â 56 Â 59 Â 41 Â 59 Â 57 Â 52 Â Â 4.5 Â 5.4 Â 5.9 Â 4.1 Â 5.9 Â 5.5 Â 5.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 58 Â 62 Â 52 Â 66 Â 73 Â 58 Â 62 Â Â 5.6 Â 6.0 Â 5.2 Â 6.6 Â 7.3 Â 5.6 Â 6.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 49 Â 35 Â 67 Â 54 Â 51 Â 53 Â 60 Â Â 4.7 Â 3.4 Â 6.7 Â 5.4 Â 5.1 Â 5.1 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 45 Â 61 Â 52 Â 61 Â 68 Â 58 Â 49 Â Â 4.3 Â 5.9 Â 5.2 Â 6.1 Â 6.8 Â 5.6 Â 4.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 110 Â 102 Â 89 Â 85 Â 96 Â 96 Â 95 Â Â 10.5 Â 9.9 Â 8.9 Â 8.4 Â 9.6 Â 9.3 Â 9.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 127 Â 118 Â 110 Â 105 Â 94 Â 122 Â 102 Â Â 12.2 Â 11.5 Â 11.0 Â 10.4 Â 9.4 Â 11.8 Â 9.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 114 Â 135 Â 109 Â 113 Â 106 Â 116 Â 114 Â Â 10.9 Â 13.1 Â 10.9 Â 11.2 Â 10.6 Â 11.3 Â 11.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 128 Â 109 Â 134 Â 147 Â 95 Â 125 Â 116 Â Â 12.3 Â 10.6 Â 13.4 Â 14.6 Â 9.5 Â 12.1 Â 11.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 105 Â 112 Â 107 Â 100 Â 102 Â 82 Â 101 Â Â 10.1 Â 10.9 Â 10.7 Â 9.9 Â 10.2 Â 8.0 Â 9.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 132 Â 113 Â 98 Â 117 Â 110 Â 111 Â 143 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 60 - V24 - THINK OF F.J.STRAUSS - (Continued) Â 12.6 Â 11.0 Â 9.8 Â 11.6 Â 11.0 Â 10.8 Â 13.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 5M Â 2M Â 8M Â 8M Â 7M Â 9M Â 8M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 162 Â 138 Â 126 Â 170 Â 174 Â 236 Â Â 15.4 Â 13.0 Â 12.6 Â 17.0 Â 16.7 Â 11.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 60 Â 39 Â 46 Â 52 Â 61 Â 127 Â Â 5.7 Â 3.7 Â 4.6 Â 5.2 Â 5.8 Â 6.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 65 Â 46 Â 54 Â 63 Â 66 Â 139 Â Â 6.2 Â 4.3 Â 5.4 Â 6.3 Â 6.3 Â 7.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 58 Â 58 Â 53 Â 53 Â 53 Â 118 Â Â 5.5 Â 5.5 Â 5.3 Â 5.3 Â 5.1 Â 5.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 52 Â 61 Â 46 Â 66 Â 54 Â 146 Â Â 4.9 Â 5.8 Â 4.6 Â 6.6 Â 5.2 Â 7.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 99 Â 95 Â 77 Â 77 Â 90 Â 201 Â Â 9.4 Â 9.0 Â 7.7 Â 7.7 Â 8.6 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 121 Â 123 Â 94 Â 94 Â 93 Â 210 Â Â 11.5 Â 11.6 Â 9.4 Â 9.4 Â 8.9 Â 10.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 80 Â 115 Â 104 Â 108 Â 96 Â 218 Â Â 7.6 Â 10.8 Â 10.4 Â 10.8 Â 9.2 Â 11.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 109 Â 125 Â 142 Â 108 Â 106 Â 226 Â Â 10.4 Â 11.8 Â 14.2 Â 10.8 Â 10.2 Â 11.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 99 Â 107 Â 117 Â 95 Â 119 Â 189 Â Â 9.4 Â 10.1 Â 11.7 Â 9.5 Â 11.4 Â 9.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 148 Â 153 Â 144 Â 116 Â 131 Â 175 Â Â 14.1 Â 14.4 Â 14.4 Â 11.6 Â 12.6 Â 8.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 8M Â 3M Â 4M Â 4M Â Â 10M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 61 - V25 - THINK OF NORBERT BLUEM - REF.NO.:0025 0 Location 47 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 48-49 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(d) And what do you think of Norbert Bluem? ----------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Not asked in March to November'86 and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 152 Â 127 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 14.7 Â 12.4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 51 Â 50 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.9 Â 4.9 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 59 Â 57 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.7 Â 5.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 61 Â 61 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.9 Â 5.9 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 66 Â 88 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.4 Â 8.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 143 Â 162 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 13.8 Â 15.8 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 139 Â 150 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 13.4 Â 14.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 129 Â 133 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.5 Â 13.0 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 121 Â 111 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.7 Â 10.8 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 66 Â 60 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.4 Â 5.8 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 62 - V25 - THINK OF NORBERT BLUEM - (Continued) 11 Â 49 Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.7 Â 2.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 13M Â 6M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 103 Â 101 Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.3 Â 9.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 43 Â 53 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.3 Â 5.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â 62 Â 57 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.2 Â 5.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â Â 87 Â 74 Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.7 Â 7.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â Â 95 Â 78 Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.5 Â 7.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â Â 142 Â 162 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14.2 Â 15.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â Â Â 124 Â 125 Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.4 Â 12.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â Â Â 144 Â 147 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14.4 Â 14.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 112 Â 125 Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.2 Â 12.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â Â Â 64 Â 67 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.4 Â 6.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â Â Â 22 Â 40 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.2 Â 3.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â Â Â 8M Â 14M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 63 - V26 - THINK OF BANGEMANN - REF.NO.:0026 0 Location 49 Card 1 MD1: 99 Width 2 Column 50-51 0 Q.8(e) What do you think of Martin Bangemann? ---------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 133 Â 93 Â 73 Â 82 Â 80 Â 92 Â 95 Â Â 13.0 Â 9.2 Â 7.4 Â 8.4 Â 8.2 Â 9.1 Â 9.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 60 Â 47 Â 46 Â 38 Â 56 Â 34 Â 36 Â Â 5.8 Â 4.6 Â 4.7 Â 3.9 Â 5.7 Â 3.4 Â 3.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 74 Â 82 Â 64 Â 66 Â 83 Â 52 Â 73 Â Â 7.2 Â 8.1 Â 6.5 Â 6.7 Â 8.5 Â 5.2 Â 7.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 66 Â 85 Â 74 Â 67 Â 94 Â 89 Â 96 Â Â 6.4 Â 8.4 Â 7.5 Â 6.8 Â 9.6 Â 8.8 Â 9.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 90 Â 121 Â 103 Â 116 Â 111 Â 96 Â 102 Â Â 8.8 Â 11.9 Â 10.5 Â 11.8 Â 11.4 Â 9.5 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 233 Â 226 Â 262 Â 269 Â 254 Â 282 Â 255 Â Â 22.7 Â 22.2 Â 26.6 Â 27.4 Â 26.0 Â 28.0 Â 25.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 140 Â 151 Â 161 Â 155 Â 124 Â 155 Â 166 Â Â 13.6 Â 14.9 Â 16.4 Â 15.8 Â 12.7 Â 15.4 Â 16.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 129 Â 124 Â 108 Â 115 Â 108 Â 109 Â 106 Â Â 12.6 Â 12.2 Â 11.0 Â 11.7 Â 11.1 Â 10.8 Â 10.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 67 Â 68 Â 60 Â 57 Â 43 Â 80 Â 55 Â Â 6.5 Â 6.7 Â 6.1 Â 5.8 Â 4.4 Â 7.9 Â 5.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 21 Â 16 Â 27 Â 14 Â 18 Â 15 Â 22 Â Â 2.0 Â 1.6 Â 2.7 Â 1.4 Â 1.8 Â 1.5 Â 2.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 13 Â 3 Â 6 Â 3 Â 5 Â 4 Â 5 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 64 - V26 - THINK OF BANGEMANN - (Continued) Â 1.3 Â 0.3 Â 0.6 Â 0.3 Â 0.5 Â 0.4 Â 0.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 23M Â 16M Â 26M Â 33M Â 31M Â 32M Â 36M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 76 Â 72 Â 76 Â 68 Â 74 Â 68 Â Â 7.4 Â 6.9 Â 7.7 Â 6.9 Â 7.2 Â 3.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 40 Â 37 Â 37 Â 39 Â 44 Â 50 Â Â 3.9 Â 3.6 Â 3.8 Â 3.9 Â 4.3 Â 2.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 59 Â 69 Â 71 Â 86 Â 67 Â 113 Â Â 5.7 Â 6.6 Â 7.2 Â 8.7 Â 6.5 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 75 Â 90 Â 72 Â 97 Â 77 Â 145 Â Â 7.3 Â 8.7 Â 7.3 Â 9.8 Â 7.5 Â 7.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 109 Â 120 Â 112 Â 113 Â 105 Â 176 Â Â 10.6 Â 11.6 Â 11.4 Â 11.4 Â 10.3 Â 9.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 268 Â 266 Â 253 Â 245 Â 261 Â 388 Â Â 26.1 Â 25.6 Â 25.7 Â 24.7 Â 25.5 Â 20.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 190 Â 195 Â 166 Â 170 Â 180 Â 376 Â Â 18.5 Â 18.8 Â 16.9 Â 17.1 Â 17.6 Â 19.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 122 Â 120 Â 100 Â 99 Â 118 Â 310 Â Â 11.9 Â 11.6 Â 10.2 Â 10.0 Â 11.5 Â 16.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 62 Â 56 Â 68 Â 50 Â 72 Â 194 Â Â 6.0 Â 5.4 Â 6.9 Â 5.0 Â 7.0 Â 10.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 17 Â 7 Â 23 Â 17 Â 17 Â 87 Â Â 1.7 Â 0.7 Â 2.3 Â 1.7 Â 1.7 Â 4.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 9 Â 6 Â 5 Â 8 Â 8 Â 25 Â Â 0.9 Â 0.6 Â 0.5 Â 0.8 Â 0.8 Â 1.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 34M Â 25M Â 24M Â 14M Â 20M Â 63M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 65 - V27 - THINK OF WILLY BRANDT - REF.NO.:0027 0 Location 51 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 52-53 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(f) What do you think of Willy Brandt? ------------------------------------------ 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Not asked in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 127 Â 105 Â 96 Â 98 Â 78 Â 104 Â 125 Â Â 12.2 Â 10.2 Â 9.6 Â 9.7 Â 7.8 Â 10.1 Â 12.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 44 Â 54 Â 54 Â 48 Â 42 Â 45 Â 54 Â Â 4.2 Â 5.3 Â 5.4 Â 4.8 Â 4.2 Â 4.4 Â 5.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 58 Â 72 Â 63 Â 73 Â 60 Â 65 Â 78 Â Â 5.6 Â 7.0 Â 6.3 Â 7.2 Â 6.0 Â 6.3 Â 7.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 72 Â 61 Â 64 Â 82 Â 61 Â 70 Â 83 Â Â 6.9 Â 5.9 Â 6.4 Â 8.1 Â 6.1 Â 6.8 Â 8.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 70 Â 83 Â 73 Â 61 Â 91 Â 80 Â 68 Â Â 6.7 Â 8.1 Â 7.3 Â 6.1 Â 9.1 Â 7.8 Â 6.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 154 Â 152 Â 141 Â 164 Â 155 Â 135 Â 140 Â Â 14.7 Â 14.8 Â 14.1 Â 16.3 Â 15.5 Â 13.1 Â 13.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 122 Â 126 Â 132 Â 138 Â 143 Â 140 Â 129 Â Â 11.7 Â 12.3 Â 13.2 Â 13.7 Â 14.3 Â 13.6 Â 12.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 132 Â 114 Â 129 Â 124 Â 130 Â 142 Â 115 Â Â 12.6 Â 11.1 Â 12.9 Â 12.3 Â 13.0 Â 13.8 Â 11.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 116 Â 154 Â 123 Â 98 Â 112 Â 126 Â 117 Â Â 11.1 Â 15.0 Â 12.3 Â 9.7 Â 11.2 Â 12.2 Â 11.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 86 Â 64 Â 77 Â 77 Â 83 Â 75 Â 75 Â Â 8.2 Â 6.2 Â 7.7 Â 7.6 Â 8.3 Â 7.3 Â 7.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 66 - V27 - THINK OF WILLY BRANDT - (Continued) 11 Â 64 Â 43 Â 51 Â 44 Â 45 Â 49 Â 57 Â Â 6.1 Â 4.2 Â 5.1 Â 4.4 Â 4.5 Â 4.8 Â 5.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 4M Â 4M Â 7M Â 8M Â 7M Â 9M Â 6M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 110 Â 101 Â 136 Â 109 Â 113 Â Â Â 10.5 Â 9.5 Â 13.6 Â 10.9 Â 10.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 56 Â 41 Â 56 Â 51 Â 57 Â Â Â 5.3 Â 3.9 Â 5.6 Â 5.1 Â 5.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 79 Â 72 Â 82 Â 79 Â 70 Â Â Â 7.5 Â 6.8 Â 8.2 Â 7.9 Â 6.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 67 Â 73 Â 66 Â 88 Â 77 Â Â Â 6.4 Â 6.9 Â 6.6 Â 8.8 Â 7.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 67 Â 81 Â 80 Â 74 Â 85 Â Â Â 6.4 Â 7.7 Â 8.0 Â 7.4 Â 8.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 126 Â 172 Â 147 Â 126 Â 137 Â Â Â 12.0 Â 16.3 Â 14.7 Â 12.6 Â 13.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 146 Â 119 Â 132 Â 138 Â 121 Â Â Â 13.9 Â 11.2 Â 13.2 Â 13.8 Â 11.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 130 Â 161 Â 129 Â 110 Â 148 Â Â Â 12.4 Â 15.2 Â 12.9 Â 11.0 Â 14.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 133 Â 128 Â 84 Â 122 Â 117 Â Â Â 12.7 Â 12.1 Â 8.4 Â 12.2 Â 11.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 78 Â 66 Â 56 Â 61 Â 82 Â Â Â 7.4 Â 6.2 Â 5.6 Â 6.1 Â 7.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 59 Â 44 Â 35 Â 43 Â 32 Â Â Â 5.6 Â 4.2 Â 3.5 Â 4.3 Â 3.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 10M Â 5M Â 4M Â 5M Â 4M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 67 - V28 - THINK OF JOHANNES RAU - REF.NO.:0028 0 Location 53 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 54-55 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(g) What do you think of Johannes Rau? ------------------------------------------ 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Not asked in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 52 Â 33 Â 33 Â 35 Â 33 Â 43 Â 45 Â Â 5.0 Â 3.2 Â 3.3 Â 3.5 Â 3.3 Â 4.2 Â 4.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 24 Â 14 Â 28 Â 27 Â 15 Â 16 Â 29 Â Â 2.3 Â 1.4 Â 2.8 Â 2.7 Â 1.5 Â 1.6 Â 2.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 41 Â 41 Â 48 Â 38 Â 52 Â 43 Â 60 Â Â 4.0 Â 4.0 Â 4.8 Â 3.8 Â 5.2 Â 4.2 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 54 Â 49 Â 48 Â 45 Â 42 Â 56 Â 54 Â Â 5.2 Â 4.8 Â 4.8 Â 4.5 Â 4.2 Â 5.5 Â 5.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 57 Â 59 Â 58 Â 63 Â 72 Â 67 Â 70 Â Â 5.5 Â 5.8 Â 5.8 Â 6.3 Â 7.3 Â 6.5 Â 6.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 173 Â 166 Â 189 Â 185 Â 163 Â 161 Â 160 Â Â 16.8 Â 16.2 Â 18.9 Â 18.5 Â 16.4 Â 15.7 Â 15.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 120 Â 146 Â 150 Â 139 Â 166 Â 146 Â 149 Â Â 11.6 Â 14.3 Â 15.0 Â 13.9 Â 16.8 Â 14.2 Â 14.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 131 Â 149 Â 129 Â 127 Â 146 Â 158 Â 131 Â Â 12.7 Â 14.6 Â 12.9 Â 12.7 Â 14.7 Â 15.4 Â 12.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 146 Â 157 Â 138 Â 134 Â 134 Â 145 Â 165 Â Â 14.1 Â 15.3 Â 13.8 Â 13.4 Â 13.5 Â 14.1 Â 15.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 106 Â 111 Â 100 Â 102 Â 76 Â 92 Â 78 Â Â 10.3 Â 10.9 Â 10.0 Â 10.2 Â 7.7 Â 9.0 Â 7.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 68 - V28 - THINK OF JOHANNES RAU - (Continued) 11 Â 128 Â 98 Â 78 Â 104 Â 92 Â 99 Â 94 Â Â 12.4 Â 9.6 Â 7.8 Â 10.4 Â 9.3 Â 9.6 Â 9.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 17M Â 9M Â 11M Â 16M Â 16M Â 14M Â 12M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 58 Â 47 Â 70 Â 67 Â 59 Â Â Â 5.5 Â 4.5 Â 7.0 Â 6.7 Â 5.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 33 Â 24 Â 31 Â 34 Â 34 Â Â Â 3.2 Â 2.3 Â 3.1 Â 3.4 Â 3.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 55 Â 56 Â 54 Â 65 Â 50 Â Â Â 5.3 Â 5.3 Â 5.4 Â 6.5 Â 4.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 66 Â 67 Â 71 Â 74 Â 74 Â Â Â 6.3 Â 6.4 Â 7.1 Â 7.4 Â 7.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 61 Â 89 Â 89 Â 72 Â 65 Â Â Â 5.8 Â 8.4 Â 8.9 Â 7.2 Â 6.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 165 Â 166 Â 149 Â 152 Â 141 Â Â Â 15.8 Â 15.7 Â 14.9 Â 15.2 Â 13.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 120 Â 123 Â 143 Â 148 Â 148 Â Â Â 11.5 Â 11.7 Â 14.3 Â 14.8 Â 14.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 143 Â 163 Â 135 Â 137 Â 143 Â Â Â 13.7 Â 15.5 Â 13.5 Â 13.7 Â 13.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 162 Â 138 Â 121 Â 106 Â 140 Â Â Â 15.5 Â 13.1 Â 12.1 Â 10.6 Â 13.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 79 Â 100 Â 76 Â 78 Â 95 Â Â Â 7.5 Â 9.5 Â 7.6 Â 7.8 Â 9.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 105 Â 82 Â 62 Â 69 Â 91 Â Â Â 10.0 Â 7.8 Â 6.2 Â 6.9 Â 8.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 14M Â 8M Â 6M Â 4M Â 3M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 69 - V29 - THINK OF STOLTENBERG - REF.NO.:0029 0 Location 55 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 56-57 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(h) What do you think of Gerhard Stoltenberg? ------------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Not asked in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 56 Â 35 Â 33 Â 38 Â 43 Â 57 Â 52 Â Â 5.4 Â 3.4 Â 3.3 Â 3.8 Â 4.4 Â 5.6 Â 5.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 27 Â 25 Â 34 Â 23 Â 22 Â 24 Â 31 Â Â 2.6 Â 2.4 Â 3.4 Â 2.3 Â 2.2 Â 2.3 Â 3.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 41 Â 37 Â 49 Â 38 Â 41 Â 44 Â 36 Â Â 4.0 Â 3.6 Â 4.9 Â 3.8 Â 4.2 Â 4.3 Â 3.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 43 Â 63 Â 40 Â 51 Â 57 Â 59 Â 51 Â Â 4.2 Â 6.2 Â 4.0 Â 5.1 Â 5.8 Â 5.8 Â 5.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 49 Â 75 Â 71 Â 56 Â 65 Â 61 Â 59 Â Â 4.7 Â 7.3 Â 7.1 Â 5.6 Â 6.6 Â 6.0 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 163 Â 155 Â 165 Â 154 Â 168 Â 156 Â 149 Â Â 15.8 Â 15.1 Â 16.5 Â 15.4 Â 17.1 Â 15.2 Â 14.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 151 Â 175 Â 166 Â 169 Â 152 Â 156 Â 142 Â Â 14.6 Â 17.1 Â 16.6 Â 16.9 Â 15.4 Â 15.2 Â 13.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 161 Â 143 Â 134 Â 132 Â 113 Â 156 Â 148 Â Â 15.6 Â 14.0 Â 13.4 Â 13.2 Â 11.5 Â 15.2 Â 14.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 147 Â 140 Â 138 Â 156 Â 142 Â 133 Â 159 Â Â 14.2 Â 13.7 Â 13.8 Â 15.6 Â 14.4 Â 13.0 Â 15.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 111 Â 106 Â 91 Â 109 Â 110 Â 112 Â 104 Â Â 10.7 Â 10.4 Â 9.1 Â 10.9 Â 11.2 Â 10.9 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 70 - V29 - THINK OF STOLTENBERG - (Continued) 11 Â 85 Â 70 Â 78 Â 74 Â 72 Â 67 Â 95 Â Â 8.2 Â 6.8 Â 7.8 Â 7.4 Â 7.3 Â 6.5 Â 9.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 15M Â 8M Â 11M Â 15M Â 22M Â 15M Â 21M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 53 Â 40 Â 42 Â 44 Â 42 Â Â Â 5.1 Â 3.8 Â 4.2 Â 4.4 Â 4.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 40 Â 19 Â 24 Â 38 Â 34 Â Â Â 3.8 Â 1.8 Â 2.4 Â 3.8 Â 3.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 41 Â 38 Â 40 Â 43 Â 49 Â Â Â 3.9 Â 3.6 Â 4.0 Â 4.3 Â 4.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 38 Â 58 Â 36 Â 56 Â 48 Â Â Â 3.7 Â 5.5 Â 3.6 Â 5.6 Â 4.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 49 Â 49 Â 42 Â 67 Â 72 Â Â Â 4.7 Â 4.6 Â 4.2 Â 6.7 Â 7.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 147 Â 164 Â 125 Â 148 Â 133 Â Â Â 14.1 Â 15.5 Â 12.6 Â 14.9 Â 12.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 143 Â 162 Â 135 Â 133 Â 132 Â Â Â 13.7 Â 15.3 Â 13.6 Â 13.4 Â 12.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 133 Â 173 Â 155 Â 150 Â 137 Â Â Â 12.8 Â 16.4 Â 15.6 Â 15.1 Â 13.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 180 Â 148 Â 162 Â 126 Â 144 Â Â Â 17.3 Â 14.0 Â 16.3 Â 12.7 Â 14.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 114 Â 127 Â 126 Â 105 Â 120 Â Â Â 11.0 Â 12.0 Â 12.7 Â 10.5 Â 11.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 103 Â 78 Â 109 Â 86 Â 118 Â Â Â 9.9 Â 7.4 Â 10.9 Â 8.6 Â 11.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 20M Â 7M Â 11M Â 10M Â 14M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 71 - V30 - THINK OF H.J.VOGEL - REF.NO.:0030 0 Location 57 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 58-59 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(j) What do you think of Hans Jochen Vogel? ----------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Not asked in January'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 62 Â 65 Â 70 Â 69 Â 75 Â 88 Â Â Â 6.0 Â 6.5 Â 7.0 Â 6.9 Â 7.3 Â 8.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 36 Â 49 Â 53 Â 36 Â 33 Â 38 Â Â Â 3.5 Â 4.9 Â 5.3 Â 3.6 Â 3.2 Â 3.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 65 Â 59 Â 61 Â 66 Â 58 Â 77 Â Â Â 6.3 Â 5.9 Â 6.1 Â 6.6 Â 5.6 Â 7.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 76 Â 71 Â 83 Â 69 Â 77 Â 67 Â Â Â 7.4 Â 7.1 Â 8.3 Â 6.9 Â 7.5 Â 6.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 82 Â 93 Â 81 Â 83 Â 100 Â 95 Â Â Â 8.0 Â 9.3 Â 8.1 Â 8.3 Â 9.7 Â 9.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 190 Â 179 Â 178 Â 198 Â 185 Â 184 Â Â Â 18.4 Â 17.9 Â 17.8 Â 19.8 Â 18.0 Â 17.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 171 Â 149 Â 153 Â 169 Â 165 Â 163 Â Â Â 16.6 Â 14.9 Â 15.3 Â 16.9 Â 16.1 Â 15.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 146 Â 146 Â 125 Â 142 Â 147 Â 129 Â Â Â 14.2 Â 14.6 Â 12.5 Â 14.2 Â 14.3 Â 12.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 129 Â 117 Â 105 Â 90 Â 108 Â 111 Â Â Â 12.5 Â 11.7 Â 10.5 Â 9.0 Â 10.5 Â 10.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 57 Â 51 Â 70 Â 45 Â 53 Â 52 Â Â Â 5.5 Â 5.1 Â 7.0 Â 4.5 Â 5.2 Â 5.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 72 - V30 - THINK OF H.J.VOGEL - (Continued) 11 Â Â 16 Â 23 Â 22 Â 31 Â 27 Â 28 Â Â Â 1.6 Â 2.3 Â 2.2 Â 3.1 Â 2.6 Â 2.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 2M Â 8M Â 14M Â 9M Â 12M Â 15M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 92 Â 69 Â 104 Â 97 Â 66 Â 100 Â Â 8.8 Â 6.5 Â 10.4 Â 9.7 Â 6.3 Â 5.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 52 Â 31 Â 42 Â 49 Â 44 Â 64 Â Â 5.0 Â 2.9 Â 4.2 Â 4.9 Â 4.2 Â 3.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 60 Â 65 Â 61 Â 56 Â 64 Â 109 Â Â 5.8 Â 6.2 Â 6.1 Â 5.6 Â 6.1 Â 5.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 63 Â 70 Â 78 Â 79 Â 82 Â 156 Â Â 6.0 Â 6.6 Â 7.8 Â 7.9 Â 7.9 Â 7.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 74 Â 93 Â 87 Â 83 Â 109 Â 177 Â Â 7.1 Â 8.8 Â 8.7 Â 8.3 Â 10.5 Â 9.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 185 Â 210 Â 183 Â 172 Â 183 Â 333 Â Â 17.7 Â 19.9 Â 18.3 Â 17.2 Â 17.6 Â 16.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 164 Â 151 Â 140 Â 139 Â 147 Â 291 Â Â 15.7 Â 14.3 Â 14.0 Â 13.9 Â 14.1 Â 14.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 148 Â 156 Â 143 Â 135 Â 147 Â 248 Â Â 14.2 Â 14.8 Â 14.3 Â 13.5 Â 14.1 Â 12.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 123 Â 112 Â 90 Â 105 Â 123 Â 247 Â Â 11.8 Â 10.6 Â 9.0 Â 10.5 Â 11.8 Â 12.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 51 Â 63 Â 44 Â 58 Â 59 Â 146 Â Â 4.9 Â 6.0 Â 4.4 Â 5.8 Â 5.7 Â 7.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 31 Â 34 Â 26 Â 28 Â 17 Â 96 Â Â 3.0 Â 3.2 Â 2.6 Â 2.8 Â 1.6 Â 4.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 18M Â 9M Â 9M Â 5M Â 2M Â 28M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 73 - V31 - THINK OF ZIMMERMANN - REF.NO.:0031 0 Location 59 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 60-61 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(k) What do you think of Friedrich Zimmermann? -------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1019 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 167 16.18 16.39 02. 69 6.69 6.77 03. 86 8.33 8.44 04. 76 7.36 7.46 05. 91 8.82 8.93 06. Undecided 205 19.86 20.12 07. 128 12.40 12.56 08. 105 10.17 10.30 09. 63 6.10 6.18 10. 23 2.23 2.26 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 6 0.58 0.59 99. NA 13 1.26 . 00. Only asked in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 99.98 100.00 - V32 - THINK OF OTTO SCHILY - REF.NO.:0032 0 Location 61 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 62-63 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(l) What do you think of Otto Schily? ----------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 74 - V32 - THINK OF OTTO SCHILY - (Continued) 00. Only asked in March, April, October, November, December'86 and January'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 198 Â 188 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 20.1 Â 19.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 88 Â 65 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.0 Â 6.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â 68 Â 87 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.9 Â 8.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â 61 Â 66 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.2 Â 6.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â 63 Â 88 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.4 Â 9.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â 153 Â 145 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 15.6 Â 14.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â Â 106 Â 121 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.8 Â 12.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â Â 90 Â 84 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.2 Â 8.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 75 Â 68 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.6 Â 6.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â Â 44 Â 40 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.5 Â 4.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â Â 37 Â 31 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.8 Â 3.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â Â Â 1007M Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â Â 27M Â 32M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 192 Â 216 Â 194 Â 184 Â Â Â Â 18.6 Â 22.1 Â 19.7 Â 18.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 73 Â 65 Â 91 Â 79 Â Â Â Â 7.1 Â 6.6 Â 9.2 Â 7.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 75 - V32 - THINK OF OTTO SCHILY - (Continued) 3 Â Â 90 Â 75 Â 67 Â 79 Â Â Â Â 8.7 Â 7.7 Â 6.8 Â 7.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 77 Â 69 Â 56 Â 55 Â Â Â Â 7.4 Â 7.0 Â 5.7 Â 5.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 87 Â 86 Â 70 Â 80 Â Â Â Â 8.4 Â 8.8 Â 7.1 Â 7.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 191 Â 134 Â 165 Â 172 Â Â Â Â 18.5 Â 13.7 Â 16.7 Â 16.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 102 Â 118 Â 105 Â 123 Â Â Â Â 9.9 Â 12.1 Â 10.6 Â 12.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 94 Â 71 Â 89 Â 89 Â Â Â Â 9.1 Â 7.3 Â 9.0 Â 8.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 63 Â 71 Â 62 Â 67 Â Â Â Â 6.1 Â 7.3 Â 6.3 Â 6.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 34 Â 33 Â 49 Â 39 Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â 3.4 Â 5.0 Â 3.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â 32 Â 41 Â 38 Â 51 Â Â Â Â 3.1 Â 4.2 Â 3.9 Â 5.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 28M Â 28M Â 20M Â 25M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V33 - THINK OF RITA SUESSMUTH - REF.NO.:0033 0 Location 63 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 64-65 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(m) What do you think of Rita Suessmuth? -------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 76 - V33 - THINK OF RITA SUESSMUTH - (Continued) 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Only asked in March and October'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 24 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 19 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.0 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â 38 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.1 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â 42 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.5 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â 70 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.5 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â 290 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 31.0 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â Â 153 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 16.4 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â Â 106 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.3 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 111 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.9 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â Â 55 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.9 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â Â 26 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.8 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â Â 1015M Â 1007M Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â Â 76M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 77 - V33 - THINK OF RITA SUESSMUTH - (Continued) ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 41 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.0 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 29 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.8 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 38 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.7 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 46 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.5 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 73 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.1 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 226 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 21.9 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 165 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 16.0 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 159 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 15.4 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 129 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.5 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 81 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.9 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â 44 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.3 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â Â 1007M Â 1006M Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 32M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 78 - V34 - THINK OF ERNST ALBRECHT - REF.NO.:0034 0 Location 65 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 66-67 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(n) What do you think of Ernst Albrecht? -------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 973 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 50 4.97 5.14 02. 26 2.58 2.67 03. 57 5.66 5.86 04. 83 8.24 8.53 05. 77 7.65 7.91 06. Undecided 232 23.04 23.84 07. 163 16.19 16.75 08. 115 11.42 11.82 09. 97 9.63 9.97 10. 52 5.16 5.34 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 21 2.09 2.16 99. NA 34 3.38 . 00. Only asked in May'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.01 99.99 - V35 - THINK OF JOSCHKA FISCHER - REF.NO.:0035 0 Location 67 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 68-69 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(o) And what do you think of Joschka Fischer? ------------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Only asked in May, June and July'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 79 - V35 - THINK OF JOSCHKA FISCHER - (Continued) ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 136 Â 229 Â 217 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14.3 Â 22.9 Â 21.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 61 Â 63 Â 82 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.4 Â 6.3 Â 8.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 66 Â 69 Â 84 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.9 Â 6.9 Â 8.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â 67 Â 59 Â 84 Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.0 Â 5.9 Â 8.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â 65 Â 72 Â 61 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.8 Â 7.2 Â 6.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â Â Â 193 Â 192 Â 171 Â Â Â Â Â Â 20.3 Â 19.2 Â 17.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â Â Â Â 101 Â 113 Â 117 Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.6 Â 11.3 Â 11.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â 95 Â 80 Â 56 Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.0 Â 8.0 Â 5.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 78 Â 56 Â 58 Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.2 Â 5.6 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â Â Â Â 43 Â 38 Â 31 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.5 Â 3.8 Â 3.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â Â Â Â 48 Â 30 Â 36 Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.0 Â 3.0 Â 3.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â Â Â Â 54M Â 39M Â 50M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 80 - V36 - THINK OF GERH. SCHROEDER - REF.NO.:0036 0 Location 69 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 70-71 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(p) What do you think of Gerhard Schroeder? ----------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 907 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 35 3.48 3.86 02. 32 3.18 3.53 03. 40 3.97 4.41 04. 56 5.56 6.17 05. 76 7.55 8.38 06. Undecided 320 31.78 35.28 07. 152 15.09 16.76 08. 95 9.43 10.47 09. 65 6.45 7.17 10. 24 2.38 2.65 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 12 1.19 1.32 99. NA 100 9.93 . 00. Only asked in May'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 99.99 100.00 - V37 - THINK OF WALTER WALLMANN - REF.NO.:0037 0 Location 71 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 72-73 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(q) What do you think of Walter Wallmann? --------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 81 - V37 - THINK OF WALTER WALLMANN - (Continued) 00. Only asked in June, July and November'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 62 Â 56 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.3 Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 32 Â 28 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â 2.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 42 Â 35 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.3 Â 3.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â 44 Â 58 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.5 Â 6.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â 52 Â 58 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.3 Â 6.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â Â Â Â 392 Â 333 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 40.0 Â 34.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â Â Â Â Â 111 Â 138 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.3 Â 14.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â 100 Â 93 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.2 Â 9.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â Â 79 Â 102 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.1 Â 10.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â Â Â Â Â 31 Â 36 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.2 Â 3.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â Â Â Â Â 35 Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.6 Â 2.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â Â Â Â Â 60M Â 83M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 56 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 32 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â 49 Â Â Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 82 - V37 - THINK OF WALTER WALLMANN - (Continued) Â Â Â 5.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â 62 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â 63 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â 252 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 26.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â Â 144 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 15.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â Â 119 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 95 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â Â 56 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â Â 34 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â Â 45M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V38 - THINK OF VOLKER HAUFF - REF.NO.:0038 0 Location 73 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 74-75 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(r) What do you think of Volker Hauff? ------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 976 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 45 4.24 4.61 02. 19 1.79 1.95 03. 33 3.11 3.38 04. 61 5.75 6.25 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 83 - V38 - THINK OF VOLKER HAUFF - (Continued) 05. 59 5.56 6.05 06. Undecided 314 29.59 32.17 07. 149 14.04 15.27 08. 114 10.74 11.68 09. 95 8.95 9.73 10. 58 5.47 5.94 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 29 2.73 2.97 99. NA 85 8.01 . 00. Only asked in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 99.98 100.00 - V39 - THINK OF GFRF LAMBSDORFF - REF.NO.:0039 0 Location 75 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 76-77 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(s) What do you think of Otto Graf Lambsdorff? -------------------------------------------------- 0 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. Undecided 07. 08. 09. 10. 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 99. NA 00. Only asked in August'86 and February'87 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 154 Â Â Â Â Â 253 Â Â 14.8 Â Â Â Â Â 13.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 52 Â Â Â Â Â 113 Â Â 5.0 Â Â Â Â Â 5.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 85 Â Â Â Â Â 168 Â Â 8.2 Â Â Â Â Â 8.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 84 - V39 - THINK OF GFRF LAMBSDORFF - (Continued) 4 Â 78 Â Â Â Â Â 193 Â Â 7.5 Â Â Â Â Â 9.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 96 Â Â Â Â Â 192 Â Â 9.2 Â Â Â Â Â 9.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 195 Â Â Â Â Â 378 Â Â 18.8 Â Â Â Â Â 19.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 136 Â Â Â Â Â 259 Â Â 13.1 Â Â Â Â Â 13.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â 109 Â Â Â Â Â 200 Â Â 10.5 Â Â Â Â Â 10.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 81 Â Â Â Â Â 129 Â Â 7.8 Â Â Â Â Â 6.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â 33 Â Â Â Â Â 48 Â Â 3.2 Â Â Â Â Â 2.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â 21 Â Â Â Â Â 16 Â Â 2.0 Â Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â 1063M Â 1007M Â 1006M Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â 21M Â Â Â Â Â 46M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V40 - THINK OF ADAM-SCHWAETZER - REF.NO.:0040 0 Location 77 Card 1 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 78-79 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(t) What do you think of Irmgard Adam-Schwaetzer? ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1735 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 49 2.46 2.82 02. 39 1.95 2.25 03. 73 3.66 4.21 04. 100 5.01 5.76 05. 146 7.32 8.41 06. Undecided 604 30.28 34.81 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 85 - V40 - THINK OF ADAM-SCHWAETZER - (Continued) 07. 268 13.43 15.45 08. 238 11.93 13.72 09. 143 7.17 8.24 10. 57 2.86 3.29 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 18 0.90 1.04 99. NA 260 13.03 . 00. Only asked in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - 0 *** DECK=0002 - V1 - ZA-STUDY NUMBER 1536 - REF.NO.:0001 0 Location 1 Card 2 Width 4 Column 1- 4 0 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 ------------------------------- - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - REF.NO.:0002 0 Location 5 Card 2 Width 6 Column 5-10 0 Respondent Number ----------------- - - Deck Identification Number is '2' Deck 2 Column 1 ----------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 86 - V41 - THINK OF GERHARD BAUM - REF.NO.:0041 0 Location 79 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 12-13 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(u) What do you think of Gerhard R.Baum? -------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1795 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 47 2.36 2.62 02. 39 1.95 2.17 03. 91 4.56 5.07 04. 122 6.12 6.80 05. 178 8.92 9.92 06. Undecided 579 29.02 32.26 07. 338 16.94 18.83 08. 224 11.23 12.48 09. 132 6.62 7.35 10. 25 1.25 1.39 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 20 1.00 1.11 99. NA 200 10.03 . 00. Only asked in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V42 - THINK OF H.A.ENGELHARD - REF.NO.:0042 0 Location 81 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 14-15 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(v) What do you think of Hans A.Engelhard? ---------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1692 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 58 2.91 3.43 02. 51 2.56 3.01 03. 71 3.56 4.20 04. 125 6.27 7.39 05. 166 8.32 9.81 06. Undecided 632 31.68 37.35 07. 278 13.93 16.43 08. 178 8.92 10.52 09. 107 5.36 6.32 10. 17 0.85 1.00 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 9 0.45 0.53 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 87 - V42 - THINK OF H.A.ENGELHARD - (Continued) 99. NA 303 15.19 . 00. Only asked in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 - V43 - THINK OF O.LAFONTAINE - REF.NO.:0043 0 Location 83 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 16-17 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(w) What do you think of Oskar Lafontaine? ---------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1911 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 133 6.67 6.96 02. 57 2.86 2.98 03. 148 7.42 7.74 04. 128 6.42 6.70 05. 152 7.62 7.95 06. Undecided 347 17.39 18.16 07. 256 12.83 13.40 08. 250 12.53 13.08 09. 224 11.23 11.72 10. 115 5.76 6.02 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 101 5.06 5.29 99. NA 84 4.21 . 00. Only asked in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V44 - THINK OF W.MISCHNIK - REF.NO.:0044 0 Location 85 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 18-19 MD2: 99 0 Q.8(x) What do you think of Wolfgang Mischnik? ----------------------------------------------- 0 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 88 - V44 - THINK OF W.MISCHNIK - (Continued) Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1852 01. -5 -- do not think much of the politician at all 38 1.90 2.05 02. 36 1.80 1.94 03. 78 3.91 4.21 04. 107 5.36 5.78 05. 154 7.72 8.32 06. Undecided 548 27.47 29.59 07. 338 16.94 18.25 08. 271 13.58 14.63 09. 196 9.82 10.58 10. 62 3.11 3.35 11. +5 -- think a great deal of the politician 24 1.20 1.30 99. NA 143 7.17 . 00. Only asked in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.98 100.00 - V45 - LIBYA TERRORISM - REF.NO.:0045 0 Location 87 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 20 MD2: 9 0 Q.9 Some people claim that recent acts of terrorism in Rome and Vienna were supported by Libya. Do you believe this or don't you believe this? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1024 1. Yes, believe it 791 75.41 77.25 2. No, don't believe it 233 22.21 22.75 9. NA 25 2.38 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 89 - V46 - US BOYCOTT RIGHT - REF.NO.:0046 0 Location 88 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 21 MD2: 9 0 Q.10 As a result, the USA imposed economic sanctions upon Libya. Do you think they were right to do so or do you think they were wrong to do so? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1029 1. They were right 526 50.14 51.12 2. They were wrong 503 47.95 48.88 9. NA 20 1.91 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 - V47 - GFR JOIN US BOYCOTT - REF.NO.:0047 0 Location 89 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 22 MD2: 9 0 Q.11 The Federal Republic does not want to join in these sanctions. Do you agree with this or don't you agree with this? --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1037 1. Agree 661 63.01 63.74 2. Disagree 376 35.84 36.26 9. NA 12 1.14 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 90 - V48 - LIBYA WORLD CONFLICT - REF.NO.:0048 0 Location 90 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 23 MD2: 9 0 Q.12 Do you believe that Libya could be the cause of world- wide conflict? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1046 1. Yes, believe it 525 50.05 50.19 2. No, don't believe it 521 49.67 49.81 9. NA 3 0.29 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.01 100.00 - V49 - GFR ON ECONOMIC UPSWING - REF.NO.:0049 0 Location 91 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 24 MD2: 9 0 Q.13 Now to another topic. Sometimes one hears the opinion that the economy in the Federal Republic is on the upswing again these days. Do you believe this or don't you believe this? ------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. Yes, believe it 2. No, don't believe it 9. NA 0. Not asked in January'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 624 Â 595 Â 598 Â 610 Â 613 Â 634 Â 682 Â Â 59.6 Â 57.8 Â 59.3 Â 60.3 Â 61.1 Â 61.4 Â 65.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 423 Â 434 Â 410 Â 401 Â 390 Â 398 Â 363 Â Â 40.4 Â 42.2 Â 40.7 Â 39.7 Â 38.9 Â 38.6 Â 34.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 2M Â 3M Â 2M Â 4M Â 4M Â 8M Â 2M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 91 - V49 - GFR ON ECONOMIC UPSWING - (Continued) ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 671 Â 689 Â 667 Â 600 Â 630 Â Â Â 63.5 Â 64.9 Â 66.7 Â 59.8 Â 60.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 386 Â 372 Â 333 Â 403 Â 409 Â Â Â 36.5 Â 35.1 Â 33.3 Â 40.2 Â 39.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 4M Â 2M Â 7M Â 3M Â 4M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V50 - WHO RESPONSBL F UPSWING - REF.NO.:0050 0 Location 92 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 25 MD2: 9 0 Q.13A Is this because of the policies of the present govern- ment, would it be the same if there were a government led by the SPD, or does it have nothing to do with who is in govern- ment in Bonn? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Because of the policies of the present government 2. Would be the same under SPD government 3. Has nothing to do with who governs in Bonn 9. NA 0. Not asked in January to April'86 and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 512 Â 559 Â 515 Â Â Â Â Â Â 51.3 Â 53.9 Â 49.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 168 Â 173 Â 188 Â Â Â Â Â Â 16.8 Â 16.7 Â 18.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 319 Â 306 Â 340 Â Â Â Â Â Â 31.9 Â 29.5 Â 32.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 8M Â 2M Â 4M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 92 - V50 - WHO RESPONSBL F UPSWING - (Continued) Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 470 Â 527 Â 511 Â 491 Â 560 Â Â Â 44.5 Â 49.9 Â 50.9 Â 49.0 Â 54.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 224 Â 191 Â 162 Â 176 Â 136 Â Â Â 21.2 Â 18.1 Â 16.1 Â 17.6 Â 13.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 362 Â 338 Â 331 Â 335 Â 339 Â Â Â 34.3 Â 32.0 Â 33.0 Â 33.4 Â 32.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 5M Â 7M Â 3M Â 4M Â 8M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V51 - LONGER SHOPPING HOURS? - REF.NO.:0051 0 Location 93 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 26 MD2: 9 0 Q.14 At the moment shops have to close at 6.30 p.m. at the latest. Are you in favor of shops staying open later in the future, are you against this, or do you not mind either way? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 1. In favor 394 37.56 37.70 2. Against 360 34.32 34.45 3. Don't mind 291 27.74 27.85 9. NA 4 0.38 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 93 - V52 - HOW LONG OPEN ON WEEKDAY - REF.NO.:0052 0 Location 94 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 27 MD2: 9 0 Q.15 (If R is in favor of shops staying open longer) How long should shops stay open in the evenings? (Interviewer read) --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 394 1. Until 8 p.m. 212 20.21 53.81 2. Until 9 p.m. 134 12.77 34.01 3. Until 10 p.m. 23 2.19 5.84 4. Later 25 2.38 6.35 9. INAP., coded 2-9 in Q.14 655 62.44 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 99.99 100.01 - V53 - HOW LONG OPEN SATURDAY? - REF.NO.:0053 0 Location 95 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 28 MD2: 9 0 Q.16 And what about Saturdays? Are you in favor of shops being allowed to stay open later than 2 p.m. every Saturday, are you against this, or do you not mind either way? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1048 1. In favor 236 22.50 22.52 2. Against 509 48.52 48.57 3. Don't mind 303 28.88 28.91 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 94 - V54 - SHOPS OPEN ON SUNDAYS? - REF.NO.:0054 0 Location 96 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 29 MD2: 9 0 Q.17 And what about Sundays? Are you in favor of shops being allowed to open on Sundays too, are you against this, or do you not mind either way? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1047 1. In favor 132 12.58 12.61 2. Against 681 64.92 65.04 3. Don't mind 234 22.31 22.35 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 - V55 - SATISFIED W SHOPPING HRS - REF.NO.:0055 0 Location 97 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 30 MD2: 9 0 Q.18 On the whole, are you satisfied or are you rather dissatisfied with present shopping hours? ------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1048 1. Satisfied 769 73.31 73.38 2. Dissatisfied 279 26.60 26.62 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 95 - V56 - WHO SHOULD PAY F STRIKE - REF.NO.:0056 0 Location 98 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 31 MD2: 9 0 Q.19 A strike in a particular region can mean that workers in another region where there is no strike action will still have to stop work, if, for example, parts they need cannot be delivered. Who should financially support such workers: the union or the labor offices? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1043 1. Union 607 57.86 58.20 2. Labor offices 436 41.56 41.80 9. NA 6 0.57 . 0. Asked only in January '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 99.99 100.00 - V57 - STRIKE MORE DIFFICULT - REF.NO.:0057 0 Location 99 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 32 MD2: 9 0 Q.19A (If R thinks that the union should pay) This would make it more difficult for the union to carry a strike through. Do you think this is a good thing, or do you think this isn't a good thing? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 602 1. Is good 414 39.47 68.77 2. Is not good 188 17.92 31.23 9. INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.19 447 42.61 . 0. Asked only in January '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 96 - V58 - STRIKE EASIER - REF.NO.:0058 0 Location 100 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 33 MD2: 9 0 Q.19B (If R thinks that the labor offices should pay) This would make it easier for the union to carry a strike through. Do you think this is a good thing, or do you think this isn't a good thing? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 436 1. Is good 356 33.94 81.65 2. Is not good 80 7.63 18.35 9. INAP., coded 1 or 9 in Q.19 613 58.44 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.01 100.00 - V59 - WHO WIN NXT ELECTIONS - REF.NO.:0059 0 Location 101 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 34 MD2: 9 0 Q.20 The next elections for the Bundestag will be held in January 1987. What do you personally think: who will win the next elections for the Bundestag? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. CDU/CSU 2. CDU/CSU and FDP, the present government 3. SPD 4. SPD and the Greens 5. Helmut Kohl 6. Johannes Rau 7. Other responses 9. Don't know, NA 0. INAP., not asked in January and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 472 Â 445 Â 383 Â 359 Â 366 Â 399 Â 473 Â Â 48.1 Â 46.4 Â 40.3 Â 38.5 Â 38.6 Â 40.8 Â 47.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 85 Â 99 Â 86 Â 64 Â 53 Â 118 Â 102 Â Â 8.7 Â 10.3 Â 9.0 Â 6.9 Â 5.6 Â 12.1 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 375 Â 367 Â 416 Â 444 Â 443 Â 375 Â 355 Â Â 38.2 Â 38.2 Â 43.7 Â 47.6 Â 46.7 Â 38.4 Â 35.3 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 97 - V59 - WHO WIN NXT ELECTIONS - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 24 Â 24 Â 25 Â 20 Â 35 Â 41 Â 33 Â Â 2.4 Â 2.5 Â 2.6 Â 2.1 Â 3.7 Â 4.2 Â 3.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 7 Â 9 Â 14 Â 22 Â 23 Â 17 Â 22 Â Â 0.7 Â 0.9 Â 1.5 Â 2.4 Â 2.4 Â 1.7 Â 2.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 10 Â 4 Â 18 Â 16 Â 16 Â 16 Â 13 Â Â 1.0 Â 0.4 Â 1.9 Â 1.7 Â 1.7 Â 1.6 Â 1.3 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 9 Â 12 Â 9 Â 8 Â 12 Â 11 Â 7 Â Â 0.9 Â 1.3 Â 0.9 Â 0.9 Â 1.3 Â 1.1 Â 0.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 67M Â 72M Â 59M Â 82M Â 59M Â 63M Â 42M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 541 Â 596 Â 592 Â 590 Â Â Â Â 53.5 Â 58.3 Â 62.7 Â 61.5 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 92 Â 119 Â 126 Â 107 Â Â Â Â 9.1 Â 11.6 Â 13.3 Â 11.1 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 302 Â 238 Â 175 Â 195 Â Â Â Â 29.8 Â 23.3 Â 18.5 Â 20.3 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â 21 Â 43 Â 27 Â 30 Â Â Â Â 2.1 Â 4.2 Â 2.9 Â 3.1 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â 27 Â 18 Â 8 Â 25 Â Â Â Â 2.7 Â 1.8 Â 0.8 Â 2.6 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â 24 Â 5 Â 3 Â 6 Â Â Â Â 2.4 Â 0.5 Â 0.3 Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â 5 Â 4 Â 13 Â 7 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â 0.4 Â 1.4 Â 0.7 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 49M Â 40M Â 63M Â 46M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 98 - V60 - PARTICIPATE IN CARNIVAL - REF.NO.:0060 0 Location 102 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 35 MD2: 9 0 Q.21 Do you join in carnival celebrations? ------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1048 1. Yes 421 40.13 40.17 2. No 627 59.77 59.83 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.00 100.00 - V61 - OPEN EVENTS OR PRIVATE - REF.NO.:0061 0 Location 103 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 36 MD2: 9 0 Q.21A (If R joins in carnival celebrations) Do you attend organized events or do you celebrate with friends? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 421 1. Attend organized events 172 16.40 40.86 2. Celebrate with friends 116 11.06 27.55 3. Both 133 12.68 31.59 9. INAP.,coded 2 or 9 in Q.21 628 59.87 . 0. Asked only in January'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1049 100.01 100.00 - V62 - RIGHT LEADERS - REF.NO.:0062 0 Location 104 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 37 0 Q.22 Do you believe that at the present time the right people are, by and large, in the leadership positions here in the Federal Republic, or don't you think so? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Yes, I think so 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 99 - V62 - RIGHT LEADERS - (Continued) 2. No, I don't think so 3. Don't know 0. INAP., asked only in February, April, June, August, October and December'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 409 Â Â 365 Â Â 419 Â Â Â Â 39.6 Â Â 36.0 Â Â 40.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 408 Â Â 419 Â Â 415 Â Â Â Â 39.5 Â Â 41.3 Â Â 39.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 215 Â Â 231 Â Â 206 Â Â Â Â 20.8 Â Â 22.7 Â Â 19.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â Â 1010M Â Â 1007M Â Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 442 Â 450 Â Â 431 Â Â Â Â 41.7 Â 42.3 Â Â 42.8 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 402 Â 358 Â Â 342 Â Â Â Â 37.9 Â 33.7 Â Â 34.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â 217 Â 255 Â Â 233 Â Â Â Â 20.5 Â 24.0 Â Â 23.2 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â 1007M Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 100 - V63 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 1 - REF.NO.:0063 0 Location 105 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 38-39 MD2: 99 0 Q.23 Various tasks and problems are being discussed in the Federal Republic right now. Please tell us which of these are most important to you personally? (Interviewer: Allow up to three responses) Q.23(A) Important to R personally -- First mention ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 01. Provision for old age, pension problems, security of pensions 02. Social policy, health care system, family policy, the "social net" 03. Youth (unemployment, occupational training, jobs, scholarships for high school and university students) 04. Social problems of youth (alcoholism, drugs) 05. Jobs, unemployment 06. Prices, increased rents 07. Income and wages, wage negotiations 08. Right to strike, planned changes therein, position of the unions 09. Foreign workers, late migrants from Eastern countries, people seeking asylum 10. Taxes, tax reform 11. Agriculture, wrong EC-policies (quota system for milk) 12. Economic situation in general, economic growth 13. Environmental problems in general, specific environ- mental problems (water, air or noise pollution, speed limits) 14. Nuclear power plants, nuclear energy, Chernobyl, radiation hazard 15. Civil rights (basic rights, privacy laws, stability of law, improvement of women's rights) 16. Abortion, law concerning termination of pregnancy 17. Law and order (criminality, terrorism, introducing State's evidence, more severe penalties) 18. Scandal concerning the union-owned enterprise NEUE HEIMAT 19. Political morale (party contribution scandal) 20. Other references to domestic issues or policies 21. Peace, disarmament (no war, no nuclear weapons) 22. German Democratic Republic, "Deutschlandpolitik" 23. Foreign policy towards or of the West 24. Foreign policy towards or of the East 25. Foreign policy in general (including East/West conflict, South Africa) 26. Other responses concerning public problems 27. Other responses concerning private problems (e.g. family, standard of living, soccer world championship) 99. NA 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 101 - V63 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 1 - (Continued) 00. Asked only in February and June'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 96 Â Â Â Â 99 Â Â Â Â 9.7 Â Â Â Â 9.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 37 Â Â Â Â 31 Â Â Â Â 3.7 Â Â Â Â 3.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 42 Â Â Â Â 21 Â Â Â Â 4.3 Â Â Â Â 2.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 439 Â Â Â Â 267 Â Â Â Â 44.4 Â Â Â Â 26.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 13 Â Â Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â 0.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 7 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 0.7 Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 36 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 3.6 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 15 Â Â Â Â 13 Â Â Â Â 1.5 Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 15 Â Â Â Â 7 Â Â Â Â 1.5 Â Â Â Â 0.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â 6 Â Â Â Â 8 Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 12 Â Â 33 Â Â Â Â 33 Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 13 Â Â 91 Â Â Â Â 147 Â Â Â Â 9.2 Â Â Â Â 14.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 14 Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 229 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â 22.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 15 Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 16 Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 0.9 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 17 Â Â 18 Â Â Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â 1.8 Â Â Â Â 1.4 Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 102 - V63 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 1 - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 19 Â Â 15 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 1.5 Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 20 Â Â 68 Â Â Â Â 26 Â Â Â Â 6.9 Â Â Â Â 2.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 21 Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â 51 Â Â Â Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â 5.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 23 Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 24 Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 25 Â Â 22 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 2.2 Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 26 Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 6 Â Â Â Â 0.9 Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 44M Â Â Â Â 36M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 93 Â 95 Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.1 Â 9.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 30 Â 28 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.9 Â 2.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 27 Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.6 Â 2.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 2 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 327 Â 254 Â Â Â Â Â Â 32.0 Â 26.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 12 Â 13 Â Â Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 103 - V63 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 1 - (Continued) Â Â 1.2 Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 3 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.3 Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 40 Â 26 Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.9 Â 2.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 13 Â 12 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â 1.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â 4 Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â 0.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 12 Â Â 31 Â 13 Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.0 Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 13 Â Â 122 Â 223 Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.9 Â 22.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 14 Â Â 92 Â 38 Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.0 Â 3.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 15 Â Â 6 Â 6 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 16 Â Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 17 Â Â 79 Â 71 Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.7 Â 7.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 18 Â Â 13 Â 6 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 19 Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 20 Â Â 20 Â 35 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.0 Â 3.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 21 Â Â 84 Â 89 Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.2 Â 9.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 22 Â Â 2 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 23 Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 25 Â Â 9 Â 5 Â Â Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 104 - V63 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 1 - (Continued) Â Â 0.9 Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 26 Â Â 4 Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 27 Â Â 4 Â 11 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â 1.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 41M Â 33M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V64 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 2 - REF.NO.:0064 0 Location 107 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 40-41 MD2: 99 0 Q.23(B) Important to R personally -- Second mention ----------------------------------------------------- 0 01. Provision for old age, pension problems, security of pensions 02. Social policy, health care system, family policy, the "social net" 03. Youth (unemployment, occupational training, jobs, scholarships for high school and university students) 04. Social problems of youth (alcoholism, drugs) 05. Jobs, unemployment 06. Prices, increased rents 07. Income and wages, wage negotiations 08. Right to strike, planned changes therein, position of the unions 09. Foreign workers, late migrants from Eastern countries, people seeking asylum 10. Taxes, tax reform 11. Agriculture, wrong EC-policies (quota system for milk) 12. Economic situation in general, economic growth 13. Environmental problems in general, specific environ- mental problems (water, air or noise pollution, speed limits) 14. Nuclear power plants, nuclear energy, Chernobyl, radiation hazard 15. Civil rights (basic rights, privacy laws, stability 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 105 - V64 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 2 - (Continued) of law, improvement of women's rights) 16. Abortion, law concerning termination of pregnancy 17. Law and order (criminality, terrorism, introducing State's evidence, more severe penalties) 18. Scandal concerning the union-owned enterprise NEUE HEIMAT 19. Political morale (party contribution scandal) 20. Other references to domestic issues or policies 21. Peace, disarmament (no war, no nuclear weapons) 22. German Democratic Republic, "Deutschlandpolitik" 23. Foreign policy towards or of the West 24. Foreign policy towards or of the East 25. Foreign policy in general (including East/West conflict, South Africa) 26. Other responses concerning public problems 27. Other responses concerning private problems (e.g. family, standard of living, soccer world championship) 99. NA; no second mention 00. Asked only in February and June'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 56 Â Â Â Â 63 Â Â Â Â 7.2 Â Â Â Â 7.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 56 Â Â Â Â 46 Â Â Â Â 7.2 Â Â Â Â 5.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 29 Â Â Â Â 28 Â Â Â Â 3.7 Â Â Â Â 3.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 170 Â Â Â Â 180 Â Â Â Â 21.9 Â Â Â Â 21.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 33 Â Â Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â 4.2 Â Â Â Â 1.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â 1.2 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 22 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 2.8 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 23 Â Â Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 3.0 Â Â Â Â 1.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 16 Â Â Â Â 13 Â Â Â Â 2.1 Â Â Â Â 1.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 106 - V64 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 2 - (Continued) 11 Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 7 Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 12 Â Â 19 Â Â Â Â 31 Â Â Â Â 2.4 Â Â Â Â 3.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 13 Â Â 140 Â Â Â Â 135 Â Â Â Â 18.0 Â Â Â Â 16.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 14 Â Â 13 Â Â Â Â 133 Â Â Â Â 1.7 Â Â Â Â 16.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 15 Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â 1.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 16 Â Â 19 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â 2.4 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 17 Â Â 12 Â Â Â Â 24 Â Â Â Â 1.5 Â Â Â Â 2.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 19 Â Â 11 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 1.4 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 20 Â Â 83 Â Â Â Â 27 Â Â Â Â 10.7 Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 21 Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 55 Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â 6.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 22 Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 23 Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 24 Â Â 10 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 25 Â Â 27 Â Â Â Â 13 Â Â Â Â 3.5 Â Â Â Â 1.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 26 Â Â 8 Â Â Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â 1.0 Â Â Â Â 1.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 255M Â Â Â Â 211M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 107 - V64 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 2 - (Continued) Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 54 Â 60 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.6 Â 7.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 40 Â 39 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.9 Â 5.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 27 Â 20 Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.3 Â 2.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 2 Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 172 Â 138 Â Â Â Â Â Â 21.0 Â 17.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 25 Â 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.1 Â 2.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 5 Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 51 Â 21 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.2 Â 2.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 17 Â 14 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.1 Â 1.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â 4 Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 12 Â Â 24 Â 15 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.9 Â 1.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 13 Â Â 116 Â 178 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14.2 Â 22.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 14 Â Â 72 Â 59 Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.8 Â 7.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 15 Â Â 4 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â 0.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 16 Â Â 2 Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 17 Â Â 59 Â 75 Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.2 Â 9.6 Â Â Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 108 - V64 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 2 - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 18 Â Â 16 Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.0 Â 1.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 19 Â Â 1 Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 20 Â Â 21 Â 16 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.6 Â 2.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 21 Â Â 86 Â 80 Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.5 Â 10.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 22 Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 24 Â Â 1 Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 25 Â Â 11 Â 10 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 26 Â Â 1 Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.1 Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 27 Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 244M Â 229M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V65 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 3 - REF.NO.:0065 0 Location 109 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 42-43 MD2: 99 0 Q.23(C) Important to R personally -- Third mention ---------------------------------------------------- 0 01. Provision for old age, pension problems, security of pensions 02. Social policy, health care system, family policy, the "social net" 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 109 - V65 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 3 - (Continued) 03. Youth (unemployment, occupational training, jobs, scholarships for high school and university students) 04. Social problems of youth (alcoholism, drugs) 05. Jobs, unemployment 06. Prices, increased rents 07. Income and wages, wage negotiations 08. Right to strike, planned changes therein, position of the unions 09. Foreign workers, late migrants from Eastern countries, people seeking asylum 10. Taxes, tax reform 11. Agriculture, wrong EC-policies (quota system for milk) 12. Economic situation in general, economic growth 13. Environmental problems in general, specific environ- mental problems (water, air or noise pollution, speed limits) 14. Nuclear power plants, nuclear energy, Chernobyl, radiation hazard 15. Civil rights (basic rights, privacy laws, stability of law, improvement of women's rights) 16. Abortion, law concerning termination of pregnancy 17. Law and order (criminality, terrorism, introducing state's evidence, more severe penalties) 18. Scandal concerning the union-owned enterprise NEUE HEIMAT 19. Political morale (party contribution scandal) 20. Other references to domestic issues or policies 21. Peace, disarmament (no war, no nuclear weapons) 22. German Democratic Republic, "Deutschlandpolitik" 23. Foreign policy towards or of the West 24. Foreign policy towards or of the East 25. Foreign policy in general (including East/West conflict, South Africa) 26. Other responses concerning public problems 27. Other responses concerning private problems (e.g. family, standard of living, soccer world championship) 99. NA; no third mention 00. Asked only in February and June'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 42 Â Â Â Â 44 Â Â Â Â 9.5 Â Â Â Â 9.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 35 Â Â Â Â 44 Â Â Â Â 7.9 Â Â Â Â 9.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 24 Â Â Â Â 22 Â Â Â Â 5.4 Â Â Â Â 4.5 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 110 - V65 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 3 - (Continued) Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 48 Â Â Â Â 72 Â Â Â Â 10.9 Â Â Â Â 14.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 17 Â Â Â Â 12 Â Â Â Â 3.9 Â Â Â Â 2.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 10 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 2.3 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 21 Â Â Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 4.8 Â Â Â Â 1.0 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 19 Â Â Â Â 11 Â Â Â Â 4.3 Â Â Â Â 2.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 8 Â Â Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â 1.8 Â Â Â Â 2.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 11 Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 0.9 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 12 Â Â 18 Â Â Â Â 30 Â Â Â Â 4.1 Â Â Â Â 6.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 13 Â Â 76 Â Â Â Â 61 Â Â Â Â 17.2 Â Â Â Â 12.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 14 Â Â 13 Â Â Â Â 41 Â Â Â Â 2.9 Â Â Â Â 8.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 15 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 16 Â Â 17 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 3.9 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 17 Â Â 10 Â Â Â Â 11 Â Â Â Â 2.3 Â Â Â Â 2.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 19 Â Â 9 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 2.0 Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 20 Â Â 38 Â Â Â Â 29 Â Â Â Â 8.6 Â Â Â Â 5.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 21 Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 38 Â Â Â Â 0.9 Â Â Â Â 7.7 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 23 Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 111 - V65 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 3 - (Continued) Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â 0.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 24 Â Â 10 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 2.3 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 25 Â Â 14 Â Â Â Â 11 Â Â Â Â 3.2 Â Â Â Â 2.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 26 Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 11 Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â 2.2 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 591M Â Â Â Â 549M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 27 Â 26 Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.4 Â 5.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 33 Â 23 Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.6 Â 5.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 19 Â 6 Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.8 Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 1 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â 66 Â 87 Â Â Â Â Â Â 13.1 Â 19.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â 21 Â 11 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.2 Â 2.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 7 Â Â 3 Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 8 Â Â 3 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 20 Â 18 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.0 Â 4.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 10 Â Â 7 Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.4 Â 1.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 112 - V65 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 3 - (Continued) 11 Â Â 1 Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 12 Â Â 23 Â 18 Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.6 Â 4.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 13 Â Â 79 Â 61 Â Â Â Â Â Â 15.7 Â 13.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 14 Â Â 47 Â 28 Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.3 Â 6.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 15 Â Â 5 Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.0 Â 0.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 16 Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 17 Â Â 42 Â 39 Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.3 Â 8.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 18 Â Â 13 Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.6 Â 1.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 19 Â Â 1 Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 0.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 20 Â Â 13 Â 27 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.6 Â 6.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 21 Â Â 64 Â 56 Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.7 Â 12.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 22 Â Â 1 Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â 1.1 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 24 Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6 Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 25 Â Â 6 Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.2 Â 1.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 26 Â Â 5 Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.0 Â 1.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 27 Â Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.7 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 99 Â Â 560M Â 561M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 113 - V65 - IMPORT PERSONL PROBLEM 3 - (Continued) Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V66 - AMENDMT EMPLOY PROM ACT - REF.NO.:0066 0 Location 111 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 44 0 Q.24 At the moment there is a great deal of talk of the planned change to article 116 of the Employment Promotion Act ("Arbeitsfoerderungsgesetz"). Do you know what this is about? --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted Abs. % 1. Yes 465 45.06 2. More or less 371 35.95 3. No 196 18.99 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 ------ ------ 1032 100.00 - V67 - IN FAVOR OF AMENDMENT - REF.NO.:0067 0 Location 112 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 45 MD2: 9 0 Q.25 The Federal government considers the change absolutely necessary; the unions have come out decisively against it. What is your opinion: Are you in favor of a change or rather opposed to a change? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 979 1. In favor of a change 364 35.27 37.18 2. Opposed to a change 615 59.59 62.82 9. NA 53 5.14 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 114 - V68 - AMENDMT MAKE STRIKE EASY - REF.NO.:0068 0 Location 113 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 46 MD2: 9 0 Q.26 Some people say that the planned amendment to the law will limit the chances of carrying a strike through. Do you believe this or don't you believe this? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 996 1. Yes, believe it 573 55.52 57.53 2. No, don't believe it 423 40.99 42.47 9. NA 36 3.49 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.00 100.00 - V69 - IN FAVOR: EASIER STRIKE - REF.NO.:0069 0 Location 114 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 47 MD2: 9 0 Q.26A (If R believes that the amendment to the law will limit the chances of carrying a strike through) Do you think this is a good thing or do you think this isn't a good thing? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 573 1. Is good 100 9.69 17.45 2. Is not good 473 45.83 82.55 9. INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.26 459 44.48 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 115 - V70 - AMENDMT ABUSE UNEMPL INS - REF.NO.:0070 0 Location 115 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 48 MD2: 9 0 Q.27 Others say that, without the planned amendment, unem- ployment insurance would be abused as a union strike fund. Do you believe this or don't you believe this? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 997 1. Yes, believe it 363 35.17 36.41 2. No, don't believe it 634 61.43 63.59 9. NA 35 3.39 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 99.99 100.00 - V71 - MORE UNEMPLOYED NXT YEAR - REF.NO.:0071 0 Location 116 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 49 MD2: 9 0 Q.28 At the present time, there are about two and a half million unemployed people in the Federal Republic. What do you think: in a year or two will there be far less unemployed people, as many unemployed people as today, or even more unemployed people? ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 In a year or two there will be Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1031 1. Far less unemployed 226 21.90 21.92 2. As many unemployed as today 534 51.74 51.79 3. Even more unemployed 271 26.26 26.29 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 116 - V72 - WHO CAN FIGHT UNEMPLOYMT - REF.NO.:0072 0 Location 117 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 50 MD2: 9 0 Q.29. In your opinion, who can do most to fight unemployment? (Interviewer: Allow only one response) ------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1023 1. The unions 72 6.98 7.04 2. The government 483 46.80 47.21 3. The employers 468 45.35 45.75 9. NA 9 0.87 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.00 100.00 - V73 - DO UNEMPLOYED ENOUGH - REF.NO.:0073 0 Location 118 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 51 MD2: 9 0 Q.30 What do you think: Do the unemployed on the whole do enough to find a job, or do they not do enough? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1021 1. They do enough 604 58.53 59.16 2. They don't do enough 417 40.41 40.84 9. NA 11 1.07 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 117 - V74 - ISSUE COMP UNEMPLOYMENT - REF.NO.:0074 0 Location 119 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 52 MD2: 9 0 Q.31 Who would be more qualified to fight unemployment: Do you think this would be the present CDU/CSU-FDP government in Bonn or would it be a government led by the SPD? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1026 1. The present CDU/CSU-FDP government 311 30.14 30.31 2. A government led by the SPD 276 26.74 26.90 3. Both 193 18.70 18.81 4. None 246 23.84 23.98 9. NA 6 0.58 . 0. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.00 100.00 - V75 - WHO GERMAN SOCCER CHAMP - REF.NO.:0075 0 Location 120 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 53-54 MD2: 99 0 Q.32 And now for something completely different: Who is going to be the German soccer league champion at the end of this season? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 740 01. Werder Bremen 362 35.08 48.92 02. Bayern Muenchen 260 25.19 35.14 03. Borussia Moenchengladbach 38 3.68 5.14 04. Hamburger SV 54 5.23 7.30 05. VFB Stuttgart 5 0.48 0.68 06. 1. FC Koeln 7 0.68 0.95 07. Bayer Leverkusen 2 0.19 0.27 08. Eintracht Frankfurt 1 0.10 0.14 09. Schalke 04 2 0.19 0.27 10. Other responses 9 0.87 1.22 99. NA 292 28.29 . 00. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 99.98 100.03 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 118 - V76 - WHO WORLD SOCCER CHAMP - REF.NO.:0076 0 Location 122 Card 2 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 55-56 MD2: 99 0 Q.32A In June the World Cup takes place in Mexico. Who do you think is going to win the World Cup? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 735 01. Germany 230 22.29 31.29 02. Brazil 218 21.12 29.66 03. Italy 97 9.40 13.20 04. Mexico 61 5.91 8.30 05. Argentina 29 2.81 3.95 06. Denmark 25 2.42 3.40 07. France 27 2.62 3.67 08. England 20 1.94 2.72 09. Uruguay 8 0.78 1.09 10. Other responses 20 1.94 2.72 99. NA 297 28.78 . 00. Asked only in February'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1032 100.01 100.00 - V77 - PREFERRED CHANCELLOR - REF.NO.:0077 0 Location 124 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 57 MD2: 9 0 Q.33 Whom would you like best as chancellor: Helmut Kohl or Johannes Rau? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Helmut Kohl 2. Johannes Rau 9. NA 0. Not asked in January and February'86 and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 420 Â 424 Â 391 Â 460 Â 468 Â Â Â Â 43.3 Â 44.4 Â 41.1 Â 46.1 Â 46.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 550 Â 530 Â 561 Â 537 Â 538 Â Â Â Â 56.7 Â 55.6 Â 58.9 Â 53.9 Â 53.5 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 119 - V77 - PREFERRED CHANCELLOR - (Continued) 9 Â Â Â 40M Â 61M Â 55M Â 43M Â 41M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â 477 Â 497 Â 509 Â 466 Â 475 Â Â Â 46.3 Â 50.3 Â 54.0 Â 49.1 Â 49.1 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â 553 Â 492 Â 434 Â 483 Â 492 Â Â Â 53.7 Â 49.7 Â 46.0 Â 50.9 Â 50.9 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â 31M Â 74M Â 64M Â 57M Â 76M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V78 - OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION - REF.NO.:0078 0 Location 125 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 58 MD2: 9 0 Q.34 How do you evaluate your own financial situation today: very good, good, part good/part bad, bad, or very bad? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Very good 2. Good 3. Part good/part bad 4. Bad 5. Very bad 9. NA 0. Asked only in March and July'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 28 Â Â Â Â 43 Â Â Â Â 2.8 Â Â Â Â 4.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 474 Â Â Â Â 544 Â Â Â Â 46.9 Â Â Â Â 52.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â 415 Â Â Â Â 380 Â Â Â Â 41.1 Â Â Â Â 36.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 120 - V78 - OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION - (Continued) 4 Â Â Â 75 Â Â Â Â 58 Â Â Â Â 7.4 Â Â Â Â 5.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â 18 Â Â Â Â 20 Â Â Â Â 1.8 Â Â Â Â 1.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â Â 1015M Â 1007M Â 1040M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 - V79 - OWN FINANC SIT SINCE 83 - REF.NO.:0079 0 Location 126 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 59 MD2: 9 0 Q.35 Since the elections for the Bundestag of 1983 has your own financial situation improved considerably, improved somewhat, remained the same,deteriorated somewhat, or deterio- rated considerably? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1008 1. Improved considerably 24 2.38 2.38 2. Improved somewhat 178 17.62 17.66 3. Remained the same 622 61.58 61.71 4. Deteriorated somewhat 147 14.55 14.58 5. Deteriorated considerably 37 3.66 3.67 9. NA 2 0.20 . 0. Asked only in March '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1010 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 121 - V80 - RETIRED:FINAN SITUATION - REF.NO.:0080 0 Location 127 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 60 MD2: 9 0 Q.36 And now we would like to know whether, in your opinion, the financial situation of various sections of the population has improved, remained the same, or deteriorated? Q.36A(1) What about the financial situation of pensioners? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1005 1. Improved 143 14.16 14.23 2. Remained the same 480 47.52 47.76 3. Deteriorated 382 37.82 38.01 9. NA 5 0.50 . 0. Asked only in March '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1010 100.00 100.00 - V81 - WORKERS:FINAN SITUATION - REF.NO.:0081 0 Location 128 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 61 MD2: 9 0 Q.36A(2) What about the financial situation of workers? -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1001 1. Improved 352 34.85 35.16 2. Remained the same 583 57.72 58.24 3. Deteriorated 66 6.53 6.59 9. NA 9 0.89 . 0. Asked only in March '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1010 99.99 99.99 - V85 - WEAK+NEEDY:FINANC SITUA - REF.NO.:0085 0 Location 132 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 65 MD2: 9 0 Q.36B(1) What about the financial situation of the weak and needy? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1000 1. Improved 84 8.32 8.40 2. Remained the same 373 36.93 37.30 3. Deteriorated 543 53.76 54.30 9. NA 10 0.99 . 0. Asked only in March '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1010 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 124 - V86 - HIGH INCOM:FINANC SITUA - REF.NO.:0086 0 Location 133 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 66 MD2: 9 0 Q.36B(2) What about the financial situation of those with higher income? ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1005 1. Improved 644 63.76 64.08 2. Remained the same 338 33.47 33.63 3. Deteriorated 23 2.28 2.29 9. NA 5 0.50 . 0. Asked only in March '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1010 100.01 100.00 - V87 - WHO RESPONS PARTY SCAND - REF.NO.:0087 0 Location 134 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 67 MD2: 9 0 Q.37 In your opinion, who is mainly to blame for the scandal involving contributions to political parties? Is it donators from the business world, the parties them- selves, tax offices, or who else? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 976 1. Donators from the business world 312 30.89 31.97 2. Parties 483 47.82 49.49 3. Tax offices 55 5.45 5.64 4. Others 30 2.97 3.07 5. Donators and parties 60 5.94 6.15 6. Donators and tax offices 4 0.40 0.41 7. Parties and tax offices 4 0.40 0.41 8. Donators, parties and tax offices 28 2.77 2.87 9. NA 34 3.37 . 0. Asked only in March '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1010 100.01 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 125 - V88 - DAMAGE REPUTATN OF KOHL - REF.NO.:0088 0 Location 135 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 68 MD2: 9 0 Q.38 A complaint has been filed against Chancellor Helmut because of false statement and now the accusations are being examined by the public prosecutor's office. Do you think that an incident like this damages the reputa- tion of the Chancellor or does it not damage his reputation? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1011 1. Damages his reputation 799 78.72 79.03 2. Does not damage his reputation 212 20.89 20.97 9. NA 4 0.39 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - V89 - UNEMPLOYMENT-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0089 0 Location 136 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 69 MD2: 9 0 Q.39 Here we have put together several tasks and goals which are being talked about in the Federal Republic. Who would be more qualified to solve each of these issues to your satisfaction. Do you think that would be the present CDU/CSU-FDP government in Bonn, or would it be a government led by the SPD? (Interviewer: Hand blue deck of cards to the respondent and ask for each one) Q.39A Fight unemployment -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1011 1. CDU/CSU-FDP 346 34.09 34.22 2. SPD 302 29.75 29.87 3. Both 147 14.48 14.54 4. Neither 216 21.28 21.36 9. NA 4 0.39 . 0. Asked only in April'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 99.99 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 126 - V90 - BOOST ECONOMY-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0090 0 Location 137 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 70 MD2: 9 0 Q.39B Boost the economy -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1010 1. CDU/CSU-FDP 517 50.94 51.19 2. SPD 197 19.41 19.50 3. Both 192 18.92 19.01 4. Neither 104 10.25 10.30 9. NA 5 0.49 . 0. Asked only in April'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.01 100.00 - V91 - ENVIRON PROTECT-ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0091 0 Location 138 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 71 MD2: 9 0 Q.39C Better environmental protection -- Who is more quali- fied to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1009 1. CDU/CSU-FDP 231 22.76 22.89 2. SPD 304 29.95 30.13 3. Both 275 27.09 27.25 4. Neither 199 19.61 19.72 9. NA 6 0.59 . 0. Asked only in April'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 127 - V92 - SECURE PENSIONS-ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0092 0 Location 139 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 72 MD2: 9 0 Q.39D Secure pensions -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1009 1. CDU/CSU-FDP 368 36.26 36.47 2. SPD 299 29.46 29.63 3. Both 198 19.51 19.62 4. Neither 144 14.19 14.27 9. NA 6 0.59 . 0. Asked only in April'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.01 99.99 - V93 - PUBLIC DEBT-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0093 0 Location 140 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 73 MD2: 9 0 Q.39E Reduce public debt -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1009 1. CDU/CSU-FDP 529 52.12 52.43 2. SPD 118 11.63 11.69 3. Both 165 16.26 16.35 4. Neither 197 19.41 19.52 9. NA 6 0.59 . 0. Asked only in April'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.01 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 128 - V94 - AGRICULTURE-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0094 0 Location 141 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 74 MD2: 9 0 Q.39F Solve the problems of the agricultural sector -- Who is more qualified in R's view? ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1007 1. CDU/CSU-FDP 281 27.68 27.90 2. SPD 205 20.20 20.36 3. Both 194 19.11 19.27 4. Neither 327 32.22 32.47 9. NA 8 0.79 . 0. Asked only in April'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - V95 - US SAY LIBYA TERRORIST - REF.NO.:0095 0 Location 142 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 75 MD2: 9 0 Q.40 And now to Libya: The USA claims that Libya is behind recent acts of terrorism. Do you believe this or don't you believe this? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 994 1. Yes, I believe this 777 76.55 78.17 2. No, I don't believe this 217 21.38 21.83 9. NA 21 2.07 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 129 - V96 - US BOMBED LIBYA:RIGHT? - REF.NO.:0096 0 Location 143 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 76 MD2: 9 0 Q.41 Because of this the USA bombed Libyan targets. Do you think that was right or do you think that was not right? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1007 1. Was right 292 28.77 29.00 2. Was not right 715 70.44 71.00 9. NA 8 0.79 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - V97 - JOIN US BOYCOTT LIBYA - REF.NO.:0097 0 Location 144 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 77 MD2: 9 0 Q.42 The USA has imposed economic sanctions upon Libya. Should the Federal Republic join in these sanctions or should it not join? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1006 1. Should join 435 42.86 43.24 2. Should not join 571 56.26 56.76 9. NA 9 0.89 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 130 - V98 - WILL UNIONS GAIN INFLUE - REF.NO.:0098 0 Location 145 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 78 MD2: 9 0 Q.43 And now a few questions on the subject of unions: In the future are the unions here going to have more influence, less influence or will there be no change? ------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. More influence 2. Less influence 3. There will be no change 9. NA 0. Asked only in April and December '86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 143 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 14.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 227 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 22.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â 638 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 63.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â Â 1007M Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 7M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 109 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.9 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 325 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 32.6 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â 564 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 56.5 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 8M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 131 - V99 - STRNG UNIONS POSITIVE R - REF.NO.:0099 0 Location 146 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 79 MD2: 9 0 Q.44 If the unions here are strong, what does that mean for you personally: Is it advantageous to you, is it detrimental to you, or does it make no difference? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1014 1. Advantageous 263 25.91 25.94 2. Detrimental 60 5.91 5.92 3. Makes no difference 691 68.08 68.15 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.01 - V100 - WOMEN--- UNIONS CARE? - REF.NO.:0100 0 Location 147 Card 2 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 80 MD2: 9 0 Q.45 When it is a question of representing the interests of the employees at work, do the unions take care of the interests of women sufficiently or not sufficiently? --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1002 1. Sufficiently 405 39.90 40.42 2. Not sufficiently 597 58.82 59.58 9. NA 13 1.28 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - 0 *** DECK=0003 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 132 - V1 - ZA-STUDY NUMBER 1536 - REF.NO.:0001 0 Location 1 Card 3 Width 4 Column 1- 4 0 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 ------------------------------- - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - REF.NO.:0002 0 Location 5 Card 3 Width 6 Column 5-10 0 Respondent Number ----------------- - - Deck Identification Number is '3' Deck 3 Column 1 ----------------------------- - V101 - YOUTH--- UNIONS CARE? - REF.NO.:0101 0 Location 148 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 12 MD2: 9 0 Q.46 And of the interests of young people - do the unions take care of their interests sufficiently or not sufficiently? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1001 1. Sufficiently 415 40.89 41.46 2. Not sufficiently 586 57.73 58.54 9. NA 14 1.38 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 133 - V102 - WHITE-COLLAR-UNIONS CARE - REF.NO.:0102 0 Location 149 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 13 MD2: 9 0 Q.47 And do the unions take care of the interests of the employees sufficiently or not sufficiently? --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 991 1. Sufficiently 696 68.57 70.23 2. Not sufficiently 295 29.06 29.77 9. NA 24 2.36 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 99.99 100.00 - V103 - UNION POLITICS UP-TO-DAT - REF.NO.:0103 0 Location 150 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 14 MD2: 9 0 Q.48 Some people say that the politics of the unions are up- to-date. Other people say that the politics of the unions are not up-to-date. Which view do you agree with? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1004 1. Union politics are up-to-date 715 70.44 71.22 2. Union politics are not up-to-date 289 28.47 28.78 9. NA 11 1.08 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 134 - V104 - UNIONS NEUTRAL? - REF.NO.:0104 0 Location 151 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 15 MD2: 9 0 Q.49 What impression do you have of the unions today: Are the unions impartial as far as party politics are concerned or do the unions lean toward one party? ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. Are impartial 2. Lean toward one party 9. NA 0. Asked only in April and December'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 361 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 36.4 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 630 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 63.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â Â 1007M Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 24M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 328 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 33.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 666 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 67.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 12M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 135 - V105 - WHICH PARTY UNIONS LEAN - REF.NO.:0105 0 Location 152 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 16 MD2: 9 0 Q.49A (If R thinks that the unions lean toward one party) Which party is this? (Interviewer: If more than one party named,ask: Which party is this in particular?) ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. SPD 2. CDU/CSU, CDU or CSU 3. FDP 4. The Greens 5. Other parties 6. Other responses 9. INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.49 0. Asked only in April and December'86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 588 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 93.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 29 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.6 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 5 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.3 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â Â 1007M Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 385M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â 618 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 92.8 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â 45 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.8 Â Â Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 136 - V105 - WHICH PARTY UNIONS LEAN - (Continued) Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 6 Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â 340M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V106 - UNIONS NECESSARY TODAY? - REF.NO.:0106 0 Location 153 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 17 MD2: 9 0 Q.50 Do we need unions nowadays or do we not need them? -------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1007 1. Yes, we need unions 886 87.29 87.98 2. No, we don't need unions 121 11.92 12.02 9. NA 8 0.79 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - V107 - DOES R DRINK WINE? - REF.NO.:0107 0 Location 154 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 18 0 Q.51 Do you drink wine? And if so, how often? ---------------------------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 137 - V107 - DOES R DRINK WINE? - (Continued) Unweighted Abs. % 1. Yes, every day 17 1.67 2. Yes, almost every day 41 4.04 3. Yes, once or twice a week 232 22.86 4. Drink wine rarely 498 49.06 5. No, never drink wine 227 22.36 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 ------ ------ 1015 99.99 - V108 - HAS R HEARD WINE SCANDAL - REF.NO.:0108 0 Location 155 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 19 MD2: 9 0 Q.52 (If R drinks wine) At the moment there is a huge scandal about Italian wine. Because of this are you drinking less Italian wine or just as much as before the scandal? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 290 1. Drink less Italian wine 91 8.97 31.38 2. Drink just as much Italian wine as before 25 2.46 8.62 3. Never drink Italian wine 174 17.14 60.00 9. INAP., coded 4 or 5 in Q.51 725 71.43 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - V109 - DRINK LESS ITALIAN WINE - REF.NO.:0109 0 Location 156 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 20 MD2: 9 0 Q.52A (If R drinks less Italian wine) Are you now drinking more German wine instead? ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 138 - V109 - DRINK LESS ITALIAN WINE - (Continued) Unweighted % N= Abs. % 91 1. Yes 74 7.29 81.32 2. No 17 1.67 18.68 9. INAP., coded 2,3 or 9 in Q.52 924 91.03 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 99.99 100.00 - V110 - COMPARE LAST WINE SCANDL - REF.NO.:0110 0 Location 157 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 21 MD2: 8 0 Q.53 We already had a wine scandal last year. Which do you think is worse: the present scandal about Italian wine or the glycol wine scandal last year? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 285 1. Present scandal is worse 242 23.84 84.91 2. Last year's scandal was worse 35 3.45 12.28 3. There is no difference 8 0.79 2.81 8. NA 5 0.49 . 9. INAP., coded 4 or 5 in Q.51 725 71.43 . 0. Asked only in April '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1015 100.00 100.00 - V111 - INTEREST IN POLITICS - REF.NO.:0111 0 Location 158 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 22 MD2: 9 0 Q.54 Quite generally, are you interested in politics? ------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Yes 2. Not particularly 3. Not at all 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 139 - V111 - INTEREST IN POLITICS - (Continued) 9. NA 0. Asked only in May'86, January and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 542 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 54.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 311 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 31.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 150 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 15.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 4M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 568 Â 966 Â Â Â Â Â Â 54.6 Â 48.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 339 Â 690 Â Â Â Â Â Â 32.6 Â 34.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 134 Â 326 Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.9 Â 16.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â 1006M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 2M Â 13M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 140 - V112 - INTEREST STRENGTH - REF.NO.:0112 0 Location 159 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 23 MD2: 9 0 Q.54A (If R is interested in politics) How strongly are you interested in politics: very strongly, strongly, or not so strongly? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Very strongly 2. Strongly 3. Not so strongly 9. INAP., coded 2,3, or 9 in Q.54 0. Asked only in May'86, January and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 90 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 16.6 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 291 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 53.7 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 161 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 29.7 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â Â 1040M Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 465M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 98 Â 153 Â Â Â Â Â Â 17.3 Â 15.8 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 301 Â 483 Â Â Â Â Â Â 53.0 Â 50.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 169 Â 330 Â Â Â Â Â Â 29.8 Â 34.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â 1006M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 475M Â 1029M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 141 - V113 - WHO WIN ELCT LOW SAXONY - REF.NO.:0113 0 Location 160 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 24 MD2: 9 0 Q.55 On June 15th, 1986 elections will take place for the Landtag of Lower Saxony. Who do you think will win the elections? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 882 1. CDU 413 41.01 46.83 2. CDU and FDP 15 1.49 1.70 3. SPD 398 39.52 45.12 4. SPD and the Greens 25 2.48 2.83 5. Albrecht 19 1.89 2.15 6. Schroeder 3 0.30 0.34 7. Other responses 9 0.89 1.02 9. NA 125 12.41 . 0. Asked only in May'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 99.99 99.99 - V114 - HEALTH DAMAG SOV ACCIDT - REF.NO.:0114 0 Location 161 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 25 0 Q.56 At the end of April there was a serious accident in a Soviet nuclear power station, the effects of which were felt here too. Do you think that your health was damaged as a result of this, or don't you think so? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted Abs. % 1. Yes, I think so 351 34.86 2. No, I don't think so 284 28.20 3. Cannot say yet 372 36.94 0. Asked only in May'86 0 0.00 ------ ------ 1007 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 142 - V115 - GVT INFORM PROTECT MEAS - REF.NO.:0115 0 Location 162 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 26 MD2: 9 0 Q.57 What do you think: Have the German authorities given adequate information about what the individual citizen can do for his/her protection or have they not given adequate infor- mation? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1004 1. Adequate 312 30.98 31.08 2. Not adequate 692 68.72 68.92 9. NA 3 0.30 . 0. Asked only in May'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 - V116 - INFO PROT MEAS IN TIME - REF.NO.:0116 0 Location 163 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 27 MD2: 9 0 Q.58 Did our authorities give information about possible pre- cautionary measures in good time or too late? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1000 1. In good time 291 28.90 29.10 2. Too late 709 70.41 70.90 9. NA 7 0.70 . 0. Asked only in May'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 143 - V117 - NUCL POWER PLANTS IN GFR - REF.NO.:0117 0 Location 164 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 28 MD2: 9 0 Q.59 And now please think about the nuclear power plants in the Federal Republic. What do you think: Should nuclear power plants continue to be built, should only the existing plants be used without constructing new ones, or should the existing nuclear power plants be shut down? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Continue to build 2. Use existing ones, no new ones 3. Shut down existing ones 9. NA 0. Asked only in May, June and July'86 and February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 100 Â 107 Â 105 Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.0 Â 10.3 Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 563 Â 607 Â 655 Â Â Â Â Â Â 56.0 Â 58.7 Â 63.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â 342 Â 320 Â 280 Â Â Â Â Â Â 34.0 Â 30.9 Â 26.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 2M Â 6M Â 7M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 200 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 10.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 1272 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 64.2 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 509 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 25.7 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â 1006M Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â Â 14M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 144 - V118 - SHUT DOWN NUCL POW PLNTS - REF.NO.:0118 0 Location 165 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 29 MD2: 9 0 Q.59A (If R wants only existing power plants to be used) Should existing nuclear power plants continue to operate for as long as possible or should they be shut down as soon as possible? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Should continue to operate 2. Should be shut down 9. INAP., coded 1,3 or 9 in Q.59 0. Asked only in June and July'86 and in February'87 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 376 Â 419 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 61.9 Â 64.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 231 Â 236 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 38.1 Â 36.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â Â 433M Â 392M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 834 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 65.6 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 438 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 34.4 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â 1007M Â 1006M Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â Â 723M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 145 - V119 - WHEN SHUT DOWN POW PLNTS - REF.NO.:0119 0 Location 166 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 30 MD2: 8 0 Q.59B (If R wants all existing nuclear power plants to be shut down) Within the space of how many years should this take place? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 896 1. Immediately 120 6.02 13.39 2. Within five years 379 19.00 42.30 3. Within ten years 273 13.68 30.47 4. After ten years 124 6.22 13.84 8. DK,NA 51 2.56 . 9. INAP., coded 1 or 9 in Q.59 or coded 1 in Q.59A 1048 52.53 . 0. Asked only in February '87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 100.00 - V120 - GERMAN POWER PLNTS SAFER - REF.NO.:0120 0 Location 167 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 31 MD2: 9 0 Q.60 It is claimed that the German nuclear power plants are safer than the Soviet reactor involved in the accident. Do you believe this or do you not believe it? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 998 1. Believe it 642 63.75 64.33 2. Don't believe it 356 35.35 35.67 9. NA 9 0.89 . 0. Asked only in May '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 146 - V121 - ACCIDNT POSS IN GERMANY - REF.NO.:0121 0 Location 168 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 32 MD2: 9 0 Q.61 Do you believe that an accident that would have serious consequences for the population could happen in a German power plant or do you not believe it? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. Believe it 2. Don't believe it 9. NA 0. Asked only in May, June and July '86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â 724 Â 733 Â 738 Â Â Â Â Â Â 72.2 Â 70.7 Â 71.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â 279 Â 304 Â 301 Â Â Â Â Â Â 27.8 Â 29.3 Â 29.0 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â 4M Â 3M Â 8M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 - V122 - NUC POWER PLANT NEARBY? - REF.NO.:0122 0 Location 169 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 33 MD2: 9 0 Q.62 Is there a nuclear power plant within a 30 km radius of here? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1004 1. Yes, there is one 317 31.48 31.57 2. Yes, there are several 27 2.68 2.69 3. No 660 65.54 65.74 9. NA 3 0.30 . 0. Asked only in May '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 147 - V123 - R HEARD MINIST NUCL SAF - REF.NO.:0123 0 Location 170 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 34 MD2: 9 0 Q.63 At the beginning of June the Federal Government set up a Ministry of the Environment and Reactor Safety. Have you heard of this? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1035 1. Yes 831 79.90 80.29 2. No 204 19.62 19.71 9. NA 5 0.48 . 0. Asked only in June '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1040 100.00 100.00 - V124 - NEW MINISTERY GOOD - REF.NO.:0124 0 Location 171 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 35 MD2: 9 0 Q.63A (If R has heard about the new ministry) Do you think this is a good thing or do you think this isn't a good thing? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 831 1. Is good 727 69.90 87.48 2. Is not good 104 10.00 12.52 9. INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.63 209 20.10 . 0. Asked only in June '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1040 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 148 - V125 - NEW MINISTERY COMPETENT - REF.NO.:0125 0 Location 172 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 36 MD2: 9 0 Q.64 Do you think that this Ministry will mean that problems concerning the environment and reactor safety will be better dealt with in the future or do you not think so? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1025 1. Think so 502 48.27 48.98 2. Don't think so 523 50.29 51.02 9. NA 15 1.44 . 0. Asked only in June'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1040 100.00 100.00 - V126 - GFR-USA RELATIONS - REF.NO.:0126 0 Location 173 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 37 MD2: 9 0 Q.65 What do you think: Are relations between the German Federal Republic and the United States (Interviewer read) --------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. Very good 2. More good than bad 3. More bad than good 4. Very bad 9. NA 0. Asked only in June and November '86 ÂJan 86 ÂFeb 86 ÂMar 86 ÂApr 86 ÂMay 86 ÂJune 86ÂJuly 86Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â 97 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 705 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 68.4 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â Â Â Â 212 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 20.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â 17 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.6 Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 149 - V126 - GFR-USA RELATIONS - (Continued) 0 Â 1049M Â 1032M Â 1010M Â 1015M Â 1007M Â Â 1047M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â Â Â Â 9M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1049 1032 1010 1015 1007 1040 1047 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 201 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 20.0 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 694 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 68.9 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â Â 99 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â Â 8 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.8 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.5 Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V127 - GFR-USA RELATNS IMPROVED - REF.NO.:0127 0 Location 174 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 38 MD2: 9 0 Q.66 Have relations between the Federal Republic and the United States improved, deteriorated or remained unchanged since last year? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1031 1. Improved 133 12.79 12.90 2. Deteriorated 321 30.87 31.13 3. Remained unchanged 577 55.48 55.97 9. NA 9 0.87 . 0. Asked only in June '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1040 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 150 - V128 - ABORTION REGULATIONS - REF.NO.:0128 0 Location 175 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 39 MD2: 9 0 Q.67 Although there is a statutory regulation governing termination of pregnancy, the subject never ceases to be dis- cussed. We have listed a number of possible rulings here and would ask you to tell us which of them you favor. (Interviewer: Hand list no.4 to the respondent, allow only one response) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1039 1. Opinion A: Termination of pregnancy should not be allowed at all 105 10.10 10.11 2. Opinion B: Termination of pregnancy should be allowed only in cases where health is endangered 328 31.54 31.57 3. Opinion C: Termination of pregnancy should be allowed not only where health is endangered but also in cases of social hardship 463 44.52 44.56 4. Opinion D: Termination of pregnancy should be allowed without restriction 143 13.75 13.76 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in June '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1040 100.01 100.00 - V129 - ABORTN SOCIAL HARDSHIP - REF.NO.:0129 0 Location 176 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 40 MD2: 9 0 Q.68 Under paragraph 218, termination of pregnancy is possible in cases of social hardship. What do you think, do people here make use of this clause too much, too little or just right? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1020 1. Too much 420 40.38 41.18 2. Too little 200 19.23 19.61 3. Just right 400 38.46 39.22 9. NA 20 1.92 . 0. Asked only in June '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1040 99.99 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 151 - V130 - POLICE BEHAV I DEMONSTR - REF.NO.:0130 0 Location 177 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 41 MD2: 9 0 Q.69 Think now about the role of the police at the demonstra- tions in Wackersdorf. Were the police too severe, not severe enough or was police conduct just right? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1027 1. Too severe 279 26.65 27.17 2. Not severe enough 331 31.61 32.23 3. Just right 417 39.83 40.60 9. NA 20 1.91 . 0. Asked only in July '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 - V131 - TIGHTEN LAW ON DEMONSTR - REF.NO.:0131 0 Location 178 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 42 MD2: 9 0 Q.70 At the present time there is talk of tightening the law on demonstrations. We have listed two opinions here. Please tell me which of them you favor. (Interviewer: Hand list no.4 to the repondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1033 1. A: Criminal law governing demonstrations must be tightened in order that violent elements at demonstrations be dealt with more satisfactorily. 487 46.51 47.14 2. B: Criminal law governing demonstrations need not to be tightened because existing laws are sufficient to prosecute violent elements. 546 52.15 52.86 9. NA 14 1.34 . 0. Asked only in July '86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 152 - V132 - GEN ECON SITUATN TODAY - REF.NO.:0132 0 Location 179 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 43 MD2: 9 0 Q.71 How would you, quite generally, evaluate the present economic situation in the Federal Republic: very good, good, part good/part bad, bad, or very bad? (Interviewer: Hand list no.5 to the respondent.) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1046 1. Very good 27 2.58 2.58 2. Good 476 45.46 45.51 3. Part good/part bad 471 44.99 45.03 4. Bad 65 6.21 6.21 5. Very bad 7 0.67 0.67 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.01 100.00 - V133 - ECON SITUATN IN A YEAR - REF.NO.:0133 0 Location 180 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 44 MD2: 9 0 Q.72 And how will it be in a year? Do you expect that the general economic situation in the Federal Republic will then be substantially better, somewhat better, the same, somewhat worse, or substantially worse? (Interviewer: Hand list no.6 to the respondent.) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 1. Substantially better 13 1.24 1.24 2. Somewhat better 285 27.22 27.27 3. The same 663 63.32 63.44 4. Somewhat worse 75 7.16 7.18 5. Substantially worse 9 0.86 0.86 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 99.99 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 153 - V134 - OWN FIN SITUATN I A YEAR - REF.NO.:0134 0 Location 181 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 45 MD2: 9 0 Q.73 What do you think your own financial situation will be in a year from now? Do you expect that your own financial situation will then be substantially better, somewhat better, the same, somewhat worse, or substantially worse? (Interviewer: Hand list no.6 to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1043 1. Substantially better 13 1.24 1.25 2. Somewhat better 166 15.85 15.92 3. The same 800 76.41 76.70 4. Somewhat worse 59 5.64 5.66 5. Substantially worse 5 0.48 0.48 9. NA 4 0.38 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.01 - V135 - REUNIFICATION OF GERMANY - REF.NO.:0135 0 Location 182 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 46 MD2: 9 0 Q.74 And now to a different subject. People can have quite different opinions about how a reunified Germany should look. We have listed a number of possibilities and would like to know which you favor. (Interviewer: Hand list no.7 to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1034 1. A A reunified Germany certainly has to be like the Federal Republic and be part of the West 602 57.50 58.22 2. B A reunified Germany should be a mixture of both German states. It should follow a policy of neu- trality, i.e. allied neither with the West nor with the East 413 39.45 39.94 3. C A reunified Germany can as far as I am concerned be like the GDR and be part of the Eastern bloc 19 1.81 1.84 9. NA 13 1.24 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 154 - V136 - FAVOR RE-UNIFIED GERMANY - REF.NO.:0136 0 Location 183 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 47 MD2: 9 0 Q.75 Are you personally in favor of the reunification of both German states, against the reunification, or indifferent about the reunification? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1044 1. In favor of reunification 735 70.20 70.40 2. Against reunification 72 6.88 6.90 3. Indifferent about reunification 237 22.64 22.70 9. NA 3 0.29 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.01 100.00 - V137 - INFORMATN ON GDR IN GFR - REF.NO.:0137 0 Location 184 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 48 MD2: 9 0 Q.76 What about information on the GDR here? Does the media, i.e. newspapers, radio, and television, report on the GDR too much, too little or just enough? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 1. Too much 58 5.54 5.55 2. Too little 501 47.85 47.94 3. Just enough 486 46.42 46.51 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 155 - V138 - GFR BANK LOANS FOR GDR - REF.NO.:0138 0 Location 185 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 49 MD2: 9 0 Q.77 The economic potential of the GDR has been boosted by bank loans from the Federal Republic several times. What do you think: Does this help German-German relations or does it not help them? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1035 1. Helps 493 47.09 47.63 2. Doesn't help 542 51.77 52.37 9. NA 12 1.15 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.01 100.00 - V139 - PRIVATE SHOPS IN GDR? - REF.NO.:0139 0 Location 186 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 50 MD2: 9 0 Q.78 As far as you know are there private groceries in the GDR or are they all state-owned? ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 1. There are still private groceries 317 30.28 30.33 2. All groceries are state-owned 308 29.42 29.47 3. Don't know 420 40.11 40.19 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 156 - V140 - PARTY MEMBERSHP IN GDR - REF.NO.:0140 0 Location 187 Card 3 MD1: 000 Width 3 Column 51-53 MD2: 999 0 Q.79 In the GDR there is the SED, the Socialist United Party, led by Erich Honecker. What percentage of the adult population of the GDR do you think are party members of the SED? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Actual percentage number coded 999. DK 000. Asked only in July'86 - V141 - BERLIN WALL BUILT WHEN - REF.NO.:0141 0 Location 190 Card 3 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 54-55 MD2: 99 0 Q.80 In Berlin there is the wall which separates East and West Berlin. Can you tell me in which year the wall was built? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Actual number of year coded 44. 1944 . 76. 1976 99. Don't know 00. Asked only in July'86 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 157 - V142 - INDUSTRIOUS--GFR OR GDR - REF.NO.:0142 0 Location 192 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 56 MD2: 9 0 Q.81 Here are a number of characteristics sometimes ascribed to Germans. For each of these please tell me whether in your opinion it is more typical of Germans in the Federal Republic or more typical of Germans in the GDR. (Interviewer: Shuffle blue deck of cards and hand to the respondent) Q.81 (A) Industriousness -- is more typical of ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1042 1. Germans in the Federal Republic 279 26.65 26.78 2. Germans in the GDR 56 5.35 5.37 3. Both 689 65.81 66.12 4. Neither 18 1.72 1.73 9. NA 5 0.48 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.01 100.00 - V143 - DISCIPLINE --GFR OR GDR - REF.NO.:0143 0 Location 193 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 57 MD2: 9 0 Q.81(B) Discipline -- is more typical of ----------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1042 1. Germans in the Federal Republic 93 8.88 8.93 2. Germans in the GDR 400 38.20 38.39 3. Both 524 50.05 50.29 4. Neither 25 2.39 2.40 9. NA 5 0.48 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 158 - V144 - ORDER SENSE--GFR OR GDR - REF.NO.:0144 0 Location 194 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 58 MD2: 9 0 Q.81(C) Sense of order -- is more typical of --------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1042 1. Germans in the Federal Republic 212 20.25 20.35 2. Germans in the GDR 92 8.79 8.83 3. Both 710 67.81 68.14 4. Neither 28 2.67 2.69 9. NA 5 0.48 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.01 - V145 - HUMOR-TYPICL GFR OR GDR - REF.NO.:0145 0 Location 195 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 59 MD2: 9 0 Q.81(D) Humor -- is more typical of ------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1041 1. Germans in the Federal Republic 333 31.81 31.99 2. Germans in the GDR 44 4.20 4.23 3. Both 452 43.17 43.42 4. Neither 212 20.25 20.37 9. NA 6 0.57 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 159 - V146 - HELPFULNESS--GFR OR GDR - REF.NO.:0146 0 Location 196 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 60 MD2: 9 0 Q.81(E) Helpfulness -- is more typical of ------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1038 1. Germans in the Federal Republic 198 18.91 19.08 2. Germans in the GDR 159 15.19 15.32 3. Both 571 54.54 55.01 4. Neither 110 10.51 10.60 9. NA 9 0.86 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.01 100.01 - V147 - PATROTISM ---GFR OR GDR - REF.NO.:0147 0 Location 197 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 61 MD2: 9 0 Q.81(F) Patriotism -- is more typical of ----------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1041 1. Germans in the Federal Republic 163 15.57 15.66 2. Germans in the GDR 209 19.96 20.08 3. Both 550 52.53 52.83 4. Neither 119 11.37 11.43 9. NA 6 0.57 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 160 - V148 - VACATION IN GDR POSSIBL - REF.NO.:0148 0 Location 198 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 62 MD2: 9 0 Q.82 What do you think: can a German from the Federal Republic spend a vacation in the GDR? ------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1039 1. Yes, it is possible 855 81.66 82.29 2. No, it is not possible 184 17.57 17.71 9. NA 8 0.76 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 99.99 100.00 - V149 - R THINK OF GDR VACATION - REF.NO.:0149 0 Location 199 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 63 MD2: 9 0 Q.83 Have you ever thought of spending your vacation in the GDR? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1046 1. Yes 195 18.62 18.64 2. No 851 81.28 81.36 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 - V150 - R EVER HAD GDR VACATION - REF.NO.:0150 0 Location 200 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 64 MD2: 9 0 Q.84 Have you ever spent your vacation in the GDR? --------------------------------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 161 - V150 - R EVER HAD GDR VACATION - (Continued) Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1046 1. Yes 100 9.55 9.56 2. No 946 90.35 90.44 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in July'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1047 100.00 100.00 - V151 - GENSCHER FOREIGN MINIST - REF.NO.:0151 0 Location 201 Card 3 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 65-66 MD2: 99 0 Q.85 If the CDU/CSU and the FDP have the majority again after the elections for the Bundestag should Hans-Dietrich Genscher continue as Foreign Minister or should another politician take over this post? (Interviewer: If "another politician" ask: Who?) ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 978 01. Yes, Genscher should continue No, this post should take.. 788 74.27 80.57 02. Strauss 119 11.22 12.17 03. Vogel 14 1.32 1.43 04. Graf Lambsdorff 8 0.75 0.82 05. Stoltenberg 10 0.94 1.02 06. Bangemann 6 0.57 0.61 07. Brandt 3 0.28 0.31 08. Other names 25 2.36 2.56 09. Other reponses 5 0.47 0.51 99. Don't know, NA 83 7.82 . 00. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 162 - V152 - STRAUSS MINIST IN BONN - REF.NO.:0152 0 Location 203 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 67 MD2: 9 0 Q.86 Should Franz-Josef Strauss then take over a post in Bonn or should he remain Minister President in Bavaria? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1058 1. Should take post in Bonn 319 30.07 30.15 2. Should remain Minister President 739 69.65 69.85 9. NA 3 0.28 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 - V153 - LAMBSDORFF AGAIN MINIST - REF.NO.:0153 0 Location 204 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 68 MD2: 9 0 Q.87 Should Otto Graf Lambsdorff return to Bonn as minister? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1049 1. Yes 391 36.85 37.27 2. No 658 62.02 62.73 9. NA 12 1.13 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 163 - V154 - SHLD SPD+GREENS GOVERN - REF.NO.:0154 0 Location 205 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 69 MD2: 9 0 Q.88 If the SPD and the Greens gain the majority in the elections for the Bundestag what should the SPD do in your opinion: Should the SPD form a government together with the Greens, form a government together with another party or form the opposition? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1053 1. Government with the Greens 320 30.16 30.39 2. Government with another party 306 28.84 29.06 3. Opposition 427 40.25 40.55 9. NA 8 0.75 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 - V155 - GREENS COOPERATE W SPD - REF.NO.:0155 0 Location 206 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 70 MD2: 9 0 Q.89 And what should the Greens do: Should the Greens form a government with the SPD and also provide ministers, should the Greens agree to cooperate with the SPD without providing ministers, or should they not make an agreement with the SPD and form the opposition? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1044 1. Govern together with the SPD and provide ministers 263 24.79 25.19 2. Cooperate with the SPD without providing ministers 202 19.04 19.35 3. Not make an agreement with the SPD and form the opposition 579 54.57 55.46 9. NA 17 1.60 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 164 - V156 - FOREIGN WORKERS NECESSA - REF.NO.:0156 0 Location 207 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 71 MD2: 9 0 Q.90 Do you think that the German economy still needs foreign workers or do you think it no longer needs them? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1057 1. Needs foreign workers 415 39.11 39.26 2. Doesn't need foreign workers 642 60.51 60.74 9. Na 4 0.38 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 - V157 - REDUCE NUMBER FORGN WOR - REF.NO.:0157 0 Location 208 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 72 MD2: 9 0 Q.91 Should the number of foreign workers in the Federal Republic be reduced or be left as it stands? --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1059 1. Reduced 744 70.12 70.25 2. Left as it stands 315 29.69 29.75 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 - V158 - FORGN WORKERS I NEIGHBHD - REF.NO.:0158 0 Location 209 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 73 MD2: 9 0 Q.92 Are there foreign workers in your neighborhood? ----------------------------------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 165 - V158 - FORGN WORKERS I NEIGHBHD - (Continued) Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1059 1. Yes 504 47.50 47.59 2. No 555 52.31 52.41 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 - V159 - RIGHT OF ASYLUM GOOD? - REF.NO.:0159 0 Location 210 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 74 MD2: 9 0 Q.93 And now to a different subject. Foreigners, who are per- secuted in their own country for political reasons have the right of asylum in the Federal Republic. Do you think this is a good thing or do you think this isn't a good thing? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1059 1. Is good 708 66.73 66.86 2. Is not good 351 33.08 33.14 9. NA 2 0.19 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 166 - V160 - REASONS F SEEKING ASYLUM - REF.NO.:0160 0 Location 211 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 75 MD2: 9 0 Q.94 This year a particularly high number of persons seeking asylum entered Berlin and the Federal Republic. Do you think that those seeking asylum are for the most part people who are persecuted for political reasons in their own country or that they are mainly people who want to come to the Federal Repu- blic for economic reasons? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 1. Are persecuted in their country 240 22.62 22.97 2. Come for economic reasons 805 75.87 77.03 9. NA 16 1.51 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 - V161 - MAKE ASYLUM MORE DIFFIC - REF.NO.:0161 0 Location 212 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 76 MD2: 9 0 Q.95 What do you think: Should the chances of asylum in the Federal Republic be made more difficult or not be made more difficult? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1056 1. More difficult 839 79.08 79.45 2. Not more difficult 217 20.45 20.55 9. NA 5 0.47 . 0. Asked only in August'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1061 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 167 - V162 - DEMOCRACY AND TERRORISM - REF.NO.:0162 0 Location 213 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 77 0 Q.96 Do you think that democracy here in the Federal Republic is strong enough to fight terrorism successfully or do you think that terrorism could succeed in destroying our democracy? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted Abs. % 1. Democracy is strong enough 625 58.80 2. Democracy could be destroyed 190 17.87 3. Don't know 248 23.33 0. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 ------ ------ 1063 100.00 - V163 - R'S OPINION OF UNIONS - REF.NO.:0163 0 Location 214 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 78 MD2: 9 0 Q.97 What opinion do you personally have of the unions: (Interviewer read) -------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. A very good opinion 2. A rather good opinion 3. A rather bad opinion 4. A very bad opinion 9. NA 0. Asked only in October and December'86 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â 59 Â Â 40 Â Â Â Â Â 5.6 Â Â 4.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â 415 Â Â 368 Â Â Â Â Â 39.4 Â Â 36.7 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 3 Â Â 437 Â Â 455 Â Â Â Â Â 41.5 Â Â 45.3 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 4 Â Â 142 Â Â 141 Â Â Â Â Â 13.5 Â Â 14.0 Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 168 - V163 - R'S OPINION OF UNIONS - (Continued) 0 Â 1061M Â Â 1007M Â Â 1043M Â 1995M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â 10M Â Â 2M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V164 - SCANDAL CHANGED OPINION - REF.NO.:0164 0 Location 215 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 79 MD2: 9 0 Q.98 Last month the unions sold the heavily indebted non- profit housing enterprise NEUE HEIMAT to a Berlin bread manu- facturer. As a result of this has your opinion of the unions improved, deteriorated or has this not changed your opinion? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1062 1. Improved 27 2.54 2.54 2. Deteriorated 642 60.40 60.45 3. Not changed 393 36.97 37.01 9. NA 1 0.09 . 0. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.00 100.00 - V165 - SCANDAL SITUATN TENANTS - REF.NO.:0165 0 Location 216 Card 3 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 80 MD2: 9 0 Q.98A Do you think that for the tenants of the NEUE HEIMAT the sale is more likely to bring advan- tages, disadvantages or have no effect upon tenancy? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1048 1. Bring advantages 48 4.52 4.58 2. Bring disadvantages 682 64.16 65.08 3. Will have no effect 318 29.92 30.34 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 169 - V165 - SCANDAL SITUATN TENANTS - (Continued) 9. NA 15 1.41 . 0. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.00 - 0 *** DECK=0004 - V1 - ZA-STUDY NUMBER 1536 - REF.NO.:0001 0 Location 1 Card 4 Width 4 Column 1- 4 0 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 ------------------------------- - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - REF.NO.:0002 0 Location 5 Card 4 Width 6 Column 5-10 0 Respondent Number ----------------- - - Deck Identification Number is '4' Deck 4 Column 1 ----------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 170 - V166 - KOHL RESPONSBLE -IRRESP - REF.NO.:0166 0 Location 217 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 12-13 MD2: 99 0 Q.99A We have collected here some characteristics which a chancellor can have. To the left and to the right of the scale are opposite attributes. Please mark which characteristics Helmut Kohl has in your opinion. Mark the scale position which best fits Kohl. The better the left or right attribute fits, the further to the left or right you should put your mark. Q.99A(1) Helmut Kohl -- responsible or irresponsible ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1051 01. Responsible 222 20.88 21.12 02. . 132 12.42 12.56 03. . 168 15.80 15.98 04. . 126 11.85 11.99 05. . 81 7.62 7.71 06. . 121 11.38 11.51 07. . 53 4.99 5.04 08. . 39 3.67 3.71 09. . 45 4.23 4.28 10. . 26 2.45 2.47 11. Irresponsible 38 3.57 3.62 99. NA 12 1.13 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 99.99 99.99 - V167 - KOHL ARROGANT-MODEST - REF.NO.:0167 0 Location 219 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 14-15 MD2: 99 0 Q.99A(2) Helmut Kohl -- arrogant or modest ------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1050 01. Arrogant 110 10.35 10.48 02. . 76 7.15 7.24 03. . 92 8.65 8.76 04. . 86 8.09 8.19 05. . 77 7.24 7.33 06. . 156 14.68 14.86 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 171 - V167 - KOHL ARROGANT-MODEST - (Continued) 07. . 100 9.41 9.52 08. . 109 10.25 10.38 09. . 92 8.65 8.76 10. . 65 6.11 6.19 11. Modest 87 8.18 8.29 99. NA 13 1.22 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 99.98 100.00 - V168 - KOHL DYNAMIC-HESITANT - REF.NO.:0168 0 Location 221 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 16-17 MD2: 99 0 Q.99A(3) Helmut Kohl -- dynamic or hesitant -------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1050 01. Dynamic 124 11.67 11.81 02. . 83 7.81 7.90 03. . 148 13.92 14.10 04. . 107 10.07 10.19 05. . 87 8.18 8.29 06. . 114 10.72 10.86 07. . 67 6.30 6.38 08. . 87 8.18 8.29 09. . 88 8.28 8.38 10. . 72 6.77 6.86 11. Hesitant 73 6.87 6.95 99. NA 13 1.22 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 99.99 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 172 - V169 - KOHL CONSERVATVE-MODERN - REF.NO.:0169 0 Location 223 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 18-19 MD2: 99 0 Q.99A(4) Helmut Kohl -- conservative or modern ----------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1047 01. Conservative 194 18.25 18.53 02. . 172 16.18 16.43 03. . 151 14.21 14.42 04. . 152 14.30 14.52 05. . 106 9.97 10.12 06. . 143 13.45 13.66 07. . 45 4.23 4.30 08. . 32 3.01 3.06 09. . 21 1.98 2.01 10. . 15 1.41 1.43 11. Modern 16 1.51 1.53 99. NA 16 1.51 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.01 - V170 - KOHL TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRUS - REF.NO.:0170 0 Location 225 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 20-21 MD2: 99 0 Q.99A(5) Helmut Kohl -- trustworthy or untrustworthy ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1051 01. Trustworthy 158 14.86 15.03 02. . 134 12.61 12.75 03. . 133 12.51 12.65 04. . 110 10.35 10.47 05. . 81 7.62 7.71 06. . 132 12.42 12.56 07. . 56 5.27 5.33 08. . 65 6.11 6.18 09. . 61 5.74 5.80 10. . 55 5.17 5.23 11. Untrustworthy 66 6.21 6.28 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 173 - V170 - KOHL TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRUS - (Continued) 99. NA 12 1.13 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.00 99.99 - V171 - KOHL ILLTEMPERED-CALM - REF.NO.:0171 0 Location 227 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 22-23 MD2: 99 0 Q.99A(6) Helmut Kohl -- lacking self-control or calm, matter of fact ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1050 01. Lacking self-control 22 2.07 2.10 02. . 19 1.79 1.81 03. . 32 3.01 3.05 04. . 34 3.20 3.24 05. . 56 5.27 5.33 06. . 147 13.83 14.00 07. . 100 9.41 9.52 08. . 115 10.82 10.95 09. . 184 17.31 17.52 10. . 149 14.02 14.19 11. Calm, matter of fact 192 18.06 18.29 99. NA 13 1.22 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 174 - V172 - RAU RESPONSBLE -IRRESP - REF.NO.:0172 0 Location 229 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 24-25 MD2: 99 0 Q.99B And which attributes fit Johannes Rau? Please mark the scale so that it best fits Rau. Q.99B(1) Johannes Rau -- responsible or irresponsible ------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1042 01. Responsible 140 13.17 13.44 02. . 135 12.70 12.96 03. . 182 17.12 17.47 04. . 160 15.05 15.36 05. . 108 10.16 10.36 06. . 162 15.24 15.55 07. . 46 4.33 4.41 08. . 39 3.67 3.74 09. . 32 3.01 3.07 10. . 17 1.60 1.63 11. Irresponsible 21 1.98 2.02 99. NA 21 1.98 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.01 - V173 - RAU ARROGANT-MODEST - REF.NO.:0173 0 Location 231 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 26-27 MD2: 99 0 Q.99B(2) Johannes Rau -- arrogant or modest --------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1041 01. Arrogant 50 4.70 4.80 02. . 37 3.48 3.55 03. . 70 6.59 6.72 04. . 74 6.96 7.11 05. . 88 8.28 8.45 06. . 188 17.69 18.06 07. . 100 9.41 9.61 08. . 138 12.98 13.26 09. . 111 10.44 10.66 10. . 92 8.65 8.84 11. Modest 93 8.75 8.93 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 175 - V173 - RAU ARROGANT-MODEST - (Continued) 99. NA 22 2.07 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.00 99.99 - V174 - RAU DYNAMIC-HESITANT - REF.NO.:0174 0 Location 233 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 28-29 MD2: 99 0 Q.99B(3) Johannes Rau -- dynamic or hesitant --------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1041 01. Dynamic 117 11.01 11.24 02. . 105 9.88 10.09 03. . 155 14.58 14.89 04. . 142 13.36 13.64 05. . 124 11.67 11.91 06. . 167 15.71 16.04 07. . 84 7.90 8.07 08. . 56 5.27 5.38 09. . 42 3.95 4.03 10. . 28 2.63 2.69 11. Hesitant 21 1.98 2.02 99. NA 22 2.07 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.00 - V175 - RAU CONSERVATIVE-MODERN - REF.NO.:0175 0 Location 235 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 30-31 MD2: 99 0 Q.99B(4) Johannes Rau -- conservative or modern ------------------------------------------------ 0 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 176 - V175 - RAU CONSERVATIVE-MODERN - (Continued) Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1035 01. Conservative 19 1.79 1.84 02. . 14 1.32 1.35 03. . 36 3.39 3.48 04. . 65 6.11 6.28 05. . 95 8.94 9.18 06. . 264 24.84 25.51 07. . 160 15.05 15.46 08. . 157 14.77 15.17 09. . 101 9.50 9.76 10. . 63 5.93 6.09 11. Modern 61 5.74 5.89 99. NA 28 2.63 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.01 - V176 - RAU TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRUST - REF.NO.:0176 0 Location 237 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 32-33 MD2: 99 0 Q.99B(5) Jonannes Rau -- trustworthy or untrustworthy ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1039 01. Trustworthy 151 14.21 14.53 02. . 110 10.35 10.59 03. . 140 13.17 13.47 04. . 131 12.32 12.61 05. . 103 9.69 9.91 06. . 171 16.09 16.46 07. . 67 6.30 6.45 08. . 50 4.70 4.81 09. . 47 4.42 4.52 10. . 30 2.82 2.89 11. Untrustworthy 39 3.67 3.75 99. NA 24 2.26 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.00 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 177 - V177 - RAU ILLTEMPERED-CALM - REF.NO.:0177 0 Location 239 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 34-35 MD2: 99 0 Q.99B(6) Johannes Rau -- lacking self-control or calm, matter of fact ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1039 01. Lacking self-control 14 1.32 1.35 02. . 16 1.51 1.54 03. . 28 2.63 2.69 04. . 36 3.39 3.46 05. . 60 5.64 5.77 06. . 152 14.30 14.63 07. . 97 9.13 9.34 08. . 157 14.77 15.11 09. . 161 15.15 15.50 10. . 144 13.55 13.86 11. Calm, matter of fact 174 16.37 16.75 99. NA 24 2.26 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.02 100.00 - V178 - IDEAL:RESPONSBLE-IRRESP - REF.NO.:0178 0 Location 241 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 36-37 MD2: 99 0 Q.99C And what attributes should an ideal chancellor possess? Again, please mark the appropriate scale position. Q.99C(1) Ideal chancellor -- responsible or irresponsible ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1046 01. Responsible 809 76.11 77.34 02. . 143 13.45 13.67 03. . 53 4.99 5.07 04. . 21 1.98 2.01 05. . 4 0.38 0.38 06. . 15 1.41 1.43 07. . 0 0.00 0.00 08. . 0 0.00 0.00 09. . 1 0.09 0.10 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 178 - V178 - IDEAL:RESPONSBLE-IRRESP - (Continued) 10. . 0 0.00 0.00 11. Irresponsible 0 0.00 0.00 99. NA 17 1.60 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.00 - V179 - IDEAL: ARROGANT-MODEST - REF.NO.:0179 0 Location 243 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 38-39 MD2: 99 0 Q.99C(2) Ideal chancellor -- arrogant or modest ------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 01. Arrogant 4 0.38 0.38 02. . 0 0.00 0.00 03. . 9 0.85 0.86 04. . 10 0.94 0.96 05. . 22 2.07 2.11 06. . 164 15.43 15.69 07. . 83 7.81 7.94 08. . 133 12.51 12.73 09. . 152 14.30 14.55 10. . 143 13.45 13.68 11. Modest 325 30.57 31.10 99. NA 18 1.69 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 179 - V180 - IDEAL:DYNAMIC-HESITANT - REF.NO.:0180 0 Location 245 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 40-41 MD2: 99 0 Q.99C(3) Ideal chancellor -- dynamic or hesitant ------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1044 01. Dynamic 721 67.83 69.06 02. . 157 14.77 15.04 03. . 91 8.56 8.72 04. . 30 2.82 2.87 05. . 10 0.94 0.96 06. . 26 2.45 2.49 07. . 1 0.09 0.10 08. . 4 0.38 0.38 09. . 2 0.19 0.19 10. . 0 0.00 0.00 11. Hesitant 2 0.19 0.19 99. NA 19 1.79 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 100.00 - V181 - IDEAL:CONSERVATVE-MODERN - REF.NO.:0181 0 Location 247 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 42-43 MD2: 99 0 Q.99C(4) Ideal chancellor -- conservative or modern ---------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1043 01. Conservative 66 6.21 6.33 02. . 29 2.73 2.78 03. . 49 4.61 4.70 04. . 53 4.99 5.08 05. . 74 6.96 7.09 06. . 283 26.62 27.13 07. . 73 6.87 7.00 08. . 91 8.56 8.72 09. . 95 8.94 9.11 10. . 56 5.27 5.37 11. Modern 174 16.37 16.68 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 180 - V181 - IDEAL:CONSERVATVE-MODERN - (Continued) 99. NA 20 1.88 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.01 99.99 - V182 - IDEAL:TRUSTWORTHY-UNTRST - REF.NO.:0182 0 Location 249 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 44-45 MD2: 99 0 Q.99C(5) Ideal chancellor -- trustworthy or untrustworthy ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1045 01. Trustworthy 845 79.49 80.86 02. . 99 9.31 9.47 03. . 59 5.55 5.65 04. . 18 1.69 1.72 05. . 7 0.66 0.67 06. . 13 1.22 1.24 07. . 0 0.00 0.00 08. . 1 0.09 0.10 09. . 2 0.19 0.19 10. . 0 0.00 0.00 11. Untrustworthy 1 0.09 0.10 99. NA 18 1.69 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 99.98 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 181 - V183 - IDEAL:ILLTEMPERED-CALM - REF.NO.:0183 0 Location 251 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 46-47 MD2: 99 0 Q.99C(6) Ideal chancellor -- lacking self-control or calm, matter of fact ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1046 01. Lacking self-control 3 0.28 0.29 02. . 3 0.28 0.29 03. . 1 0.09 0.10 04. . 7 0.66 0.67 05. . 7 0.66 0.67 06. . 40 3.76 3.82 07. . 27 2.54 2.58 08. . 62 5.83 5.93 09. . 137 12.89 13.10 10. . 171 16.09 16.35 11. Calm, matter of fact 588 55.32 56.21 99. NA 17 1.60 . 00. Asked only in October'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1063 100.00 100.01 - V184 - STATE'S EVIDENCE HEARD? - REF.NO.:0184 0 Location 253 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 48 MD2: 9 0 Q.100 Due to recent terrorist attacks a new law is being prepared which will introduce so-called State's evidence. An offender will be granted a mitigation of, or exemption from, a sentence if he/she divulges information. Have you heard about this? ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 998 1. Yes 826 82.03 82.77 2. No 172 17.08 17.23 9. NA 9 0.89 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 182 - V185 - STATE'S EVIDENCE GOOD? - REF.NO.:0185 0 Location 254 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 49 MD2: 9 0 Q.100A (If R has heard about the new law) Do you think a law like this is a good thing or do you think it isn't a good thing? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 826 1. Is good 324 32.17 39.23 2. Is not good 502 49.85 60.77 9. NA ;INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.100 181 17.97 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 99.99 100.00 - V186 - MURDER GO FREE GOOD? - REF.NO.:0186 0 Location 255 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 50 MD2: 9 0 Q.100B (If R thinks that the introduction of State's evidence is good) Do you still think the law is a good idea if it means that a murderer goes free? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 324 1. Yes 92 9.14 28.40 2. No 232 23.04 71.60 9. NA ;INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.100A 683 67.83 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 183 - V187 - GFR-USSR RELATIONS - REF.NO.:0187 0 Location 256 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 51 MD2: 9 0 Q.101 What do you think: Are relations between the German Federal Republic and the Soviet Union (Interviewer read) ---------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1004 1. Very good 21 2.09 2.09 2. More good than bad 438 43.50 43.63 3. More bad than good 469 46.57 46.71 4. Very bad 76 7.55 7.57 9. NA 3 0.30 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.01 100.00 - V188 - SHLD GFR COMPLY US VIEW - REF.NO.:0188 0 Location 257 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 52 MD2: 9 0 Q.102 If, in important political questions, the views of the Federal Republic are different to those of the United States, should the Federal Republic comply with American views or should it base its decisions on its own ideas? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1001 1. Comply with American views 167 16.58 16.68 2. Follow its own ideas 834 82.82 83.32 9. NA 6 0.60 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 184 - V189 - USA WANT DISARMAMENT? - REF.NO.:0189 0 Location 258 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 53 MD2: 9 0 Q.103 Disarmament talks have been going on for a while between the United States and the Soviet Union. Both super- powers stress that they are in favor of disarmament. Do you believe that the United States wants disarmament or do you not believe this? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1000 1. Believe it 361 35.85 36.10 2. Don't believe it 639 63.46 63.90 9. NA 7 0.70 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.01 100.00 - V190 - USSR WANT DISARMAMENT? - REF.NO.:0190 0 Location 259 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 54 MD2: 9 0 Q.103A Do you believe that the Soviet Union wants disarmament? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1002 1. Believe it 419 41.61 41.82 2. Don't believe it 583 57.89 58.18 9. NA 5 0.50 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 185 - V191 - PEACE IN EUROPE CERTAIN - REF.NO.:0191 0 Location 260 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 55 MD2: 9 0 Q.104 In the last year has peace in Europe become more certain, less certain or has nothing changed? ------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1003 1. More certain 148 14.70 14.76 2. Less certain 196 19.46 19.54 3. Nothing changed 659 65.44 65.70 9. NA 4 0.40 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 - V192 - HAS R HEARD ABOUT SDI - REF.NO.:0192 0 Location 261 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 56 MD2: 9 0 Q.105 The United States are planning a military defense system in space (SDI). Have you heard about this? -------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 979 1. Yes 839 83.32 85.70 2. No 140 13.90 14.30 9. NA 28 2.78 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 186 - V193 - GFR SUPPORT SDI PLANS - REF.NO.:0193 0 Location 262 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 57 MD2: 9 0 Q.105A (If R has heard about SDI) Should the Federal Govern- ment urge the United States to abandon SDI or should it encou- rage US intentions to press on with SDI? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 839 1. Urge to abandon SDI 589 58.49 70.20 2. Confirm US intentions 250 24.83 29.80 9. NA ;INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.105 168 16.68 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 - V194 - PLEBISCITE OR PARLAMNT - REF.NO.:0194 0 Location 263 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 58 MD2: 9 0 Q.106 What is your general opinion: Should the most important political questions be decided by plebiscite or should elected politicians alone decide these questions, as they have up to now? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1002 1. Decision by plebiscite 585 58.09 58.38 2. Decision by elected politicians 417 41.41 41.62 9. NA 5 0.50 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 187 - V195 - WOMEN IN THE ARMY? - REF.NO.:0195 0 Location 264 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 59 MD2: 9 0 Q.107 What is your view on the topic of women in the Bundes- wehr : Women should not on principle be employed in the Bundeswehr or women should have the opportunity to enlist voluntarily in the Bundeswehr? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1. On principle no 2. Voluntarily yes 9. NA 0. Asked only in November'86 and February'87 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 464 Â Â Â 873 Â Â Â Â 46.4 Â Â Â 44.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 536 Â Â Â 1105 Â Â Â Â 53.6 Â Â Â 55.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 7M Â Â Â 17M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V196 - WOMEN TRAINED ON WEAP? - REF.NO.:0196 0 Location 265 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 60 MD2: 9 0 Q.107A (If R wants women to be allowed to enlist in the Bundeswehr) Should women in the Bundeswehr also be trained in use of weapons? -------------------------------------------------------- 0 1. Yes 2. No 9. NA INAP., coded 1 or 9 in Q.107 0. Asked only in November'86 and February'87 ÂAug 86 ÂOct 86 ÂNov 86 ÂDec 86 ÂJan 87 ÂFeb 87 Â ---Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 1 Â Â Â 210 Â Â Â 432 Â 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 188 - V196 - WOMEN TRAINED ON WEAP? - (Continued) Â Â Â 39.2 Â Â Â 39.1 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 2 Â Â Â 326 Â Â Â 673 Â Â Â Â 60.8 Â Â Â 60.9 Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 0 Â 1061M Â 1063M Â Â 1006M Â 1043M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â 9 Â Â Â 471M Â Â Â 890M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â-------Â Sum 1061 1063 1007 1006 1043 1995 - V197 - FILTER:IS R EMPLOYED? - REF.NO.:0197 0 Location 266 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 61 MD2: 9 0 Q.108 Are you employed? ------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 984 1. Yes 478 47.47 48.58 2. No 506 50.25 51.42 9. NA 23 2.28 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.00 100.00 - V198 - LEAVE JOB FOR CHILDREN? - REF.NO.:0198 0 Location 267 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 62 MD2: 9 0 Q.108A (If R is employed) Would you leave your job for a longer period to have children or would you rather do without children to be able to stay in your job? (Interviewer: Ask all employed men and women!) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 478 1. Would leave my job 91 9.04 19.04 2. Would do without children 20 1.99 4.18 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 189 - V198 - LEAVE JOB FOR CHILDREN? - (Continued) 3. Would combine the two 129 12.81 26.99 4. Don't want to have children for other reasons 32 3.18 6.69 5. Already have children 206 20.46 43.10 9. NA INAP., coded 2 or 9 in Q.108 529 52.53 . 0. Asked only in November'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1007 100.01 100.00 - V199 - UNEMPLOYMNT-- ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0199 0 Location 268 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 63 MD2: 9 0 Q.109 Here we have put together a number of tasks and goals which are being talked about in the Federal Republic.Who would be more qualified to solve each of these issues to your satis- faction? Do you think that would be the present CDU/CSU-FDP government in Bonn, or would it be a government led by the SPD ? Q.109A Fight umemployment -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 997 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 358 35.59 35.91 2. SPD-led government 298 29.62 29.89 3. Both 126 12.52 12.64 4. Neither 209 20.78 20.96 5. CDU/CSU 5 0.50 0.50 6. SPD 1 0.10 0.10 9. NA 9 0.89 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 190 - V200 - UMEMPLOYMNT- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0200 0 Location 269 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 64 MD2: 9 0 Q.109A(a) (If R thinks that the CDU/CSU-FDP government is more qualified) Would this work out better if the CDU/CSU governed alone or would it work out better if the FDP were in the government too? Q.109A(a) Fight unemployment -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 358 1. CDU/CSU government 180 17.89 50.28 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 178 17.69 49.72 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.109A 648 64.41 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 99.99 100.00 - V201 - UNEMPLMNT-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0201 0 Location 270 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 65 MD2: 9 0 Q.109A(b) (If R thinks that a government led by the SPD would be more qualified) Would this work out better if the SPD governed alone or would it work out better if the Greens were in the government too? Q.109A(b) Fight unemployment -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 298 1. SPD government 191 18.99 64.09 2. SPD together with the Greens 107 10.64 35.91 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.109A 708 70.38 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 191 - V202 - BOOST ECONOMY- ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0202 0 Location 271 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 66 MD2: 9 0 Q.109B Boost the economy -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 995 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 493 49.01 49.55 2. SPD 209 20.78 21.01 3. Both 173 17.20 17.39 4. Neither 111 11.03 11.16 5. CDU/CSU 8 0.80 0.80 6. SPD 1 0.10 0.10 9. NA 11 1.09 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.01 100.01 - V203 - BOOST ECON-- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0203 0 Location 272 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 67 MD2: 9 0 Q.109B(a) Boost the economy -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 493 1. CDU/CSU government 215 21.37 43.61 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 278 27.63 56.39 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.109B 513 50.99 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 192 - V204 - BOOST ECON-SPD OR GREEN - REF.NO.:0204 0 Location 273 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 68 MD2: 9 0 Q.109B(b) Boost the economy -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 209 1. SPD government 146 14.51 69.86 2. SPD together with the Greens 63 6.26 30.14 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.109B 797 79.22 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 99.99 100.00 - V205 - ENVIRONMENT- ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0205 0 Location 274 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 69 MD2: 9 0 Q.109C Efficient environmental protection -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 996 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 247 24.55 24.80 2. SPD 393 39.07 39.46 3. Both 186 18.49 18.67 4. Neither 163 16.20 16.37 5. CDU/CSU 6 0.60 0.60 6. SPD 1 0.10 0.10 9. NA 10 0.99 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 193 - V206 - ENVIRONMENT- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0206 0 Location 275 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 70 MD2: 9 0 Q.109C(a) Efficient environmental protection -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 247 1. CDU/CSU government 108 10.74 43.72 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 139 13.82 56.28 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.109C 759 75.45 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.01 100.00 - V207 - ENVIRONMNT-SPD OR GREEN - REF.NO.:0207 0 Location 276 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 71 MD2: 9 0 Q.109C(b) Efficient environmental protection -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 393 1. SPD government 102 10.14 25.95 2. SPD together with the Greens 291 28.93 74.05 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.109C 613 60.93 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 194 - V208 - PENSIONS-- ISSUE COMPET - REF.NO.:0208 0 Location 277 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 72 MD2: 9 0 Q.109D Secure pensions -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 993 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 400 39.76 40.28 2. SPD 268 26.64 26.99 3. Both 194 19.28 19.54 4. Neither 117 11.63 11.78 5. CDU/CSU 12 1.19 1.21 6. SPD 2 0.20 0.20 9. NA 13 1.29 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 99.99 100.00 - V209 - PENSIONS-- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0209 0 Location 278 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 73 MD2: 9 0 Q.109D(a) Secure pensions -- would be best solved by ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 400 1. CDU/CSU government 222 22.07 55.50 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 178 17.69 44.50 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.109D 606 60.24 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 195 - V210 - PENSIONS- SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0210 0 Location 279 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 74 MD2: 9 0 Q.109D(b) Secure pensions -- would be best solved by ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 268 1. SPD government 185 18.39 69.03 2. SPD together with the Greens 83 8.25 30.97 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.109D 738 73.36 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.00 100.00 - V211 - DISARMAMENT- ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0211 0 Location 280 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 75 MD2: 9 0 Q.109E Disarmament in East and West -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 994 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 248 24.65 24.95 2. SPD 395 39.26 39.74 3. Both 178 17.69 17.91 4. Neither 164 16.30 16.50 5. CDU/CSU 6 0.60 0.60 6. SPD 3 0.30 0.30 9. NA 12 1.19 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 196 - V212 - DISARMAMENT- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0212 0 Location 281 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 76 MD2: 9 0 Q.109E(a) Disarmament in East and West -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 248 1. CDU/CSU government 109 10.83 43.95 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 139 13.82 56.05 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.109G 758 75.35 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.00 100.00 - V213 - DISARMMNT-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0213 0 Location 282 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 77 MD2: 9 0 Q.109E(b) Disarmament in East and West -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 395 1. SPD government 189 18.79 47.85 2. SPD together with the Greens 206 20.48 52.15 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.109E 611 60.74 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 197 - V214 - CHANGE OPINION UNINONS - REF.NO.:0214 0 Location 283 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 78 MD2: 9 0 Q.110 Since the NEUE HEIMAT could not be saved by its sale in September, the unions have now bought back the heavily in- debted housing enterprise. In the light of this has your opinion of the unions improved, deteriorated or has this not changed your opinion? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1005 1. Improved 55 5.47 5.47 2. Deteriorated 542 53.88 53.93 3. Not changed 408 40.56 40.60 9. NA 1 0.10 . 0. Asked only in December'86 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1006 100.01 100.00 - V215 - WILL R VOTE IN JAN 1987 - REF.NO.:0215 0 Location 284 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 79 0 Q.111 Elections for the Bundestag on January 25: Are you going to vote? --------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted Abs. % 1. Yes 882 84.56 2. Yes, will vote by absentee vote 53 5.08 3. Don't know 54 5.18 4. No 54 5.18 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 ------ ------ 1043 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 198 - V216 - CANDID VOTE INTENTN 1987 - REF.NO.:0216 0 Location 285 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 80 MD2: 8 0 Q.112 (If R would vote or does not know yet) Here is a voting ballot similar to the one you will receive for the upcoming elections for the Bundestag. Again, you have two votes. The first vote is for a candidate here in your local constituency, the second vote is for a party. For which candidate will you vote? Please, tell me the number of the candidate. (Interviewer: Hand list W to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 952 1. (1) CDU candidate 432 41.42 45.38 2. (2) SPD candidate 379 36.34 39.81 3. (3) FDP candidate 45 4.31 4.73 4. (4) The Greens candidate 74 7.09 7.77 5. (5) NPD candidate 0 0.00 0.00 6. Candidate of another party 22 2.11 2.31 8. NA 37 3.55 . 9. INAP., coded 4 in Q.111 54 5.18 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 - 0 *** DECK=0004 - V1 - ZA-STUDY NUMBER 1536 - REF.NO.:0001 0 Location 1 Card 4 Width 4 Column 1- 4 0 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 ------------------------------- 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 199 - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - REF.NO.:0002 0 Location 5 Card 4 Width 6 Column 5-10 0 Respondent Number ----------------- - - Deck Identification Number is '4' Deck 4 Column 1 ----------------------------- - V217 - PARTY VOTE INTENTN 1987 - REF.NO.:0217 0 Location 286 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 12 MD2: 8 0 Q.112A (If R would vote or does not know yet) And for which party would you vote? Please, tell me the number of the party. (Interviewer: Hand list W to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 957 1. (1) CDU 422 40.46 44.10 2. (2) SPD 356 34.13 37.20 3. (3) FDP 68 6.52 7.11 4. (4) The Greens 92 8.82 9.61 5. (5) NPD 2 0.19 0.21 6. Other party 17 1.63 1.78 8. NA 32 3.07 . 9. INAP., coded 4 in Q.111 54 5.18 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 200 - V218 - WHEN DECIDE TO VOTE 1987 - REF.NO.:0218 0 Location 287 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 13 MD2: 9 0 Q.113 Can you please tell me when you reached this decision? Was it a long time ago, only a few months ago, or did you make this decision in the last few weeks? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1014 1. A long time ago 746 71.52 73.57 2. A few months ago 174 16.68 17.16 3. In the last few weeks 94 9.01 9.27 9. NA 29 2.78 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 99.99 100.00 - V219 - SURE OF VOTING DECISION - REF.NO.:0219 0 Location 288 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 14 MD2: 9 0 Q.113A Are you sure that you will stick to your decision or are you not quite sure? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1010 1. Sure 913 87.54 90.40 2. Not quite sure 97 9.30 9.60 9. NA 33 3.16 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 201 - V220 - WHCH PARTY MST ACT SUPP - REF.NO.:0220 0 Location 289 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 15 MD2: 9 0 Q.114 What is your impression as to which party's supporters are being the most active in the present campaign? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1038 1. CDU/CSU supporters 297 28.48 28.61 2. SPD supporters 205 19.65 19.75 3. FDP supporters 19 1.82 1.83 4. The supporters of the Greens 68 6.52 6.55 5. All about equal 313 30.01 30.15 6. Cannot decide 136 13.04 13.10 9. NA 5 0.48 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 99.99 - V221 - FDP IN PARLIAMNT GOOD? - REF.NO.:0221 0 Location 290 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 16 MD2: 9 0 Q.115 Do you think that it would be good if after the elec- tions of January 25 the FDP were represented in the Bundestag again, or do you think that wouldn't be good? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1037 1. Would be good 729 69.89 70.30 2. Wouldn't be good 308 29.53 29.70 9. NA 6 0.58 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 202 - V222 - GREENS IN PARLMNT GOOD? - REF.NO.:0222 0 Location 291 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 17 MD2: 9 0 Q.115A And what about the Greens? Do you think it would be good if the Greens were represented in the Bundestag again, or do you think that wouldn't be good? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1037 1. Would be good 570 54.65 54.97 2. Wouldn't be good 467 44.77 45.03 9. NA 6 0.58 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 - V223 - MAJORITY PARTY GOOD? - REF.NO.:0223 0 Location 292 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 18 MD2: 9 0 Q.116 Would you consider it good if one of the large parties, the SPD or the CDU/CSU, would receive the absolute majority in the elections for the Bundestag, or would you not consider that good? (Interviewer: If "good", probe: For which party, SPD or CDU?) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1032 1. Yes, the SPD should receive the absolute majority 247 23.68 23.93 2. Yes, the CDU/CSU should receive the absolute majority 281 26.94 27.23 3. No, would not consider it good 504 48.32 48.84 9. NA 11 1.05 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 203 - V224 - WHICH COALITION - REF.NO.:0224 0 Location 293 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 19-20 MD2: 99 0 Q.117 If after the elections for the Bundestag no party can govern alone, which parties do you think should form the government together? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 986 01. CDU/CSU and FDP 427 40.94 43.31 02. CDU/CSU and SPD 128 12.27 12.98 03. SPD and the Greens 254 24.35 25.76 04. SPD and FDP 112 10.74 11.36 05. CDU/CSU and FDP and SPD 4 0.38 0.41 06. All parties together 1 0.10 0.10 07. CDU/CSU should govern alone 24 2.30 2.43 08. SPD should govern alone 8 0.77 0.81 09. Other responses 28 2.68 2.84 99. NA 57 5.47 . 00. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 - V225 - WHO WIN NXT ELECTIONS - REF.NO.:0225 0 Location 295 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 21 MD2: 9 0 Q.118 What do you personally think: Who will win the elections for the Bundestag on January 25 ? ----------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 999 1. CDU/CSU 611 58.58 61.16 2. CDU/CSU and FDP, the present government 114 10.93 11.41 3. SPD 163 15.63 16.32 4. SPD and the Greens 15 1.44 1.50 5. Helmut Kohl 68 6.52 6.81 6. Johannes Rau 20 1.92 2.00 7. Other responses 8 0.77 0.80 9. NA 44 4.22 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 204 - V226 - WILL CDU GAIN MAJORITY - REF.NO.:0226 0 Location 296 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 22 MD2: 8 0 Q.119 (If R mentioned CDU, CDU/CSU or Kohl) Do you think that the CDU/CSU will gain an absolute majority, i.e. that they will be able to form a government alone, or do you think that the CDU/CSU will not arrive at an absolute majority? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 675 1. CDU/CSU will gain absolute majority 214 20.52 31.70 2. CDU/CSU will not gain absolute majority 461 44.20 68.30 8. NA 162 15.53 . 9. INAP., coded 3,4,6 to 9 in Q.118 206 19.75 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 - V227 - EXPECT FDP IN PARLMNT - REF.NO.:0227 0 Location 297 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 23 MD2: 9 0 Q.120 Do you think that after the elections the FDP will return to the Bundestag by gaining at least 5% of the votes or do you think that the FDP will then not be represented in the Bundestag? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1034 1. FDP will return to the Bundestag 834 79.96 80.66 2. FDP will not return to the Bundestag 200 19.18 19.34 9. NA 9 0.86 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 205 - V228 - EXPECT GREENS IN PARLMT - REF.NO.:0228 0 Location 298 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 24 MD2: 9 0 Q.121 And what about the Greens: will the Greens be repre- sented in the Bundestag again or will they not be represented in the Bundestag? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1038 1. Greens will be in the Bundestag 936 89.74 90.17 2. Greens will not be in the Bundestag 102 9.78 9.83 9. NA 5 0.48 . 0. Asked only in January'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1043 100.00 100.00 - V229 - DID R VOTE IN 1987 - REF.NO.:0229 0 Location 299 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 25 MD2: 9 0 Q.122 In the elections for the Bundestag on January 25 there were many citizens who, for good reasons, could not or did not want to participate in the elections. How about you? Did you vote or did you not vote? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1989 1. Yes, voted 1670 83.71 83.96 2. Yes, voted by absentee ballot 125 6.27 6.28 3. No, did not vote 194 9.72 9.75 9. NA 6 0.30 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 206 - V230 - WHY DID R NOT VOTE 1987 - REF.NO.:0230 0 Location 300 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 26-27 MD2: 98 0 Q.122A (If R did not vote) And why did you not vote? ----------------------------------------------------- 0 R is unsatisfied with Unweighted % N= Abs. % 189 01. CDU, CDU/CDS 0 0.00 0.00 02. The government, present politics, the general development, specific policies 10 0.50 5.29 03. The Chancellor 0 0.00 0.00 04. The party he/she used to vote for 7 0.35 3.70 05. The parties in general 21 1.05 11.11 06. The man on the street has no influence, one vote doesn't count, one cannot achieve anything by voting 29 1.45 15.34 07. No interest, don't care, too old, don't understand anything about politics 41 2.06 21.69 08. Don't know which party to vote for, it is all so messed up 11 0.55 5.82 09. Never vote 0 0.00 0.00 10. Personal reasons (illness, bad weather, too far) 53 2.66 28.04 11. Was not eligible to vote 13 0.65 6.88 12. Other responses 4 0.20 2.12 98. DK 5 0.25 . 99. INAP., coded 1,2 or 9 in Q.122 1801 90.28 . 00. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 207 - V231 - CANDIDATE VOTE 1987 - REF.NO.:0231 0 Location 302 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 28 MD2: 8 0 Q.123 (If R voted on January 25, 1987) Here is a voting ballot similar to the one you received for the election on January 25. At that time, you had two votes. The first vote was for a candidate here in your constituency, the second for a party. (Interviewer: Hand list no.1 to the respondent) For which candidate did you vote? Please, tell me the number of the candidate. ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1736 1. (1) CDU <-candidate> 785 39.35 45.22 2. (2) SPD <-candidate> 664 33.28 38.25 3. (3) FDP <-candidate> 114 5.71 6.57 4. (4) The Greens <-candidate> 146 7.32 8.41 5. (5) NPD <-candidate> 2 0.10 0.12 6. Candidate of another party 25 1.25 1.44 8. NA 59 2.96 . 9. INAP., coded 3 or 9 in Q.122 200 10.03 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 - V232 - PARTY VOTE 1987 - REF.NO.:0232 0 Location 303 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 29 MD2: 8 0 Q.123A (If R voted on January 25, 1987) And for which party did you vote? Please, tell me the number of the party. (Interviewer: Hand list no.1 to the respondent) ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1740 1. (1) CDU/CSU 745 37.34 42.82 2. (2) SPD 661 33.13 37.99 3. (3) FDP 148 7.42 8.51 4. (4) The Greens 163 8.17 9.37 5. (5) NPD 2 0.10 0.11 6. Other party 21 1.05 1.21 8. NA 55 2.76 . 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 208 - V232 - PARTY VOTE 1987 - (Continued) 9. INAP., coded 3 or 9 in Q.122 200 10.03 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 - V233 - 1987 SAME PARTY AS 1983 - REF.NO.:0233 0 Location 304 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 30 MD2: 8 0 Q.124 (If R voted on January 25,1987) Did you, in the elections for the Bundestag of January 25 this year, vote for the same party as in 1983 ? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1786 1. Yes, voted for the same party 1442 72.28 80.74 2. No, did not vote for the same party 227 11.38 12.71 3. Did not vote in 1983 32 1.60 1.79 4. Was not eligible to vote in 1983 85 4.26 4.76 8. NA 9 0.45 . 9. INAP., coded 3 or 9 in Q.122 200 10.03 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V234 - WHICH OTHER PARTY 1987 - REF.NO.:0234 0 Location 305 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 31 MD2: 8 0 Q.124A (If R did not vote for the same party as in 1983) For which party did you vote? Please, give me the number of the party. (Interviewer: Hand list no.1 to the respondent) ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 216 1. (1) CDU/CSU 83 4.16 38.43 2. (2) SPD 89 4.46 41.20 3. (3) FDP 25 1.25 11.57 4. (4) The Greens 14 0.70 6.48 5. (5) NPD 0 0.00 0.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 209 - V234 - WHICH OTHER PARTY 1987 - (Continued) 6. Other party 5 0.25 2.31 8. NA 11 0.55 . 9. INAP., coded 1, 3 to 9 in Q.124 1768 88.62 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 99.99 - V235 - WHY OTHER PARTY 1987 - REF.NO.:0235 0 Location 306 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 32-33 MD2: 98 0 Q.124B (If R did not vote for the same party as in 1983) Why did you vote for another party this time? --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Positive references to the party which R voted for in 1987 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 216 01. Trust them, believe in them, they should show what they can achieve 10 0.50 4.63 02. Agree with them, they are all right 31 1.55 14.35 03. Wanted to support them 9 0.45 4.17 04. Other positive answers 7 0.35 3.24 0 Negative references to the party which R voted for in 1983 05. Have lost confidence, not reliable 5 0.25 2.31 06. Dissatisfied, disappointed, haven't achieved anything 49 2.46 22.69 07. Lacks character, not credible 1 0.05 0.46 08. Are at variance, in disagreement 3 0.15 1.39 09. Too much to the left, have a touch of Communism, cooperate with the Greens 8 0.40 3.70 10. Other negative responses 7 0.35 3.24 11. Reference to a candidate 8 0.40 3.70 0 Reference to specific issues 12. Economic policy, tax related promises, economic upswing, unemployment 10 0.50 4.63 13. Agriculture, the farmers 3 0.15 1.39 14. Scandal about the NEUE HEIMAT 1 0.05 0.46 15. Environmental issues 11 0.55 5.09 16. Peace, missiles, nuclear policy 4 0.20 1.85 17. Other issues 4 0.20 1.85 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 210 - V235 - WHY OTHER PARTY 1987 - (Continued) 18. Time for a change, wanted a change in government 3 0.15 1.39 19. To counterbalance the big parties, to prevent an absolute majority, to prevent a government of only one party 17 0.85 7.87 20. The Greens did not exist then 1 0.05 0.46 21. Personal reasons, changed my mind 14 0.70 6.48 22. I am a floating voter 2 0.10 0.93 23. Other responses 8 0.40 3.70 98. NA 11 0.55 . 99. INAP., coded 1, 3 to 9 in Q.124 1768 88.62 . 00. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.98 99.98 - V236 - NON-VOTER:WHY VOTE 1987 - REF.NO.:0236 0 Location 308 Card 4 MD1: 00 Width 2 Column 34-35 MD2: 98 0 Q.124C (If R did not vote in January 1983) And why did you vote this time? ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Reasons related to the 1987 elections Unweighted % N= Abs. % 25 10. Unidentified code 1 0.05 4.00 31. Reference to a party 3 0.15 12.00 32. Reference to the government 2 0.10 8.00 33. Reference to specific issues 2 0.10 8.00 0 Reasons related to the 1983 elections 35. Personal reasons 11 0.55 44.00 36. I am an intentional non-voter 1 0.05 4.00 37. Other responses 5 0.25 20.00 98. NA 2 0.10 . 99. INAP., coded 1, 2, 4 to 9 in Q.124 1963 98.64 . 00. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1990 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 211 - V237 - POLLS RESULTS IN MEDIA - REF.NO.:0237 0 Location 310 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 36 MD2: 8 0 Q.125 (If R voted on January 25,1987) In the weeks preceding the elections for the Bundestag, TV and the press occasionally published the results of opinion polls with regard to the pro- bable outcome of the elections. Did you personally read or see such results? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1790 1. Yes 1203 60.30 67.21 2. No 587 29.42 32.79 8. NA 11 0.55 . 9. INAP., coded 3 in Q.122 194 9.72 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V238 - IMPACT ON R VOTING BEHAV - REF.NO.:0238 0 Location 311 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 37 MD2: 9 0 Q.125A (If R heard about poll results) Do you think these opinion polls played a major role, some role or no role at all in your decision as to which party you would support? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1203 1. A major role 34 1.70 2.83 2. Some role 237 11.88 19.70 3. No role at all 932 46.72 77.47 9. INAP., coded 2, 8 or 9 in Q.125 792 39.70 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 212 - V239 - FDP SUCCESS GOOD? - REF.NO.:0239 0 Location 312 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 38 MD2: 9 0 Q.126 And now let's talk about the results of the elections for the Bundestag. Do you think it is good that the FDP received so many votes or do you think this isn't good? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1974 1. Is good 1327 66.52 67.22 2. Is not good 647 32.43 32.78 9. NA 21 1.05 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V240 - GREENS SUCCESS GOOD? - REF.NO.:0240 0 Location 313 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 39 MD2: 9 0 Q.126A And how about the Greens? Do you think it is good that the Greens received so many votes or do you think this isn't good? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1980 1. Is good 876 43.91 44.24 2. Is not good 1104 55.34 55.76 9. NA 15 0.75 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 213 - V241 - FDP- OWN GOALS AGST CDU - REF.NO.:0241 0 Location 314 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 40 MD2: 9 0 Q.127 Opinions differ widely about the position of the FDP within the coalition with the CDU/CSU. Here are several of these opinions. Do you tend to agree with these statements or do you tend to reject them? (Interviewer: Shuffle blue deck of cards and hand it to the respondent) Q.127H In the coalition the FDP -- pursues its own political ideas over those of the CDU/CSU ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1959 1. Agree 1220 61.15 62.28 2. Reject 739 37.04 37.72 9. NA 36 1.80 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V242 - FDP- PROGRESSIVE POLICY - REF.NO.:0242 0 Location 315 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 41 MD2: 9 0 Q.127I In the coalition the FDP -- ensures progressive policies ------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1956 1. Agree 1108 55.54 56.65 2. Reject 848 42.51 43.35 9. NA 39 1.95 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 214 - V243 - FDP- ONLY APPENDAGE CDU - REF.NO.:0243 0 Location 316 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 42 MD2: 9 0 Q.127K In the coalition the FDP -- is only an appendage to the CDU/CSU ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1962 1. Agree 723 36.24 36.85 2. Reject 1239 62.11 63.15 9. NA 33 1.65 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V244 - FDP- LIBERAL COMPLEMENT - REF.NO.:0244 0 Location 317 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 43 MD2: 9 0 Q.127L In the coalition the FDP -- is a liberal complement to the CDU/CSU ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1958 1. Agree 1259 63.11 64.30 2. Reject 699 35.04 35.70 9. NA 37 1.85 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 215 - V245 - FDP- COUNTERBALANCE CSU - REF.NO.:0245 0 Location 318 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 44 MD2: 9 0 Q.127M In the coalition the FDP -- counterbalances the CSU ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1955 1. Agree 1289 64.61 65.93 2. Reject 666 33.38 34.07 9. NA 40 2.01 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V246 - FDP- WANTS MINIST POSTS - REF.NO.:0246 0 Location 319 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 45 MD2: 9 0 Q.127N In the coalition the FDP -- is only interested in ministerial posts --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1959 1. Agree 765 38.35 39.05 2. Reject 1194 59.85 60.95 9. NA 36 1.80 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 216 - V247 - FDP- PREVENTS BIASD POL - REF.NO.:0247 0 Location 320 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 46 MD2: 9 0 Q.127O In the coalition the FDP -- prevents one-sided politics of the CDU/CSU ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1962 1. Agree 1380 69.17 70.34 2. Reject 582 29.17 29.66 9. NA 33 1.65 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V248 - UNEMPLOYMENT- ISSUE IMP - REF.NO.:0248 0 Location 321 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 47 MD2: 9 0 Q.128 Here we have put together several tasks and goals which are being talked about in the Federal Republic. Please tell us for each of these issues whether you personally consider it to be very important, important, not so important, or completely unimportant. (Interviewer: Shuffle yellow deck of cards and hand it to the respondent. Also hand list no.5 to the respondent.) Please distribute the cards in the respective fields of this table. Q.128A Fight unemployment -- How important is this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1993 1. Very important 1634 81.90 81.99 2. Important 315 15.79 15.81 3. Not so important 34 1.70 1.71 4. Completely unimportant 8 0.40 0.40 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 2 0.10 0.10 9. NA 2 0.10 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 217 - V249 - REDUCE SUBSID-ISSUE IMP - REF.NO.:0249 0 Location 322 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 48 MD2: 9 0 Q.128B Reduce subsidies considerably -- How important is this issue in R's view? ---------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1970 1. Very important 474 23.76 24.06 2. Important 827 41.45 41.98 3. Not so important 519 26.02 26.35 4. Completely unimportant 104 5.21 5.28 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 46 2.31 2.34 9. NA 25 1.25 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 - V250 - WOMEN MORE INFL-ISS IMP - REF.NO.:0250 0 Location 323 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 49 MD2: 9 0 Q.128C Ensure women more influence in politics -- How important is this issue in R's view? -------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1989 1. Very important 542 27.17 27.25 2. Important 663 33.23 33.33 3. Not so important 583 29.22 29.31 4. Completely unimportant 145 7.27 7.29 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 56 2.81 2.82 9. NA 6 0.30 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 218 - V251 - PROTCT ENVIRON- ISS IMP - REF.NO.:0251 0 Location 324 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 50 MD2: 9 0 Q.128D Work for efficient environmental protection -- How important is this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1986 1. Very important 1329 66.62 66.92 2. Important 590 29.57 29.71 3. Not so important 48 2.41 2.42 4. Completely unimportant 13 0.65 0.65 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 6 0.30 0.30 9. NA 9 0.45 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V252 - SECURE PENSIONS-ISS IMP - REF.NO.:0252 0 Location 325 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 51 MD2: 9 0 Q.128E Secure pensions -- How important is this issue in R's view? --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1990 1. Very important 1299 65.11 65.28 2. Important 594 29.77 29.85 3. Not so important 75 3.76 3.77 4. Completely unimportant 19 0.95 0.95 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 3 0.15 0.15 9. NA 5 0.25 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 219 - V253 - REDUCE TAXES-ISSUE IMP - REF.NO.:0253 0 Location 326 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 52 MD2: 9 0 Q.128F Reduce taxes noticeably -- How important is this issue in R's view? -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1984 1. Very important 865 43.36 43.60 2. Important 807 40.45 40.68 3. Not so important 276 13.83 13.91 4. Completely unimportant 31 1.55 1.56 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 5 0.25 0.25 9. NA 11 0.55 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V254 - DISARMAMENT-- ISSUE IMP - REF.NO.:0254 0 Location 327 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 53 MD2: 9 0 Q.128G Speak out for disarmament in East and West -- How important is this issue in R's view? ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1984 1. Very important 1093 54.79 55.09 2. Important 709 35.54 35.74 3. Not so important 154 7.72 7.76 4. Completely unimportant 20 1.00 1.01 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 8 0.40 0.40 9. NA 11 0.55 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 220 - V255 - SMALL ENTERPRS- ISS IMP - REF.NO.:0255 0 Location 328 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 54 MD2: 9 0 Q.128H Improve conditions for small and medium-sized businesses -- How important is this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1984 1. Very important 695 34.84 35.03 2. Important 856 42.91 43.15 3. Not so important 362 18.15 18.25 4. Completely unimportant 59 2.96 2.97 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 12 0.60 0.60 9. NA 11 0.55 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 100.00 - V256 - STABLE PRICES-ISSUE IMP - REF.NO.:0256 0 Location 329 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 55 MD2: 9 0 Q.128I Ensure stable prices -- How important is issue in R's view? ----------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1987 1. Very important 1078 54.04 54.25 2. Important 765 38.35 38.50 3. Not so important 126 6.32 6.34 4. Completely unimportant 15 0.75 0.75 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 3 0.15 0.15 9. NA 8 0.40 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 221 - V257 - BOOST ECONOMY-ISSUE IMP - REF.NO.:0257 0 Location 330 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 56 MD2: 9 0 Q.128K Boost the economy -- How important is this issue in R's view? -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1984 1. Very important 877 43.96 44.20 2. Important 826 41.40 41.63 3. Not so important 239 11.98 12.05 4. Completely unimportant 26 1.30 1.31 5. Respondent is opposed to this goal 16 0.80 0.81 9. NA 11 0.55 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V258 - UNEMPLOYMENT-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0258 0 Location 331 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 57 MD2: 8 0 Q.129 (Interviewer: Ask this question for all issues designated as "very important" or "important" in Q.128) Who would be more qualified to solve each of these issues to your satisfaction? Do you think that would be present CDU/CSU-FDP government in Bonn, or would it be a government led by the SPD? Q.129A Fight umemployment -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1932 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 791 39.65 40.94 2. SPD led government 545 27.32 28.21 3. Both 272 13.63 14.08 4. Neither 324 16.24 16.77 8. NA 17 0.85 . 9. INAP.,coded 3 to 9 in Q.128A 46 2.31 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 222 - V259 - UMEMPLOYMNT- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0259 0 Location 332 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 58 MD2: 8 0 Q.129A(a) (If R thinks that the CDU/CSU-FDP government is more qualified) Would this work out better if the CDU/CSU governed alone or would it work out better if the FDP is in the government too? Q.129A(a) Fight unemployment -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 773 1. CDU/CSU government 262 13.13 33.89 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 511 25.61 66.11 8. NA 24 1.20 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129A 1198 60.05 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V260 - UNEMPLMNT-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0260 0 Location 333 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 59 MD2: 8 0 Q.129A(b) (If R thinks that a government led by the SPD would be more qualified) Would this work out better if the SPD governed alone or would it work out better if the Greens were in the government too? Q.129A(b) Fight unemployment -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 544 1. SPD government 382 19.15 70.22 2. SPD together with the Greens 162 8.12 29.78 8. NA 7 0.35 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129A 1444 72.38 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 223 - V261 - UNEMPLMNT--COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0261 0 Location 334 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 60 MD2: 8 0 Q.129A(c) If you think for a moment about the government in Bonn, are you of the opinion that the coalition partners have different ideas about how various issues should be solved? For each of the issues please tell me whether, between the solutions proposed by the CDU/CSU and those proposed by the FDP, there are essential differences or no essential differences. Q.129A(c) Fight unemployment -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1830 1. Essential differences 593 29.72 32.40 2. No essential differences 1237 62.01 67.60 8. NA 119 5.96 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128A 46 2.31 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V262 - REDUCE SUBSID--ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0262 0 Location 335 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 61 MD2: 8 0 Q.129B Reduce subsidies considerably -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1281 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 518 25.96 40.44 2. SPD 380 19.05 29.66 3. Both 223 11.18 17.41 4. Neither 160 8.02 12.49 8. NA 20 1.00 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128B 694 34.79 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 224 - V263 - REDCE SUBSID-CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0263 0 Location 336 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 62 MD2: 8 0 Q.129B(a) Reduce subsidies considerable -- would be best solved by --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 601 1. CDU/CSU government 225 11.28 37.44 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 376 18.85 62.56 8. NA 22 1.10 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129B 1372 68.77 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V264 - RDC SUBSID-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0264 0 Location 337 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 63 MD2: 8 0 Q.129B(b) Reduce subsidies considerably -- would be best solved by --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 431 1. SPD government 283 14.19 65.66 2. SPD together with the Greens 148 7.42 34.34 8. NA 7 0.35 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129B 1557 78.05 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 225 - V265 - REDC SUBSID-COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0265 0 Location 338 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 64 MD2: 8 0 Q.129B(c) Reduce subsidies considerable -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1217 1. Essential differences 551 27.62 45.28 2. No essential differences 666 33.38 54.72 8. NA 84 4.21 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128B 694 34.79 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V266 - WOMEN MRE INFLU-ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0266 0 Location 339 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 65 MD2: 8 0 Q.129C Ensure women more influence in politics -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1193 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 283 14.19 23.72 2. SPD 554 27.77 46.44 3. Both 191 9.57 16.01 4. Neither 165 8.27 13.83 8. NA 12 0.60 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128C 790 39.60 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 226 - V267 - WOMEN INFLU-- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0267 0 Location 340 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 66 MD2: 8 0 Q.129C(a) Ensure women more influence in politics -- would be best solved by ---------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 362 1. CDU/CSU government 109 5.46 30.11 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 253 12.68 69.89 8. NA 6 0.30 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129C 1627 81.55 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V268 - WOMEN INFL-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0268 0 Location 341 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 67 MD2: 8 0 Q.129C(b) Ensure women more influence in politics -- would be best solved by ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 676 1. SPD government 240 12.03 35.50 2. SPD together with the Greens 436 21.85 64.50 8. NA 12 0.60 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129C 1307 65.51 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 227 - V269 - WOMEN INFL- COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0269 0 Location 342 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 68 MD2: 8 0 Q.129C(c) Ensure women more influence in politics -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1129 1. Essential differences 408 20.45 36.14 2. No essential differences 721 36.14 63.86 8. NA 76 3.81 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128C 790 39.60 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V270 - PROTCT ENVIRON--ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0270 0 Location 343 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 69 MD2: 8 0 Q.129D Efficient environmental protection -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1903 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 490 24.56 25.75 2. SPD 778 39.00 40.88 3. Both 412 20.65 21.65 4. Neither 223 11.18 11.72 8. NA 16 0.80 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128D 76 3.81 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 228 - V271 - PROTCT ENVIR--CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0271 0 Location 344 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 70 MD2: 8 0 Q.129D(a) Efficient environmental protection -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 479 1. CDU/CSU government 145 7.27 30.27 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 334 16.74 69.73 8. NA 17 0.85 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129D 1499 75.14 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V272 - PROTCT ENV-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0272 0 Location 345 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 71 MD2: 8 0 Q.129D(b) Efficient environmental protection -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 779 1. SPD government 182 9.12 23.36 2. SPD together with the Greens 597 29.92 76.64 8. NA 7 0.35 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129D 1209 60.60 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 229 - V273 - PROTCT ENV--COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0273 0 Location 346 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 72 MD2: 8 0 Q.129D(c) Efficient environmental protection -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1814 1. Essential differences 635 31.83 35.01 2. No essential differences 1179 59.10 64.99 8. NA 105 5.26 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128A 76 3.81 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V274 - SECURE PENSIONS-ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0274 0 Location 347 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 73 MD2: 8 0 Q.129E Secure pensions -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? --------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1874 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 841 42.16 44.88 2. SPD 479 24.01 25.56 3. Both 386 19.35 20.60 4. Neither 168 8.42 8.96 8. NA 19 0.95 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128E 102 5.11 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 230 - V275 - SEC PENSIONS--CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0275 0 Location 348 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 74 MD2: 8 0 Q.129E(a) Secure pensions -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 827 1. CDU/CSU government 308 15.44 37.24 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 519 26.02 62.76 8. NA 29 1.45 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129E 1139 57.09 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V276 - SEC PENSNS-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0276 0 Location 349 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 75 MD2: 8 0 Q.129E(b) Secure pensions -- would be best solved by ----------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 479 1. SPD government 341 17.09 71.19 2. SPD together with the Greens 138 6.92 28.81 8. NA 8 0.40 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129E 1508 75.59 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 231 - V277 - SECURE PENS-COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0277 0 Location 350 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 76 MD2: 8 0 Q.129E(c) Secure pensions -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1787 1. Essential differences 641 32.13 35.87 2. No essential differences 1146 57.44 64.13 8. NA 106 5.31 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128A 102 5.11 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V278 - REDUCE TAXES- ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0278 0 Location 351 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 77 MD2: 8 0 Q.129F Reduce taxes noticeably -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ---------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1653 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 731 36.64 44.22 2. SPD 473 23.71 28.61 3. Both 262 13.13 15.85 4. Neither 187 9.37 11.31 8. NA 19 0.95 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128F 323 16.19 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 99.99 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 232 - V279 - REDUCE TAXES- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0279 0 Location 352 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 78 MD2: 8 0 Q.129F(a) Reduce taxes -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 762 1. CDU/CSU government 274 13.73 35.96 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 488 24.46 64.04 8. NA 18 0.90 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129F 1215 60.90 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V280 - RED TAXES--SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0280 0 Location 353 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 79 MD2: 8 0 Q.129F(b) Reduce taxes -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 500 1. SPD government 334 16.74 66.80 2. SPD together with the Greens 166 8.32 33.20 8. NA 7 0.35 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129F 1488 74.59 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 233 - V281 - REDCE TAXES-COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0281 0 Location 354 Card 4 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 80 MD2: 8 0 Q.129F(c) Reduce taxes -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1577 1. Essential differences 868 43.51 55.04 2. No essential differences 709 35.54 44.96 8. NA 95 4.76 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128F 323 16.19 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - 0 *** DECK=0005 - V1 - ZA-STUDY NUMBER 1536 - REF.NO.:0001 0 Location 1 Card 5 Width 4 Column 1- 4 0 ZENTRALARCHIV Study Number 1536 ------------------------------- - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - REF.NO.:0002 0 Location 5 Card 5 Width 6 Column 5-10 0 Respondent Number ----------------- - - Deck Identification Number is '5' Deck 5 Column 1 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 234 - V2 - RESPONDENT NUMBER - (Continued) - V282 - DISARMAMENT-ISSUE COMPET - REF.NO.:0282 0 Location 355 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 12 MD2: 8 0 Q.129G Disarmament in East and West -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1780 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 487 24.41 27.36 2. SPD 741 37.14 41.63 3. Both 308 15.44 17.30 4. Neither 244 12.23 13.71 8. NA 22 1.10 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128G 193 9.67 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V283 - DISARMAMENT-- CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0283 0 Location 356 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 13 MD2: 8 0 Q.129G(a) Disarmament in East and West -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 483 1. CDU/CSU government 149 7.47 30.85 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 334 16.74 69.15 8. NA 17 0.85 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129G 1495 74.94 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 235 - V284 - DISARMAMNT-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0284 0 Location 357 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 14 MD2: 8 0 Q.129G(b) Disarmament in East and West -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 764 1. SPD government 303 15.19 39.66 2. SPD together with the Greens 461 23.11 60.34 8. NA 10 0.50 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129G 1221 61.20 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V285 - DISARMAMENT-COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0285 0 Location 358 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 15 MD2: 8 0 Q.129G(c) Disarmament in East and West -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1692 1. Essential differences 674 33.78 39.83 2. No essential differences 1018 51.03 60.17 8. NA 110 5.51 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128G 193 9.67 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 236 - V286 - SMALL ENTERPRS--ISS COMP - REF.NO.:0286 0 Location 359 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 16 MD2: 8 0 Q.129H Improve conditions for small and medium-sized businesses -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1533 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 785 39.35 51.21 2. SPD 428 21.45 27.92 3. Both 209 10.48 13.63 4. Neither 111 5.56 7.24 8. NA 18 0.90 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128H 444 22.26 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V287 - SMALL ENTERPS-CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0287 0 Location 360 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 17 MD2: 8 0 Q.129H(a) Improve conditions for small and medium-sized businesses -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 843 1. CDU/CSU government 251 12.58 29.77 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 592 29.67 70.23 8. NA 18 0.90 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129H 1134 56.84 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 237 - V288 - SML ENTERP-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0288 0 Location 361 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 18 MD2: 8 0 Q.129H(b) Improve conditions for small and medium-sized businesses -- would be best solved by -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 459 1. SPD government 323 16.19 70.37 2. SPD together with the Greens 136 6.82 29.63 8. NA 9 0.45 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129H 1527 76.54 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V289 - SML ENTERPR-COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0289 0 Location 362 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 19 MD2: 8 0 Q.129H(c) Improve conditions for small and medium-sized businesses -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1450 1. Essential differences 637 31.93 43.93 2. No essential differences 813 40.75 56.07 8. NA 101 5.06 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128H 444 22.26 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 238 - V290 - STABLE PRICES-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0290 0 Location 363 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 20 MD2: 8 0 Q.129I Stable prices -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1826 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 951 47.67 52.08 2. SPD 379 19.00 20.76 3. Both 349 17.49 19.11 4. Neither 147 7.37 8.05 8. NA 17 0.85 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128I 152 7.62 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V291 - STABLE PRICES-CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0291 0 Location 364 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 21 MD2: 8 0 Q.129I(a) Stable prices -- would be best solved by --------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 942 1. CDU/CSU government 338 16.94 35.88 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 604 30.28 64.12 8. NA 30 1.50 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129I 1023 51.28 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 239 - V292 - STBLE PRIC-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0292 0 Location 365 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 22 MD2: 8 0 Q.129I(b) Stable prices -- would be best solved by --------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 385 1. SPD government 268 13.43 69.61 2. SPD together with the Greens 117 5.86 30.39 8. NA 7 0.35 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129I 1603 80.35 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V293 - STABLE PRIC COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0293 0 Location 366 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 23 MD2: 8 0 Q.129I(c) Stable prices -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1740 1. Essential differences 432 21.65 24.83 2. No essential differences 1308 65.56 75.17 8. NA 103 5.16 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128I 152 7.62 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 240 - V294 - BOOST ECONOMY-ISSUE COMP - REF.NO.:0294 0 Location 367 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 24 MD2: 8 0 Q.129K Boost the economy -- Who is more qualified to solve this issue in R's view? ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1686 1. CDU/CSU-FDP government 894 44.81 53.02 2. SPD 348 17.44 20.64 3. Both 320 16.04 18.98 4. Neither 124 6.22 7.35 8. NA 17 0.85 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128K 292 14.64 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 - V295 - BOOST ECONOMY-CDU OR FDP - REF.NO.:0295 0 Location 368 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 25 MD2: 8 0 Q.129K(a) Boost the economy -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 920 1. CDU/CSU government 310 15.54 33.70 2. CDU/CSU together with FDP 610 30.58 66.30 8. NA 25 1.25 . 9. INAP., coded 2 to 9 in Q.129K 1050 52.63 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 241 - V296 - BOOST ECON-SPD OR GREENS - REF.NO.:0296 0 Location 369 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 26 MD2: 8 0 Q.129K(b) Boost the economy -- would be best solved by ------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 361 1. SPD government 278 13.93 77.01 2. SPD together with the Greens 83 4.16 22.99 8. NA 8 0.40 . 9. INAP., coded 1,3 to 9 in Q.129K 1626 81.50 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V297 - BOOST ECON--COALITN DIFF - REF.NO.:0297 0 Location 370 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 27 MD2: 8 0 Q.129K(c) Boost the economy -- between CDU/CSU and FDP there are ------------------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1624 1. Essential differences 538 26.97 33.13 2. No essential differences 1086 54.44 66.87 8. NA 79 3.96 . 9. INAP., coded 3 to 9 in Q.128K 292 14.64 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 100.00 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 242 - V298 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-R'S VIEW - REF.NO.:0298 0 Location 371 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 28 MD2: 9 0 Q.130A We have noted down two opposing demands made with regard to nuclear power. Please give us your opinion with the help of the scale. The more strongly you feel about either of the demands, the nearer your cross should be to that particu- lar side. (Interviewer: Hand questionnaire over to the respondent until Q.133) Q.130A(a) R's opinion ------------------------------------------------------------ Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1977 1. Continued development of nuclear power 106 5.31 5.36 2. 129 6.47 6.53 3. 212 10.63 10.72 4. 569 28.52 28.78 5. 353 17.69 17.86 6. 285 14.29 14.42 7. Immediate shut-down of all nuclear power plants 323 16.19 16.34 9. NA 18 0.90 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 - V299 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-CDU/CSU V - REF.NO.:0299 0 Location 372 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 29 MD2: 9 0 Q.130A(b) And what do you think is the view of the CDU/CSU? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1952 1. Continued development of nuclear power 504 25.26 25.82 2. 567 28.42 29.05 3. 468 23.46 23.98 4. 307 15.39 15.73 5. 70 3.51 3.59 6. 28 1.40 1.43 7. Immediate shut-down of all nuclear power plants 8 0.40 0.41 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 243 - V299 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-CDU/CSU V - (Continued) 9. NA 43 2.16 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 - V300 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-SPD VIEW - REF.NO.:0300 0 Location 373 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 30 MD2: 9 0 Q.130A(c) And what is the view of the SPD? ------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1962 1. Continued development of nuclear power 23 1.15 1.17 2. 52 2.61 2.65 3. 110 5.51 5.61 4. 391 19.60 19.93 5. 613 30.73 31.24 6. 604 30.28 30.78 7. Immediate shut-down of all nuclear power plants 169 8.47 8.61 9. NA 33 1.65 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 - V301 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-FDP VIEW - REF.NO.:0301 0 Location 374 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 31 MD2: 9 0 Q.130A(d) And the view of the FDP? --------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1952 1. Continued development of nuclear power 152 7.62 7.79 2. 367 18.40 18.80 3. 497 24.91 25.46 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 244 - V301 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-FDP VIEW - (Continued) 4. 667 33.43 34.17 5. 188 9.42 9.63 6. 65 3.26 3.33 7. Immediate shut-down of all nuclear power plants 16 0.80 0.82 9. NA 43 2.16 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V302 - NUCLEAR ENERGY-GREENS V - REF.NO.:0302 0 Location 375 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 32 MD2: 9 0 Q.130A(e) And the Greens? ------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1965 1. Continued development of nuclear power 9 0.45 0.46 2. 9 0.45 0.46 3. 14 0.70 0.71 4. 42 2.11 2.14 5. 30 1.50 1.53 6. 135 6.77 6.87 7. Immediate shut-down of all nuclear power plants 1726 86.52 87.84 9. NA 30 1.50 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 245 - V303 - GUARANTEE PEACE-R'S VIEW - REF.NO.:0303 0 Location 376 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 33 MD2: 9 0 Q.130B And what is your opinion with regard to the mainte- nance of peace? Q.130B(a) R's opinion ----------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1960 1. Peace can only be maintained if the West is militarily superior to the East 141 7.07 7.19 2. 160 8.02 8.16 3. 238 11.93 12.14 4. 705 35.34 35.97 5. 259 12.98 13.21 6. 203 10.18 10.36 7. Peace can only be maintained if the West embarks upon unilateral disarmament 254 12.73 12.96 9. NA 35 1.75 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 - V304 - GUARANTEE PEACE-CDU/CSU - REF.NO.:0304 0 Location 377 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 34 MD2: 9 0 Q.130B(b) And what do you think is the view of the CDU/CSU? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1945 1. Peace can only be maintained if the West is militarily superior to the East 463 23.21 23.80 2. 501 25.11 25.76 3. 408 20.45 20.98 4. 415 20.80 21.34 5. 99 4.96 5.09 6. 41 2.06 2.11 7. Peace can only be maintained if the West embarks upon unilateral disarmament 18 0.90 0.93 9. NA 50 2.51 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 246 - V305 - GUARANTEE PEACE-SPD VIEW - REF.NO.:0305 0 Location 378 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 35 MD2: 9 0 Q.130B(c) And what is the view of the SPD? ------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1942 1. Peace can only be maintained if the West is militarily superior to the East 33 1.65 1.70 2. 64 3.21 3.30 3. 132 6.62 6.80 4. 562 28.17 28.94 5. 602 30.18 31.00 6. 417 20.90 21.47 7. Peace can only be maintained if the West embarks upon unilateral disarmament 132 6.62 6.80 9. NA 53 2.66 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 100.01 - V306 - GUARANTEE PEACE-FDP VIEW - REF.NO.:0306 0 Location 379 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 36 MD2: 9 0 Q.130B(d) And the view of the FDP? --------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1940 1. Peace can only be maintained if the West is militarily superior to the East 144 7.22 7.42 2. 340 17.04 17.53 3. 456 22.86 23.51 4. 715 35.84 36.86 5. 194 9.72 10.00 6. 69 3.46 3.56 7. Peace can only be maintained if the West embarks upon unilateral disarmament 22 1.10 1.13 9. NA 55 2.76 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.01 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 247 - V307 - GUARANTEE PEACE-GREENS V - REF.NO.:0307 0 Location 380 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 37 MD2: 9 0 Q.130B(e) And the Greens? ------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1947 1. Peace can only be maintained if the West is militarily superior to the East 17 0.85 0.87 2. 18 0.90 0.92 3. 25 1.25 1.28 4. 142 7.12 7.29 5. 96 4.81 4.93 6. 314 15.74 16.13 7. Peace can only be maintained if the West embarks upon unilateral disarmament 1335 66.92 68.57 9. NA 48 2.41 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 99.99 - V308 - EQUL OPPORTUNIT-R'S VIEW - REF.NO.:0308 0 Location 381 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 38 MD2: 9 0 Q.130C There are also differing views on the subject of equal opportunities for women in professional life. What is your opinion? Q.130C(a) R's opinion -------------------------------------------------------- Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1977 1. As a temporary measure, a law should be introduced to ensure that women who wish to work are given pre- ference over men applying for the same position 71 3.56 3.59 2. 87 4.36 4.40 3. 116 5.81 5.87 4. 389 19.50 19.68 5. 196 9.82 9.91 6. 325 16.29 16.44 7. The law should only go so far to ensure that men and women enjoy equal opportunities for employment 793 39.75 40.11 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 248 - V308 - EQUL OPPORTUNIT-R'S VIEW - (Continued) 9. NA 18 0.90 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 99.99 100.00 - V309 - EQUAL OPPORTUNIT-CDU/CSU - REF.NO.:0309 0 Location 382 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 39 MD2: 9 0 Q.130C(b) And what do you think is the view of the CDU/CSU? ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1951 1. As a temporary measure, a law should be introduced to ensure that women who wish to work are given pre- ference over men applying for the same position 26 1.30 1.33 2. 56 2.81 2.87 3. 148 7.42 7.59 4. 440 22.06 22.55 5. 346 17.34 17.73 6. 369 18.50 18.91 7. The law should only go so far to ensure that men and women enjoy equal opportunities for employment 566 28.37 29.01 9. NA 44 2.21 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.01 99.99 - V310 - EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES- SPD - REF.NO.:0310 0 Location 383 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 40 MD2: 9 0 Q.130C(c) And what is the view of the SPD? ------------------------------------------- 0 1 0 ZA-NO. 1536 German Election Study, 1987 Page 249 - V310 - EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES- SPD - (Continued) Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1954 1. As a temporary measure, a law should be introduced to ensure that women who wish to work are given pre- ference over men applying for the same position 45 2.26 2.30 2. 108 5.41 5.53 3. 284 14.24 14.53 4. 503 25.21 25.74 5. 353 17.69 18.07 6. 312 15.64 15.97 7. The law should only go so far to ensure that men and women enjoy equal opportunities for employment 349 17.49 17.86 9. NA 41 2.06 . 0. Asked only in February'87 0 0.00 . ------ ------ ------ 1995 100.00 100.00 - V311 - EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES- FDP - REF.NO.:0311 0 Location 384 Card 5 MD1: 0 Width 1 Column 41 MD2: 9 0 Q.130C(d) And the view of the FDP? --------------------------------------------- 0 Unweighted % N= Abs. % 1946 1. As a temporary measure, a law should be introduced to ensure that women who wish to work are given pre- ference over men applying for the same position 18 0.90 0.92 2. 51 2.56 2.62 3. 138 6.92 7.09 4. 540 27.07 27.75 5. 390 19.55 20.04 6.